David Cameron - To Succeed Great Britain Needs An Asian PM

                                                                         

                                         

Sometimes its difficult to understand what goes on inside the head of a career politician who has spent his entire life breathing the rarified air of a privileged elite and who has never spent any time in the real world inhabited by the majority of the British people.

It would appear that the agenda driven PR men and media managers who control David Cameron deliberately isolate him from the world outside and only feed him what they want him to hear in order for him to perform as required in the media.

The self proclaimed heir to the universally despised Tony Blair, he is on record as describing himself as a 'progressive' therefore it can be safely assumed that he is committed to imposing the agenda of the global elite as opposed to the representing the people he has been elected to serve.            

Despite all the false promises he makes to deceive the British people that he's listening, every speech that Cameron makes is loaded with references that re-assure his handlers he is remaining loyal to the global elite and committed to their transformational agenda.

His latest pronouncement that he would like to see an Asian Prime Minister in his lifetime, along with any position that has a title, is designed to achieve several outcomes.

Firstly, immigrant communities, both new and settled, have tended to vote for the Labour Party, especially those from the Indian sub-continent. With an election imminent, this is another example of Cameron shamelessly whoring for the Asian vote. (For the benefit of American readers, what the British refer to Asian is the Indian sub-continent - India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sir Lanka etc. as opposed to the Far East).    

Secondly, he is confirming to the global 'progressive' elite that despite any anti-immigration noises he may make during the election campaign - which are designed to spike the guns of the anti-EU United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) - he remains firmly on board with the UN and EU mandated cultural and demographic replacement agenda.

Cameron is echoing the words uttered on the BBC by UN super bureaucrat Peter Sutherland, the organisations head of the Global Forum on Migration and Development. The UN mandates that the EU must undermine national homogeneity and impose so called 'multi-cultural societies' across the continent in order to succeed economically.

It's nonsense of course, as anyone with an iota of common sense will realise when they think about for a millisecond or two. It's social engineering on a global scale. The UN has metamorphasised into a  'progressive' dominated organization that outlived its usefullness decades ago.

It's purpose today is not preventing wars or human rights abuses but promoting anti-Americanism and passing daily resolutions condemning Israel.

The cultural replacement process in Great Britain was started in earnest, and with total dedication, by Tony Blair and it is being continued with equal dedication by his chosen heir, David Cameron.

Thirdly, he is burnishing his own multi-cultural credentials in preparation for a Blair-like role when he is finally relieved of his post in British politics.

In his desperation, and in keeping with modern political discourse, Cameron and his media management team have given up even the pretence of being honest. They are openly flip flopping and lying depending on the prevailing political wind within the demographic group they are targeting on any particular day.

Last year, in response to rising Euroscepticism and the rise of the anti-immigrant groups across Europe,  both Cameron and the German Chancellor Angela Merkel were making calculated noises claiming that multi-culturalism doesn't work. Since then they have done absolutely nothing to stop it.

On the contrary, last week Frau Merkel was insisting that open borders is an absolute core value of the EU and therefore not negotiable.

It would appear that both Merkel and Cameron went off  Peter Sutherland's UN multi-cultural reservation with those remarks requiring a flip flop of epic proportions.

Cameron has since been promoting the multi-cultural cause with renewed vigour. Prior to his latest pronunciations about wanting an Asian Prime Minister, he has spoken about British politics being too white, not enough Muslim MP's, not enough MP's from ethnic minorities, Great Britain's lack of diversity is holding the country back etc. ad nauseum

On top of this he makes a point of celebrating every ethnic festival except English ones and despite all the daily evidence to the contrary from around the world he still insists on referring to Islam as the 'religion of peace'.

Cameron's Business Secretary Vince Cable, from the ever more ludicrous Liberal Democrat party, is insisting that twenty percent of FSTE 100 board members should be from ethnic minorities. This type of quota setting be it on the basis of ethnicity, gender, sexuality or anything else, runs the risk of downgrading the quality and experience of boardrooms for political reasons.

Cameron and Cable should listen to an icon of the Asian business community, Lord Bilimoria, who holds the opinion that a twenty percent target is wrong because it is out of proportion with the ethnic minorities in the population.

As an aside, Indian born Lord Bilimoria is not impressed with Cameron's immigration policy either.  He claims it sends out the wrong signals and targets the wrong people. He is especially critical of government incompetence with regard to illegal immigration.

He is particularly scathing about Cameron's Home Secretary Theresa May who he claims doesn't have a clue about illegal immigration and neither does her Department because they have lost control of it.

I would suggest that the noble Lord is not fully aware of the cultural replacement agenda which is being achieved using open border mass immigration. Cameron and May both know that illegals will never be deported and sure as death and taxes, illegals will be given amnesty in the end.

Again for the benefit of American readers, President Obama is pulling the very same stunt with illegal immigrants as they are about to find out in the near future.

The issue of success in the developed world being dependent on un-homogenising long established cultures and replacing traditional ways of life with so called 'multi-cultural societies' is more to do with global social engineering than economic growth or prosperity.

The British people need an explanation from both Cameron and Sutherland as to how a nation of people who have contributed so much to technical innovation, science, the arts etc., and also built one of the greatest civilizations in history, are now unable to tie their own shoe laces without millions of semi-literate, welfare dependent immigrants from backward cultures living in often violent mono-cultural ghettos?      
 

#BringBackOurGirls In Nigeria - British Child Rape Victims Ignored

Sometimes one has to wonder just how shameless and cynical so called VIP's and celebrities can be when courting publicity for themselves, their personal agenda's or their bank balances.  There doesn't appear to be a bandwagon they won't jump on or a trendy cause they won't exploit if they think there could be something in it for them.

Who couldn't fail to laugh at multi-millionaire celebrities joining the occupy Wall Street protest against the so called one percent when they themselves are the one percent? Who couldn't raise a titter at images of Sean Penn espousing socialism, equality and the redistribution of wealth with his bosom pal Hugo Chavez from the comfort of his $150 million dollar fortune?

Only recently British Foreign Secretary William Hague was milking publicity for all it was worth with Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt over war time rape. One has to wonder what is so different about wartime rape as opposed to peacetime rape when the latter outnumbers the former by hundreds of thousands per year in the USA and Europe alone.

When the Muslim terrorist gang Boko Haram kidnapped a hundred or so school girls in Nigeria recently celebrities were falling over themselves to join the #BringBackOurGirlsTwitter campaign, complete with very sad faces, to publicise their plight and plead for their release.

Its only right and proper that those who can generate publicity should put it to good use and agitate for these unfortunate girls to be returned home and perpetrators punished. Reports indicated that Boko Haram were going to keep the captive girls as brides for themselves or sell them as sex slaves to other Muslims.

Since there are more horrific instances of child abuse going on in the world it would be interesting to know how these VIP's and celebrities choose which cause to publicise.

One would have thought that the child sex abuse scandals in Great Britain would be a more worthy cause due the staggering number of victims and the more horrific nature of the crimes.

For the uninitiated, Muslim paedophile gangs have been grooming then raping underage white girls, subjecting them to horrific sex abuse then pimping them out sex slaves across the country. These gangs have been operating in England's major cities and towns with the full knowledge of the authorities for decades.

The numbers are truly staggering - with the revelation that the city of Manchester is involved there could be as many as forty thousand victims with fourteen hundred identified in the town of Rotherham alone.

In the case of Rotherham and, as suspected the other towns as well, these gangs operated with the full knowledge of the local political establishments and public institutions. These included the local authorities, the child social services, the police, the Member of Parliament and in some cases the education establishment.

There have been investigations, inquiries, commissions and goodness knows what else but no one has been held accountable let alone prosecuted. There is an investigation into the tampering and destruction of records relevant to one inquiry but despite modern methods of detection they are unable to identify the culprits.

It stretches credulity to the limit when after two decades of covering up the abuse of children by hundreds of officials, all the commissions, investigations and inquiries have not revealed a single responsible official that can be prosecuted. In the opinion of some from the legal world, any official that ignored, therefore facilitated, child abuse knowing it to be a crime is an accessory and can be subject to a prosecution.

Where these hundreds of guilty officials are hiding remains a mystery.

Thousands of young girls have received no justice and guilty public officials are walking free with their taxpayer funded salaries, benefits and pension entitlements intact.

Returning to the original theme - bearing in mind the numbers involved and the horrific nature of the crimes against these young girls, one is entitled to ask where is Michelle Obama, Sean Penn and rest of the celebrity crowd. This is Great Britain so where is William Hague and his pals Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt?

Surely with their ability to generate publicity they can organise a #JusticeForOurGirls Twitter campaign at the very least and William Hague can use his political clout to pressure the authorities into making justice for these young girls a priority over covering up the complicity of public officials.

'This Is What A Feminist Looks Like' - PR Stunt Hides The Truth

The days when political discourse revolved around the various candidates publicly debating the issues disappeared when psephologists, pollsters and PR men took over elections, devaluing democracy in the process.

Democracy in Great Britain has been reduced to periodic elections where teams of spin doctors, marketing professionals and media managers create false images for a group of bland, photogenic automatons who possess the innate ability to lie with a straight face.

These generic candidates will be required to flawlessly repeat soundbites and slogans which are centrally generated by their various party PR and media management machines. They will also be required to take part in publicity stunts which for the cynical voter are sometimes so embarrassingly false they are a source of much hilarity.

Any PR person worth their salt would agree that a picture is worth a thousand words especially when trying to create an image or deliver a message that they want the public to swallow. Unfortunately for them, due to the Internet, they no longer have a monopoly of messaging therefore the same tactic can be used to strip away the veneer and reveal the truth.

Wearing a "This is what a feminist looks like" T-shirt in the House of Commons was a publicity stunt led by the Labour Party's premier feminist Harriet Harman. The message may have suited her reputation as a champion of women's rights but it also hid the truth about Harman and her 'progressive' agenda. Therefore taking leaf out of her PR departments book, here are some photographs to put the record straight.

"This is what a paedophile supporter looks like". One who wants to legalise sex between adults and children.

"This what a Muslim paedophile gang looks like". The gang that groomed, raped and sexually abused under age white girls with the full knowledge and connivance of her Labour Party on the grounds of 'cultural sensitivity'.

"This what a young female victim of a the Labour Party's client group of paedophiles would look like" if one could face the camera.

In the top photograph Harman is flanked on the left by her party leader Red Ed Miliband and on the right by Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, the current leader of the ever more ridiculous Liberal Democrat Party.

"This is what a Liberal Democrat deviant looks like". The one that had a relationship with a young female constituent with special needs who originally came to him for help. Clegg finally acknowledged he knew about this but took no action at the time.

When senior politicians engage in publicity stunts of this nature they not only make themselves look ridiculous they also demean politics and embarrass the nation at the same time. Informed people are not fooled by this kind of cheap stunt and as has just been demonstrated they can be used to reveal the truth as well as to deceive.


Finally a couple of publicity stunts for your mirth and enjoyment:


 "This is what a pair of idiots look like when going after the Sikh vote".


 .









Update: Check The Mellow Jihadi for more Red Ed publicity stunt hilarity.

Anarchy If ISIS Killers Are Not Allowed To Return 'Home'

It seems such a long time ago but it was only August 20th that PM David Cameron was being lauded around the world for cutting short his summer vacation in order to take tough action after American journalist James Foley was beheaded by a British documented Muslim killer known as Jihadi John.

Just to recap - Cameron's tough action was going to prevent the radicalisation of Muslims in Great Britain by banning preachers of hate and by teaching British values in the schools. He also promised to prevent British documented Muslims from going abroad to fight on behalf of Allah and his prophet.

In addition to this tough action he promised he would confiscate the passports and cancel the citizenship of Muslim killers who were already raping and butchering their way across Iraq, Syria and other Islamic hot spots around the world.

Those who are familiar with Cameron's modus operandi, myself included, warned at the time that this was a calculated PR exercise put together by his media management team in order to create a tough image, at least until the news cycle moved on.
(See here, here and here)

The news cycle has indeed moved on and to date, as predicted, Muslim preachers of hate, including the celebrity shariah advocate and ISIS supporter Anjem 'Andy' Choudary, are still on the streets and in the media spouting their filth. In the meantime Paul Weston of Liberty GB remains charged by the police for quoting from Sir Winston Churchill's book, The River War.

Cameron's coalition partner and Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg of the increasingly lunatic Liberal Democrat party, claims that teaching British values in British schools will somehow offend Muslims. In addition to this, not a single radicalising mosque or madrassa has been closed down, not a single passport has been cancelled nor has anybody's citizenship been revoked.

It is the issue of passports and citizenship that appears to be attracting the most attention while at the same time exposing the yawning chasm between the remote political elite and the people they are supposed to be representing.

It is fair to say without fear of contradiction that outside of the 'progressive' elite and the inadequates of the self loathing community, the British people are heartily sick of all things Muslim.

They are sick to death of constantly hearing the words Koran,  sharia,  halal,  burqua,  hijab,  jihad, Ramadan, Eid,  Haj,  Mohammad,  ISIS,  beheading and Allahu Akbar. They are sick of their politicians constantly caving in to Muslim sensitivities regarding pork, alcohol, dogs, music, dancing, dress codes and the rights, or non rights, of women.

Most of all they are sick and tired of being smeared as bigots, racists or Islamophobes for voicing a contrary opinion of Muslims and Islam.  In the final analysis, they didn't ask for this, they weren't consulted and they don't want it. Many regard Islam as a medieval desert death cult which is being imposed upon them by a remote, agenda driven political class for their own social engineering ends.

The vast majority of the British people do not want British documented Muslim killers to return to Great Britain from the killing fields of the Islamic world. Neither do they want the government preventing Muslims from leaving to join ISIS. Having made their choice to leave, the British people want the killers' passports cancelled and their citizenship revoked on arrival in their beloved Islamic State.

Unsurprisingly, the political class, as represented by the Labour MP Emily Thornberry, take an entirely different view and as the British people know to their cost, their view will be disregarded because only her view counts.

An archetypal 'progressive' technocrat, Thornberry is a barrister by profession specialising in human rights law; it shouldn't come as a shock therefore to learn that in her mind the human rights of the Muslim killers come before the safety and security of the British people.

Her must see interview with the BBC's Andrew Neil reveals a remote political elitist who has no concept of how real people think or what their hopes and fears may be. She has an unwavering belief that international laws made behind closed doors by technocrats like herself are unquestionably correct and must be obeyed.
(Must see interview here)

Thornberry was bemused by the suggestion that the safety and security of the British people with regard to returning killers takes precedent over some obscure law made up by unknown technocrats in New York or Geneva.

As a socialist she put her natural authoritarian instincts on display when she claimed that without the total  obedience of these laws there would be chaos and anarchy. This is almost as if the situation in Great Britain and these Muslim countries is one of peace, tolerance and social order.

She is unable to comprehend that these jihadis are, in the main, British educated adults who are quite capable of making a personal decision. They have made it plain that they despise Great Britain, its people, its culture and its way of life. They have made it abundantly clear they believe in the supremacy of Islam, the teachings of their prophet as written in the Koran and their duty to die in the name of Allah.

It should be re-emphasised for the benefit of people like Thornberry and the 'progressive' elite, that the jihadi's loyalty is to the Islamic State and not to Great Britain, they are in effect renouncing their citizenship in spirit if not in actuality.

These fanatics have made it crystal clear that they intend to bring their blood soaked jihad to Great Britain and state that they will not stop until the ISIS flag is flying over Buckingham Palace and 10 Downing Street.

Everyone is familiar with the barbaric brutality of these killers and for those with a strong constitution graphic images of their methods are available on the Internet for all to see. One is entitled to ask why these savages who are doing what they left Great Britain to do, now want to return to the beer drinking, pork eating, infidel infested country that is an affront to their religious sensitivities.

Firstly, some are cowards who, like bullies and thugs the world over, are happy to rape, torture behead and kill innocent women and children when unopposed. When there is a prospect of meeting an opposition who are just as ruthless, seventy two virgins in paradise doesn't seem quite so attractive.

Secondly, to the more fanatical ones, getting killed in the desert or some sh*thole of a mud brick town without taking a hundreds of infidels with you will not please Allah as much as returning home and letting off a bomb in some crowded arena or similar venue.

This murderous scenario and the trepidation of the British people is beyond the understanding of people such as Emily Thornberry and the political elite who believe that these sub humans should be brought 'home' and subjected to a judicial process focused on their human rights.

Despite the possibility that they may have committed horrific crimes in the course of their jihad, prosecuting them in a British court will be difficult if not impossible.

In her technocratic brain, Thornberry believes that these jihadis can be found guilty of 'something' then be made subject of a control order which will include some kind of de-radicalisation program.

If past form is anything to go by, the most likely scenario will be that some liberal, bleeding heart judge will send them on a cultural sensitivity course then release them with an order to report to the local police station once a month.

In conclusion I would suggest that readers avail themselves of the BBC interview, watch Emily Thornberry's performance closely and be afraid, be very afraid.

Cash Or Cheque Frau Merkel? EU In Control PM Cameron Humiliated

Ordering Prime Minister David Cameron to hand over an extra 1.7 billion pounds of the people's hard earned money is not satisfying enough for the European Union bureaucrats who have almost completed their decades long project to take over the British government. In time honoured fashion the victors have to humiliate the vanquished as a demonstration of their dominance.
(Story here)

In times past the victors would have looted and pillaged the treasure of the vanquished, destroyed the emblems that gave them their identity and enslaved the people for labour. In addition they would have displayed the leaders before the baying mob in acts of public humiliation.

Nations never forget defeat so after Trafalgar, Waterloo and the exile of Napoleon to St. Helena, after Versailles and Nuremberg and particularly after the fall of the British Empire, her traditional enemies have waited patiently for their chance to make the British grovel.

Karma one might say due to British haughtiness in the her glorious past, but this was no noble defeat after years of battle but a meek surrender by ambitious, self serving politicians satisfying their inner despotism by seeking power over their own people.

As the French bureaucrat Jean Monet projected, a federal European superstate will be built gradually by lies and deceit before the people realise what has happened. Sovereignty was to be slowly surrendered in series of treaties disguised as being of economic benefit.

True to the Monet doctrine, the treacherous, self serving political class, regardless of party affiliation, slowly handed over sovereignty in a series of treaties disguised as being of economic benefit to a cabal of bureaucrats dominated by Great Britain's historic enemies.

This has culminated in a situation whereby, not only has the ability to make ones own laws and control ones own borders been surrendered, but the emblems and attributes of statehood are being gradually removed.

With the advent of modern communications, victorious nations no longer have to physically loot and pillage the treasure of vanquished nor do they have to parade defeated leaders before the baying mob. Loot can be transferred remotely using electronic means and leaders humiliated, not before the baying mob in some city square, but across the planet via the Internet.

British Prime Minister David Cameron experienced this first hand after his petulant reaction to being handed a bill by EU bureaucrats for an extra 1.7 billion pounds of British taxpayers money.

This loot, generated by the British people by way of austerity and a sharp drop in living standards, which was brought about by a deliberate increase in the cost of living, will be handed over to the victors in the form of Chancellor Merkel's Germany and President Hollande's socialist basket case France.

EU bureaucrats have been queuing for some time to humiliate him but armed with the knowledge that David Cameron is as popular as Ebola in his own country and facing defeat at the polls in the near future, they piled on the agony after his imbecilic outburst.

In an attempt to hoodwink the British public and steal their votes, Cameron has been making false promises to appease their anger over mass immigration and the access of economic migrants to the social services and welfare systems. Every time he does so he is smacked down by some upstart career bureaucrat with an axe to grind, who is taking the opportunity to swing a punch at the self neutered giant.

German MEP Alexander Lambsdorff and Austrian Chancellor Werner Fayman have ordered Cameron to pay up because he doesn't have the power to refuse. That was surrendered years ago
(Story here).

Hungarian bureaucrat Laszlo Andor has labelled the British people xenophobic and has warned them to expect more migration.
(Story here)

Portuguese Maoist, and out going EU Commission president Jose Manuel Barrosso, has publicly warned Cameron that doing what the British people demand of him breaches EU law. In typical Maoist fashion Barrosso will receive $162,200 inflation proof pension for life, a golden parachute payment of $32,000, one month of his $384,000 annual salary and a transitional allowance of between $464,000 and $756,800 over the next three years.
(Slap down here, pension here.  UKIP's Farage thanks Barrosso here)

His replacement, the Euro fanatic Jean-Claude Junker, has not only ordered Cameron to hand over the cash but humiliatingly has told Cameron that he plans to make migration into Great Britain easier.
(See here)

If being slapped down and robbed by a German MEP, the Austrian Chancellor, a Hungarian bureaucrat, a Portuguese Maoist and Luxembourgian arch federalist isn't bad enough, then being likened to an enraged diner on the comedy farce Fawlty Towers by the French media is particularly humiliating.

"Angry Cameron refuses to take out his cheque book for Europe" ran one French headline ignoring the fact that it is not Cameron's money to give away and the money is not destined for 'Europe' but to Germany and socialist basket case France.
(French ridicule story here)

It is now an unarguable fact that German Chancellor Angel Merkel runs the EU like a personal fiefdom. She has wasted no time, not only ordering Cameron to hand over British taxpayers money, but to publicly sink his plans to renegotiate Great Britain's membership terms and to repatriate powers back to the people.
(Merkel in dictates the rules here)

Despite his embarrassing petulance and his stated refusal to to pay up on time, David Cameron will handover British taxpayers money as ordered, but his public subservience to the German Chancellor and the hubristic EU bureaucrats reveals the totality of Great Britain's surrender.

The surrender document known to the world as the Lisbon Treaty will fully take effect on November 1st 2014 and with that the British Parliament at Westminster will finally come to an end. David Cameron might as well hand over the keys to No 10 Downing Street to Chancellor Merkel for what use he will be to the British people.

Parliament comes to an end story here

EU Bureaucrats Demand More Money On The Feast Of St Crispin

Hot on the heels of yesterdays article, reference the government of Great Britain being run by EU bureaucrats and the impotence of Prime Minister Cameron, comes news of a daylight robbery that confirms it beyond doubt.
(See here)

Nobody should be surprised if the EU bureaucrats knew the significance of this particular date and chose it deliberately to compound David Cameron's humiliation; such is their hatred of Great Britain, its people and their history.

The Battle Agincourt fought on St Crispin's Day in 1415 ranks as one of Great Britain's greatest military victories where the French were roundly defeated despite odds in their favour some historians put at five to one.

As if to negate the significance of the victory and rub the noses of the British people in the fact that they may have won that particular battle but they no longer run their own country, the bureaucrats have ordered David Cameron's government to hand over an extra 1.7 billion pounds of hard earned taxpayers money.

This is on top of the 55 million pounds they hand over per day, circa 20 billion per year, and despite the fact that they handed over 1.4 billion pounds to the European Investment Bank the previous March.

To add insult to injury, while the hard working British taxpayers get fleeced, Germany and France will get a rebate.

The reason for this daylight robbery is supposedly because the British economy has grown more than expected relative to the others. To put this in layman's terms, the British economy has grown on the back of an austerity package which has seen the British people suffer a sharp reduction in their living standards with many formerly prosperous people resorting to food banks in order to survive.

Thousands of pensioners and others in fuel poverty will die of hypothermia this coming winter because they can't afford to pay their artificially inflated fuel bills. Also at the same time, the tsunami of economic migrants continues unabated putting already scarce resources under further intolerable pressure.

The French economy has collapsed as predicted when their economically illiterate President Hollande increased taxes and opened the floodgate of government spending, mainly on social programs. So the increasingly impoverished British people are subsidising the improving lifestyle of their French counterparts.

Likewise after winning two world wars the same impoverished British people are subsidising the already affluent lifestyles of Angela Merkel's Deutschen Volke.

As the British people have discovered to their cost, their Prime Minister David Cameron is a weak, inexperienced media creation - their chances of him discovering a bit of the Agincourt spirit and standing up to the smirking Eurocrats on their behalf is nonexistent.

For the benefit of his media image and his ongoing election campaign, Cameron has expressed bucket loads of faux anger at this outrageous demand, but as everyone knows by his previous appeasement of the Eurocrats, he will hand over their money in the end. When it comes to doing battle with the Eurocrats David Cameron is more Neville Chamberlain than Henry V.

By the way Cameron and the Eurocrats rig the economic system to suit themselves and their agenda, there's no way the British people can ever overcome austerity and get ahead. It would appear they face an endless drop in living standards with prosperity for themselves and future generations disappearing further into the distance despite a growing economy.
(Bankrolling the EU here)

Whenever the economy grows Great Britain's contributions to the EU grow accordingly, likewise with a commitment to spend 0.7% of GDP on foreign aid, more is given away to finance vanity projects abroad and to maintain the lifestyles of corrupt foreign dictators.

Boasting that this is his finest achievement, the foreign aid budget has been doubled by David Cameron and it now stands at over 11 billion pounds per year. This will continue to rise until the 0.7% target is reached and go on rising as the economy grows.
(Cameron aid story here)

In addition to this foreign aid insanity, the inexorable rise in net immigration has resulted in 25 billion pounds being sent abroad each year in remittances together with welfare entitlements to immigrant families and payments to the World Bank, the IMF, the UN and its agencies, not to mention NATO.

The harder the British people work to improve the economy the more of their money is sent abroad for the benefit of others.

This is all smoke and mirrors of course and only in the fetid air of the political swamp can such flawed economics be used as a criteria for the redistribution of nonexistent wealth. If individuals, families or businesses used the same criteria they would be sewing mailbags for pennies at one of Her Majesty's penal institutions.

In reality there is no money, there is no wealth to redistribute, not a single penny. By any account, the British people are not only bankrupt but up to their necks in debt that will take generations to pay off, if at all.

Government borrowing increased by 10% last month to 11.8 billion, which is 1.6 billion more than last year and 1 billion more than forecast. The national debt has increased each year of Cameron's Premiership and now stands at an unsustainable 1.36 trillion pounds.
(Government borrowing figures here, debt figures here)

How can these figures improve and the living standards of the British people increase when any extra money earned due to a rise in economic growth is dispersed abroad instead of used at home to fix the broken economy.

There is no chance this side of hell that David Cameron in the year 2014 will ever discover the indomitable spirit of that happy few, that band of brothers that stood up against such fearful odds and won the day at the Battle of Agincourt fought on the day of  Crispin Crispianus in year of our Lord 1415.

See the battle speech here at The Mellow Jihadi and be inspired.

After Two World Wars EU Bureaucrats Finally Govern Great Britain

When EU Commission President Jose Manuel Barrosso appeared on prime time television and proceeded to shred Prime Minister David Cameron's agenda to pieces, it left the viewer in no doubt who governs Great Britain. It also left the viewer in no doubt that David Cameron, by continuing to talk about repatriating powers, including border control, is either in denial or totally deluded in his desperate attempt to cling on to power.
(Interview here)

A disciple of Chairman Mao, Jose Manuel Barrosso is one in a long line of EU bureaucrats who have so little regard for Great Britain that they feel confident enough to lecture David Cameron and the British people on what their future policies will be.

Apart from the usual suspects from the 'progressive' left, together with the Liberal Democrats and the rest of the self loathing community, the British people are almost unanimous in their opposition to open border mass immigration and the access of economic migrants to their taxpayer funded welfare benefits. This includes access to housing, education and health care which are now strained to the point of collapse.

As a self confessed Europhile and a committed supporter of the federal superstate project, David Cameron studiously ignored the wishes of the British people until the rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) threatened to derail the project, throwing Cameron out of office in the process.


He has continued to surrender British sovereignty to Brussels and despite solemn promises to the people, he has failed to curb mass immigration. On the contrary, to comply with EU diktats immigration is increasing year on year equivalent to a city the size of Strasbourg.

In a desperate attempt to cling on to office, Cameron is reduced to making promises he knows he can't keep with regard to curbing mass immigration and restricting access to the taxpayers welfare system.

It would appear that every time he makes a promise to the British people there's an EU bureaucrat waiting at the ready to chastise him, letting him know who governs Great Britain in the process.

Who would have guessed that a British Prime Minister would be humiliated on prime time television by an unelected Portuguese bureaucrat?

David Cameron's humiliation doesn't end there. In the recent past he has been publicly put down by a number of foreign bureaucrats including Cecilia Malmstron from Sweden, Ollie Rhen from Finland, Mark Rutte from Holland, Laszio Andor from Hungary and even a chap named Aligurdius Ballevioius from Lithuania.
(Reding slap down here)

Barrosso's replacement as the unelected President Europe, Jean-Claude Junker, is an even bigger humiliation for David Cameron. Having suffered a defeat over Junker's appointment, this Euro federalist fanatic has promised to make immigration into Great Britain even easier - he has listed this as a prime aspiration of his tenure in office.
(Junker's appointment here, immigration slap down here)

However powerful these bureaucrats are, they are mere cheerleaders for the German Chancellor Angela Merkel. She has told Cameron in no uncertain terms, and on many occasions, that 'ever closer union' and mass immigration are not negotiable now or in the future. It is accepted, even by Junker and his army of bureaucrats, that when it comes to the direction of the EU, what Merkel says goes.

If David Cameron is serious about repatriating powers from the EU bureaucrats back to the people, then it would make sense to have a moratorium on surrendering any further sovereignty until the re-negotiation and referendum are complete. It would also make sense to have a similar moratorium on any further immigration into Great Britain.

The fact is that David Cameron hails from a remote elite who's only experience in the world outside of exclusive educational establishments and privilege was four years as a PR executive for a now failed television company. This has left him bereft of the skills necessary to stand up to the hardened agenda driven, career bureaucrats such as Merkel and Junker.

Embarrassingly they are in the habit of treating him like an errant schoolboy whenever he articulates the wishes of the people he represents.

A week truly is a long time in politics. After ignoring the increasingly desperate pleas of the long suffering British people for years, Barrosso's latest public slap down has provoked Cameron to make statements that he himself claimed were racist just a few days ago.

After publicly declaring his fealty to the European Union and its ruling bureaucrats, including Barrosso, Cameron has now declared that the British people are his only boss.
(Cameron's declaration here)

If this is true then the decades long nightmare is finally over for the British people. They demand that David Cameron implements the following without delay:

a) A referendum on Great Britain's membership of the European Union.

b) No further implementation of the Lisbon Treat due on 1st November which effectively ends the supremacy of the UK Parliament.
(See the story here)

c) A suspension of all but emergency foreign aid.

d) Using the precedent set by other EU members, the deportation of foreign criminals together with illegal immigrants and those who's asylum requests have been refused.

e) the freedom to conclude trade deals with members of the British Commonwealth of Nations.

f) The supremacy of British law over all other laws including sharia.

This list is not exclusive but is a start for Cameron to demonstrate that his final acceptance of his subservience to the will of the British people is genuine and not just another of his cast iron guarantees.

(A previous post on Cameron subservience here)