British ISIS Killers Are Radicalised At Home From Birth

                                           "I don't want my daughters to grow up in England"

                                          "I don't like the UK, it's becoming more like America"

                                           "I don't want my children growing up in this society"

                                         I want to live in Saudi Arabia because I don't like the UK"

These statements are attributed to thirty three-year old Zorah Dawood who left our green and pleasant land to take up residence with ISIS in Syria along with her two children aged five and eight.

She was accompanied by her two sisters Khadija aged thirty and Sugra aged thirty-four along with their combined brood aged three to fifteen.
(Full story here)

These ISIS supporters join the hundreds if not thousands of other British documented Muslims who despise the British people and reject utterly the British way of life, making their way to Syria in order to fulfill their destiny and the requirements of their prophet.

The attitude of the government and the establishment, including the police and the BBC, is indicative of the yawning chasm that exists between them and the majority of the British people they are supposed to serve.

Time and again when news that more Muslim males, females or families have gone missing from their mono-cultural ghettos, the government along with the police and the BBC 'fear' for their safety or 'fear' that they are heading to Syria to join the caliphate.

In truth there is a mutual disdain bordering on hatred between these two incompatible cultures whereby the vast majority of the British people don't 'fear' their disappearance at all, instead they bid them good luck, bon voyage and good riddance.

It is now generally accepted that the government and the establishment are using the Muslim community as a battering ram to impose a so called 'multi-cultural society' on an unwilling people on behalf of their masters in the EU/UN.

This deliberate policy manifests itself in a Statute Book full of hate crime legislation and a regime of rigidly policed political correctness that makes it virtually impossible to voice criticism, or any form of disagreement, for fear of prosecution.

In addition to this cordon of protection they have thrown around their client community the government and their agents continue to ignore reality by making excuses for the so called radicalisation of these ISIS volunteers.

When one looks in detail at the issue of British documented volunteers joining ISIS, it becomes obvious that the government is forced to make these excuses or else admit that the Muslim communities have not evolved away from the medieval desert death cult that is articulated in the Koran and are therefore incompatible with the British way of life.

The government claim that these jihadis were normal British citizens like any other then suddenly became blood thirsty savages by radicalising themselves using the Internet and social media.

The parents and families of these jihadis plead ignorance about radicalisation and have the temerity to blame the government and the police for not doing enough to prevent their offspring leaving to join ISIS in Iraq and Syria.

The excuses offered by David Cameron's former Cabinet member, Baroness Warsi, are risible beyond believe; it's no wonder she is regarded as an abject failure who was appointed on the basis of being a non-white Muslim woman (her words not mine) as opposed to merit.

Ignoring the fact that Great Britain's Muslim community is the most indulged in the land, Warsi has the gall to claim that the government has a deliberate policy of non-engagement with Muslims. She uses her standard accusation that any criticism of Islam is 'far right'.

Her nonsense was in response to a letter sent to mosques and Muslim organisations that rightly urged them to do more to root out terrorism following the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris.

It's worth noting for Warsi's benefit that forty nine percent of her 3.4 million strong Muslim community endorse hate preachers, twenty seven percent support the Charlie Hebdo massacre and eleven percent support jihad.

 Also, ignoring the antics of the notorious hate preacher Anjem Choudary who, incidentally, is allowed to preach his filth and act as a recruiting agent for ISIS without fear of arrest, she claims that the government has 'failed to tackle Islamophobic language and hate crimes'.

(Watch Choudary harass a police officer over a Help for Heroes wristband here)

In reality, British Muslims are born and raised to be radical; not only is radical Islam in their genes it is reinforced every day of their lives by their culture and the religion they are subservient to and from which there is no escape.

The lady quoted at the start of this article along with her siblings are not immature, impressionable school kids, they are wives and mothers in their early and mid-thirties who have lived their lives in a free and open society.

The sad fact is that due to the requirements of the misogynistic cult they have been forced to follow they have not been allowed to participate in British life; instead they have been taught from birth that Great Britain is evil and must be subjugated or destroyed.

It is obvious from her second comment that Ms. Dawood has also been brought up to believe that America is the great Satan and Great Britain his willing apprentice. What kind of woman in the year 2015 would prefer to live in Saudi Arabia, or war torn Syria, as opposed to the United States of America or Great Britain?

The fact these women had taken their children, one only three years old, on a religious pilgrimage to Medina in Saudi Arabia, where non-Muslims are not allowed because they are regarded as infidels and therefore evil and unclean, confirms indoctrination of hate from childhood.

In conclusion it has to be said that these children, like all the other children who inhabit the thousands of mono-cultural, shariah controlled Muslim ghettos in Great Britain, are radicalised from birth and and it is unbecoming of the British government to claim otherwise.

Token Muslim Baroness Resigns - Ummah First Britain Last

The resignation from government of the Baroness Warsi came as no surprise to anyone outside of the cloistered, incestuous world of politics. Her resignation does however raise many important issues each deserving of examination in their own right. It is the issues of tokenism and quotas together with the loyalties and self identity of the Muslim and Pakistani communities in Great Britain that will be discussed here.

The days when the British government represented the people and made their safety and well being the top priority have long gone, replaced instead by a remote, generic elite with an agenda of their own. This agenda does not include protecting the British people from their enemies, both foreign and domestic, or their way of life - on the contrary it's main objective is to replace the traditional British way of life with a so called 'multi-cultural society'.

Who gave them the authority to carry out this cultural vandalism is not immediately apparent as the British people were not consulted nor did they give their consent. Looking back in retrospect it is obvious why this was done by stealth - the cultural and demographic replacement agenda was long in the planning and the plotters were well aware that if this had been put to the people it would have been overwhelmingly rejected.

This was a risk they were not prepared to take, instead they opened the borders to all and sundry then implemented a policy of rigidly policed political correctness to impose their transformation.  Their agents in the institutions and the establishment threatened and demonized anyone who had the temerity to even question their agenda. In addition to this they stuffed the establishment, the civil service, the public institutions and the government-media complex with highly motivated, like minded bureaucrats, apparatchiks and useful idiots.

Without a thought for quality, performance or suitability, the criteria for any position in a business or an organization, especially in the public sector, was no longer academic qualifications, relevant experience or merit, but race, religion, gender and sexuality. Equality laws and political correctness dictated that quotas and token appointees would replace more suitable candidates.

It doesn't take a genius to work out that quality and performance, together with any other measurable criteria, would plummet as a result.

On his usurpation of power, the self confessed 'Heir to Blair', David Cameron, set about purging the British Conservative Party of its traditional values on the orders of the 'progressive' global elite and his masters in the European Union. As a result, political correctness and quotas replaced qualifications and suitability for political office in his modernized, detoxified party and later on in government.

On the surface Sayeeda Hussein Warsi was the anglicised daughter of a Pakistani immigrant who worked his way up into the middle class and made sure his daughter was well educated. Despite her unsuitability, an educated, non white Muslim woman was ideal for a quota driven Cameron to display his 'progressive' multi-cultural credentials.

Rejected at the ballot box by her own people of Dewsbury, Cameron appointed her to the legislature anyway by making her a Baroness, this entitled her to sit in Great Britain's second chamber, a festering den of iniquity known as the House of Lords.

He made her the Co-Chairman of the Conservative Party itself and according to the party hierarchy she was a complete and utter disaster. After a meeting of the 1922 Committee one party elder is quoted as saying:

"I though she was appalling, she's got no idea" he went on to say that "I genuinely think she is the worse chairman we have ever had".
(See story here)

Undeterred by any criticism Cameron was unable to sack his token Muslim woman, consequently she was a complete and utter disaster in every position gave her, including the shadow Minister for Community Cohesion. (After centuries of existing perfectly well without one, the British people suddenly need a Minister for Community Cohesion).

Despite her past record of incompetence and failure, and to the consternation of his colleagues, Cameron brought her into the Cabinet, the innermost sanctum of government, as Senior Minister of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and he also made her the Minister for Faith and Communities. (As well as a Minister for Community Cohesion the British people can't now exist without a Minister for Faith and Communities)

By their own admission the Pakistani community refuses to integrate, even the second generation born and bred in Great Britain regard themselves as Pakistani as opposed to British. As far as the indigenous British are concerned it would appear that a majority don't accept these ingrates as British either.

Sayeeda Warsi gave the impression that she was somehow different from the traditional Pakistani woman. She wore western clothes and spoke English with a distinct local accent and for all intents and purposes was as British as roast beef and Yorkshire pudding.

The indications that all was not as they appeared was there for anyone who was not prepared to accept her official manufactured image. In line with the Pakistani community in Great Britain at aged fifteen she had an arranged marriage in Pakistan to her cousin.

On government business, Baroness Warsi was mainly photographed in western attire but in a demonstration of solidarity with the Ummah, she turned up for her first Cabinet meeting dressed in traditional Pakistani garb knowing the media would be in full attendance.

Despite her best efforts to portray herself as a thoroughly modern British wife and mother with a high flying career in politics, her loyalty to her 'own people' in the Ummah proved too strong for her to resist.

The British government's support for Israel defending itself against an army of ruthless, blood soaked savages, who have a declared intention to erase all Jews off the face of the earth, has proved too much for her Muslim sensibilities. She resigned her position citing
government policy in Gaza as the reason.

It is incumbent upon Baroness Warsi to expand on the reasons for her resignation by explaining what part of British policy in Gaza she objects to. Hamas is a ruthless terrorist organization, that uses its own civilians, including children, as human shields. It has fired thousands of missiles into civilian areas of Israel with the intention of causing mass murder. It has commandeered aid money and building materials that was intended for the people to construct tunnels into Israeli towns and villages for the purposes of kidnapping and murder of civilians.

She should let the British people know what she suggests the Israelis do in the face of such a murderous onslaught by medieval savages.

Like the majority of the Pakistani community of all generations, her undivided loyalty is to the global Muslim community first and foremost, followed by the Pakistani people, thereafter all brown skinned people and somewhere in the far distance comes Great Britain and her long suffering people. 

Immigration, Gay Marriage, Foreign Aid - Politicians' War Against The People

Arrogant, greedy, corrupt, self serving and out-of-touch are words and phrases that are frequently employed whenever anyone is asked to give an opinion on the current crop of politicians. To say that there is a disconnect between the people and their representatives would the understatement of the century and it is worth exploring this a little further.

The relationship between governments and the people has, over several decades, altered to the point where politicians and their armies of bureaucrats believe that the people are subject to them and they consider it impertinence and downright insubordination whenever the people question their actions or behavior.

By their collective ignorance, intellectual laziness and predictable voting habits, the people have brought this down upon their own heads but fortunately the wind of change is blowing across the political landscape and the people are slowly awaking from their decades long slumber.

It can be said without fear of contradiction that a political class has arisen across the entire civilised world and embarked upon a transformational agenda of such magnitude they know that people will not give their consent.

This agenda is designed to re-order the nations of the world and engineer the equality of nations, together with giving moral equivalence to cultures, religions and ethnic groups regardless of their evolutionary stage..

This cannot be achieved by raising undeveloped, uncivilized cultures, religions and ethnic groups up to level of the developed world, therefore it is being achieved by deliberately down grading the civilized world to the lowest common denominator of nations.

This will include the redistribution of wealth using any excuse possible, including increasing foreign aid to a percentage of GDP, the transferring industry and technology under the auspices of the UN, to the perverting of science in the name of combating climate change.

If anyone thinks this is an exercise in exaggeration or hyperbole then I challenge them to visit, as an educational example, some of the transformed areas of England, such as Tower Hamlets, Brick Lane or Bethnal Green in the East End of London, the St. Pauls area of Bristol, the Mosside area of Manchester along with any number of towns and villages that are unrecognizable as anything other than the third world.

As far as my research goes, this downgrading is not unique to Great Britain and is occurring right across the developed, civilized world, including the USA, Canada and Australia.

I will, however, restrict this article to Great Britain for reasons of familiarity and take it as read that I am correct in my other assertion unless proved otherwise.

The current Prime Minister of Great Britain, David Cameron, is part of the global elite that has been chosen and groomed to impose the transformational agenda on the British people and he is as determined as he is unrepentant.

When he makes a speech or offers a comment on any subject, his view is always in opposition to the will of the people; it is as if he is openly showing his allegiance to the global elite and his utter contempt for the plebeians that inhabit the British Isles.

David Cameron has a sophisticated political machinery at his disposal and this contains some of the most accurate pollsters and political scientists in the game, this includes Lord Ashcroft from his own conservative party. He is well aware of the issues that are of most concern to the British people together with where they stand with reference to them.

On the issue of foreign aid, the British people are as unanimous as it is possible to be. When the country is borrowing over one hundred billion pounds per year and people are struggling to pay their bills, they don't want their money given to China or to space age India or to nuclear armed Pakistan or to kleptocrat African despots.

They also don't want half a billion pounds of their money given to multi-millionaire professionals from the burgeoning foreign aid industry.

Cameron is well aware of this but displays his contempt for the British people by announcing that his biggest single achievement since taking office is the doubling of foreign aid. He is also sending a signal to his colleagues in the global elite that he is meeting their target of 0.7% of GDP.

The British people did not want traditional marriage to be abolished but the global elite were adamant that it should be. Cameron was only too happy to oblige, and in a calculated insult he planned to send his legislators to around the world to help other countries impose homosexual marriage on their people.

And so it goes on, his contempt for the British people and his allegiance to the trendy 'progressive' elite is on display with issues such as 'combating climate change'. He knows the people have woken up to the scam but he continues imposing hardship on the people and wrecking the British economy in the process.

On the issue of surrendering sovereignty to the unelected, unaccountable, unsackable bureaucrats of the European Union he is again at odds with the people.

Despite describing himself as Eurosceptic, Cameron "firmly believes" that Britain should remain shackled to this failing corrupt abomination that was conceived by bureaucrats, in the interests of bureaucrats and for the benefit of bureaucrats.

The latest in a long line of corruption scandals in the British Parliament has demonstrated Cameron's willingness to set aside the rule of law in order to protect one of his own. Maria Miller, the Secretary of State at the Orwellian Department of Culture, Media and Sport, willfully stole from the British public to line her own pocket.

Despite calls for her sacking by the vast majority of the British people, Cameron is giving her his "warm support".

Apart from a minority of 'progressives' and self loathers the British people are against the pernicious human rights laws that are preventing the removal of undesirables from the country no matter how heinous their crimes. The politicians know this is the case but refuse to act in the interests of the people but acquiesce instead to the global elite.

The one issue that unites the majority of the British in opposition to the political class is open border mass immigration. This is the issue that has caused so much damage to Great Britain, its economy, its communities and its way of life.

This is also the issue that the political class are determined to persevere with in order to meet their obligation of downgrading Great Britain to third world status.

This is the issue where politicians spin, obfuscate, lie, smear, threaten with prosecution and generally browbeat the people with political correctness into submission.

Being the calculating liars that politicians are, they paint a picture of Great Britain as a peaceful, multi-cultural nirvana, where all the different cultures and ethnic groups live side by side in perfect harmony with mutual respect for each other.

If there is any animosity then it is blamed on the white indigenous people, who are painted as nothing more than intolerant bigots who display an inherent capacity for racism.

The reality is somewhat different and it is on display for all to see should they follow the news or take the time to go and look for themselves.

Great Britain is divided into semi-autonomous, mono-cultural, welfare addicted, crime ridden ghettos where, as in some areas, the Queens writ no longer applies. The law is applied selectively or ignored entirely depending on cultural requirements, except in areas populated by the indigenous people.

The leaders of the three legacy parties, David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Red Ed Miliband speak as one in support of mass immigration and never miss an opportunity to proclaim the economic benefits of this disaster or the enrichment it has brought to their lives.

None of these three live in the areas that are blighted by Muslim paedophile gangs, Islamic Jihadi's, Jamaican Yardie gangs, Chinese Triads, East European street gangs, Romanian gypsies, drug gangs, turf wars, beggars, pickpockets, burglars, foreign rapists and murderers, yet they expect the British to endure this without complaint and consider it to be culturally enriching.

As mentioned earlier the British people are slowly awakening from their slumber and they are starting to hold the political class to account. The rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) is spreading panic among the Westminster bubble and those that facilitate the corruption and criminality that passes for politics in Great Britain.

With elections imminent the smear machines are cranking up to full speed and the insults are flowing thick and fast. Cameron himself has previously insulted millions of supporters, including the thousands who have switched their allegiance from his supposedly detoxified conservative party to UKIP, by referring to them as "fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists".

His party has further alienated the British people, and further marginalized the Muslim community, when the insult was repeated by the over promoted and utterly useless, Baroness Warsi.

She lumbers under the title of Minister for Faith and Communities and must realize that she is in government not because of any skills or achievements but because she is not white, a woman and a Muslim.

Warsi has a habit of using the smear "far right" when anyone has the temerity to question open border mass immigration or the myth of a multi-cultural society.

The reaction to the two televised debates between UKIP leader Nigel Farage and the Liberal Democrat party leader, Nick Clegg, demonstrated convincingly that the British people are on the march toward wresting their country back from the career politicians and bureaucrats who have done so much damage to the people and the British way of life.

Mr Farage demolished the arguments of the man who people now acknowledge is a potty trained European Union fanatic. Great Britain hater, Nick Clegg, represents all that is deceitful in a political order that hails from a tiny elite of professional like minded 'progressives' that believe their world view is the one that should be imposed on the people whether they agree or not. .

Hopefully along with Cameron, Red Ed Miliband and the rest of the political elite, Clegg will be unceremoniously dispatched by the people of Sheffield Hallam, into the dustbin of history where he so rightly belongs.

     .....................................................................................................................................

I am off on a mini tour around South Wales to see the lie of the political landscape and maybe, at great risk to myself, indulge in a little electioneering for any anti-socialist, pro-British causes.

Blogging may possibly be sporadic but I hope to update Facebook where I can. I will also be visiting Middlesex and Surrey to imbibe some of the worlds best ales.


  
     

World War I Centenary - British Ministers Warn Against Upsetting The Germans

Every student of history will know that the year 2014 signals the centenary of the start of World War I. This was labeled the war to end wars, and one of my grandfathers medals is inscribed with the words "the great war for civilization". Upwards of 16 million people lost their lives in bloody fighting which in many cases was just needless slaughter.

The phrase 'Lions led by donkeys' entered the British lexicon after the sacrifice of tens of thousands of brave men by incompetent war leaders fighting pointless battles using 19th century tactics in a 20th century war. Other words such as honour, bravery, courage and sacrifice also became the most frequently used in daily language.

Nowadays, these words are obsolete in any conversation which involves the modern political class. The stark truth about the calibre and attitudes of these people becomes only too apparent when listening to government Ministers as they make preparations to mark the centenary of this tragic conflict.

The world may be surprised to know that the British government, as part of its agenda to impose multi-culturalism on the unwilling people, have a Cabinet Minister with the Orwellian title of 'Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport', this same Cabinet minister also has the title of  'Minister for Women and Equalities'.

This is not to be confused with that other Orwellian appointment, the Cabinet Minister for Faith and Communities, currently occupied by the unelected and under qualified, walking disaster known as Baroness Warsi.

The Minister in question is Maria Miller, a former advertising and marketing executive who appeared from nowhere as part of the Prime Minister's declared objective of promoting women into government based on their gender rather than their ability.

Ms Miller displays all the attributes required of a  David ' Call Me Dave' Cameron type of trendy, politically correct, 'progressive' Conservative, the main requirements of which are to studiously ignore the wishes of the people and to regard traditional conservatives as swivel eyed loons and closet racists.

Unfortunately for the British people Ms Miller is taking a leading role in organizing the events that will mark the centenary of the Great War. She displayed her politically correct credentials right from the start by announcing that "we won't be judgmental" as to the causes of the war. Obviously these weasel words signal the British governments fear of upsetting the Germans.

The German people of today are not to blame for the sins of the ancestors and marking the centenary with the truth should not upset them.

Re-writing history for political reasons used to be the preserve of Hitler and his National Socialist German Workers Party and it is unbecoming and cowardly for British government ministers to be indulging in such practices.

If Secretary of State Maria Miller at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport wasn't bad enough then the confirmation of government cowardice was entrenched further by Eric Pickles at the Orwellian Department of Communities and Local Government.

Many people regarded Eric Pickles as an independent minded government minister who was prepared to rock the boat and speak up on behalf of the people. They were disappointed to learn that when it comes to political correctness and bowing down to Angela Merkel and the Germans, Pickles follows the party line to the letter.

Eric Pickles in the true modern conservative style of  'Dave' is warning against upsetting the Germans and declaring that it would be a shame if the commemoration turned into an anti-German, anti-Turkey festival.

Historians are rightly accusing the government of being reluctant to recognize the British victory, the question they should be asking is why?

Government Ministers, Eric Pickles and Maria Miller included, have been briefed to "refuse commenting on the causes of the war and try to make sure that memorial events are not too triumphalist or patriotic".

If they knuckle under to this shameful diktat then they are pathetic cowards in the face of the enemy who do not deserve respect from the people let alone renumeration. (the enemy being political correctness, not the German people)

Cities, towns, villages and hamlets lost sons in their hundreds and thousands to prevent the German domination of Europe. Their sacrifice should be respectfully honoured and not downgraded or swept under the carpet because the cowards in government are subservient to political correctness and Angela Merkel.

Ignoring political correctness and being absolutely judgmental, let me state for the record that World War I was fought to prevent Kaiser Wilhelm II's imperialist design for a German dominated Europe. The assassination of Arch Duke Franz Ferdinand by a Serbian nationalist was the long awaited pretext.

Every schoolchild should be taught that the German imperialists of yesterday were solely to blame for World War I and the resultant atrocities, just as they were for World War II.

If Angela Merkel and the German people get upset by that unquestionable truth, then tough.

Baroness Warsi Accuses Critics of Islam As Being Un-British

If there is one thing that winds up the British people more than stale beer, its migrants coming into their country to take advantage of its freedoms then continually whinging and whining about their hosts and their perceived shortcomings.

Chief among these ungrateful carpetbaggers is East African Muslim and the BBC's favourite 'progressive' Yasmin Alibai-Brown. (YA-B)

Many believe that this irritant makes a comfortable living out of deliberately antagonising the British people with her views on them and their values but unfortunately she actually believes the nonsense that she spouts.

She passes herself off as a Ugandan Asian which leads one to believe that she is a victim of Idi Amin's expulsion but this is false. YA-B came to Great Britain as an economic migrant prior to Amin's descent into insanity.

YA-B's route to riches is to portray herself as a victim and the British people as intransigent bigots because they continue to live their lives as they did before her arrival and who refuse to change their way of life to accommodate her.

I have spoken to many people about YA-B and the sentiment is always the same i.e. if the country and its people are not to your liking, why don't you just leave.

* ( I have re-worded the above statement as the actual wording is not suitable for a family blog)

If YA-B and her whining isn't bad enough, the British people now have to put up with token Muslim woman and Cabinet Minister Baroness Warsi, spouting the same divisive nonsense.

In a recent article she cites a YouGov poll which found that just 24% of voters think Islam is compatible with being British and only 23% say Islam is not a threat to Western civilisation.

Baroness Warsi's response is typical of the modern 'progressive' politician and that is to smear anyone who disagrees with her point of view.

In this case the noble Baroness has accused 76% of the British people of being un-British. She goes on to condemn critics of Islam for "peddling hate".

The Baroness has previous form when it comes to insulting the British people in the name of Islam.

In an offensive speech two years ago she ranted that "Britain's approach to Muslims has made Islamophobia acceptable at middle class dinner parties".

Before proceeding any further it's worth taking a look back to remind ourselves who the noble  Baroness is.

Warsi was born in Dewsbury in the county of West Yorkshire, England of Pakistani economic migrants. As a result of this good fortune she was able to enjoy housing, education and healthcare free of charge and financed by the 'Islamophobic' British people she sees fit to insult.

The Baroness went on to become a solicitor and immediately after qualifying she entered party politics, in other words she has no experience in the real world that the rest of the British people inhabit.

Warsi stood for election in her home town of Dewsbury and was rejected.  This was the first and only time she has subjected herself to the people at the ballot box and  the closest she has ever come to democracy.

Rejection by the people at the ballot box did not signal the end of Warsi's political career, on the contrary, it was the beginning of a stellar rise through the ranks.

Due to her gender and ethnicity she was made a life peer and Sayeedi Hussain Warsi became Baroness Warsi of Dewsbury in the County of West Yorkshire on full allowances and expenses paid for the 'Islamophobic' British people she despises.

At this particular time David Cameron was detoxifying the Conservative Party of its traditional values and trying to establish his multi-cultural credentials so he appointed the Baroness to Shadow Minister of State for Community Cohesion and Social Action.

Cameron then made her the co-chairman of the Conservative Party in a cynical attempt to attract the ethnic minority vote but the Baroness proved herself to be an embarrassment and such an utter failure that Cameron had to move her on for fear of damaging his image with the electorate.

The story goes that she pleaded for a place in Cabinet and based her argument on her gender and ethnic minority origins. "I'm a woman and I'm not white" she is reputed to whined.

Without a doubt Warsi would have played the race card had she been sacked therefore Cameron had no choice but to make her Minister of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and she is currently Minister of State for Faith and Communities also.

Like her co-religionist the Baroness Uddin, she was caught cheating on her expenses by claiming rent when she had spent the night with a friend.

She also failed to declare outside income in the Lords Register of Interests and she broke the Ministerial code by travelling to Pakistan on a business trip with her friend and business partner Habid Hussain.

Hussain just happens to be involved with the radical Muslim group Hizb ut Tahrir which is banned by her own Conservative Party.

Whatever spin the Conservative Party puts on it, Baroness Warsi was promoted on the basis of her gender and ethnicity and was so under qualified that she turned out to be a total disaster who had to be moved aside to prevent further damage.

Baroness Warsi has now reverted to type and joined fellow Muslim Yasmin Alibai-Brown by playing the race and victim card and insulting the British people. This is the same British people who gave them and their families sanctuary together with opportunities that are still not available in their ancestral countries to this day.

These two ungrateful harpies are in denial about the part Muslims themselves play in the British people's attitude to Islam. They claim Muslim extremism is all the fault of the British people.

To quote the noble Baroness:

" the underlying, unfounded mistrust of Muslims is fuelling extremism"

In the British tradition trust has to be earned, so its up to the Muslim population to demonstrate why the British people should trust them.

"the media is not doing enough to combat negative views of Muslims"

Another British tradition is freedom of the press. Baroness Warsi is advocating press censorship in relation to Muslim criminality.

She doesn't want the people to know about the Muslim paedophile gangs in Oxford and Rotherham that targeted under age white girls and subjected them to unspeakable depravity.

The British people shouldn't read about the quaint Muslim tradition of 'honour killings' where women are murdered for being women.

The people shouldn't have a right to know about the lady in Cardiff, Wales who beat her own son to death with a hammer and burned his body because he wasn't memorising verses from the Koran fast enough.

" But let me tell you what's really dangerous. It's when people are treated differently because they hold a different religious belief "

One would be incorrect for thinking that this comment was made in jest, unbelievably she really does believe this nonsense.

I challenge the Baroness to educate us all on the Muslim tolerance of other religions, particularly in her families' native Pakistan where they murder men, women and children, burn down their homes and places of worship just for being a Christian.

"I will not take lessons on loyalty from those on the extreme right who demonstrate the ideology of intolerance"

Predictably as with all scoundrels, Warsi smears anyone who disagrees with her version of tolerence as belonging to the extreme right.

There has never been a more intolerant religion than Islam, which preaches killing of all Kufurs and the beheading of apostates who have finally seen the barbaric side of Islam and converted.

There are over 50 Muslim countries on the planet where the likes of Baroness Warsi and Yasmin Alibai-Brown can depart to where they can be free at last from the un-British people who's traditional views they are unable to tolerate.

*(The message articulated earlier in this post still applies)