Jihadi Flags Fly In England - Local Gestapo's Ban St George's Cross

 

In order to demonstrate their support for the mass murdering terrorist organization Hamas, the local councilors hoisted the Palestinian flag above their Town Hall in Preston, England. Not to be outdone, the corrupt Mayor of the quasi autonomous Muslim ghetto in Tower Hamlets, East London planned to do the same and hoist the flag over his Town Hall
(Preston here, Tower Hamlets here)

Nearby the residents of the Will Crooks Estate near Canary Wharf went one step further and displayed the flag of ISIS along with the Palestinian flag and other jihadi slogans. A reporter at the scene was subjected to anti-semitic abuse and physically threatened until rescued by a fellow journalist.
(F*ck off Jew stories here and here)

If anyone doesn't know by now ISIS stands for the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria and they are a merciless army of anti-western Muslim fanatics who are beheading and butchering their way across Syria and Iraq with the intention of setting up a global caliphate.

They represent the vanguard of the jihad against western civilization and have thousands of recruits from Great Britain, Europe and America. The people of the west, especially those who support Hamas and other radical Muslim organisations, should be under no illusions, these people are utter fanatics and they will stop at nothing. Their declared intention is bring their jihad to the hated west and that means you and I are considered legitimate targets. But I digress.

It may seem strange but the flying of flags in England is a measure of just how far the country's local institutions have been infiltrated and taken over by a dedicated group of Common Purpose trained anti-English bureaucrats together with an army of like minded useful idiots.

The Union flag, the Welsh Dragon and the Scottish Saltire make regular appearances on various flagpoles in England and under orders of the new British government in Brussels, so does the hated star spangled blue rag of the EU.

The same Grand Burghers of Preston even fly the Jamaican flag over their Town Hall once a year to celebrate the island's independence. At this point one is bound to ask why the Jamaican community go to such pains to celebrate their independence from England then leave their palm fringed, sun drenched Caribbean paradise for a struggling post industrial town on a damp, windswept island in the North Atlantic? But again, I digress.
(Jamaica story here)

There is one flag that attracts the attention of the aforementioned anti-English bureaucrats and that's the Cross of St George. They hate it with a passion and oppose its display whenever they can. If they had their way they would ban it completely, but as this is not possible at present, they give anyone displaying it a hard time by using threats and intimidation.

Teignbridge Council in the English county of Devon has banned local cab driver Denise Said from having two small Cross of St George stickers on her cab and threatened her livelihood if she didn't obey. A council spokesweasel claims they are denigrating and offensive to foreigners. Councillor Mark Walters confirmed that only a single complaint had been received.
(Denise's story here)

Radstock Town Council in the English county of Somerset has voted to stop flying the flag of St George claiming it is offensive to the town's sixteen Muslims. (That's 16 out of a population of some 5,600 souls).

John Clements of the Royal Society of St George condemned the decision as did Rizwan Ahmed of the nearby Bristol Muslim Cultural Society. Nasima Begum of the influential Muslim Council of Britain states that they encourage the flying of the St George flag as it unites rather than divides the country.


Labour Councillor, Eleanor Jackson was unmoved and obviously knows best, she insisted the flag will cause upset to Muslims and plans to fly the LGBT flag instead. What did England do to deserve this kind of visceral hatred? What motivates a creature like this to ban the flag of St George but fly the LGBT flag.
                                                                                  
(Jackson story here)

There are countless examples of anti-English bureaucrats and their useful idiots in the local authorities waging their campaigns to ban anything that is quintessentially English especially the flag of St George.

Cab drivers in Southampton, binmen in Liverpool, pubs in Croydon and so on and so forth have all been threatened on various occasions for displaying English patriotism but the weasels in Thurrock council in Essex take the biscuit.

On one occasion the cowards from Thurrock Council called the police to force cab drivers to remove St George flags from their vehicles despite the fact it was St George's Day.

The words from an anonymous spokesweasel demonstrates the arrogance of the modern day agenda driven bureaucrat and the assumption that they control the people rather than the other way round.  "In the spirit of St George's Day we are happy to let them display the flag but they will have to remove them after the event".  The use of we and they in this case should give cause for concern that the bureaucrats have a high opinion of themselves and assuming authority beyond their mandate.

These people are typical of the anti-English bureaucrats who are acting as the agents of the state and who are imposing multi-culturalism at local level. These are the Vichy France equivalents, the Judenrats who do their masters bidding by imposing the multi-cultural agenda on an unwilling people.

There'll Always Be An England - Not After The Ethnic Cleansers Have Finished There Won't.

Feel free to read this previous post here.

Token Muslim Baroness Resigns - Ummah First Britain Last

The resignation from government of the Baroness Warsi came as no surprise to anyone outside of the cloistered, incestuous world of politics. Her resignation does however raise many important issues each deserving of examination in their own right. It is the issues of tokenism and quotas together with the loyalties and self identity of the Muslim and Pakistani communities in Great Britain that will be discussed here.

The days when the British government represented the people and made their safety and well being the top priority have long gone, replaced instead by a remote, generic elite with an agenda of their own. This agenda does not include protecting the British people from their enemies, both foreign and domestic, or their way of life - on the contrary it's main objective is to replace the traditional British way of life with a so called 'multi-cultural society'.

Who gave them the authority to carry out this cultural vandalism is not immediately apparent as the British people were not consulted nor did they give their consent. Looking back in retrospect it is obvious why this was done by stealth - the cultural and demographic replacement agenda was long in the planning and the plotters were well aware that if this had been put to the people it would have been overwhelmingly rejected.

This was a risk they were not prepared to take, instead they opened the borders to all and sundry then implemented a policy of rigidly policed political correctness to impose their transformation.  Their agents in the institutions and the establishment threatened and demonized anyone who had the temerity to even question their agenda. In addition to this they stuffed the establishment, the civil service, the public institutions and the government-media complex with highly motivated, like minded bureaucrats, apparatchiks and useful idiots.

Without a thought for quality, performance or suitability, the criteria for any position in a business or an organization, especially in the public sector, was no longer academic qualifications, relevant experience or merit, but race, religion, gender and sexuality. Equality laws and political correctness dictated that quotas and token appointees would replace more suitable candidates.

It doesn't take a genius to work out that quality and performance, together with any other measurable criteria, would plummet as a result.

On his usurpation of power, the self confessed 'Heir to Blair', David Cameron, set about purging the British Conservative Party of its traditional values on the orders of the 'progressive' global elite and his masters in the European Union. As a result, political correctness and quotas replaced qualifications and suitability for political office in his modernized, detoxified party and later on in government.

On the surface Sayeeda Hussein Warsi was the anglicised daughter of a Pakistani immigrant who worked his way up into the middle class and made sure his daughter was well educated. Despite her unsuitability, an educated, non white Muslim woman was ideal for a quota driven Cameron to display his 'progressive' multi-cultural credentials.

Rejected at the ballot box by her own people of Dewsbury, Cameron appointed her to the legislature anyway by making her a Baroness, this entitled her to sit in Great Britain's second chamber, a festering den of iniquity known as the House of Lords.

He made her the Co-Chairman of the Conservative Party itself and according to the party hierarchy she was a complete and utter disaster. After a meeting of the 1922 Committee one party elder is quoted as saying:

"I though she was appalling, she's got no idea" he went on to say that "I genuinely think she is the worse chairman we have ever had".
(See story here)

Undeterred by any criticism Cameron was unable to sack his token Muslim woman, consequently she was a complete and utter disaster in every position gave her, including the shadow Minister for Community Cohesion. (After centuries of existing perfectly well without one, the British people suddenly need a Minister for Community Cohesion).

Despite her past record of incompetence and failure, and to the consternation of his colleagues, Cameron brought her into the Cabinet, the innermost sanctum of government, as Senior Minister of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and he also made her the Minister for Faith and Communities. (As well as a Minister for Community Cohesion the British people can't now exist without a Minister for Faith and Communities)

By their own admission the Pakistani community refuses to integrate, even the second generation born and bred in Great Britain regard themselves as Pakistani as opposed to British. As far as the indigenous British are concerned it would appear that a majority don't accept these ingrates as British either.

Sayeeda Warsi gave the impression that she was somehow different from the traditional Pakistani woman. She wore western clothes and spoke English with a distinct local accent and for all intents and purposes was as British as roast beef and Yorkshire pudding.

The indications that all was not as they appeared was there for anyone who was not prepared to accept her official manufactured image. In line with the Pakistani community in Great Britain at aged fifteen she had an arranged marriage in Pakistan to her cousin.

On government business, Baroness Warsi was mainly photographed in western attire but in a demonstration of solidarity with the Ummah, she turned up for her first Cabinet meeting dressed in traditional Pakistani garb knowing the media would be in full attendance.

Despite her best efforts to portray herself as a thoroughly modern British wife and mother with a high flying career in politics, her loyalty to her 'own people' in the Ummah proved too strong for her to resist.

The British government's support for Israel defending itself against an army of ruthless, blood soaked savages, who have a declared intention to erase all Jews off the face of the earth, has proved too much for her Muslim sensibilities. She resigned her position citing
government policy in Gaza as the reason.

It is incumbent upon Baroness Warsi to expand on the reasons for her resignation by explaining what part of British policy in Gaza she objects to. Hamas is a ruthless terrorist organization, that uses its own civilians, including children, as human shields. It has fired thousands of missiles into civilian areas of Israel with the intention of causing mass murder. It has commandeered aid money and building materials that was intended for the people to construct tunnels into Israeli towns and villages for the purposes of kidnapping and murder of civilians.

She should let the British people know what she suggests the Israelis do in the face of such a murderous onslaught by medieval savages.

Like the majority of the Pakistani community of all generations, her undivided loyalty is to the global Muslim community first and foremost, followed by the Pakistani people, thereafter all brown skinned people and somewhere in the far distance comes Great Britain and her long suffering people. 

Labour's 15% Death Tax - Declare The Pennies On Your Eyes

Now my advise for those who die

Declare the pennies on your eyes

"Cause I'm the taxman

Yeah I'm the taxman

And your working for no one but me

 

Beatle fans will recognize those famous lines from their song Taxman which was penned by George Harrison in response to the extortionate rates of taxation in 1960's and 70's Great Britain. The country was being (mis)governed in those days by an alternating mix of a dripping wet Conservative government led by Edward Heath and a rabidly socialist one led by Harold Wilson.

It was the Wilson government and his ex-Communist Chancellor of the Exchequer, Denis Healey, that took punitive taxation to whole new levels.

"I warn you that there are going to be howls of anguish from those rich enough to pay over 75% on their last slice of earnings" was one of his more infamous quotes.

His most famous quote of all that "Labour will squeeze the rich until the pips squeak" has gone down in the annals of British political history even although Healey claims he was misquoted.

He was unfazed by the warnings that his tax proposals were putting the party's electoral chances in jeopardy and declared that the party and the country must face the consequences of Labours policy of the redistribution of income and wealth. "That is what our policy is, the party must face the realities of it".

The rest is history, Labour won the election, income tax was increased to 83% and combined with a 15% surcharge on investment income and dividends this led to a 98% marginal rate of personal income tax. The rich fled in their droves into tax exile, the government ran out of other peoples money and they were forced to go begging, cap in hand, to the International Monetary Fund for a loan.

(Labour taxes here. Tax exiles here.)                                           

It was an abject lesson for everyone, including the most dedicated Labour voter, on how socialist policies always end in economic collapse, bankruptcy and hardship for the majority of hard working people.

One would have thought that future Labour governments would have learned from the disaster of their predecessors, but despite a new generation of young, wealthy, privately educated political operators, backed by a media savvy PR machine, they made exactly the same mistakes.

In order to fulfill the requirements of their socialist ideology, the 1997 Blair/Brown government raised tax rates and opened the floodgates of spending. They introduced over one hundred new taxes, one of which removed over one hundred billion pounds from the private sector pension schemes, destroying them in the process.

Using stealth as a weapon, they used fiscal drag to ensnare more working people than ever into the 40% tax bracket and when National Insurance contributions are added they have an effective rate of 52%. This doesn't include the employers contribution paid on their behalf.

Out of the remainder of their earnings the people were forced to pay a compulsory Council Tax, VAT @ 18% on all but a few goods and services, car tax, a television tax, a fishing rod tax. There's excise duty on vehicles, fuel, alcohol, tobacco and betting. VAT is added after excise duty resulting in a tax being taxed itself.

Using a tool called the fuel and alcohol duty escalator, duty was increased on fuel and booze by 1% above inflation every year, adding VAT to the new price increases the cost further.

Stamp duty is charged on the transfer of shares, securities and land. House sales above a certain price attract stamp duty.

Airport Departure Tax was introduced and is now one of the highest on the planet.

Kicking the bucket opened up new avenues for the government to confiscate the fruits of other peoples labour. Estates over two hundred and fifteen thousand pounds are subject to a mind boggling 40% Inheritance Tax. This is money that is left over after the politicians have already taken their cut.

In addition to all this there are Corporation taxes, Capital Gains taxes and a myriad of other schemes the government use to separate the people and industry from their hard earned money.

Despite all this taxation the Blair/Brown governments ran out of other peoples money and bankrupted the nation yet again, saddling it with insurmountable levels of debt for future generations to pay off.

It isn't just a theory that high government spending combined with punitive levels of taxation leads to economic collapse, bankruptcy and hardship for the majority.  It has been demonstrated by socialist governments past and present, both at home and abroad. One would think that these expensively educated scholars armed with the mandatory Politics, Philosophy and Economics degree would understand this.


Obviously not. In a recent radio interview, the Deputy Leader of the Labour Party, Harriet Harman, announced that should her party win the forthcoming election, they would raise middle class taxes in order to finance yet more government spending. In the same week the Shadow Health Secretary, Andrew Burnham proposed a 15% death tax to finance elderly care.
(A Death tax story here)

The Liberal Democrats want an inappropriately named 'mansion' tax regardless of the fact that many middle income people live in ordinary residences that increased above the tax threshold due to the unprecedented house price boom of previous years.

This level of taxation is unsustainable as the country has reached the point where there are more people riding in the wagon than pulling it. Unscrupulous politicians stir up class hatred and feed on people's envy as a solution, but taxing the so called 'rich' is only viable until the last 'rich' man has had his pips squeaked. The threshold for being classed as 'rich' will be set so low that anyone earning above the minimum wage will find themselves in the 40% bracket.
(Taxing low paid workers story here)

The truth is that the British government doesn't have a revenue problem but a spending one. The political class steadfastly refuse to live within their means as this will require spending cuts to their various client groups with a potential loss of votes.

A bigger worry for the political class is that cutting taxes will lead to a prosperous majority and this is a transfer of power from them to the people, they will become less relevant and the people will control the agenda as opposed to the politicians.

Politicians will continue to ignore the rules of fiscal arithmetic that the rest of us have to live by and continue to spend more than they earn in revenue in order to extend dependency.

Prosperity for the majority puts the fear of God into the political class and their armies of bureaucrats. Dependency on government is the life blood of the modern politician, it gives them a hold over the people and political power for as long as they can get away with it.

Listen to the Beatles sing Taxman here, turn up, the volume and sing along out loud.

Kerry Double Whammy - If Hamas Doesn't Erase Israel Climate Change Will

                                            
When the veteran Labour MP Frank Dobson described his party leader Red Ed Miliband and his inner circle as "useless" his word applied to the entire political class both foreign and domestic. The rest of his opinion is even more revealing and indicates the patronising attitude of an increasingly arrogant elite. He continued by saying that Red Ed and his Shadow Cabinet are only capable of delivering post graduate lectures instead of simple policies the voters can understand.

There we have it, the public are too stupid to understand what the professional, career politician has in store for them and judging by election results he may have a point. Dobson's interview with the hopelessly left wing Guardian newspaper contains two pearls of wisdom which when applied to the current political scene explain a great deal.

Firstly:

"you need to boil things down to a few simple, short, sharp concepts and say them time and time and time again".

In other words the government's deliberate dumbing down of the education system has been so successful that people have lost the ability to analyse information and form their own independent opinion. Their opinions can be formed for them by repeating slogans and sound bites over again ad nauseum until they are embedded in the subconscious.

Secondly:

Asked if Red Ed's inner circle are useless, Dobson agreed enthusiastically before clarifying that "not of sufficient quality and clarity" was a more accurate description.

When describing the current political class as 'not of sufficient quality' he hit the nail squarely on head.

The consequences of Dobson's observations are there for all to see - the people will believe practically anything they are told by a degraded political class, no matter how outrageous or ridiculous, if it has been repeated often enough.

Logic and empirical evidence are no competition for oft repeated official statements and propaganda especially when they are cascaded by a compliant bought-and paid-for agenda driven media.

There are countless numbers of detached, inexperienced people masquerading as politicians that are eminently unsuitable for high office, Red Ed being one, David Cameron being another, with the ultimate prize for unsuitability going to the community organizer, Barack Obama.

There is no one better to illustrate the points inadvertently raised by Frank Dobson, than US Secretary of State John Kerry with Israel and climate change as the propaganda driven issues.

Kerry may meet the criteria to be a U.S. Senator but in the eyes of the world he is totally unsuitable to be Secretary of State. His dubious war record, together with his Fonda-like trashing of his country, his accusations of war crimes against his brothers-in-arms and his socialist hypocrisy have rendered him untrustworthy and therefore ineffective.
(See one Kerry story here)

Being a modern day politician he uses propaganda, distortions, insults and soundbites as a matter of course and it doesn't take a genius to see through it and spot the agenda driven ideologue that lurks underneath.

Prior to the Ukraine and the Israel/Hamas crisis taking the front pages, Kerry was in Jakarta as part of an East Asian doomsday tour, warning the world that climate change is the greatest challenge of our generation. According to Kerry it is more dangerous than terrorism or the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction or even a nuclear armed Iran.

It may seem strange that such a world threatening issue hardly got a mention by the former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, who's priority seemed to be justifying her existence and raising her profile for a Presidential run.

Without a smidgen of empirical evidence Kerry warned that Indonesian fishing catches will reduce by forty percent, not thirty or fifty but forty. The recent farming problems in California are definitely caused by climate change as are the wildfires in Australia and Hurricane Sandy. According to a recent documentary all low lying areas, including Manhattan, will be under water in the not-to-distant future causing a global financial meltdown.
(Kerry on climate change here and here)

Being a Liberal or 'progressive' or whatever socialists are calling themselves these days in America, Kerry will be bound by an ideological pro-Palestinian terrorist/anti-Israel requirement and this is evident by his actions.

Despite the fact that Israel is defending itself from an unprovoked attack by ruthless terrorists who have a declared intention to erase Israel and the Jews from the face of the planet, Kerry continues to give Hamas succor and support while demanding concessions from Israel.

He has the compliant media on his side demonising Israel and the Jews to the point where violent anti-Semitism is on the rise, particularly in Europe. The government-media complex continues with the false narrative about stolen land and a Palestinian state when even minor research will reveal that Israel is the ancient homeland of the Jews and there never has been a Palestinian state let alone one with Jerusalem as its capital.

The John Kerry doomsday tour highlighting the greatest threat facing humanity has been largely forgotten as events in the real world interrupt the world of spin, lies and the global socialist agenda. How can a minor conflict in the middle east with a comparatively small loss of life call a halt to a mission to save the world from a catastrophe which could cost millions of lives?

Indulging in this carbon spewing shuttle diplomacy around the middle East and Europe is a pointless exercise if the lessons of his previous tour to East Asia are to be believed. One report has Israel suffering from water shortages and desertification due to climate change making vast areas uninhabitable.

Also Israel, being a low lying country with some areas below sea level, if the oceans are inexorably rising due to ongoing climate change then coastal Israel will be under water before too long making more areas uninhabitable and this war even more pointless.
(See story here)

Hamas can put down their arms, stop killing their own children and stop trying to erase Israel from the face of earth.  If John Kerry is to be believed climate change will do the job that any number of their rockets have failed to do. 

Great Britain Surrenders Without A Shot Fired - November 2014

 

                                                            

 

Known as the Compiegne or Foch Railcar, students of history will recognize it as the one Adolf Hitler used in an act of humiliation to house the signing of the French surrender during World War II. Its the same railcar that the French used to house the German surrender after World War I.

 

The French surrender in June 1940 saw the formation of Vichy France whereby a puppet government led by Marshal Petain and Pierre Laval, assisted by various other traitors and collaborators, was set up to rule on behalf of their German masters.

On November 1st 2014 the insidious Nice and Lisbon Treaties come into effect in Great Britain after which forty three crucial areas of legislative authority will be surrendered from the democratically elected representatives of the people to the unelected, unaccountable, unsackable bureaucrats of the EU.

These areas include:

Border controls

Immigration, Asylum

Criminal Law

Foreign Affairs

Defence

Energy

and most notable, the ability for member states to withdraw from the Union.
(See full list and opinions here and here)

British politicians under the guise of various treaties have surrendered so much sovereignty already that seventy five percent of British laws come from the EU, reducing the Westminster Parliament to a rubber stamp. The surrendering of what remains will effectively end Great Britain's status as an independent sovereign state and with it over a thousand years of history.

It is undeniable that the current EU is dominated by Germany, assisted by a craven France and an unholy alliance of Great Britain's historical enemies. Anyone watching the proceedings of the EU cannot fail to notice the animosity and vitriol directed at some of Great Britain's representatives. This can be confirmed by the voting record which has read twenty six to zero against Great Britain in the past.

These historical enemies would like nothing more than to see a once great Britain reduced to a vassal state or a minor province paying tribute to a United States of Europe which is controlled by a German-French axis.

No nation that has over seventy five percent of its laws made by a foreign entity and who is about to surrender control of the forty three critical areas linked above, can call itself an independent, sovereign nation. It is, in effect, the death of the democratically governed nation state and the birth of a authoritarian tyranny governed by appointed bureaucrats.

This excersise in nation building has been well planned and built without the consent of the subject peoples. Consultation and referendums have been routinely denied and where they have been held due to constitutional requirements, unfavourable results have been ignored with the project progressing regardless.

The political class are well aware that the EU has been a complete and utter disaster for the British people with an ever increasing number wanting an exit. It was with this in mind that the then British Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, in an act of cowardice that wouldn't have been amiss in the railway car at Compiegne, sent his Foriegn Secretary, David Miliband, to sign the initial surrender document known as the Lisbon Treaty.

When he thought the heat had died down and the twenty four hour news cycle had moved on, Gordon Brown, who is renown for his cowardice in the face of adversity, snuck in to Brussels like a thief in the night to add his signature to the surrender document.

 General Charles Huntzinger signs the surrender document aboard the railcar at Compiegne 

 

 

                                                                     

Too cowardly to take his seat, Prime Minister Gordon Brown signs the Lisbon Treaty surrender document in a broom cupboard somewhere in Brussels.

To borrow a phrase from President Franklin Roosevelt, November 2014 "is a date that will live in infamy" as it marks the end of Great Britain as an independent sovereign state and it brings to a close over a thousand years of history. This treachery was achieved by lies, deceit and without a shot being fired.

Footnote to this article: It is worth noting that after the liberation of France and the regaining of its status as an independent, sovereign nation, several official and unofficial purges of collaborators took place. Between 1948 and 1952 some six thousand collaborators were executed before liberation and some four thousand after.

One hundred and twenty thousand collaborators were prosecuted with one thousand five hundred death sentences handed down. The leader of the Vichy government Marshal Petain had his death sentence commuted by Charles De Gaulle. The Prime Minister Pierre Laval was not so fortunate, he was put up against a wall and shot. 



 

 

Building An EU Empire From The Atlantic To The Urals Without A Mandate

One has to give credit to the European Union and its leaders for the way they can deceive their respective peoples with what is a continuous tissue of lies, obfuscation and deceit and get away with it unscathed. Having a government-media complex in their back pocket is a big help off course, along with compliant populations who are beaten down with a deluge of propaganda unheard of since the days of the Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda.

Their belief in propaganda combined with their utter contempt for the views of their people has led these elitists to believe they can re-order the world without consulting those who's lives will be drastically altered.

The Divine Right of Kings may have gone the way of King Charles the First's head, but it has reappeared with a vengeance in the new post democratic age and it is used ruthlessly by this new generic political class. These politicians have been conditioned to believe that their global agenda is somehow 'divinely' inspired and must be imposed at all costs regardless of any objections from the people who will suffer the consequences.

As we know from the Jean Monet strategy, the EU was conceived and expanded by a series lies deliberately employed to fool the people into a federal superstate without them realising their fate. This has been the strategy employed ever since by politicians of all parties who are dedicated to the superstate project.

Despite his claims to be otherwise, British Prime Minister David Cameron is the consummate European politician who has mastered the art of saying one thing to the British people and something totally different to the European audience he is trying to woo.

At home he is trying to stem the tide of Euroscepticism by claiming the EU must be reformed as a condition for British membership or the EU must drop its insistence on 'ever closer union'.  He is going to re-negotiate Britain's term of membership and take back control of the borders etc. etc. In Europe he is letting slip the true ambitions of the EU which is to have an empire from the Atlantic to the Urals while speaking in the former Soviet Republic of Kazakhstan.

Cameron states that "Britain has always supported the widening of the EU" - no it hasn't, the people have not been consulted so he cannot speak for Great Britain. What he means is that the political elite want to expand the EU empire to snare as many other peoples as possible into their clutches in an effort to accumulate power.

In his arrogance he also states that "Our vision of the EU is that it should be a large trading and cooperating organisation that effectively stretches, as it were, from the Atlantic to the Urals". When he says "our vision" who is he referring to?  The result of the last European elections clearly demonstrate that it's not the British people. Again he is speaking on behalf of the political elite not the British people.

Even in his speech to the Kazakh audience he refuses to tell the whole truth; he makes reference to a "large trading and cooperating organisation" but fails to mention the surrender of sovereignty to unelected bureaucrats that will end any democratic aspirations the Kazakh people may have had after their liberation from the Soviet empire.

(Read the story here)

He tells the British people that the current EU is out date and unacceptable in its present form only to tell his East European audience that "we have a wide vision of Europe and have always encouraged countries that want to join".   There's that "we" again.

In an attempt to fool the people Cameron has reshuffled his Cabinet to include a supposed Eurosceptic Phillip Hammond as Foreign Secretary.  Apart from saying that he would vote to leave the EU if it doesn't change he has done little to convince anyone he wants a free, independent and sovereign Great Britain.
(Hammond story here)

At the same time as Hammond is unconvincingly talking about a possible British exit, the top conservative in the House of Lords is proclaiming that a British exit "is not an option".

Lord Popat, the Conservative Chief Whip and spokesman for the Department of Business Innovation and Skills, stated that  "there is no chance that the UK could leave the EU".

Maybe Cameron could enlighten the British people as to which one of his senior lieutenants should be believed. Bearing in mind that Lord Popat is appointed, not elected, he is more in line with the EU modus operandi. Hammond voting to leave doesn't mean Britain actually will, the odds must be on the noble Lord.
(Lord Popat story here)

Despite his claim to be listening to the British people and that he "gets it" with reference to their immigration concerns, Cameron continues to lie - he could do the decent thing for once in his disreputable political career and tell the truth:

He is committed to the EU project as it stands today.

There will be no meaningful renegotiation of membership terms. The EU leaders have already said so.

The British government will not repatriate any powers.  On the contrary, sovereignty will continued to be slowly and inexorably surrendered.

The British government will never regain control over the borders and uncontrolled mass immigration will continue.

He is committed to expanding the EU empire to include Turkey, Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Serbia and that means giving unlimited access to the British people's taxpayer funded welfare system to another one hundred and thirty nine million impoverished people who may not be compatible to the British way of life.

The EU has been a disaster for the British people and their way of life.  The only vision they have is to be rid of it and be a free, independent and sovereign nation once again.


                                                  ------------------------------------------------


Footnote: Attempts to coerce Ukraine into the EU empire has resulted in a bloody civil war, trying to do the same with other Soviet Republics like Kazakhstan would be disastrous, but thats another story.  

After Israel And The Jews Have Been Erased, Will There Be Peace?

As the battles rage in Gaza and criticism of Israel reaches a crescendo of naive hysteria, it is worth examining the consequences should Hamas and Hezbollah, together with the people that give them succour and support, were to achieve their much publicised objectives.

Western apologists for the Palestinians should be under no illusions, there is no ambiguity in these objectives, they are clear and precise with no room misinterpretation. Israel must be erased from the earth and every Jew subjugated or killed. There is no two state solution, every offer has been refused by the Palestinians as any deal will require an acknowledgement of Israel's right to exist.

It is safe to say that whenever hostilities break out in the region, the balance of news reporting is sympathetic to the Palestinian terrorists and hostile to Israel. These hostilities are usually the result of incursions into Israel by terrorists, resulting in the murder of innocent citizens, or rocket attacks intended to do the same.

Whatever the Israeli government does to protect its citizens it is always condemned, be it building a wall or an iron dome rocket defence system. Whenever the Israeli military respond to an attack it is always condemned as disproportionate. In the eyes of the worlds media and its more gullible readers, the Israeli government can do nothing right when protecting its citizens from terrorists.

History shows that western governments have hardly shown restraint themselves when faced with the same situation. It would appear that proportionate responses to unprovoked military assaults and terrorist attacks are only required by Israel.

When Hitler rained down his revenge weapons, the V1 'Doodlebugs' and V2 rockets, onto the civilian population of England, the Royal Airforce reduced the cities of Hamburg, Dresden and Cologne to rubble.

The response to the Libyan organised 1986 La Belle discotheque bombing in Berlin, in which two American servicemen were killed, was the bombing of Tripoli and Benghazi with some bombs hitting the civilian suburb of Bin Ashur. Hundreds were killed, including Hanna Qaddafi, the adopted daughter of Libya's dictator Mohamar Qaddafi

                                           

(See story here)

When Al-Qaeda flew three hijacked civilian aircraft into the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon, killing some three thousand civilians, the US Airforce rained hell down on Afghanistan and invaded the country. Tens of thousands of people were killed, including civilians. They continue to rain down hell to this day, using remotely controlled drones.

President Reagan's words after the Libya bombing apply to every nation but obviously not Israel.

"When our citizens are attacked anywhere in the world on the direct orders of hostile regimes, We will respond".

He argued that America was exercising its rights to self defence under Article 50 of the UN Charter. If that is the case then so are the Israelis but I digress.

The world should be under no illusions of what would happen should the Israelis comply with its critics and lay down their arms - Israel would indeed be erased from the face of the earth as promised and the Jews would be faced with another Holocaust.  Dwight Eisenhower, as Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces during World War II, instructed that video and photographic evidence be gathered of the German extermination camps because he knew that sometime in the future attempts would be made to re-write history and deny the Jewish Holocaust.

If Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran and its Ayatollahs, together with all the other medieval barbarians that inhabit that part of the world, get their way another Holocaust would be a racing certainty.

The Jews wouldn't submit themselves to annihilation a second time and would most likely seek exile once again and the ancient land of Israel would become the Jew free land of Palestine for the first time in history. With their objectives achieved the justification for Muslim terrorism around the world will be removed and peace should reign at long last.

Every so called 'progressive', every bleeding heart hand wringing liberal, every socialist with their faux compassion and false concern for justice, the Pope, the Archbishop of Canterbury and every Jew hating anti-semite would now be able to come down from their ivory towers and their sanctimonious moral high ground to celebrate their part in bringing peace to the middle east at last.

One would have to be totally deluded to think that the centuries old animosity would end with peace replacing war and people of different faiths living side by side with in perfect harmony. The news reels from the middle east showing images of mayhem, destruction and murder that are available on the Internet and social media should give some indication of what will happen next.

When Muslims proclaim that everyone must submit or be subservient to Islam, they actually mean it and fuelled by the religious fervor of victory they will set about doing the bidding of their prophet.

Once the Jewish holy sites have been desecrated and destroyed, the religion of peace will turn its attention to Christians and other faiths. Their holy sites, the Church of the Holy Sepulchre etc. will be destroyed and overbuilt as is traditional after a Muslim conquest.  Cordoba Cathedral in Spain, Higha Sofia in Istanbul, the Temple Mount in Jerusalem and the Hindu God Ram's birthplace in Ayodhya, India are classic examples of Muslim architectural triumphalism.

(Desecration story here. 1800 year old church burned by ISIS here)

Violence, murder and rape against centuries old Christian communities in Iraq is being perpetrated by rampaging Muslims while the Christian leaders obsess themselves with women priests, gay marriage, inequality, social exclusion and all the other trendy left wing 'progressive' nonsense that should be the preserve of the temporal.
(See story here)  

While the middle east is being cleared of infidels and kaffurs, the fifth columns in western countries will be awakened and activated to agitate in conjunction with battle hardened jihadis who have returned to cut off the hands that fed them and gave them sanctuary.

The British people, disarmed by their government and crippled by political correctness, will be threatened and intimidated into accepting Islam as an integral part of British life and they will be compelled to celebrate its festivals. Their own festivals and way of life will be deemed as offensive to Muslims and suppressed.

This can be dismissed as fanciful speculation but just a tertiary glance at some of the antics of the political class, together with their agents in the public institutions, will demonstrate the veracity of this scenario. Schools adapting their procedures and altering their holidays to accommodate Muslims, school children being forced to celebrate Muslim festivals, halal meat being made compulsory in supermarkets and stores. Employees refusing to handle pork products or alcohol are indulged and remain employed instead of being fired.

Hate preachers are allowed to spout their threatening anti-western filth unmolested by the same authorities that rigidly enforce political correctness for the indigenous people.

                                                 

Other European countries have practically succumbed already with Belgium set to become the first majority Muslim country within a decade or so. The Scandinavian countries, particularly Sweden, are reeling under the weight of Muslim demands and criminality, which includes the rape of women and children.

The great Satan will still be there and the traditional Muslim hatred for America and its people will continue unabated. They can expect particular attention and with the help of their traitorous politicians, fundamental transformation will include acceptance of Islam as equal to Christianity with the celebration of Muslim festivals being made compulsory. There is hope in that the governments attempts to disarm the people have been unsuccessful so far.

Even the revered Pledge of Allegiance is being desecrated in schools with kids forced to say it Arabic with the name of God replaced with Allah.
(See the story here).

These are likely scenarios but if they only happen in part it will mean massive upheaval, disruption and murder in the once Christian dominated lands. It is only Israel that stands between us and the mayhem the Muslim communities have promised to bring down on our heads.

If the west had any sense and self respect, it would ignore the hand wringing bleeding hearts and their Jew hating fellow travellers and give Israel all the support it can muster in order to save themselves from a similar fate.