The Empire Strikes Back Using An Imbecile Of The Highest Order

With barely three days to go before the most important election in a generation the state is going after the insurgent Brexit Party at the request of the disgraced former Chancellor of the Exchequer and Prime Minister, Gordon Brown.

Just a week after the Electoral Commission gave a clean bill of health to the Brexit Party’s funding arrangements, they gave notice of another investigation just hours before their final election rally in London.

Their plan to investigate them again using Gordon Brown's accusations of impropriety as an excuse is a sure sign that the political class and the establishment are getting desperate.

The latest polls indicate that the Brexit Party will wipe the floor with the legacy parties which will signal the end of the establishment hegemony over British political life.

The peoples’ resistance is winning the battle against the political class but the democracy deniers are fighting back using every dirty trick in the book.

Widely regarded as an economic illiterate and complete imbecile, Gordon Brown seems to be a strange choice to front a politically motivated attack on a new political movement. This is until one looks at his political history and his previous clash with the Brexit Party leader, Nigel Farage, over Brown’s disastrous record as Chancellor of the Exchequer.

Rabid socialist Gordon Brown is an advocate of the New World Order (NWO) in which he wants to be a major player.

The European Union (EU) is an essential part of the NWO and Brown was determined to fully integrate Great Britain into the centrally controlled United States of Europe.

In an act of unforgivable treachery, Brown signed the Lisbon Constitution/Treaty which made the EU a legal entity and transferred what was left of British sovereignty from Westminster to Brussels. To compound his treachery, he did it without the referendum he solemnly swore to give the British people first.

Brown knew what he had done was an act of unforgivable treachery and being the coward that he is he avoided the original signing ceremony by sending a minion but then tried to add his signature later outside the public gaze.

He refuses to sit down for the traditional photo opportunity but luckily his treachery was captured on camera for all the world to see.

If the threat to Brown’s ambitions for the EU and the NWO weren’t incentive enough to go after the Brexit Party, his personal animosity with the party leader, Nigel Farage. most certainly is.

The clash took place a decade ago in the chamber of the European Parliament where Farage exposed Brown for the incompetent, economic illiterate he was by demolishing his carefully constructed image as a world economic leader.

I would highly recommend watching one of the most stunning three minutes of political video ever made and watch a carefully crafted reputation get deconstructed. The inane grin on Gordon Brown’s face is priceless.

Watch the spectacle here.

Gordon Brown has waited a decade to get his revenge but his attempt will fail.

Like his friend and political soulmate Donald Trump, every attack on Nigel Farage only serves to boost his popularity.

It must be noted that the Electoral Commission itself is made up of government cronies who are all disciples of the European Union and they are committed to Great Britain remaining locked inside the failing nation building project.

We will find out on election day whether this politically motivated attack on the Brexit Party will succeed but win or lose Gordon Brown will always be an imbecile and the worst Chancellor in the history of British politics.

Watch one of Gordon Brown's New World Order speeches here

Catch A Falling Star - Obama Is Being Bitch Slapped From Iran To Kenya

It seems like only yesterday that candidate Barack Obama was being anointed as the new Messiah, a new era of politician who was going to 'fundamentally transform' the most powerful and prosperous nation on earth........into what he didn't say.

In a promise worthy of the Saviour Himself this photogenic so-called African-American, flanked by fake Greek columns, was going to 'stop the oceans from rising and heal the planet'.

So powerful was the Obama media created brand that world leaders would embarrass themselves with an undignified scrum whenever the chance for a photo opportunity came their way.

Great Britain's former Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, was so desperate for a photo-op that he disgraced himself, his office and the British people by chasing Obama through a hotel kitchen having been turned down for a meeting five times.

(Cynics argue that Obama was right to avoid Brown as the latter's reputation for imbecility went before him like a storm front. A photo-opportunity with Brown at this particular moment in time was to be avoided at all costs to prevent him tarnishing Obama's expensively created image)

The ultimate accolade came when after only nine months in office, a now sanctified President Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace prize for his "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between people"; this was despite the fact that he was engaged in two wars at the time.

Many people had warned during his initial campaign for the Presidency that Barack Obama was a dangerous creation of the global 'progressive' elite who were determined, in the name of equality of nations and of people, to downgrade the United States of America, erase its Judeo-Christian heritage and consign American exceptionalism to the dustbin of history.

Some six years later every American patriots' worst nightmare has come true; the United States has indeed suffered a severe downgrade both socially and economically and its reputation abroad is tainted almost beyond repair.

During his tenure as Commander-in-Chief, the once mighty military machine has been so socially engineered by sexuality and gender obsessed politicians it is no longer feared or respected. Among some of America's more religiously motivated enemies, the move to allow gay, lesbian and transgendered people to serve openly is the last straw that has reduced the military to nothing more than a laughing stock.

A heavy dose of reality does have a sobering effect on the mind in addition to removing the rose tinted spectacles from those that put them on because they deliberately did not wish to see the truth.

Looking back some six years it would have been inconceivable that this man who was halfway to Divinity is now being bitch slapped everywhere from Iran to Kenya; not just by the big beasts of Iran and Russia but by every tin pot dictator from Assad in Syria, to Uhuru Kenyatta in his supposed spiritual home of Kenya.

In six short years the slobbering sycophants who were hoping for some of Obama's starlight to rub off on them have replaced their undignified scramble for a photo op with a polite 'say cheese and lets get the hell outta here' attitude.

During the recent mid-term elections, even his own Democratic party members made their excuses and hid in the trees rather than have their reputations tarnished by a photo op with their own President.

This disregard for Barack Obama, along with the associated disrespect for the office he holds, has made the world a more dangerous place.

The tyrants in Beijing are expanding their influence in the South China Sea and attacking America's cyberspace interests with impunity.

President Putin has humiliated President Obama on the world stage by ignoring his threats and expanding, without fear of retribution, his Russian Empire into Crimea and Ukraine. He is currently working on returning the Baltic States into the Russian sphere of influence and who would bet against him succeeding.

President Assad of Syria crossed Obama's so called 'red line' over the use of chemical weapons without fear of the threatened retribution. This has emboldened every other dictator and terrorist in the region and beyond to also pursue their goals without fear.

Embarrassingly for the American people, their President still believes in his own Divinity and that the whole world still hangs on every word he utters.

President Kenyatta rightly bitch slapped him when he proceeded to lecture him on gay rights in Kenya; this episode also serves as a clear indication that although he touts himself as an African-American, with Kenyan ancestry, he doesn't have the faintest idea about African attitudes to homosexuality.

Likewise when he lectured the British people about their remaining in the hated EU; he was told in no uncertain terms to mind his own business by a series of prominent politicians, including the leaders of the ever growing United Kingdom Independence Party (Ukip), which is campaigning to leave.

If, as British Prime Minister Harold Wilson is once quoted as saying, 'a week is a long time in politics' then six years is a lifetime and it shows in the demeanor and delusions of the once infallible, Messianic President of the United States.

In conclusion, like President Jimmy Carter before him, no matter what he thinks his legacy will be, it won't turn out that way. With the Ayatollahs openly humiliating him over their victory in the nuclear talks, they join Russia, China, ISIS and every other Obama emboldened enemy laughing as they belittle the person that was, until recently, the most powerful man on the planet.

The Gettysburg Address - David Cameron Is No Abraham Lincoln

Address delivered at the dedication of the cemetery at Gettysburg.

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those here who gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate - we can not hallow - we can not consecrate this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note , nor long remember what we say here, but they can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us - that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion - that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain - that this nation under God, shall have a new birth of freedom - and government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

                                                                                                                                  Abraham Lincoln

November 19. 1863.

Without the top and bottom lines most students from the pre-progressive education era will still recognise this as the Gettysburg Address, delivered by President Abraham Lincoln while consecrating the war cemetery after the battle of Gettysburg during the final stages of the American Civil War.

Most students will not have committed it to memory but they will be familiar with its sentiments, particularly the last line. They will also acknowledge that it was delivered by a man so immense that despite his humble beginnings and demeanor, he strides across history like a colossus.

It is believed that President Lincoln wrote this speech himself on November 18/19 while travelling from Washington DC to Gettysburg. It is also believed that he was seriously ill at the time, suffering from the initial stages of smallpox.

With all this in mind it is worth contrasting Abraham Lincoln, together with this defining moment in history, with the current crop of political leaders as the world created by the fallen from both the New World and the Old, goes to hell in a hand basket.

The catalyst for this article was British Prime Minister David Cameron and his threat to sack any government minister who does not back him over a his proposed EU renegotiation and referendum.

(Since the leaders of the EU, including the Supreme Leader, Angela Merkel, have ruled out any
re-negotiation this is regarded as a cynical election tactic by Cameron) 

It is obviously beyond his comprehension that these ministers are elected to represent their constituents who in ever increasing numbers disagree with Cameron's subservience to the EU bureaucrats. Either this or he believes the views of the people are irrelevant and should be ignored.

Whichever it is "government of the people, by the people, for the people" plays no part in his political philosophy or that of his administration. 

It is worth reminding ourselves that David Cameron is no Abraham Lincoln. There is no log cabin story here or grinding poverty. Nor is there self education, work in the real world or any experience whatsoever of the lives of ordinary people.

David Cameron hails from a remote, wealthy elite who was apparently 'spotted' at university as potential leadership material. Spotted by who and under what criteria remains a mystery.

He is a machine politician created by PR men, advertising executives and image consultants with the sole purpose of fronting the political elite who are committed to imposing their 'progressive' agenda on the British people whether they want it or not.

Unfortunately for the British people, David Cameron couldn't write a lunch order without his army of SpAds (Special Advisers), spin doctors and media management consultants let alone a Gettysburg Address.

While President Lincoln 'dedicated a portion of the battlefield as a final resting place for those who gave their lives that the nation may live', David Cameron attends the Remembrance ceremony at the Cenotaph knowing he is surrendering the sovereignty that our Glorious Dead sacrificed their lives to preserve.

At the same time he is dismantling the once mighty British military machine in preparation for its absorption into the European Defence Force thus consigning a major part of Great Britain's glorious past to history.

To add insult to injury he attended the Remembrance ceremony in the company of five of Great Britain's most notorious collaborators. This group of people are committed to the destruction of a sovereign Great Britain in favour of a post democratic federal super state.

These six political collaborators have done more to damage Great Britain's independence and sovereignty than Hitler's bombs ever did. In line with the demands of EU membership they have set about deliberately destroying British culture and its way of life for a mythical 'multi-cultural society'.

This willful destruction is social engineering on a massive scale designed to replace the cultures and ways of life of the individual nation states with a generic non-European citizen.

On the left is Gordon Brown, a Scottish socialist and misanthropist who harbours a particular loathing for the English people. Apart from his economic incompetence which broke the nation's finances, he signed the Lisbon Treaty breaking a specific promise to give the people a referendum first.

Next is Ed Miliband, better known as Red Ed. He took over the leadership of the Labour Party after Brown's ejection from power. A first generation immigrant, he is a born and bred Marxist who is committed to the replacement of a sovereign Great Britain with a communist run United States of Europe. In line with his creed, he is opposed to the British people having a referendum on their future.

Next is the infamous Tony Blair, another Scotsman and committed Europhile. A growing number of British people consider Blair to be a war criminal for taking Great Britain into an illegal war with Iraq which cost hundreds of thousands of lives.

The refusal of the government, both British and American, to release the findings of the Chilcott inquiry into the Iraq war is considered by many to be the political establishment looking after one of its own.

Then comes Nick Clegg. The leader of the ridiculously named Liberal Democrat party is another Great Britain hating first generation immigrant who's dedication to the United States of Europe is legendary. Clegg also believes that the British people should not have a say on EU membership via a referendum.

Next to Clegg is former Prime Minister John  Major, a committed Europhile who signed the Maastricht Treaty. This more than any other treaty effectively ended Great Britain as an independent country thus giving away what Our Glorious Dead made the ultimate sacrifice to preserve. He did this without consulting the people first or giving them a referendum.

On the right is Cameron, the current leader of the movement dedicated to the replacement of the independent nation states of Europe with a post democratic federal super state.

The appearance of these politicians at the Cenotaph desecrates the monument and makes a mockery of the Remembrance ceremony.

It is worth noting that it's impossible to differentiate between the malign intentions of these six British politicians with those of the Norwegian politician and traitor Vidkun Quisling. Like Quisling they are surrendering their country to foreign rule to the detriment of the people they are supposed to be representing.

I would add in conclusion that there is one particular British politician that ranks alongside Abraham Lincoln in the annals of history and he had something to say about Quislings and those that tried to destroy the nation states of Europe.

Watch the must see video here.          

The Working Class Can Kiss My A*se - The Labour Party Speaks

The rather rude headline comprises the alternative words to the communist anthem The Red Flag, the singing of which signals the closing of the Labour Party conference. This jamboree is an annual stage managed media event which is designed to give the impression that millionaires and wealthy career politicians have selflessly dedicated their lives to the well being of the working class. They try, unsuccessfully, to identify with working people by contrived working class behavior, laughable fake accents and class warfare rhetoric.

When I was growing up in the South Wales coalfield the Labour Party conference used to be a long awaited event and I assume it was the same in the other declining industrial areas of Great Britain. It was the annual showpiece where party policy, party officials and the party leadership were decided in open elections by representatives from the constituency parties, the trade unions and other affiliated organisations.

These conferences were televised allowing the public at large to watch the proceedings and become familiar with the processes and language of the working man's party. Those were days when 'motions' were read out before the delegates, including things called 'composite motions', a device where several different motions were rolled into one before the debate. After a succession of speakers for and against, the motions were put to the vote and became official party policy if so decided. The proceedings were interspersed with 'fraternal greetings' from well wishers and delegates addressed each other as 'comrade'.

The proceedings were, and still are, brought to a close with the traditional singing of The Red Flag by the delegates and officials.

Like every other aspect of modern politics the recently concluded Labour Party conference was stage managed from beginning to end by professional media mangers, not to decide what's right for the country or the British people but to give the impression that the political class actually cares what the people think and then making promises to act accordingly.

Every detail of the charade is choreographed and every speech carefully constructed by spin doctors to give the impression that the speaker identifies, and has empathy with, working people.

Despite the fact that the usual soundbites and slogans were repeated ad nauseum by speaker after speaker, the idea that the modern Labour Party is the party of the working man is not only risible but utterly delusional.

The spin doctors favourite words and soundbites such as; Fairness, Equality, Inequality, Working People, Hard Working People, Hard Working Families, Social Justice, Your NHS, Our NHS, The Rich etc. were trotted out in gay abandon in a shameless attempt to stir up envy and hatred using class warfare rhetoric.
(Equality article here)

It was obvious to all and sundry that these speeches, which are designed to appeal to the assumed prejudices of working people, are delivered by extremely wealthy career politicians who have never had a job in the real world that any normal person would consider as work.

The highlight of the conference is the speech by the party leader. The current leader of the working man's party is comrade Ed Miliband, better known as Red Ed.

Ed Miliband is the millionaire son of the late Marxist academic Adolph 'Ralph' Miliband, a Belgian immigrant who was given sanctuary during World War II. After the war he went on to spend his life agitating for Great Britain's downfall and its subsequent replacement with a Soviet style communist country.

It is worth noting at this point the professionalism and dedication of Labour's media managers and their eye for detail. With an eye on the optics for Miliband's speech, they evicted the disabled delegates from the front of the auditorium and replaced them with more telegenic people. So much for the poor, the downtrodden and the disadvantaged.

His speech was a dreadful dirge of politic speak that is typical of a remote career politician, especially one who's life long dedication to doctrinaire Marxism has left him devoid of any personality or any capacity for original thinking. It didn't go unnoticed that apart from the soundbites mentioned above he failed to address, or even mention, what concerns working people most. i.e. the deficit, the EU, open border mass immigration and imposed multi-culturalism.
(Speech transcript here)

He also failed to make any reference to the Muslim paedophile scandals in Rotherham, Rochdale and other blighted towns despite nationwide publicity and national outrage. Muslim men were allowed to groom and subject underage white girls to rape and horrific sexual abuse unhindered by the Labour controlled authorities including the children's social services and the police.

These young victims lives were supposedly sacrificed in the interests of 'community cohesion' - in other words Ed Miliband's Labour Party allowed under age white girls to be raped and sexually abused by Muslim men because the imposition of a so called 'multi-cultural society' took a higher priority.

The iconic line from the anthem, 'When cowards flinch and traitors sneer' applies to Ed Miliband and the Labour leadership in spades. How can any politician, let alone a party leader who aspires to become Prime Minister, not mention this scandal,  the deficit or the catastrophic national debt in his headline conference speech? He also made no mention of an EU referendum that the people demand or any controls on the mass immigration that is blighting every village, town and city across the country.

He had no tangible policy to tackle radical Islam or the British documented jihadis who are returning from the Middle East battlefields and who are obviously a clear and present danger to the British people.

It came as no surprise to those who gave up Red Ed's brand of left wing politics when they reached puberty that he did promise the only policy that the one track mind of a life long Marxist can muster.  That is tax and spend. Regardless of the disastrous record of the last Labour government, he promised to raise taxation in order to pump even more money into 'our' NHS and elsewhere.

It would appear that the one hundred or so new taxes imposed by the last Labour government were not quite enough.

They want to impose a 'Mansion Tax' on expensive houses, more tax on tobacco products, raising the upper rate to fifty percent and once again for the umpteenth time, a tax on bankers bonuses.

The Mansion tax is a spiteful, ill thought out piece of class warfare designed to appeal to base instincts of his core voters. It fails to take into account that his victims could be asset rich and cash poor due to the unprecedented house price boom of the seventies and eighties.
(Mansion tax here)

The consequences of even more tax on tobacco will result in more people giving it up or moving to the black market, either way tax revenue will decrease.

Raising the upper tax rate to fifty percent is another spiteful piece of class warfare which every student in basic economics knows will decrease revenue to the Treasury.

Taxing the bonuses of the evil bankers is an old favourite which is rolled out whenever they want to galvanise their core voters. This is the fifth or so Labour Party social program that is going to be financed by bankers bonuses.

Whichever way the media managers and spin doctors present it, Labour Party policy has Marxism as its underlying core philosophy. Despite the evidence of history that communism/socialism, or progressivism as they now call it, always leads to poverty and misery for the majority, the transfer of wealth from the private sector to the politicians is the only policy they know.

The alternative lyrics to The Red Flag could have been penned especially for the Labour Party leadership of recent years. In spite of all the rhetoric about fairness, inequality and the rest of the nonsense they spout, when the Labour Party leadership talk about the redistribution of wealth they mean everyone else's which doesn't include their own.

Despite his Marxist beliefs and redistribution rhetoric, Ed Miliband is reputed to be worth some four million pounds. Un-redistributed, this fortune can only grow larger with his taxpayer funded package of ministerial level salary, allowances and expenses.

In conclusion it is worth looking at some of the previous leaders of the working man's party and their much trumpeted dedication to equality, fairness, social justice and the redistribution of wealth.

Hard line Scottish socialist Gordon Brown, the former Prime Minister and Red Ed's mentor and predecessor. His socialist policies wrecked the British economy in the name of fairness and social

justice. Rightly booted out of office he remains the MP for Kilkaldy and Cowdenbeath. He rarely attends Parliament but jet sets around the world, First Class no doubt, as some kind of UN ambassador. He subsidises the circa two million he makes from his charitable activities with his Parliamentary salary and generous expenses.

The story goes that most of his earnings go to charity but this cannot be verified. Either way he lives like a lord compared to his disenfranchised, poor and downtrodden constituents in Kilkaldy and Cowdenbeath.

Neil, now Lord Kinnock, the former Labour Party leader and career politician who, together with his wife Glenys, somehow managed to accumulate a ten million pound fortune. This is despite the fact that he never won a general election and had no experience in the business or wealth creating sector. Meanwhile their former constituents in South East Wales wallow in the same poverty and deprivation they suffered during the pre Kinnock era.
(Neil Kinnock story here, Glenys story here)

These money makers pale into insignificance compared to Tony Blair. Known as Phony Tony, he is another career politician who infamously stated that he "came to socialism via Marxism". He has accumulated a fortune estimated between twenty and one hundred million pounds. Like Kinnock, Miliband and Brown he has no experience in the business or wealth creating sector and appears to have no intention of putting into practice his philosophy by redistributing his wealth.



                It suits today the weak and base

                                                       Who's minds are fixed with pelf and place*

                                                       To cringe before the rich mans crown

                                                       And haul the sacred emblem down

This kind of hypocrisy has not gone unnoticed by the long suffering British public who have grown tired of their standard of living falling while being patronized by millionaires promising equality and fairness. Along with the other two legacy parties, Labour are scared witless by the rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party, known as UKIP.
(Labour's response to UKIP here)

Two of the reasons that this grass roots political party is resonating with the public is their use of honest straight talk instead of spin, centrally issued soundbites and slogans combined with the total absence of a*se kissing.

The Red Flag lyrics here.

The Alternative Red Flag lyrics here

Red Ed sings here

Great Britain Surrenders Without A Shot Fired - November 2014

 

                                                            

 

Known as the Compiegne or Foch Railcar, students of history will recognize it as the one Adolf Hitler used in an act of humiliation to house the signing of the French surrender during World War II. Its the same railcar that the French used to house the German surrender after World War I.

 

The French surrender in June 1940 saw the formation of Vichy France whereby a puppet government led by Marshal Petain and Pierre Laval, assisted by various other traitors and collaborators, was set up to rule on behalf of their German masters.

On November 1st 2014 the insidious Nice and Lisbon Treaties come into effect in Great Britain after which forty three crucial areas of legislative authority will be surrendered from the democratically elected representatives of the people to the unelected, unaccountable, unsackable bureaucrats of the EU.

These areas include:

Border controls

Immigration, Asylum

Criminal Law

Foreign Affairs

Defence

Energy

and most notable, the ability for member states to withdraw from the Union.
(See full list and opinions here and here)

British politicians under the guise of various treaties have surrendered so much sovereignty already that seventy five percent of British laws come from the EU, reducing the Westminster Parliament to a rubber stamp. The surrendering of what remains will effectively end Great Britain's status as an independent sovereign state and with it over a thousand years of history.

It is undeniable that the current EU is dominated by Germany, assisted by a craven France and an unholy alliance of Great Britain's historical enemies. Anyone watching the proceedings of the EU cannot fail to notice the animosity and vitriol directed at some of Great Britain's representatives. This can be confirmed by the voting record which has read twenty six to zero against Great Britain in the past.

These historical enemies would like nothing more than to see a once great Britain reduced to a vassal state or a minor province paying tribute to a United States of Europe which is controlled by a German-French axis.

No nation that has over seventy five percent of its laws made by a foreign entity and who is about to surrender control of the forty three critical areas linked above, can call itself an independent, sovereign nation. It is, in effect, the death of the democratically governed nation state and the birth of a authoritarian tyranny governed by appointed bureaucrats.

This excersise in nation building has been well planned and built without the consent of the subject peoples. Consultation and referendums have been routinely denied and where they have been held due to constitutional requirements, unfavourable results have been ignored with the project progressing regardless.

The political class are well aware that the EU has been a complete and utter disaster for the British people with an ever increasing number wanting an exit. It was with this in mind that the then British Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, in an act of cowardice that wouldn't have been amiss in the railway car at Compiegne, sent his Foriegn Secretary, David Miliband, to sign the initial surrender document known as the Lisbon Treaty.

When he thought the heat had died down and the twenty four hour news cycle had moved on, Gordon Brown, who is renown for his cowardice in the face of adversity, snuck in to Brussels like a thief in the night to add his signature to the surrender document.

 General Charles Huntzinger signs the surrender document aboard the railcar at Compiegne 

 

 

                                                                     

Too cowardly to take his seat, Prime Minister Gordon Brown signs the Lisbon Treaty surrender document in a broom cupboard somewhere in Brussels.

To borrow a phrase from President Franklin Roosevelt, November 2014 "is a date that will live in infamy" as it marks the end of Great Britain as an independent sovereign state and it brings to a close over a thousand years of history. This treachery was achieved by lies, deceit and without a shot being fired.

Footnote to this article: It is worth noting that after the liberation of France and the regaining of its status as an independent, sovereign nation, several official and unofficial purges of collaborators took place. Between 1948 and 1952 some six thousand collaborators were executed before liberation and some four thousand after.

One hundred and twenty thousand collaborators were prosecuted with one thousand five hundred death sentences handed down. The leader of the Vichy government Marshal Petain had his death sentence commuted by Charles De Gaulle. The Prime Minister Pierre Laval was not so fortunate, he was put up against a wall and shot. 



 

 

Scorched Earth - Cynical Tactic That Hurts People For Political Advantage

Scorched Earth is a tactic normally associated with military campaigns where armies destroy anything that could be useful to the enemy during an advance or retreat. The tactic itself is nothing new and was used by the ancient Greeks, the Romans and the Vikings. Infamous uses of this tactic in more modern times include Sherman's March to the Sea during the American Civil War, Lord Kitchener during the Boer War and Hitler's retreat from Russia during World War II.

I have deliberately omitted Saddam Hussein's destruction of the oilfields during his retreat from Kuwait as there was no shortage of oil for the coalition troops therefore Kuwaiti oil was superfluous to the campaign. This destruction was not only an act of spite but also of pure evil designed to hurt the Kuwaiti people and make the reconstruction of their country more difficult than it otherwise would have been.

By their very nature scorched earth tactics hurt civilian populations the most but this fact is never taken into consideration when the implementation decision is made.

In the political arena scorched earth has now become a weapon that is being increasingly deployed, not in the interests of the people but to gain political advantage by cynical, agenda-driven politicians over perceived enemies.

It is worth taking a brief look at how scorched earth came to be a tactic and the reasons that engendered its common use today in both Great Britain and the USA.

At the end of World War II it was decided that Great Britain was a spent force with an Imperial past that rendered it a bad influence during the construction of the modern post war world. It was agreed that Great Britain would enter a period of 'managed decline' until its influence was decreased and its status no higher than that of its former colonies.

Things were progressing as planned until the arrival of Margaret Thatcher who opposed the 'managed decline' project but believed that Great Britain, with its history and free enterprise system, still had plenty to offer the modern world. It must be remembered that Thatcher's rise to power was enabled by voters from all sections of society including the working class, trade unionists, rich and poor alike.

The 'managed decline' project was halted in its tracks and those responsible for its implementation were cast into the political wilderness for thirteen years.

During those thirteen years the believers in 'managed decline' planned their return and made their political calculations to implement their project irrevocably and to such a degree that another Thatcher would be powerless to halt its progress and final implementation.

The election of Tony Blair's Labour government in 1997 signaled the restart of the project with a time table and contingency based on electoral calculations.

a) The assumption was that Blair would only get two five year terms therefore the project had to be completed and made irreversible during that time.

b) Should the project not be irreversible by that time, a scorched earth policy would be put in place that would make it impossible for an incoming government to operate without making itself so unpopular it would be limited to a single term.

History shows us that it was indeed Blair's second term where the scorched earth policy was deployed with complete disregard for the economy, the country and the wellbeing of the people. The policy was embarked upon with the ruthlessness of Sherman and Kitchener and with the malice of Saddam Hussein.

The government spending flood gates were opened and the public sector expanded beyond recognition; government borrowing and debt reached record levels. Pension schemes were willfully wrecked and government assets, including gold reserves, airports, utility companies and all the remaining major industries were sold off leaving the Treasury empty and the nations credit card maxed out.

The borders were thrown open to anyone without checks, regardless of any criminal past and with a total disregard for the views or the wellbeing of the British people.

Incorporating the European Human Rights Act into British law was an integral part of the scorched earth policy as it made it virtually impossible to deport anyone and for all intents and purposes acted as an amnesty.

Unpredictably, Blair secured a third term which was marred by a succession battle with his Chancellor Gordon Brown. He lost the battle leaving the British people at the mercy of an unstable misogynist with a visceral hatred of anyone he perceived as an enemy.

It was a racing certainty that he would not get another term resulting in Brown pursuing Blair's scorched earth with renewed vigour. He increased welfare entitlements and made them available to all and sundry including immigrants and their children who may never have set foot in Great Britain.

His biggest crime was signing the Lisbon Treaty which surrendered whole new areas of  British sovereignty to the EU bureaucrats without first giving the people the referendum which he had made a solemn promise to give.

The wreckage of Great Britain and the state that the people find themselves in today was avoidable, it is primarily the result of a deliberate scorched earth policy embarked upon by the Blair/Brown governments to render the 'managed decline' project irreversible and to make the country impossible to govern. It was calculated that any incoming government would have to make unpopular decisions and subsequently be limited to a single term.

Looking at events in the USA, it is more than obvious that President Obama is following a similar agenda to Blair and Brown, although unlike the his two British counterparts he did signal his malign intention to 'fundamentally transform' America in advance.

The decline of the USA has been spectacular and in many ways it has outpaced Great Britain. Obama is the American equivalent of Tony Blair on steroids. The decline is there for the whole world to see.

The Constitution limits Obama to two terms and it is not guaranteed that he will be followed by a fellow supporter of America's decline. He is embarking on a scorched earth policy that makes Tony Blair's effort look mild by comparison.

By the time he leaves office the American people and future generations will be saddled with insurmountable debt. At time of writing it is already a mind boggling seventeen trillion dollars with two more years of spending to go.

He is deliberately orchestrating a tsunami of immigration both legal and illegal and refuses to implement the law to stem the flow. This tsunami is getting ever bigger with the promise of an amnesty.

He is increasing welfare benefits and extending entitlements to all and sundry including illegals.

He has wrecked the health care system and saddled the country with an unworkable bureaucracy that will eventually wreck the economy.

He has increased the powers of the Environmental Protection Agency to the point where it has gone rogue and operates outside the restraints of Congress.

He is dismantling the mighty American military machine and making deals with the Taliban. This has the effect of emboldening its enemies both at home and abroad.

He has bypassed Congress and he now rules by Executive decree.

This is not an exhaustive list but merely an example of what President Obama is up to.

I will add in conclusion that this is by no means the end for the American people, their spectacular decline will continue apace until they wake up and smell the coffee. They are being destroyed by malignant forces from within. Learn from the British experience and don't let it happen to you.



         

Tony Blair Wheeled Out To Defend EU - Claims A Sovereign Great Britain Is Regressive

With the humiliating defeat handed out by the British people to the three legacy parties it was inevitable that the political establishment would adopt desperate measures to preserve their century old grip on power.

To the horror of the LibLabCon party hierarchies, the overwhelming success of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) was achieved in spite of a vicious coordinated campaign of vilification and smear by the entire government-media complex.

The worry for the old political order is compounded by the fact that UKIP's success will inspire the other disenfranchised peoples across Europe, who have been impoverished by the cabal of unelected, unsackable bureaucrats, to cast off the chains that bind them and fight for the restoration of their respective democracies.

The revolt against the smug, metropolitan elite is the biggest threat the EU has faced since the British people were seduced into joining the then Common Market with a continuous tissue of lies about the true intention to build a federal superstate.

More worrying for the self serving political class is that the end of the EU monster will also bring to an end the taxpayer funded gravy train and with it the prospects of a lucrative sinecure that has made millionaires out of their predecessors no matter how incompetent and destructive they have been.

With the British people in open revolt and the disenfranchised peoples of Europe emboldened by the success of UKIP, who better for the old political order to wheel out and defend the indefensible than former Prime Minister, Tony Blair.

They could have heeled out Peter, now Lord, Mandelson, or the ennobled Neil and Glenys Kinnock but these unwholesome characters are a living embodiment of the corrupt entity that allows career politicians with no experience in business or wealth creation to become millionaires virtually overnight.

Tony Blair's appearance on the political scene has highlighted several facts about the old establishment that if properly articulated to the British people should act as a recruiting tool for UKIP and help it make bigger inroads into the traditional Labour heartlands.

Tony Blair is a congenital liar who hoodwinked his Labour supporters about his dedication to their wellbeing and that of the British people. At the same time he masked his intention to destroy their unique Anglo-Saxon culture and replace it with a mythical 'multi-cultural' society.

With this intervention Tony Blair is continuing where his campaigners left off by smearing UKIP and its supporters, including those in the Labour heartlands as "pretty nasty and unpleasant".

He demonstrated his contempt for the British people, including Labour supporters, by urging his party's elite not to allow the people a say in their future by denying them an In/Out referendum on EU membership.
Only Tony Blair and the political elite know what's best for the British people who are obviously too stupid to decide their own future.

Blair really does think the British people are stupid and Labour voters particularly so. He urged the old political establishment to "ignore the people on immigration - swinging to the right will only 'confuse' Labour voters". Obviously Labour voters are easily confused and incapable of making up their own minds about mass immigration.

The next quote is revealing in that it confirms that Blair is part of a supranational elite who have analysed Great Britain and decided that its existence as an independent sovereign state is regressive, reactionary and over.

With reference to UKIP, Tony Blair says that:

"What they are putting before the people is a set of solutions that anybody who analyses a country like Britain has to be in the twenty first century knows they are solutions that are regressive, reactionary and would make all the problems of the country worse not better".

One would have thought that Blair would have put his analysis before the people so that they can decide but this is the post democratic age and only Tony know what's best.

It's worth asking what Blair means when he says that UKIP'S solutions "would make all the problems of the country worse not better".

After thirteen years of unfettered Labour rule both locally and nationally, what problems could he possibly be referring to?

Could it be economic stagnation and lack of growth or out of control deficit spending and debt?  It was his government that opened the floodgates, expanded the public sector and introduced over one hundred new taxes.

Could it be the catastrophic collapse of educational standards? It was his government that dumbed down the curriculum, did away with competitive sport and introduced an 'all must have prizes mentality'.

Could it be the breakdown of social order and the wanton destruction of indigenous communities that have existed for centuries? It was him and his government that opened the borders to mass immigration with the pre-planned intention of destroying the traditional Great Britain and replacing it with an unwanted, unasked for 'multi-cultural' society. His intention also was to "rub the rights noses in diversity".

It's also interesting to note that Blair is talking about Great Britain in the twenty first century when he himself, together with Red Ed Miliband, the current leader of his Labour party, are disciples of Karl Marx, a nineteenth century philosopher who's perverted economic system has failed wherever it has been imposed and is responsible for the deaths of over one hundred million people.

If proof were needed that Blair is not an inhabitant of the real word, he is actually saying that Marxism is 'progressive'. Many people who do live in the real world would love be Marxists like Blair but they are too busy working for a living.

What he is also suggesting is that the creation of thousands of mono-cultural, crime ridden, welfare addicted ghettos is 'progressive' and essential for economic growth and the future prosperity of the British people. He obviously hasn't been a recent visitor to Tower Hamlets, Mosside, Manchester, St Paul's, Bristol, Rothertham, Rochdale or any of the thousands of communities that have been blighted as a result of his open border mass immigration policy.

The people of Great Britain should be reminded, just in case they are tempted to heed the words of Blair:

This is the same Tony Blair that wrecked the British economy and the best funded pension schemes in the world thus ruining the retirement plans and lives of millions of his countrymen and women.

This is the bloodsoaked Tony Blair who is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi men, women and children not to mention the lives of British military personnel.

This is the same Tony Blair who claimed that he "came to socialism via Marxism" who is now a multi-millionaire who seeks the company of the rich and famous and who wouldn't be seen dead with a member of the working class.

This is the same Tony Blair that dumped the unstable, misogynist Gordon Brown onto the British people and who then proceeded to embark upon a scorched earth policy from which the country is yet to recover.

Many people after thirteen years of wanton destruction wish Tony Blair would stay away and spare them any more of his perverted views but many will see his intervention as an opportunity to remind the British of his destruction and use him as a recruiting tool for UKIP and their noble attempt to get their country back.



    

Gordon Brown's Gold Heist - Fourteen Years And Still No Arrest.

The term 'would you buy a used car' from ex British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, is employed because his trustworthiness and competence are questionable. After his sale of century gold auction in 1999 the answer must be a resounding yes.

It is universally agreed that Brown's gold sale at the bottom of the market plus the announcement of his intentions in advance was the biggest blunder in British economic history, so on that basis one would probably get a cracking deal on a used car.

A big news item this morning was the decade long buy up of 570 tonnes of gold bullion by President Putin's Russia that coincides with the fourteenth anniversary of Gordon Brown's sale of nearly 400 tonnes of Great Britain's gold reserves and almost thirty years since the infamous Brinks Matt gold bullion heist at London's Heathrow Airport in 1984.

If this news is coupled with the German governments decision to repatriate its gold reserves from France and Fort Knox, then financial laymen can deduce that something is imminent with the worlds markets.

The British should have more cause for concern than other nations because of Brown's incompetence and his dedication to a socialist ideology. This will ensure that any further shocks to the global economy will have a bigger effect in Great Britain than in other advanced economies.

As Chancellor of the Exchequer and Prime Minister, Brown doubled the national debt during his tenure and his reckless spending of taxpayers money racked up the biggest deficit in peacetime history

Together with his fellow ideologues, Ed Balls and Red Ed Miliband, he looted the private sector pension funds to the point where the schemes are closed down to new employees and they will close altogether when the last member kicks the bucket.

Gordon Brown and his two boot boys, Balls and Miliband, are labelled deficit deniers for their absolute refusal to acknowledge the consequences of their incompetence.

Even his own minister, the well respected Frank Field, compared these three crooks with the appeasers of the 1930's who claimed there was no threat from Hitler.

In a final act of utter asinine banality, the outgoing socialist Chief Secretary to the Treasury, the follicley challenged ignoramus Liam Byrne, left a note for the incoming Secretary making fun of the fact that there was "no money left, good luck". 

This note is also an admittance that they knew they had bankrupted the country and that it was a deliberate scorched earth policy to make it impossible for any incoming government to clean it up in a single term. To these socialist fanatics, politics comes before people every time.

For those readers who are not familiar with the current political situation in Great Britain, Red Ed Miliband is leader of the Labour Party and his fellow incompetent and political thug Ed Balls is his Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer.

Gordon Brown was re-elected by the useful idiots of Kilcaldy and Cowdenbeath who's interests he ignores by not attending Parliament and by spending his time gallivanting around the world making millions from the contacts he made while in office.

In addition to these millions, he claims the maximum amount of taxpayer funded allowances and expenses for his non attendance in Parliament.

Due to the incompetence of the current office holders, David 'Call Me Dave' Cameron and George Osbourne, if an election were to be held in the near future, Labour would win and the two Ed's would be in a position to finish the job of destruction started by Phony Tony Blair and Gordon Brown in 1997.

As Great Britain enters its triple dip recession with the Treasury empty, the pension funds looted and half of the gold reserves given away by Brown, the current government have found the solution to the looming crisis of long term care for the elderly.

They plan to break their election promise on inheritance tax and charge motorists $240 per year to drive on the roads previously owned by the taxpayer but flogged off to their cronies in the private sector. Heaven forbid that they would ever consider cutting spending.

The Brown gold heist cost the British taxpayers in the region of $16 billion and he got away Scot free, while 'Little Britain' actor Peter Dixon was sent to jail for cheating the taxpayer out of $12,160 in false benefit claims.

While sentencing, Judge Gibson told Dixon "You were calculating and you showed serious disregard to the public who funded your dishonest claims".

I am looking forward to a front row seat on the day when Gordon Brown meets Judge Gibson in his courtroom.

In conclusion, an explanation for Russia's behavior in the gold markets was given by Evgeny Federov, a lawmaker for President Putin's United Russia Party. Take note all you Europhiles and Federalists.

"the more gold a country has, the more sovereignty it will have if there's a cataclysm with the dollar, the euro, the pound or any other reserve currency".

Europe Goes Over The Fiscal Cliff, Guilty Men Go Free

Honest and responsible people when considering whether to make a purchase such as a house, a car or a new refrigerator are obliged to take time out in order to analyse their financial position.

This analysis revolves around the individuals' monthly income and expenditure eventually hinging on borrowing together with the affordability of loan repayments.

This also applies to businesses from the smallest convenience store to the biggest corporations. Every aspect of the balance sheet and the finances are investigated and all the possible assumptions and projections are factored into the calculation. Whatever the case, the laws of arithmetic will always apply and however much a particular product is desired, if it doesn't fit the financial analysis then the purchase is not made or a more affordable alternative is sought.

There are alternatives ways to acquire the products we may desire such as stealing them, stealing the money to buy them or by borrowing the money outside the rules of arithmetic regardless of the consequences. Such behaviour as we know, is irresponsible, dishonest and in many cases illegal.

In most cases there is no physical harm done and the amounts of money are relatively small but there are victims and they deserve to see the perpetrators brought to justice.

People and business owners engaging in such behaviour are punished either by fines and penalties or sanctions such as being disbarred from running a business and in some cases transgressors have been sentenced to prison.

Politicians engaging in such behaviour, and worse, are rarely punished, in fact the opposite is often true, they are rewarded with a non job which usually attracts a taxpayer funded salary with accompanying allowances and expenses or they are allowed to retire with their gold plated, index linked, taxpayer funded pensions the size of which is beyond the comprehension of the average elector they represent.

Despite being surrounded by the devastation they have caused politicians often carry on in their current position as if nothing as happened.

In the previous article it was revealed how 'progressive' career politician George Papandreou, the man who ignored the arithmetic in order to impose his perverted socialist ideology on the Greek people, destroyed the economy and impoverished the whole nation is now feted around the world as a wise elder statesman.

Perversely, George Papandreou has been appointed as a lecturer at the prestigious Harvard University in the USA lecturing students on debt and governance!

Greece and Papandreou was not an isolated case so the following is an update on the other incompetent politicians who's economic crimes are as bad if not worse than Papandreou and who also got away with their wanton destruction unpunished.

Great Britains' Gordon Brown and his thuggish enforcer Ed Balls were responsible for the unfunded expansion of the state, increasing borrowing beyond what the nation could afford and increasing the national debt to such an extent that future generations will be stuck with consequences long after Brown and Balls have met their maker.

When Gordon Brown was Chancellor of the Exchequer and sidekick Balls was Treasury Secretary they continually preached prudence while they were emptying the coffers. They repeated the claim that they had abolished boom and bust right up until the day that the economy went..... er.. bust.

They expanded welfare entitlements and made them available to ever more people while taxing the British people to saturation point. Their incompetence is as bad if not worse than the hapless Papandreou. To cap it all, like George the Greek, they are both hard left uncompromising socialists.

Gordon Brown was kicked out of office but remains a Member of Parliament and continues to claim his MP's salary, allowances and expenses even though he doesn't attend the House. It has been a year since he last spoke in the House and his absence has effectively disenfranchised his constituents who are currently without democratic representation.

Gordon Brown travels the world making huge amounts of money by using the contacts he acquired while in Office. His earnings are channelled into his private company where they remain opaque to scrutiny from the people and the tax inspectors.

Gordon Brown the uncompromising socialist and scourge of the wealthy is on course to becoming one of the millionaires he claims to despise.

Ed Balls remains an MP and is the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer. He is married to Shadow Home Secretary Evette Cooper, so with their combined taxpayer funded ministerial salaries, allowances and expenses they are seriously rich.

They are rich enough not to suffer from the consequences of their socialist policies that have impoverished the people they claim to represent.

Staying true to his socialist ideology Ed Balls opposes any policy which seeks to put right the damage he has done and he openly campaigns for more tax, borrow, spend and debt. If a general election were to be held tomorrow the polls indicate that in an act of suicidal stupidity the British people would elect the Labour Party into office and Ed Balls would take back control of the economy.

                               ...............................................................................................

The descent of Ireland into bankruptcy and poverty was engineered by *Brian 'Biffo' Cowen, a boozer and pot smoker who was part of a political family which included his father and brother. As previously reported 'Biffo' Cowen ignored the rules of arithmetic and went on an unprecedented spending spree, spraying taxpayers on welfare entitlements and tax cuts in a successful attempt to bribe the voters.

He also increased the pay and perks of Irish legislators to the point where they were the highest paid in Euroland. As Biffo well knew this was financed by borrowing that would impoverish the Irish people for generations.

Biffo's punishment consists of spending more time with his family financed by a gold plated, taxpayer funded pension of $215,000 per year. The prevailing wisdom is that Biffo will lay low for a while before returning to public life and the gravy train.

(* I have been reliably informed that the initials BIFFO stand for Big Ingnorant F*cker From O'Falley)

                                ................................................................................................

Italian politics has been mired in corruption for as long as anyone can remember and its only contribution to the global political scene is to provide us all with entertainment. Italy's reputation as an international laughing stock was confirmed with the election of multi billionaire entrepreneur and playboy Silvio Berlisconi as their Prime Minister.

His time in office has been mired in scandal and the list of alleged crimes and misdemeanors include:

Abuse of office, Mafia collusion, false accounting, tax fraud, bribery, procuring under age girls for sex etc.

Observers of the political scene consider this to be standard behaviour for all modern politicians and in Italy it is positively an electoral advantage.

While Berlisconi was busy enjoying his wealth and celebrity his government was borrowing and spending Italy into bankruptcy racking up debts of 121% of GDP. The irony is that if Berlisconi ran his business enterprises like he ran the Italian economy he would be destitute.

Berlisconi was removed from office in a European Union coup and replaced by a Gauleiter. He is currently enjoying his billions but has indicated he is planning to stand for office in the next election.

                              ...............................................................................................

The Spanish economic performance was proceeding normally but started to head south in 2004 with the election of Jose Zapatero of the Spanish Socialist Workers Party. While his government was busy ignoring the economic arithmetic and spending Spain to the edge of bankruptcy, Zapatero was busy with the global socialist priorities of removing Spanish troops from Iraq, continuing the war on tobacco and legislating for homosexual marriage.

Zapatero did not stand for re-election in 2011 but remains on the political scene as a member of the Spanish Council of State which is a consultative body for the government.

                            .................................................................................................

Any analysis of the mismanagement of European national economies can not be completed without scrutiny of the European Union and its leaders.

Briefly, the EU was the idea of post war 'progressive' politicians who dreamt of a socialist federal superstate that would compete with, and ultimately destroy, the hated United States of America together with its free enterprise system based on individual liberty and prosperity.

The EU is based on the old soviet model where power is centralised and used to control all aspects of life, public, private and economic. The EU bureaucracy churns out thousands of regulations every day to achieve this end.

The EU autocrats also believe that the transferring of sovereignty by stealth year on year will facilitate the eventual destruction of the nation states and lead to their goal of 'ever closer union' toward the superstate of their dreams.

The current leaders of this autocracy are the President of the European Parliament the life long German socialist thug Martin Shultz, the President of the European Commission, Portuguese autocrat and self confessed Maoist Jose Manuel Barosso and the President of the European Council the sinister Belgian totalitarian Herman von Rumpoy.

These three autocrats enjoy powerful positions that gives them control over the lives of half a billion people and yet none of them are elected and they cannot be removed electorally by the people they govern.

On the economic front the European Union is such a cesspit of corruption that its own accounts have not been signed off by the auditors for nineteen straight years.

In spite of this corruption and the fact that the European countries are suffering from economic collapse, insolvency, poverty and budget deficits,  these three autocrats insist on growing the budget by substantially increasing the contributions paid by the member states.

The logic of these three lunatics is beyond comprehension.

They are insisting that the bankrupt countries who borrowed and spent themselves into oblivion and who are forced as a result to impose severe austerity programmes at home are being ordered to borrow more money and hand it over to the institutionally corrupt European Union which has not had its accounts signed off for nineteen years!

This insanity will drive these indebted countries further into poverty and for a longer period. It appears that the suffering of people of Europe will not come between these autocrats and  their nation building agenda.

To the suffering people of Europe all of these politicians are no better than criminals who have escaped not only justice, but the consequences of their financially incontinent behaviour.

We can only live in hope that one day justice will prevail and they will be held responsible for the devastation they have caused.