The coordinated campaign by the political elite to smear the new kids on the block, who are threatening to end their decades long hold on power, is moving from the hysterical to the downright laughable.
The popularity of the United Kingdom Independence Party, UKIP, has put the fear of God into this corrupt political elite to the point where their desperation to make the charge of 'racist' stick is exposing their hypocrisy for all to see.
UKIP leader, Nigel Farage, spoke the truth when being goaded and browbeaten by hostile LBC radio show host James O'Brien when he indicated that it is mainly Romanian immigrants that are responsible for the crime wave that is blighting the lives of the British people and that he would prefer to have German, as opposed to Romanian, neighbours.
The modus operandi of the media during this campaign has been to seize on any remark that refers to a nationality and distort in order to portray UKIP and Nigel Farage as racist. On orders from their political masters the editor and so called 'journalists' of the popular Daily Mail newspaper led the charge, assuming that the public will have forgotten their previous articles on the scourge of Romanian immigrants that are trashing some of London's most iconic landmarks and causing havoc among communities in some of Great Britain's cities, including other settled immigrant communities.
Here is a Daily Mail report on the seven hundred and fifty foreign criminals including violent robbers, rapists, drug dealers and killers, who are on the streets of Great Britain because the EU will not allow the government to deport them. Is the Daily Mail guilty of stirring up animosity against foreigners or reporting the truth like Nigel Farage?
Read the Daily Mail's report on Romanian beggars in London and decide if Nigel Farage's comments are justified or is he being a racist.
This is a Daily Mail report on a Roma gang who used young girls as sex slaves subjecting them to horrific sexual abuse. Read this and decide if Nigel Farage is speaking the truth or being racist.
Another Daily Mail report on the how the influx of Roma from Slovakia are blighting the lives of people in Sheffield to such an extent that the former Labour Home Secretary, David Blunkett is warning of race riots. It must be remembered that David Blunkett was a senior member of Tony Blair's government that opened the borders to all and sundry in the first place.
This Daily Mail report highlights the fact that one in four serious crimes in Great Britain are committed by foreigners.
Read these articles and decide not only if Nigel Farage was speaking the truth or being a racist but would you prefer to have these people or Germans as your neighbours?
These articles are proof, if any were needed, that the Daily Mail is rife with hypocrisy and is playing its part along with the rest of the media in the coordinated campaign of insult and smear against UKIP and Nigel Farage.
The Daily Mail, the BBC and the rest of the media are claiming that they are only doing their duty by subjecting the policies and candidates of UKIP to scrutiny - in a proper functioning democracy this would be the right thing to do but the ad hominem personal attacks and attempts at portraying UKIP and Nigel Farage as racist is anything but scrutiny.
Compare the pathetically soft treatment of Labour supporting drug abuser and pervert, Paul Flowers by the BBC's supposed attack dog, Jeremy Paxman with his indignant sneering at Nigel Farage.
It must be borne in mind that Methodist preacher Reverend Paul Flowers used illegal drugs, crystal meth, Ketamin and party drug GHB in industrial quantities and indulged in three-in-a bed orgies with rent boys while leading the so called ethical Coop Bank into bankruptcy. This behavior put in jeopardy the savings and livelihoods of millions of members and stakeholders including millions of ordinary working class people.
If the BBC and media had put establishment politicians under the same scrutiny as Nigel Farage then maybe hundreds of young boys would be unmolested by Liberal paedophile Cyril Smith, convicted criminal Chris Huhne would never have become and MP and hundreds of underage girls in Rochdale, Rotherham and Oxford would not have been subjected to sexual abuse and rape by immigrant gangs.
Just minor scrutiny would have revealed the criminal element that infests the Houses of Parliament and Tony Blair would not have taken Great Britain into what many consider to be an illegal war, Gordon Brown would not have been able to spend the country into bankruptcy or destroy the private sector pension funds.
Proper scrutiny would have revealed the numerous sex scandals in Parliament since Profumo fifty years ago.
In conclusion it must be said that the Daily Mail and the rest of the bought and paid for media are not only smearing UKIP and Nigel Farage but also his supporters together with millions of honest, decent people the length and breadth of the country who's only 'crime' in their eyes is to challenge the agenda of the political elite. Hopefully these much abused people will let their feelings be known at the ballot box on Thursday.
Update: Its looks David Blunkett was right. Violent confrontations in Sheffield this week between Yemeni and Pakistani immigrants. It's worth reminding people that Blunkett was part of the government that opened the borders to mass immigration and smeared anyone who questioned the policy as a racist.
Is this the cultural enrichment Blunkett and his government was referring to? Is this inter-racial violence the tangible benefits of multiculturalism? The people deserve an answer from Blunkett, Clegg and the other two charlatans that refuse to manage immigration.
Our diversity is our strength my a*rse.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For those with a strong constitution here is some further reading on media hypocrisy regarding immigration that would have generated howls of manufactured outrage if highlighted by UKIP or Nigel Farage:
Daily Mail story on the Heston Bridge people.
A mind boggling article by the BBC on Nick Clegg calling on Roma immigrants to show sensitivity to the British way of life.
Daily Mail story reporting a French politicians call for Roma gypsies to return to Romania and Bulgaria because they refuse to integrate.
Daily Mail article by Yasmin Alibai-Brown on welfare colonists from the Caribbean and Asia taking over the constituency of Birmingham, Ladywood. Read this and weep for Great Britain.
Wednesday, May 21, 2014
Tuesday, May 20, 2014
EU Elections - MSM Smear Campaign Against The Peoples Party Becoming Hysterical
As election day approaches, the day of reckoning for the established political class gets ever closer and their malevolent stranglehold over the lives of the British people will at long last be released, hopefully for ever.
What this election campaign has brought home to many people is that multi-party democracy in Great Britain ceased to exist decades ago, replaced with a cross party consensus on the main issues that effect people the most.
To say that the cross party political class have declared a war on the British people would be an understatement, they know very well that they share a common agenda which, if put to the people in a popular vote, would be soundly rejected. This has resulted in a political discourse where media management, propaganda, spin, deceit, obfuscation and lying are a normal part of everyday life for the modern day career politician.
Despite their supposed ideological differences, the three legacy parties in Great Britain, the Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties, are in total agreement on the following important issues:
a) 'Ever closer union' and continued surrendering of sovereignty to a post democratic United States of Europe.
b) Continued demographic and cultural replacement via open border mass immigration.
c) The imposition of a so called 'multi-cultural' society.
d) Continued spending 0.7% of GDP, unconditionally, on foreign aid despite the fact the country's economy is operating in deficit and the political class has to borrow over one hundred billion pounds per year to finance its largess.
e) Their refusal to tackle the 1.2 trillion of debt they have accumulated between them, instead leaving it to our children and grandchildren to pay off.
f) A refusal to trust the British people to decide their own future by allowing an In/Out referendum on continued membership of the EU.
g) Allowing access to taxpayer funded services such as housing, education, health care and cash welfare benefits to anyone who arrives on our shores and who have not contributed anything into the system.
h) The continued use of rigidly policed political correctness to bully and threaten with prosecution anyone who has the temerity to disagree with the establishment's agenda.
i) A refusal to take action to end the hideous left wing bias of the taxpayer funded BBC.
This list is not exhaustive but nevertheless it is in opposition to wishes of the vast majority of the British people.
It is no wonder that the arrival on the political scene of the straight talking United Kingdom Independence Party, universally referred to as UKIP, and its growing popularity across all sections of society, would sent the established political class into a panic.
Over the decades the British people with their predictable voting habits allowed the politicians of the three legacy parties to take them for granted, thus the political class became arrogant, self serving, corrupt and many cases downright criminal and all combined with a hypertrophied sense of entitlement. It was this sense of entitlement together with their complacency that has brought about their downfall.
The establishments belief that only they know what is best for the British people, who they believe should unquestionably fall into line, has left them exposed to the grass roots arguments and increasing popularity of UKIP to the point where all they have left in their election armoury are insults, personal attacks and smear.
Up until now, and with election day rapidly approaching, support for UKIP is holding up in the face of one of the vilest and most personal election campaigns in living memory. This continued support is causing panic among the political class and their bought and paid for whores in the media, resulting in their smear campaign becoming ever more hysterical.
The British people are waking up and rapidly losing their fear of political correctness as the establishment ramps up the insults. The over used, dog eared accusations of racism, homophobia, xenophobia, islamophobia and bigot etc. are losing their potency. The uncomfortable fact for the establishment is that the more they throw these insults at the people the more the support for UKIP hardens.
What this election campaign has also exposed is the ability of the political establishment to mobilise all sections of the media to join in the smear campaign against UKIP and its candidates.
It doesn't take a leap of imagination to understand that the BBC, Channel 4, the Guardian, the Daily Mirror and the Independent newspapers would be the vanguard of this vile campaign but supposedly right of center, investigative newspapers such as the Daily Mail, the Daily Telegraph and the Rupert Murdoch titles including the Sun, The Times and the Financial Times have all joined in the anti UKIP free for all.
Unsurprisingly, bought and paid for journalists such as Dan Hodges and Nick Robinson joined in with gusto as directed by their masters but one is entitled to expect a more professional attitude from the likes of Peter Oborne and Peter Hitchens. The Daily Mail's Richard Littlejohn is the only one to emerge with any credibility.
Most disappointingly of all, the popular anti-politician website and scourge of Parliament, Guido Fawkes, saw fit to run anti-UKIP stories designed to damage the parties prospects as opposed to just reporting the news. Its proprietor, Paul Staines claims that taking the Murdoch shilling to write a column in his Sun on Sunday rag was nothing to do with his joining the anti-UKIP campaign. Somehow I find that hard to believe as its more likely that Staines has succumbed to temptation and sold out to the political establishment.
In conclusion its worth repeating that the mudslinging, insults and smears are having a minimal affect on support and hopefully this will be reflected in Thursday's election results.
It also worth reminding the three party leaders, Messrs. Cameron, Clegg and Red Ed Miliband that when they insult and smear UKIP and its candidates they are also insulting and smearing the millions of supporters the length and breadth of the country who are tired of being taken for granted, lied to and having their hard won sovereignty surrendered to unelected, unaccountable and unsackable bureaucrats in Brussels.
The message for the political establishment and their media lackey's is this - keep up the insults and the smears, bring it on and accelerate your own demise.
Friday, May 16, 2014
Political Enemies And The MSM Unite To Smear The Peoples Party As Racist
It came as no surprise that the rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party, popularly known as UKIP, would shake the cosy consensus between the three old legacy parties, their bought and paid for media whores and the BBC, right through to its rotten core.
Never in my experience have I witnessed such a concerted effort by the established political class to insult, denigrate and smear a political party that polls less than ten percent of the popular vote in general elections.
This phenomenon not only raises some important issues with regard to the state of British democracy but it also highlights the yawning chasm between the cross party political class and the people they are supposedly representing.
The advent of the professional political class has been accompanied by the demise of democracy; this is particularly apparent by the fact that people enter politics nowadays, not as a public service or a sense of duty after a life long career in the real world, but straight from school as a lucrative, self serving pursuit of political power funded by the taxpayer.
It doesn't take an expert to notice that regardless of party affiliation they are all the same. They dress the same, they talk the same, they have the same mannerisms and they speak in a language dominated by centrally issued slogans and soundbites. They have all been trained in the black arts of media management, spin, deceit together with the ability to lie with a straight face.
They make false promises and lie without conscience to get themselves elected - they are bereft of any semblance of principle. Consequently it is no wonder that when a straight talking party enters the political fray, who accurately articulate the concerns of the people, they are attacked mercilessly by the united political order.
Short of throwing the kitchen sink at UKIP and its leader Nigel Farage, the political class and their media cronies have joined together out of mutual self interest to use every dirty trick in the book to discredit and smear the increasingly popular movement that promotes a return to national sovereignty, democracy and common sense by leaving that undemocratic disaster known as the European Union.
One of the things that becomes apparent by this concerted cross party smear campaign is the unwillingness of the party leaders to debate the issues - the reason being that they would lose, and lose humiliatingly, if judged by the debates between Liberal Democrat leader, Nick Clegg, and UKIP leader Nigel Farage.
If the other two party leaders, David Cameron and Red Ed Miliband are too cowardly to debate the leader of a minor political party, how in God's name can they stand up for the British people's interests against hardened political animals such as Russia's President Putin, China's Xi Jinping or Germany's Angela Merkel?
These two over promoted schoolkids would have difficulty extracting a minor concession from political pygmies of the Herman von Rumpuy/Jose Manuel Barrosso school of bureaucracy, let alone a political heavyweight.
They are unable to debate the issues therefore in the tradition of the new political class they resort to smear and there is no bigger smear at the moment in politically correct Great Britain than 'racist'. It must be the most over used word in the English language. It is thrown around at random on the flimsiest of excuses but unfortunately for the political class its over use is its downfall.
Its effectiveness is lessened the more its used, and in many circles it is becoming a badge of honour to be smeared as a racist by a member of the current political class. It's use as a smear to denigrate UKIP is having the opposite effect by galvanising support and its continued use merely reflects the fact that they have lost the debate on the issues.
The high profile defection of UKIP's so called rising star, Sanya-Jeet Thandi, has all the hallmarks of a set up, choreographed to cause maximum damage at a crucial point in the campaign.
The fact that this student from the radical left wing London School of Economics was openly advocating UKIP's immigration policy days before her defection, and then doing it via the ultra left wing Guardian newspaper, should dispel any doubt that this was choreographed. By her own logic, by promoting UKIP's long standing immigration policy she herself was a racist up until her defection.
There is no shortage of ambitious young ladies willing to volunteer for publicity generating scams such as this. I would suggest that Ms. Thandi has political aspirations and like others before her she is willing to indulge in a publicity generating controversy in order to raise her profile - and make some easy baksheesh in the process.
It was only recently that an obscure actress, Somi Guha was put up to suing Jeremy Clarkson and the BBC in blaze of publicity, in hope of resurrecting her failed acting career while making some easy money in the process. Indian national Ms. Guha was apparently offended by Clarkson's use of the word 'slope' which has no connotations with Indian people whatsoever. Obviously controversies generated by the word 'racist' can be very lucrative as well as career enhancing.
Nobody should be surprised if Ms. Thandi reappears in the not too distant future as an ethnic rising star in one of the established parties. Hopefully it will be with the Liberal Democrats where her treacherous career will be mercifully short.
The latest 'racist' controversy artificially generated by the established political order, ruthlessly executed by the media in order to smear UKIP and cause maximum damage, is the row over an Afghan community ignoring a planning ruling by a North London local authority, safe in the knowledge they will get away it.
Local UKIP candidate, Heino Vockradt gave his view on the issue, not in centrally issued slogans or soundbites but in a forthright language everyone can understand.
With reference to the Afghans ignoring the ruling which has resulted in non Muslims being squeezed out of a shopping street in his area, he correctly states that:
"Political correctness is preventing the council from taking action for fear of being called racist, when, just like in all other cases where Muslims are grooming children to be sex slaves under the eyes of the authorities, the council does nothing".
(He is refering to the local authorities in Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford and other cites in England who ignored Muslim paedophile gangs as they groomed under age white girls before subjecting them to horrific sexual abuse)
Echoing the experience of thousands of communities the length and breadth of the country, Vockradt states that:
"The neighbourhood was already exploding under the weight of segregation, shopkeepers are being squeezed out by Muslims. The entire parade - once lovely owner/occupier shops - resembles Helmand Province".
He went on to state state correctly, and echoing the words of Sir Winston Churchill highlighted in yesterdays post that:
"Islam is a mono-cultural, totalitarian ideology. It is not a religion. It is against multi-culturalism and only promotes its own culture. It is against everything modern Britain stands for".
Right on cue, the Labour leader of the council in question, Mohammed Butt, gave us a pearl of his wisdom using a dogeared, vintage soudbite from the Blair/ Mandelson era.
"In Brent we draw strength from our diversity and the vibrancy that it brings".
You really couldn't make this stuff up.
This kind of candid talk is forbidden in politically correct Britain for fear that the truth will resonate with the electorate, therefore the established political order stamp on it early through their dirty tricks department in order to shut down the debate. The weapon of choice of course is a smear using the word 'racist'.
What the political order fail to understand is that the people have learned by bitter experience the the comments made by the candidate are true, therefore they do resonate with the electorate and the 'racist' smear only hardens the support for UKIP.
In conclusion I will state that it is my fervent wish that support for UKIP holds up in the face of this unprecidented onslaught of dirty tricks and smear and that an electoral earthquake gives the political class a shock from which it will never recover.
Here a racist, there a racist, everywhere a racist racist. A great article from across the pond.
Never in my experience have I witnessed such a concerted effort by the established political class to insult, denigrate and smear a political party that polls less than ten percent of the popular vote in general elections.
This phenomenon not only raises some important issues with regard to the state of British democracy but it also highlights the yawning chasm between the cross party political class and the people they are supposedly representing.
The advent of the professional political class has been accompanied by the demise of democracy; this is particularly apparent by the fact that people enter politics nowadays, not as a public service or a sense of duty after a life long career in the real world, but straight from school as a lucrative, self serving pursuit of political power funded by the taxpayer.
It doesn't take an expert to notice that regardless of party affiliation they are all the same. They dress the same, they talk the same, they have the same mannerisms and they speak in a language dominated by centrally issued slogans and soundbites. They have all been trained in the black arts of media management, spin, deceit together with the ability to lie with a straight face.
They make false promises and lie without conscience to get themselves elected - they are bereft of any semblance of principle. Consequently it is no wonder that when a straight talking party enters the political fray, who accurately articulate the concerns of the people, they are attacked mercilessly by the united political order.
Short of throwing the kitchen sink at UKIP and its leader Nigel Farage, the political class and their media cronies have joined together out of mutual self interest to use every dirty trick in the book to discredit and smear the increasingly popular movement that promotes a return to national sovereignty, democracy and common sense by leaving that undemocratic disaster known as the European Union.
One of the things that becomes apparent by this concerted cross party smear campaign is the unwillingness of the party leaders to debate the issues - the reason being that they would lose, and lose humiliatingly, if judged by the debates between Liberal Democrat leader, Nick Clegg, and UKIP leader Nigel Farage.
If the other two party leaders, David Cameron and Red Ed Miliband are too cowardly to debate the leader of a minor political party, how in God's name can they stand up for the British people's interests against hardened political animals such as Russia's President Putin, China's Xi Jinping or Germany's Angela Merkel?
These two over promoted schoolkids would have difficulty extracting a minor concession from political pygmies of the Herman von Rumpuy/Jose Manuel Barrosso school of bureaucracy, let alone a political heavyweight.
They are unable to debate the issues therefore in the tradition of the new political class they resort to smear and there is no bigger smear at the moment in politically correct Great Britain than 'racist'. It must be the most over used word in the English language. It is thrown around at random on the flimsiest of excuses but unfortunately for the political class its over use is its downfall.
Its effectiveness is lessened the more its used, and in many circles it is becoming a badge of honour to be smeared as a racist by a member of the current political class. It's use as a smear to denigrate UKIP is having the opposite effect by galvanising support and its continued use merely reflects the fact that they have lost the debate on the issues.
The high profile defection of UKIP's so called rising star, Sanya-Jeet Thandi, has all the hallmarks of a set up, choreographed to cause maximum damage at a crucial point in the campaign.
The fact that this student from the radical left wing London School of Economics was openly advocating UKIP's immigration policy days before her defection, and then doing it via the ultra left wing Guardian newspaper, should dispel any doubt that this was choreographed. By her own logic, by promoting UKIP's long standing immigration policy she herself was a racist up until her defection.
There is no shortage of ambitious young ladies willing to volunteer for publicity generating scams such as this. I would suggest that Ms. Thandi has political aspirations and like others before her she is willing to indulge in a publicity generating controversy in order to raise her profile - and make some easy baksheesh in the process.
It was only recently that an obscure actress, Somi Guha was put up to suing Jeremy Clarkson and the BBC in blaze of publicity, in hope of resurrecting her failed acting career while making some easy money in the process. Indian national Ms. Guha was apparently offended by Clarkson's use of the word 'slope' which has no connotations with Indian people whatsoever. Obviously controversies generated by the word 'racist' can be very lucrative as well as career enhancing.
Nobody should be surprised if Ms. Thandi reappears in the not too distant future as an ethnic rising star in one of the established parties. Hopefully it will be with the Liberal Democrats where her treacherous career will be mercifully short.
The latest 'racist' controversy artificially generated by the established political order, ruthlessly executed by the media in order to smear UKIP and cause maximum damage, is the row over an Afghan community ignoring a planning ruling by a North London local authority, safe in the knowledge they will get away it.
Local UKIP candidate, Heino Vockradt gave his view on the issue, not in centrally issued slogans or soundbites but in a forthright language everyone can understand.
With reference to the Afghans ignoring the ruling which has resulted in non Muslims being squeezed out of a shopping street in his area, he correctly states that:
"Political correctness is preventing the council from taking action for fear of being called racist, when, just like in all other cases where Muslims are grooming children to be sex slaves under the eyes of the authorities, the council does nothing".
(He is refering to the local authorities in Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford and other cites in England who ignored Muslim paedophile gangs as they groomed under age white girls before subjecting them to horrific sexual abuse)
Echoing the experience of thousands of communities the length and breadth of the country, Vockradt states that:
"The neighbourhood was already exploding under the weight of segregation, shopkeepers are being squeezed out by Muslims. The entire parade - once lovely owner/occupier shops - resembles Helmand Province".
He went on to state state correctly, and echoing the words of Sir Winston Churchill highlighted in yesterdays post that:
"Islam is a mono-cultural, totalitarian ideology. It is not a religion. It is against multi-culturalism and only promotes its own culture. It is against everything modern Britain stands for".
Right on cue, the Labour leader of the council in question, Mohammed Butt, gave us a pearl of his wisdom using a dogeared, vintage soudbite from the Blair/ Mandelson era.
"In Brent we draw strength from our diversity and the vibrancy that it brings".
You really couldn't make this stuff up.
This kind of candid talk is forbidden in politically correct Britain for fear that the truth will resonate with the electorate, therefore the established political order stamp on it early through their dirty tricks department in order to shut down the debate. The weapon of choice of course is a smear using the word 'racist'.
What the political order fail to understand is that the people have learned by bitter experience the the comments made by the candidate are true, therefore they do resonate with the electorate and the 'racist' smear only hardens the support for UKIP.
In conclusion I will state that it is my fervent wish that support for UKIP holds up in the face of this unprecidented onslaught of dirty tricks and smear and that an electoral earthquake gives the political class a shock from which it will never recover.
Here a racist, there a racist, everywhere a racist racist. A great article from across the pond.
Wednesday, May 14, 2014
Democracy In Decline - Election Candidate Arrested For Quoting Churchill
In any country that claims to be free and open, based on individual liberty and equality under the law, it's worth individuals taking some time to audit the processes and the institutions that affect the their everyday lives. More importantly it is essential that they audit the motivation of those that govern in order check the political health of the nation and that of democracy itself.
In a properly functioning democracy this duty would be performed by the press and the rest of the mainstream media but, regrettably, they have abdicated their responsibility and now openly whore themselves as paid servants of the political elite, dispensing what can only be described as establishment approved party political propaganda.
Looking at the state of British democracy it is obvious that it is in terminal decline with issues affecting civil liberties that were once taken for granted being slowly eroded away with the connivance of the peoples representatives.
Freedom of the press.
Freedom of speech.
Freedom to campaign during elections.
Free and fair elections.
Freedom to hold a secure bank account to name but a few. Up until recently it would have been unthinkable that these basic freedoms would be taken away - unfortunately they were eroded away while the people's attention was diverted elsewhere by a diet of propaganda, soap operas, talent shows, reality television and sport.
Despite being touted by the three old political parties as one of Great Britain's national treasures, the left wing bias of the BBC is legendary. This state run organization is given around four billion pounds of public money every year which allows it to dominate the airwaves with its multi-channel television and radio output together with an ever increasing presence on the Internet.
Only BSkyB makes more revenue but it has to earn it the hard way and appears to concentrate its output on more popular items such as sport, films and light entertainment, as opposed to hard news and analysis.
The free money allows the BBC to squeeze out any competition that has to earn its own revenue in the marketplace, effectively silencing any non establishment opinions or points of view. Figures show that a significant majority of the British people, particularly low information voters, get their news from the BBC therefore it is little wonder that the establishment promoted, left wing world view prevails.
Any lingering remnants of a free press that actively engages in public interest investigative journalism is being snuffed out by the Leveson inquiry recommendations - this will institute government control of the press in Great Britain for the first time two centuries.
In a more shocking development - an incident that one would never have thought would ever take place in a long standing democracy such as Great Britain's, was the arrest of Paul Weston, a candidate for Liberty GB in the forthcoming election, for quoting Sir Winston Churchill while on the campaign trail.
Everyone with an iota of intelligence understands that freedom of speech requires an element of responsibility but freedom of speech will always trump any person's right not to be offended, especially in a world where people are deliberately looking to be offended in order to silence opposing views or to shut down debate.
Nobody, except those using political correctness as a weapon, can be offended by the truth, and the authorities, be they politicians, police or any other agent of the state, should never censor the truth especially during an election campaign.
The quote in question comes from observations made by Sir Winston Churchill while fighting in Sudan and recorded in his book The River of War. It is worth reproducing it here and challenging anyone who questions its veracity or relevance to the current election debate.
"How dreadful are the curses of which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia is in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy.
The effects are apparent in many countries. Imprudent habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live".
There is nothing in that passage that could possibly cause offence or give reason for an arrest, Churchill's observations become more accurate as the quote proceeds.
"A degraded sensualism deprives this life of it's grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity".
The worship of death like civilized people worship life is nothing new and was obviously prevalent in the Sudan during Churchill's day.
At a time when the Sultan of Brunei has adopted Sharia law to blight his land, when women in Muslim countries are being stoned to death for being raped, when they are confined to the home, subjected to violent spousal abuse and facial disfigurement, denied education and the most basic of human rites, traded like cattle and kidnapped in their hundreds in countries like Nigeria, Churchill's observations are as relevant today as when he published them back in 1899.
"The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property - either as a child, a wife or a concubine - must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be great power among men".
For the benefit of the so called 'progressive' community and those that are most vocal in trumpeting women's rights, multi-culturalism and the lingering legacy of slavery, please note the meaning of that last sentence - the final extinction of slavery is delayed while the faith of Islam is a great power among men.
He concludes thus, and truer words were never spoken:
"Thousands become the loyal soldiers of the faith: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyzes social development of those who follow it.
No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith".
The reason given by the police for Paul Weston's arrest was 'religious or racial harassment'. If this is the criteria for arrest then the jails would be full of Muslim hate preachers including, Anjem 'Andy' Choudary, for their public utterances which includes a visceral hatred of Jews and death threats for non believers.
Personally I had never heard of the Liberty GB party but their mission statement probably sealed its fate as it exposes the truth and motives of the current political establishment.
It reveals what the party believes to be "the most important issues of our time - namely mass immigration from the Third World, the steady rise of fundamentalist Islam and the hijacking of British culture and institutions by well organized left wing 'progressives' ".
Amen to that!
Another affront to the democratic process is the extension of postal voting and the opportunities it gives to those intent on corruption. It is now accepted as fact that 'the ends justify the means' mentality of the socialist/communist/progressive community allows them to indulge in ballot rigging free of conscience.
Ballot rigging is considered normal in trade union and internal Labour party elections and they now make use of their expertise in general elections where there is a lot more at stake.
In May 2005, Senior judge Richard Mowery QC is quoted as saying that "government complacency in the fraud would disgrace a banana republic".
It would appear that after the Blair/Brown tyranny of 1997, a trip to the polling station on election day is no longer the social occasion it used to be.
One final example of the decline of British democracy is the granting of power to the universally hated tax collectors from Her Majesties Revenue and Customs (HRMC), to raid an individuals bank account without a warrant if they believe tax is owed. This was imposed without discussion, debate or a vote. See here also.
Draconian is not the word for this totalitarian outrage and it must borne in mind that the HMRC is a monolithic grossly incompetent state bureaucracy that issued forty thousand incorrect tax codes last year and issued twelve thousand incorrect penalty notices.
This should come as no surprise as I warned this was coming back in March 2013, here and here.
In conclusion it's worth pointing out that in a healthy democracy the interests of the people should be protected by their elected representatives, but alas in Great Britain they have become a feral, self serving bunch of unprincipled charlatans who have looked the other way as the nation's sovereignty has been surrendered to the point where seventy five percent of laws come from the EU bureaucracy in Brussels.
They obey the Whips and the party hierarchies while ignoring their constituents, they line their pockets with taxpayers money and indulge in drunken debauched behavior that is unbecoming of a people's tribune.
Their ejection from Parliament is long overdue and the opportunity presents itself next week. Make it happen or lose your country, it's that simple.
In a properly functioning democracy this duty would be performed by the press and the rest of the mainstream media but, regrettably, they have abdicated their responsibility and now openly whore themselves as paid servants of the political elite, dispensing what can only be described as establishment approved party political propaganda.
Looking at the state of British democracy it is obvious that it is in terminal decline with issues affecting civil liberties that were once taken for granted being slowly eroded away with the connivance of the peoples representatives.
Freedom of the press.
Freedom of speech.
Freedom to campaign during elections.
Free and fair elections.
Freedom to hold a secure bank account to name but a few. Up until recently it would have been unthinkable that these basic freedoms would be taken away - unfortunately they were eroded away while the people's attention was diverted elsewhere by a diet of propaganda, soap operas, talent shows, reality television and sport.
Despite being touted by the three old political parties as one of Great Britain's national treasures, the left wing bias of the BBC is legendary. This state run organization is given around four billion pounds of public money every year which allows it to dominate the airwaves with its multi-channel television and radio output together with an ever increasing presence on the Internet.
Only BSkyB makes more revenue but it has to earn it the hard way and appears to concentrate its output on more popular items such as sport, films and light entertainment, as opposed to hard news and analysis.
The free money allows the BBC to squeeze out any competition that has to earn its own revenue in the marketplace, effectively silencing any non establishment opinions or points of view. Figures show that a significant majority of the British people, particularly low information voters, get their news from the BBC therefore it is little wonder that the establishment promoted, left wing world view prevails.
Any lingering remnants of a free press that actively engages in public interest investigative journalism is being snuffed out by the Leveson inquiry recommendations - this will institute government control of the press in Great Britain for the first time two centuries.
In a more shocking development - an incident that one would never have thought would ever take place in a long standing democracy such as Great Britain's, was the arrest of Paul Weston, a candidate for Liberty GB in the forthcoming election, for quoting Sir Winston Churchill while on the campaign trail.
Everyone with an iota of intelligence understands that freedom of speech requires an element of responsibility but freedom of speech will always trump any person's right not to be offended, especially in a world where people are deliberately looking to be offended in order to silence opposing views or to shut down debate.
Nobody, except those using political correctness as a weapon, can be offended by the truth, and the authorities, be they politicians, police or any other agent of the state, should never censor the truth especially during an election campaign.
The quote in question comes from observations made by Sir Winston Churchill while fighting in Sudan and recorded in his book The River of War. It is worth reproducing it here and challenging anyone who questions its veracity or relevance to the current election debate.
"How dreadful are the curses of which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia is in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy.
The effects are apparent in many countries. Imprudent habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live".
There is nothing in that passage that could possibly cause offence or give reason for an arrest, Churchill's observations become more accurate as the quote proceeds.
"A degraded sensualism deprives this life of it's grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity".
The worship of death like civilized people worship life is nothing new and was obviously prevalent in the Sudan during Churchill's day.
At a time when the Sultan of Brunei has adopted Sharia law to blight his land, when women in Muslim countries are being stoned to death for being raped, when they are confined to the home, subjected to violent spousal abuse and facial disfigurement, denied education and the most basic of human rites, traded like cattle and kidnapped in their hundreds in countries like Nigeria, Churchill's observations are as relevant today as when he published them back in 1899.
"The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property - either as a child, a wife or a concubine - must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be great power among men".
For the benefit of the so called 'progressive' community and those that are most vocal in trumpeting women's rights, multi-culturalism and the lingering legacy of slavery, please note the meaning of that last sentence - the final extinction of slavery is delayed while the faith of Islam is a great power among men.
He concludes thus, and truer words were never spoken:
"Thousands become the loyal soldiers of the faith: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyzes social development of those who follow it.
No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith".
The reason given by the police for Paul Weston's arrest was 'religious or racial harassment'. If this is the criteria for arrest then the jails would be full of Muslim hate preachers including, Anjem 'Andy' Choudary, for their public utterances which includes a visceral hatred of Jews and death threats for non believers.
Personally I had never heard of the Liberty GB party but their mission statement probably sealed its fate as it exposes the truth and motives of the current political establishment.
It reveals what the party believes to be "the most important issues of our time - namely mass immigration from the Third World, the steady rise of fundamentalist Islam and the hijacking of British culture and institutions by well organized left wing 'progressives' ".
Amen to that!
Another affront to the democratic process is the extension of postal voting and the opportunities it gives to those intent on corruption. It is now accepted as fact that 'the ends justify the means' mentality of the socialist/communist/progressive community allows them to indulge in ballot rigging free of conscience.
Ballot rigging is considered normal in trade union and internal Labour party elections and they now make use of their expertise in general elections where there is a lot more at stake.
In May 2005, Senior judge Richard Mowery QC is quoted as saying that "government complacency in the fraud would disgrace a banana republic".
It would appear that after the Blair/Brown tyranny of 1997, a trip to the polling station on election day is no longer the social occasion it used to be.
One final example of the decline of British democracy is the granting of power to the universally hated tax collectors from Her Majesties Revenue and Customs (HRMC), to raid an individuals bank account without a warrant if they believe tax is owed. This was imposed without discussion, debate or a vote. See here also.
Draconian is not the word for this totalitarian outrage and it must borne in mind that the HMRC is a monolithic grossly incompetent state bureaucracy that issued forty thousand incorrect tax codes last year and issued twelve thousand incorrect penalty notices.
This should come as no surprise as I warned this was coming back in March 2013, here and here.
In conclusion it's worth pointing out that in a healthy democracy the interests of the people should be protected by their elected representatives, but alas in Great Britain they have become a feral, self serving bunch of unprincipled charlatans who have looked the other way as the nation's sovereignty has been surrendered to the point where seventy five percent of laws come from the EU bureaucracy in Brussels.
They obey the Whips and the party hierarchies while ignoring their constituents, they line their pockets with taxpayers money and indulge in drunken debauched behavior that is unbecoming of a people's tribune.
Their ejection from Parliament is long overdue and the opportunity presents itself next week. Make it happen or lose your country, it's that simple.
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Great Britain Still A Christian Country - The Usual Suspects Disagree
Whether Great Britain's Prime Minister, David Cameron, deliberately intended to provoke the anti-British left into a collective spasm of public letter writing as part of his election campaign is open to debate, but what is certain is that the usual suspects from the socialist/communist/progressive community were coordinated in their reaction to his pronouncements.
It is now accepted as indisputable fact that the 1997 Blair/Brown Labour government embarked upon a long planned agenda to destroy the Great Britain that had evolved over two millennia into a developed, civilised culture based on Judeo-Christian values and replace it with a so called 'multi-cultural society' based on alien religions, uncivilized death cults and nihilism, knowing they were incompatible with the established British way of life.
This fundamental transformation of their country was imposed by the government using stealth, deceit, lies and bullying and it has been an unmitigated disaster for the indigenous people of Great Britain who didn't ask for this upheaval nor were they consulted.
Much to the consternation of the political elite, the British people are now expressing their disapproval of the political class and their destructive agenda by dumping the three old legacy parties for the United Kingdom Independence Party, popularly referred to as Ukip.
The deliberate destruction of Great Britain is part of a wider agenda which is being imposed by supranational entities like the UN and the EU with the intention to reorder the world based on the equality of nations and the moral equivalence of cultures; it is being imposed across the civilized world including the USA. But I digress.
When David Cameron was chosen as the front man by the political elite to usurp power over the British Conservative Party, their agenda was also long planned. Their first act was to purge the party of people who held traditional British values, including those based on Christianity, together with any policies and attitudes that were not commensurate with their transformational agenda. Cameron and his backers insultingly described this process as detoxifying the party.
The result of this exercise should have come as no surprise to anyone, especially to people such as Cameron who's only experience is in Public Relations ---- membership and support for his detoxified party collapsed in favour of Ukip.
Ukip's policies are based on the traditional British values which were unceremoniously dumped by Cameron and his so called 'modernisers'.
The previously supposed agnostic Cameron who, like his predecessors in the last Labour administration, "didn't do God", has now miraculously seen the light.
Hallelujah, Hosanna In The Highest, Hail Mary and Praise the Lord - after abolishing traditional Christian marriage and remaining silent on the persecution of Christians at home and abroad, and in addition to tolerating radical Islam in our schools, towns and cities, David Cameron is now openly talking about his Christian faith and referring to Great Britain as a Christian country.
Cameron mentions the "healing power of the Church" and he goes on to talk about "infusing politics with Christian ideals and values such as responsibility, hard work, charity, compassion, humility and love". These are the same values deliberately trashed by the Blair/Brown Labour government, aided and abetted by the Liberal Democrats and his own Conservative Party.
Whether he has had a Saul of Tarsus 'road to Damascus' conversion or is cynically trying to appeal to the traditional supporters that he himself drove into the arms of Ukip is up to the reader, but it must be borne in mind that Cameron is a consummate PR man who has hired the professional spin doctor, Lynton Crosby, to help him deceive and lie his way to an election victory.
As sure as night follows day the mention of Great Britain being a Christian country, especially by the Prime Minister, provoked a highly predictable reaction by the usual gaggle of anti-British, self loathers - led by the BBC, they infest the media, public life and academia like a virus.
These people comprise the arrogant metropolitan elite of so called 'progressives' who believe that only their world view holds any merit - they regard the world view of millions of indigenous British people as unworthy of consideration and fit only to be studiously ignored.
Fifty 'eminent' people, led by Iraqi born Professor Jim Al-Khalil, put their names to a letter claiming that Cameron was "fostering sectarian division" by referring to Great Britain as a Christian country. The letter goes on to say that the Prime Minister "has a right to his beliefs but we object to his repeated mischaracterization of our country as a Christian country".
For the information of Professor Al-Khalil together with his forty nine anti-British self loathing co-conspirators - despite the efforts of the political establishment and the BBC to make it otherwise, my country and that of my British born compatriots is as much a Christian country today as his birthplace is a Muslim one. This is not measured specifically by Church attendance, but by personal belief systems, history, tradition and heritage.
Fifty nine percent of the British people still regard themselves as Christians and the majority of the remainder adopt Judeo-Christian ethics and values for their moral code. Whether it is overt or not our way of life has been constructed and ordered around Christianity.
Having only reached British shores in 1979, our Iraqi friend Professor Khalil, together with his chums, are obviously ignorant of Great Britain's history so it is incumbent upon me to give them, and any other people who dispute that we are a Christian country, the very briefest of summaries of our heritage together with a homework assignment encompassing further study.
From the dawn of Christianity the British people adopted the faith, from the early Celtic Saints through to Saint Augustine, the Venerable Bede, Saint Thomas a' Becket, Edward the Confessor, Pope Adrian right up to the current Archbishop of Canterbury and the Monarch, who's title includes Defender of the Faith.
The Lords Spiritual have seats in the House of Lords, the Justice system is based on ancient Jewish and Christian principles and we still revolve our year and calendar around Christian Festivals particularly Christmas and Easter.
Each of the nations that make up the United Kingdom have a Patron Saint. Please name them.
Unless they are wearing blinkers or are in total denial about their existence, the fifty complainants should have noticed our great places of Christian worship, from Westminster Abbey and the great cathedrals that dominate most of our cities to the tiny churches and chapels that grace every town village and hamlet throughout the land.
On the northeast coast of England lies the Holy Island of Lindisfarne, then there's Saint Michael's Mount, Saint David's and the great Christian cultural centre at Strata Florida in Wales.
Many of our myths and legends revolve around Christianity, from the legendary landing of Joseph of Arimathea and the Christ child in Glastonbury, to the legends of King Arthur and his Quest for the Holy Grail.
From Paradise Lost to Dante's Inferno, our literature is steeped in Christianity and Christian thought.
Whether we notice it or not, we are surrounded by our Christian heritage everywhere we look, every day of our lives. It subconsciously influences our attitudes, it helps form our characters, it is who we are and no Johnny-Come-Lately Professor from Iraq and his gang of left wing hangers on is going to change it because they disapprove or wish it to be otherwise.
Many born and bred indigenous British people will be rightly offended that an Iraqi who has only been in Great Britain since 1979 sees fit to lecture them about their history, traditions and heritage that has evolved over two thousand years and that has not disappeared in the decade or so since Tony Blair's Labour party opened the borders to all and sundry in 1997.
Prof. Al-Khalil and his fellow left wing activists claim that by talking about peace, love and compassion and the fact that Great Britain is a Christian country, the Prime Minister is fueling sectarian division, but they fail to mention the divisiveness of aggressive atheists like Professor Richard Dawkins, Muslim hate preachers like Anjem 'Andy' Choudary, the permanently
complaining immigrant ingrate Yasmin Alibai-Brown or blatantly racist politicians such as Diane Abbot.
His letter also fails to mention communist supporting Trade Union leaders such as Red Len McClusky and Christine Blower, who's only mission in life is to stir up hatred and class warfare while enjoying the lifestyles of the ruling elite they claim to hate, and all financed by their members subscriptions.
By carrying on with their traditional way of life and refusing to accept the official policy of state imposed multi-culturalism, millions of law abiding British people are smeared and dismissed as bigots and racists with their views suppressed by rigidly enforced political correctness. (Cultural Marxism to give it its correct title).
In their closeted, incestuous world, only the indigenous people of Great Britain are capable of divisiveness - immigrants and non Christians, such as Professor Khalil and his chums, consider themselves to be tolerant paragons of virtue, except that is, when someone disagrees with their world view, they then become just as intolerant a bigot as any other common or garden fascist.
For fifty diverse individuals to come to exactly the same conclusion about David Cameron's opinion and go on to take collective action does suggest coordination by some vested interest or another.
It should come as no surprise to learn that the BBC in collusion with the British Humanist Association are at the root of this attempt to rewrite history and present the so called 'multi-cultural society' as a fait accompli in our country.
Apart from the Iraqi born Professor, who just happens to be the President of the British Humanist Association (BHA) and a favourite of the BBC, its worth taking a random look at some of the other forty nine anti-British signatories to the infamous letter:
Phillip Pullman - an atheist, a supporter of the BHA and the National Secular Society (NSS). He is quoted as saying that he is "trying to undermine the basis of Christian belief". He was a signatory to a letter opposing the visit of Pope Benedict XVI to Great Britain.
Ken Follett - best selling author, a self confessed lefty and signatory to the letter opposing the visit of Pope Benedict to Great Britain.
Dr. Adam Rutherford - a Guardianista and favourite of the BBC ( a Beeboid), he gave the Darwin lecture for the BHA.
Dr John Sulston - atheist and supporter of the BHA.
Dr. Simon Singh - an exclusively educated first generation of immigrants from the Punjab. No deep roots in Great Britain which gives an indication of his knowledge of Great Britain's Christian history, traditions and heritage.
Steven Rose - Guardianista and supporter of the BHA.
Virginia Ironside - she has declared her own war on religion and the church.
Zoe Margolis - Guardianista and sex obsessed blogger.
Michael Rubenstein - BHA supporter and human rights advocate. He doesn't appear to advocate any of the responsibilities that go with human rights.
Lord Avebury - supporter of the NSS and signatory of the letter opposing Pope Benedict's visit to Great Britain.
Lorraine Barratt - Labour Party apparatchik and supporter of the BHA
Polly Toynbee - infamous socialist hypocrite, Guardianista, Beeboid, atheist and supporter of the BHA.
C. J. De Mooi - all around weirdo, homosexual activist and supporter of the BHA.
Nick Ross - life long Beeboid. Being potty trained at the BBC, it is unlikely Nick can form an opinion outside their notoriously biased world view.
Dan Snow - a British-Canadian, whatever that is, like Nick Ross he was potty trained at the BBC. It is unlikely he can form an independent opinion outside of the BBC world view.
Sir David Smith - a life long Australian professional bureaucrat.
Tim Minchin - an exclusively educated Australian atheist
Peter Tatchell - Australian homosexual activists who ran away to Great Britain to avoid conscription into the Australian military. Despised in Great Britain for pursuing his perverts charter and adopting common cause with the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) to lower the age of consent for sex between adults and children.
The media is in the process of re-branding Tatchell from a homosexual activists to a human rights campaigner.
I could go on and expose the entire list of signatories as the gang of anti-British, self loathing activists that they are, who have been garnered together by the BHA and the BBC in order to counter David Cameron's assertion that Great Britain is still a Christian country. The pubs are open however, and I would prefer to spend my valuable time supping a few ales with real people rather than wallowing in the sump of contrived outrage by an agenda driven privileged elite.
In conclusion I will add that they are also attempting to rewrite history by completely ignoring Great Britain's Christian history, traditions and heritage as if it never happened and in the process create the perception that our country is already irreversibly a so called 'multi-cultural society'.
It isn't by a long way, and when the people take back control of their country they will ensure it never will be.
To that end I will personally be voting for the United Kingdom Independence Party in the forthcoming elections and encourage all those that believe in the continued existence of Great Britain to do the same.
It is now accepted as indisputable fact that the 1997 Blair/Brown Labour government embarked upon a long planned agenda to destroy the Great Britain that had evolved over two millennia into a developed, civilised culture based on Judeo-Christian values and replace it with a so called 'multi-cultural society' based on alien religions, uncivilized death cults and nihilism, knowing they were incompatible with the established British way of life.
This fundamental transformation of their country was imposed by the government using stealth, deceit, lies and bullying and it has been an unmitigated disaster for the indigenous people of Great Britain who didn't ask for this upheaval nor were they consulted.
Much to the consternation of the political elite, the British people are now expressing their disapproval of the political class and their destructive agenda by dumping the three old legacy parties for the United Kingdom Independence Party, popularly referred to as Ukip.
The deliberate destruction of Great Britain is part of a wider agenda which is being imposed by supranational entities like the UN and the EU with the intention to reorder the world based on the equality of nations and the moral equivalence of cultures; it is being imposed across the civilized world including the USA. But I digress.
When David Cameron was chosen as the front man by the political elite to usurp power over the British Conservative Party, their agenda was also long planned. Their first act was to purge the party of people who held traditional British values, including those based on Christianity, together with any policies and attitudes that were not commensurate with their transformational agenda. Cameron and his backers insultingly described this process as detoxifying the party.
The result of this exercise should have come as no surprise to anyone, especially to people such as Cameron who's only experience is in Public Relations ---- membership and support for his detoxified party collapsed in favour of Ukip.
Ukip's policies are based on the traditional British values which were unceremoniously dumped by Cameron and his so called 'modernisers'.
The previously supposed agnostic Cameron who, like his predecessors in the last Labour administration, "didn't do God", has now miraculously seen the light.
Hallelujah, Hosanna In The Highest, Hail Mary and Praise the Lord - after abolishing traditional Christian marriage and remaining silent on the persecution of Christians at home and abroad, and in addition to tolerating radical Islam in our schools, towns and cities, David Cameron is now openly talking about his Christian faith and referring to Great Britain as a Christian country.
Cameron mentions the "healing power of the Church" and he goes on to talk about "infusing politics with Christian ideals and values such as responsibility, hard work, charity, compassion, humility and love". These are the same values deliberately trashed by the Blair/Brown Labour government, aided and abetted by the Liberal Democrats and his own Conservative Party.
Whether he has had a Saul of Tarsus 'road to Damascus' conversion or is cynically trying to appeal to the traditional supporters that he himself drove into the arms of Ukip is up to the reader, but it must be borne in mind that Cameron is a consummate PR man who has hired the professional spin doctor, Lynton Crosby, to help him deceive and lie his way to an election victory.
As sure as night follows day the mention of Great Britain being a Christian country, especially by the Prime Minister, provoked a highly predictable reaction by the usual gaggle of anti-British, self loathers - led by the BBC, they infest the media, public life and academia like a virus.
These people comprise the arrogant metropolitan elite of so called 'progressives' who believe that only their world view holds any merit - they regard the world view of millions of indigenous British people as unworthy of consideration and fit only to be studiously ignored.
Fifty 'eminent' people, led by Iraqi born Professor Jim Al-Khalil, put their names to a letter claiming that Cameron was "fostering sectarian division" by referring to Great Britain as a Christian country. The letter goes on to say that the Prime Minister "has a right to his beliefs but we object to his repeated mischaracterization of our country as a Christian country".
For the information of Professor Al-Khalil together with his forty nine anti-British self loathing co-conspirators - despite the efforts of the political establishment and the BBC to make it otherwise, my country and that of my British born compatriots is as much a Christian country today as his birthplace is a Muslim one. This is not measured specifically by Church attendance, but by personal belief systems, history, tradition and heritage.
Fifty nine percent of the British people still regard themselves as Christians and the majority of the remainder adopt Judeo-Christian ethics and values for their moral code. Whether it is overt or not our way of life has been constructed and ordered around Christianity.
Having only reached British shores in 1979, our Iraqi friend Professor Khalil, together with his chums, are obviously ignorant of Great Britain's history so it is incumbent upon me to give them, and any other people who dispute that we are a Christian country, the very briefest of summaries of our heritage together with a homework assignment encompassing further study.
From the dawn of Christianity the British people adopted the faith, from the early Celtic Saints through to Saint Augustine, the Venerable Bede, Saint Thomas a' Becket, Edward the Confessor, Pope Adrian right up to the current Archbishop of Canterbury and the Monarch, who's title includes Defender of the Faith.
The Lords Spiritual have seats in the House of Lords, the Justice system is based on ancient Jewish and Christian principles and we still revolve our year and calendar around Christian Festivals particularly Christmas and Easter.
Each of the nations that make up the United Kingdom have a Patron Saint. Please name them.
Unless they are wearing blinkers or are in total denial about their existence, the fifty complainants should have noticed our great places of Christian worship, from Westminster Abbey and the great cathedrals that dominate most of our cities to the tiny churches and chapels that grace every town village and hamlet throughout the land.
On the northeast coast of England lies the Holy Island of Lindisfarne, then there's Saint Michael's Mount, Saint David's and the great Christian cultural centre at Strata Florida in Wales.
Many of our myths and legends revolve around Christianity, from the legendary landing of Joseph of Arimathea and the Christ child in Glastonbury, to the legends of King Arthur and his Quest for the Holy Grail.
From Paradise Lost to Dante's Inferno, our literature is steeped in Christianity and Christian thought.
Whether we notice it or not, we are surrounded by our Christian heritage everywhere we look, every day of our lives. It subconsciously influences our attitudes, it helps form our characters, it is who we are and no Johnny-Come-Lately Professor from Iraq and his gang of left wing hangers on is going to change it because they disapprove or wish it to be otherwise.
Many born and bred indigenous British people will be rightly offended that an Iraqi who has only been in Great Britain since 1979 sees fit to lecture them about their history, traditions and heritage that has evolved over two thousand years and that has not disappeared in the decade or so since Tony Blair's Labour party opened the borders to all and sundry in 1997.
Prof. Al-Khalil and his fellow left wing activists claim that by talking about peace, love and compassion and the fact that Great Britain is a Christian country, the Prime Minister is fueling sectarian division, but they fail to mention the divisiveness of aggressive atheists like Professor Richard Dawkins, Muslim hate preachers like Anjem 'Andy' Choudary, the permanently
complaining immigrant ingrate Yasmin Alibai-Brown or blatantly racist politicians such as Diane Abbot.
His letter also fails to mention communist supporting Trade Union leaders such as Red Len McClusky and Christine Blower, who's only mission in life is to stir up hatred and class warfare while enjoying the lifestyles of the ruling elite they claim to hate, and all financed by their members subscriptions.
By carrying on with their traditional way of life and refusing to accept the official policy of state imposed multi-culturalism, millions of law abiding British people are smeared and dismissed as bigots and racists with their views suppressed by rigidly enforced political correctness. (Cultural Marxism to give it its correct title).
In their closeted, incestuous world, only the indigenous people of Great Britain are capable of divisiveness - immigrants and non Christians, such as Professor Khalil and his chums, consider themselves to be tolerant paragons of virtue, except that is, when someone disagrees with their world view, they then become just as intolerant a bigot as any other common or garden fascist.
For fifty diverse individuals to come to exactly the same conclusion about David Cameron's opinion and go on to take collective action does suggest coordination by some vested interest or another.
It should come as no surprise to learn that the BBC in collusion with the British Humanist Association are at the root of this attempt to rewrite history and present the so called 'multi-cultural society' as a fait accompli in our country.
Apart from the Iraqi born Professor, who just happens to be the President of the British Humanist Association (BHA) and a favourite of the BBC, its worth taking a random look at some of the other forty nine anti-British signatories to the infamous letter:
Phillip Pullman - an atheist, a supporter of the BHA and the National Secular Society (NSS). He is quoted as saying that he is "trying to undermine the basis of Christian belief". He was a signatory to a letter opposing the visit of Pope Benedict XVI to Great Britain.
Ken Follett - best selling author, a self confessed lefty and signatory to the letter opposing the visit of Pope Benedict to Great Britain.
Dr. Adam Rutherford - a Guardianista and favourite of the BBC ( a Beeboid), he gave the Darwin lecture for the BHA.
Dr John Sulston - atheist and supporter of the BHA.
Dr. Simon Singh - an exclusively educated first generation of immigrants from the Punjab. No deep roots in Great Britain which gives an indication of his knowledge of Great Britain's Christian history, traditions and heritage.
Steven Rose - Guardianista and supporter of the BHA.
Virginia Ironside - she has declared her own war on religion and the church.
Zoe Margolis - Guardianista and sex obsessed blogger.
Michael Rubenstein - BHA supporter and human rights advocate. He doesn't appear to advocate any of the responsibilities that go with human rights.
Lord Avebury - supporter of the NSS and signatory of the letter opposing Pope Benedict's visit to Great Britain.
Lorraine Barratt - Labour Party apparatchik and supporter of the BHA
Polly Toynbee - infamous socialist hypocrite, Guardianista, Beeboid, atheist and supporter of the BHA.
C. J. De Mooi - all around weirdo, homosexual activist and supporter of the BHA.
Nick Ross - life long Beeboid. Being potty trained at the BBC, it is unlikely Nick can form an opinion outside their notoriously biased world view.
Dan Snow - a British-Canadian, whatever that is, like Nick Ross he was potty trained at the BBC. It is unlikely he can form an independent opinion outside of the BBC world view.
Sir David Smith - a life long Australian professional bureaucrat.
Tim Minchin - an exclusively educated Australian atheist
Peter Tatchell - Australian homosexual activists who ran away to Great Britain to avoid conscription into the Australian military. Despised in Great Britain for pursuing his perverts charter and adopting common cause with the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) to lower the age of consent for sex between adults and children.
The media is in the process of re-branding Tatchell from a homosexual activists to a human rights campaigner.
I could go on and expose the entire list of signatories as the gang of anti-British, self loathing activists that they are, who have been garnered together by the BHA and the BBC in order to counter David Cameron's assertion that Great Britain is still a Christian country. The pubs are open however, and I would prefer to spend my valuable time supping a few ales with real people rather than wallowing in the sump of contrived outrage by an agenda driven privileged elite.
In conclusion I will add that they are also attempting to rewrite history by completely ignoring Great Britain's Christian history, traditions and heritage as if it never happened and in the process create the perception that our country is already irreversibly a so called 'multi-cultural society'.
It isn't by a long way, and when the people take back control of their country they will ensure it never will be.
To that end I will personally be voting for the United Kingdom Independence Party in the forthcoming elections and encourage all those that believe in the continued existence of Great Britain to do the same.
Monday, April 7, 2014
Immigration, Gay Marriage, Foreign Aid - Politicians' War Against The People
Arrogant, greedy, corrupt, self serving and out-of-touch are words and phrases that are frequently employed whenever anyone is asked to give an opinion on the current crop of politicians. To say that there is a disconnect between the people and their representatives would the understatement of the century and it is worth exploring this a little further.
The relationship between governments and the people has, over several decades, altered to the point where politicians and their armies of bureaucrats believe that the people are subject to them and they consider it impertinence and downright insubordination whenever the people question their actions or behavior.
By their collective ignorance, intellectual laziness and predictable voting habits, the people have brought this down upon their own heads but fortunately the wind of change is blowing across the political landscape and the people are slowly awaking from their decades long slumber.
It can be said without fear of contradiction that a political class has arisen across the entire civilised world and embarked upon a transformational agenda of such magnitude they know that people will not give their consent.
This agenda is designed to re-order the nations of the world and engineer the equality of nations, together with giving moral equivalence to cultures, religions and ethnic groups regardless of their evolutionary stage..
This cannot be achieved by raising undeveloped, uncivilized cultures, religions and ethnic groups up to level of the developed world, therefore it is being achieved by deliberately down grading the civilized world to the lowest common denominator of nations.
This will include the redistribution of wealth using any excuse possible, including increasing foreign aid to a percentage of GDP, the transferring industry and technology under the auspices of the UN, to the perverting of science in the name of combating climate change.
If anyone thinks this is an exercise in exaggeration or hyperbole then I challenge them to visit, as an educational example, some of the transformed areas of England, such as Tower Hamlets, Brick Lane or Bethnal Green in the East End of London, the St. Pauls area of Bristol, the Mosside area of Manchester along with any number of towns and villages that are unrecognizable as anything other than the third world.
As far as my research goes, this downgrading is not unique to Great Britain and is occurring right across the developed, civilized world, including the USA, Canada and Australia.
I will, however, restrict this article to Great Britain for reasons of familiarity and take it as read that I am correct in my other assertion unless proved otherwise.
The current Prime Minister of Great Britain, David Cameron, is part of the global elite that has been chosen and groomed to impose the transformational agenda on the British people and he is as determined as he is unrepentant.
When he makes a speech or offers a comment on any subject, his view is always in opposition to the will of the people; it is as if he is openly showing his allegiance to the global elite and his utter contempt for the plebeians that inhabit the British Isles.
David Cameron has a sophisticated political machinery at his disposal and this contains some of the most accurate pollsters and political scientists in the game, this includes Lord Ashcroft from his own conservative party. He is well aware of the issues that are of most concern to the British people together with where they stand with reference to them.
On the issue of foreign aid, the British people are as unanimous as it is possible to be. When the country is borrowing over one hundred billion pounds per year and people are struggling to pay their bills, they don't want their money given to China or to space age India or to nuclear armed Pakistan or to kleptocrat African despots.
They also don't want half a billion pounds of their money given to multi-millionaire professionals from the burgeoning foreign aid industry.
Cameron is well aware of this but displays his contempt for the British people by announcing that his biggest single achievement since taking office is the doubling of foreign aid. He is also sending a signal to his colleagues in the global elite that he is meeting their target of 0.7% of GDP.
The British people did not want traditional marriage to be abolished but the global elite were adamant that it should be. Cameron was only too happy to oblige, and in a calculated insult he planned to send his legislators to around the world to help other countries impose homosexual marriage on their people.
And so it goes on, his contempt for the British people and his allegiance to the trendy 'progressive' elite is on display with issues such as 'combating climate change'. He knows the people have woken up to the scam but he continues imposing hardship on the people and wrecking the British economy in the process.
On the issue of surrendering sovereignty to the unelected, unaccountable, unsackable bureaucrats of the European Union he is again at odds with the people.
Despite describing himself as Eurosceptic, Cameron "firmly believes" that Britain should remain shackled to this failing corrupt abomination that was conceived by bureaucrats, in the interests of bureaucrats and for the benefit of bureaucrats.
The latest in a long line of corruption scandals in the British Parliament has demonstrated Cameron's willingness to set aside the rule of law in order to protect one of his own. Maria Miller, the Secretary of State at the Orwellian Department of Culture, Media and Sport, willfully stole from the British public to line her own pocket.
Despite calls for her sacking by the vast majority of the British people, Cameron is giving her his "warm support".
Apart from a minority of 'progressives' and self loathers the British people are against the pernicious human rights laws that are preventing the removal of undesirables from the country no matter how heinous their crimes. The politicians know this is the case but refuse to act in the interests of the people but acquiesce instead to the global elite.
The one issue that unites the majority of the British in opposition to the political class is open border mass immigration. This is the issue that has caused so much damage to Great Britain, its economy, its communities and its way of life.
This is also the issue that the political class are determined to persevere with in order to meet their obligation of downgrading Great Britain to third world status.
This is the issue where politicians spin, obfuscate, lie, smear, threaten with prosecution and generally browbeat the people with political correctness into submission.
Being the calculating liars that politicians are, they paint a picture of Great Britain as a peaceful, multi-cultural nirvana, where all the different cultures and ethnic groups live side by side in perfect harmony with mutual respect for each other.
If there is any animosity then it is blamed on the white indigenous people, who are painted as nothing more than intolerant bigots who display an inherent capacity for racism.
The reality is somewhat different and it is on display for all to see should they follow the news or take the time to go and look for themselves.
Great Britain is divided into semi-autonomous, mono-cultural, welfare addicted, crime ridden ghettos where, as in some areas, the Queens writ no longer applies. The law is applied selectively or ignored entirely depending on cultural requirements, except in areas populated by the indigenous people.
The leaders of the three legacy parties, David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Red Ed Miliband speak as one in support of mass immigration and never miss an opportunity to proclaim the economic benefits of this disaster or the enrichment it has brought to their lives.
None of these three live in the areas that are blighted by Muslim paedophile gangs, Islamic Jihadi's, Jamaican Yardie gangs, Chinese Triads, East European street gangs, Romanian gypsies, drug gangs, turf wars, beggars, pickpockets, burglars, foreign rapists and murderers, yet they expect the British to endure this without complaint and consider it to be culturally enriching.
As mentioned earlier the British people are slowly awakening from their slumber and they are starting to hold the political class to account. The rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) is spreading panic among the Westminster bubble and those that facilitate the corruption and criminality that passes for politics in Great Britain.
With elections imminent the smear machines are cranking up to full speed and the insults are flowing thick and fast. Cameron himself has previously insulted millions of supporters, including the thousands who have switched their allegiance from his supposedly detoxified conservative party to UKIP, by referring to them as "fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists".
His party has further alienated the British people, and further marginalized the Muslim community, when the insult was repeated by the over promoted and utterly useless, Baroness Warsi.
She lumbers under the title of Minister for Faith and Communities and must realize that she is in government not because of any skills or achievements but because she is not white, a woman and a Muslim.
Warsi has a habit of using the smear "far right" when anyone has the temerity to question open border mass immigration or the myth of a multi-cultural society.
The reaction to the two televised debates between UKIP leader Nigel Farage and the Liberal Democrat party leader, Nick Clegg, demonstrated convincingly that the British people are on the march toward wresting their country back from the career politicians and bureaucrats who have done so much damage to the people and the British way of life.
Mr Farage demolished the arguments of the man who people now acknowledge is a potty trained European Union fanatic. Great Britain hater, Nick Clegg, represents all that is deceitful in a political order that hails from a tiny elite of professional like minded 'progressives' that believe their world view is the one that should be imposed on the people whether they agree or not. .
Hopefully along with Cameron, Red Ed Miliband and the rest of the political elite, Clegg will be unceremoniously dispatched by the people of Sheffield Hallam, into the dustbin of history where he so rightly belongs.
.....................................................................................................................................
I am off on a mini tour around South Wales to see the lie of the political landscape and maybe, at great risk to myself, indulge in a little electioneering for any anti-socialist, pro-British causes.
Blogging may possibly be sporadic but I hope to update Facebook where I can. I will also be visiting Middlesex and Surrey to imbibe some of the worlds best ales.
The relationship between governments and the people has, over several decades, altered to the point where politicians and their armies of bureaucrats believe that the people are subject to them and they consider it impertinence and downright insubordination whenever the people question their actions or behavior.
By their collective ignorance, intellectual laziness and predictable voting habits, the people have brought this down upon their own heads but fortunately the wind of change is blowing across the political landscape and the people are slowly awaking from their decades long slumber.
It can be said without fear of contradiction that a political class has arisen across the entire civilised world and embarked upon a transformational agenda of such magnitude they know that people will not give their consent.
This agenda is designed to re-order the nations of the world and engineer the equality of nations, together with giving moral equivalence to cultures, religions and ethnic groups regardless of their evolutionary stage..
This cannot be achieved by raising undeveloped, uncivilized cultures, religions and ethnic groups up to level of the developed world, therefore it is being achieved by deliberately down grading the civilized world to the lowest common denominator of nations.
This will include the redistribution of wealth using any excuse possible, including increasing foreign aid to a percentage of GDP, the transferring industry and technology under the auspices of the UN, to the perverting of science in the name of combating climate change.
If anyone thinks this is an exercise in exaggeration or hyperbole then I challenge them to visit, as an educational example, some of the transformed areas of England, such as Tower Hamlets, Brick Lane or Bethnal Green in the East End of London, the St. Pauls area of Bristol, the Mosside area of Manchester along with any number of towns and villages that are unrecognizable as anything other than the third world.
As far as my research goes, this downgrading is not unique to Great Britain and is occurring right across the developed, civilized world, including the USA, Canada and Australia.
I will, however, restrict this article to Great Britain for reasons of familiarity and take it as read that I am correct in my other assertion unless proved otherwise.
The current Prime Minister of Great Britain, David Cameron, is part of the global elite that has been chosen and groomed to impose the transformational agenda on the British people and he is as determined as he is unrepentant.
When he makes a speech or offers a comment on any subject, his view is always in opposition to the will of the people; it is as if he is openly showing his allegiance to the global elite and his utter contempt for the plebeians that inhabit the British Isles.
David Cameron has a sophisticated political machinery at his disposal and this contains some of the most accurate pollsters and political scientists in the game, this includes Lord Ashcroft from his own conservative party. He is well aware of the issues that are of most concern to the British people together with where they stand with reference to them.
On the issue of foreign aid, the British people are as unanimous as it is possible to be. When the country is borrowing over one hundred billion pounds per year and people are struggling to pay their bills, they don't want their money given to China or to space age India or to nuclear armed Pakistan or to kleptocrat African despots.
They also don't want half a billion pounds of their money given to multi-millionaire professionals from the burgeoning foreign aid industry.
Cameron is well aware of this but displays his contempt for the British people by announcing that his biggest single achievement since taking office is the doubling of foreign aid. He is also sending a signal to his colleagues in the global elite that he is meeting their target of 0.7% of GDP.
The British people did not want traditional marriage to be abolished but the global elite were adamant that it should be. Cameron was only too happy to oblige, and in a calculated insult he planned to send his legislators to around the world to help other countries impose homosexual marriage on their people.
And so it goes on, his contempt for the British people and his allegiance to the trendy 'progressive' elite is on display with issues such as 'combating climate change'. He knows the people have woken up to the scam but he continues imposing hardship on the people and wrecking the British economy in the process.
On the issue of surrendering sovereignty to the unelected, unaccountable, unsackable bureaucrats of the European Union he is again at odds with the people.
Despite describing himself as Eurosceptic, Cameron "firmly believes" that Britain should remain shackled to this failing corrupt abomination that was conceived by bureaucrats, in the interests of bureaucrats and for the benefit of bureaucrats.
The latest in a long line of corruption scandals in the British Parliament has demonstrated Cameron's willingness to set aside the rule of law in order to protect one of his own. Maria Miller, the Secretary of State at the Orwellian Department of Culture, Media and Sport, willfully stole from the British public to line her own pocket.
Despite calls for her sacking by the vast majority of the British people, Cameron is giving her his "warm support".
Apart from a minority of 'progressives' and self loathers the British people are against the pernicious human rights laws that are preventing the removal of undesirables from the country no matter how heinous their crimes. The politicians know this is the case but refuse to act in the interests of the people but acquiesce instead to the global elite.
The one issue that unites the majority of the British in opposition to the political class is open border mass immigration. This is the issue that has caused so much damage to Great Britain, its economy, its communities and its way of life.
This is also the issue that the political class are determined to persevere with in order to meet their obligation of downgrading Great Britain to third world status.
This is the issue where politicians spin, obfuscate, lie, smear, threaten with prosecution and generally browbeat the people with political correctness into submission.
Being the calculating liars that politicians are, they paint a picture of Great Britain as a peaceful, multi-cultural nirvana, where all the different cultures and ethnic groups live side by side in perfect harmony with mutual respect for each other.
If there is any animosity then it is blamed on the white indigenous people, who are painted as nothing more than intolerant bigots who display an inherent capacity for racism.
The reality is somewhat different and it is on display for all to see should they follow the news or take the time to go and look for themselves.
Great Britain is divided into semi-autonomous, mono-cultural, welfare addicted, crime ridden ghettos where, as in some areas, the Queens writ no longer applies. The law is applied selectively or ignored entirely depending on cultural requirements, except in areas populated by the indigenous people.
The leaders of the three legacy parties, David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Red Ed Miliband speak as one in support of mass immigration and never miss an opportunity to proclaim the economic benefits of this disaster or the enrichment it has brought to their lives.
None of these three live in the areas that are blighted by Muslim paedophile gangs, Islamic Jihadi's, Jamaican Yardie gangs, Chinese Triads, East European street gangs, Romanian gypsies, drug gangs, turf wars, beggars, pickpockets, burglars, foreign rapists and murderers, yet they expect the British to endure this without complaint and consider it to be culturally enriching.
As mentioned earlier the British people are slowly awakening from their slumber and they are starting to hold the political class to account. The rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) is spreading panic among the Westminster bubble and those that facilitate the corruption and criminality that passes for politics in Great Britain.
With elections imminent the smear machines are cranking up to full speed and the insults are flowing thick and fast. Cameron himself has previously insulted millions of supporters, including the thousands who have switched their allegiance from his supposedly detoxified conservative party to UKIP, by referring to them as "fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists".
His party has further alienated the British people, and further marginalized the Muslim community, when the insult was repeated by the over promoted and utterly useless, Baroness Warsi.
She lumbers under the title of Minister for Faith and Communities and must realize that she is in government not because of any skills or achievements but because she is not white, a woman and a Muslim.
Warsi has a habit of using the smear "far right" when anyone has the temerity to question open border mass immigration or the myth of a multi-cultural society.
The reaction to the two televised debates between UKIP leader Nigel Farage and the Liberal Democrat party leader, Nick Clegg, demonstrated convincingly that the British people are on the march toward wresting their country back from the career politicians and bureaucrats who have done so much damage to the people and the British way of life.
Mr Farage demolished the arguments of the man who people now acknowledge is a potty trained European Union fanatic. Great Britain hater, Nick Clegg, represents all that is deceitful in a political order that hails from a tiny elite of professional like minded 'progressives' that believe their world view is the one that should be imposed on the people whether they agree or not. .
Hopefully along with Cameron, Red Ed Miliband and the rest of the political elite, Clegg will be unceremoniously dispatched by the people of Sheffield Hallam, into the dustbin of history where he so rightly belongs.
.....................................................................................................................................
I am off on a mini tour around South Wales to see the lie of the political landscape and maybe, at great risk to myself, indulge in a little electioneering for any anti-socialist, pro-British causes.
Blogging may possibly be sporadic but I hope to update Facebook where I can. I will also be visiting Middlesex and Surrey to imbibe some of the worlds best ales.
Thursday, April 3, 2014
Mammoth EU-Africa Summit - Failed Superstate's Desperate Attempt To Stop China
The one thing that politicians and bureaucrats love most of all is a summit meeting; topics are irrelevant so long as the world's media are present and the taxpayers are picking up the bill. If ever a politician or a bureaucrat goes missing the chances are they'll be found in some expensive location attending a summit.
The sheer number of summits for our representatives to attend is mind boggling. There's the UN, NATO, G20, G8, Commonwealth Heads of Government, WTO from Doha to Cancun, EU Foreign Ministers, The Earth summit, Climate Change summits, Bilderberg conferences, to name but a few.
Apart from dining on the best cuisine our money can buy, what goes on at these summits is a mystery. All the taxpaying public get for their money is a photo opportunity, where publicity conscious politicians elbow each other to stand next to President Obama or Angela Merkel, and a joint communique which says nothing of consequence.
Life carries on after a summit meeting much as it did before, the only difference appears to be a few extra pounds added to the weight of each attendee and a few extra pounds subtracted from the purses and wallets of the hard pressed taxpayers.
One also has to bear in mind that prior to these summits, lesser politicians and bureaucrats from participant countries have met up multiple times, at great cost to the taxpayer, in order to set up the whole jamboree in the first place.
One of the biggest summit meetings in history is taking place at the moment in Brussels, where some seventy politicians and bureaucrats will attend the mammoth European Union-Africa summit. This has supposedly been convened to improve political and economic ties between the EU and Africa with an emphasis on development aid, climate change and migration.
In reality this particular summit is a desperate attempt by the EU bureaucrats to stop dynamic countries with growing economies such as China, India and Brazil from replacing the collapsing economies of the stagnant, out of date EU with respect to development in Africa.
Incidentally, an agenda like this should send shivers down the spine of every taxpayer in Great Britain and Germany as this is the sort of trendy, ego massaging nonsense that the politicians love to wallow in, especially when it involves publicly promising to give away more taxpayers money. (The rest of the EU countries are too bankrupt to make a meaningful contribution)
The summit itself didn't get off to a very good start when Zimbabwe's long time tyrant, Robert Mugabe, suggested a boycott which didn't materialize - he failed to attend anyway because his notorious shopaholic wife Grace was refused a visa.
South Africa's erratic corruptocrat, Jacob Zuma, also refused to attend using the excuse that he was too busy. It would appear that looting the Treasury and stealing money destined for development aid in order to renovate his personal mansion, is obviously a time consuming business.
Also in non attendance was Sudan's President Omar al-Bashir on account that he is wanted for war crimes and would be liable to arrest the moment he steps off the plane.
Among those who are attending the summit are Kenya's Uhuru Kenyatta, who us currently under indictment at the International Criminal Court.
Also in attendance are Nigerian corruptocrat Goodluck Jonathan, the long term Ugandan despot and gay hater, Yoweri Museveni and a boat load of other unsavoury characters who routinely loot, pillage, starve and generally oppress the unfortunate people of Africa.
More attendees here.
Why UN Secretary General, Ban Ki moon is attending is a mystery for the simple reason that his organization is crippled by inefficiency, incompetence, anti semitism and corruption.
The sole function of the UN at this point in its history is to provide a platform for every anti-American, anti-Israel, anti-Western, anti-Christian, anti-Capitalist totalitarian nut case on the planet.
The reason that African leaders love the UN so much cannot be based on its performance with respect to their continent. It has spectacularly failed to stop wars, including civil wars, genocide, famine, mutilations, torture, rape, murder, kidnapping for child soldiers, together with the widespread looting of aid money and natural resources.
Apart from indulging in another taxpayer funded junket and taking the opportunity to polish their 'progressive' compassionate credentials on the world stage, the stark fact is that despite the outpouring of positive propaganda, the European Union is a complete and utter failure.
The Soviet Union type command and control of all aspects of political, economic and personal life by a bloated unaccountable bureaucracy is out of date. The EU today is stuffed to the gunwales with time expired politicians and career bureaucrats who's only function is to churn out ever increasing amounts of regulations that strangle economic growth and job creation.
Due to the inbuilt inefficiencies and corruption of self serving bureaucracies, they require ever increasing amounts of money just to service themselves. There is no extra benefit to the taxpayer for the ever increasing contributions, only more regulations requiring more bureaucrats.
Using free enterprise principles, the dynamic economies of China, India and Brazil are catching up and overtaking the moribund EU and slowly replacing it as a dominant force on the geopolitical stage. Africa is in the process of disengaging from its former colonial masters and realigning itself with the up and coming power houses of Asia and Brazil.
In a 2012 paper, the European Centre for Development Policy Management (ECDPM) was forced to admit that the relationship between Africa and the EU is changing, noting that Africa is on the rise while the EU is on the wane.
This paper highlights the outdated attitudes of the EU towards Africa and the changing attitude of Africans to development, they are now focusing on trade and investment instead of monetary aid.
Informed people have been warning for decades that pouring endless sums of aid money into Africa will not cure the problems that have blighted the continent since the end of the colonial era.
Trillions have been pumped into Africa in the decades since de-colonization and the situation of the people has got increasingly worse.
Award winning Zambian economist, Dambisa Moyo will know more about the damage aid does to the African people than any European Union bureaucrat, publicity seeking Hollywood actor or ageing celebrity rock star.
She explains it all in her book Dead Aid.
Dambisa Moyo also accurately predicted America's descent into socialism.
Unscrupulous vested interests that benefit from the aid industry have always framed the debate on development aid including the use of harrowing images of starving children to ensure that emotion and hand wringing replaces common sense and logic.
The multi-millionaire aid industry professionals, along with publicity seeking celebrities and agenda driven politicians, are responsible for prolonging misery, disease and death across the African continent, either to appease their white mans guilt or to further their own selfish ends.
It's worth quoting from this report as it not only highlights the changing attitudes of African nations to development through investment and trade as opposed to monetary aid, but it also exposes the real reason for this mammoth summit.
With reference to the EU and Africa:
"The marked reversal of roles between the two continents is a good starting point. Many African countries are experiencing unprecedented economic growth, with a booming natural resources sector and growing markets. Europe meanwhile, is struggling with financial crisis, soaring debt, budget cuts and widespread euro-skepticism".
The wind of change is blowing across Africa but the mindset of the out of date Brussels bureaucrats is too fixed in their anachronistic ideology to understand and adjust accordingly.
"This trend is reinforced by new development partners, such as India, China and Brazil, promoting new kinds of relationships that prioritise trade, investment and geopolitics over official development assistance (ODA)."
This quote confirms what the realists have been saying for years only for them to be derided and smeared with accusations of cruelty, racism and lack of compassion.
"Many African countries' attitudes towards development assistance have changed as well. Rather than relying on ODA, African countries are actively developing other policies and methods to insure economic growth. Domestic resource mobilization, innovative ways to secure national and regional financing and utilization of the resource boom for wider development are examples of new ideas that call for rethinking the role of aid."
EU politicians and bureaucrats are unable to rethink the role of aid because they have committed themselves to giving away 0.7% of GDP whether recipient countries need it or not.
"The game has thus truly changed.
...West African countries led by Nigeria refused to open their economies to free trade with the European Union.
One report says negotiations over the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) stalled two years ago after countries of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) resisted lifting tariff barriers over fears they could crush nascent industries unable to cope with European imports."
The Eurocrats still maintain that using collective bargaining clout to secure global trade deals is an advantage of EU membership. Obviously not in the case of ECOWAS. Great Britain could have secured an independent trade deal had it not been shackled to the EU dead horse.
"The EU should learn from this episode. The bloc, on the other hand, should disabuse itself of delusions of grandeur, because it's greatness is well and truly gone and the wealth accumulated by theft and plunder is fast diminishing. (Ouch! That's a home truth).
"Europe can only be poorer; less powerful. The other point concerns the shifting power and economic dynamics with the rise of new players fronted by China."
The truth is there for all to see but the Eurocrats dedication to the United States of Europe project will always take priority over reality and the well being of the peoples of Europe.
"Statistics indicate that China's trade with Africa jumped from US$10 billion in 2000 to an estimated US$200 billion in 2013 and in the process overtook the United States as Africa's largest trading partner."
The rest of this eye opening article is here.
It should be accepted that it's all over for European Union and no amount of summit meetings with their promises of ever bigger sums of taxpayer money will alter the fact. The colonial age and its aftermath is over and done with. Africa is moving on and realigning itself with dynamic countries and their growing economies; the EU bureaucracy had better get used to it.
As the western countries concentrate on imposing their Marxist inspired 'progressive' agendas on their reluctant populations, Africa and the developing world are moving on and it won't be too long before their global positions are reversed.
If events carry on as they are, anyone with an imagination will have some idea of how history will progress from this point.
Resource rich African states using free enterprise principles, and guided by China, India and Brazil, will realize their potential and prosper; they will continue to develop and eventually overtake the current developed world.
The so called developed world, including the USA, will continue its descent into self imposed mediocrity where inequality has been erased and everyone will be equally poor and miserable.
While African states and the developing world starts to move ahead, western politicians will continue fiddling their expenses and obsessing about gender neutrality, sexuality, gay rights, women's rights, minority rights, animal's rights, abortion, diversity, community cohesion, cultural sensitivity, multi-culturalism, combating climate change and redistribution of what little wealth there is left.
In conclusion, it must be admitted that the EU is time expired, inefficient, corrupt and totally moribund. A self serving, unelected, bloated bureaucracy stuffed with inexperienced career bureaucrats and retired politicians dedicated to outdated ideologies cannot compete in the new dynamic world.
It is in the peoples interests to bring this monster down and enjoy the blessings that are inherent in freedom and liberty.
The sheer number of summits for our representatives to attend is mind boggling. There's the UN, NATO, G20, G8, Commonwealth Heads of Government, WTO from Doha to Cancun, EU Foreign Ministers, The Earth summit, Climate Change summits, Bilderberg conferences, to name but a few.
Apart from dining on the best cuisine our money can buy, what goes on at these summits is a mystery. All the taxpaying public get for their money is a photo opportunity, where publicity conscious politicians elbow each other to stand next to President Obama or Angela Merkel, and a joint communique which says nothing of consequence.
Life carries on after a summit meeting much as it did before, the only difference appears to be a few extra pounds added to the weight of each attendee and a few extra pounds subtracted from the purses and wallets of the hard pressed taxpayers.
One also has to bear in mind that prior to these summits, lesser politicians and bureaucrats from participant countries have met up multiple times, at great cost to the taxpayer, in order to set up the whole jamboree in the first place.
One of the biggest summit meetings in history is taking place at the moment in Brussels, where some seventy politicians and bureaucrats will attend the mammoth European Union-Africa summit. This has supposedly been convened to improve political and economic ties between the EU and Africa with an emphasis on development aid, climate change and migration.
In reality this particular summit is a desperate attempt by the EU bureaucrats to stop dynamic countries with growing economies such as China, India and Brazil from replacing the collapsing economies of the stagnant, out of date EU with respect to development in Africa.
Incidentally, an agenda like this should send shivers down the spine of every taxpayer in Great Britain and Germany as this is the sort of trendy, ego massaging nonsense that the politicians love to wallow in, especially when it involves publicly promising to give away more taxpayers money. (The rest of the EU countries are too bankrupt to make a meaningful contribution)
The summit itself didn't get off to a very good start when Zimbabwe's long time tyrant, Robert Mugabe, suggested a boycott which didn't materialize - he failed to attend anyway because his notorious shopaholic wife Grace was refused a visa.
South Africa's erratic corruptocrat, Jacob Zuma, also refused to attend using the excuse that he was too busy. It would appear that looting the Treasury and stealing money destined for development aid in order to renovate his personal mansion, is obviously a time consuming business.
Also in non attendance was Sudan's President Omar al-Bashir on account that he is wanted for war crimes and would be liable to arrest the moment he steps off the plane.
Among those who are attending the summit are Kenya's Uhuru Kenyatta, who us currently under indictment at the International Criminal Court.
Also in attendance are Nigerian corruptocrat Goodluck Jonathan, the long term Ugandan despot and gay hater, Yoweri Museveni and a boat load of other unsavoury characters who routinely loot, pillage, starve and generally oppress the unfortunate people of Africa.
More attendees here.
Why UN Secretary General, Ban Ki moon is attending is a mystery for the simple reason that his organization is crippled by inefficiency, incompetence, anti semitism and corruption.
The sole function of the UN at this point in its history is to provide a platform for every anti-American, anti-Israel, anti-Western, anti-Christian, anti-Capitalist totalitarian nut case on the planet.
The reason that African leaders love the UN so much cannot be based on its performance with respect to their continent. It has spectacularly failed to stop wars, including civil wars, genocide, famine, mutilations, torture, rape, murder, kidnapping for child soldiers, together with the widespread looting of aid money and natural resources.
Apart from indulging in another taxpayer funded junket and taking the opportunity to polish their 'progressive' compassionate credentials on the world stage, the stark fact is that despite the outpouring of positive propaganda, the European Union is a complete and utter failure.
The Soviet Union type command and control of all aspects of political, economic and personal life by a bloated unaccountable bureaucracy is out of date. The EU today is stuffed to the gunwales with time expired politicians and career bureaucrats who's only function is to churn out ever increasing amounts of regulations that strangle economic growth and job creation.
Due to the inbuilt inefficiencies and corruption of self serving bureaucracies, they require ever increasing amounts of money just to service themselves. There is no extra benefit to the taxpayer for the ever increasing contributions, only more regulations requiring more bureaucrats.
Using free enterprise principles, the dynamic economies of China, India and Brazil are catching up and overtaking the moribund EU and slowly replacing it as a dominant force on the geopolitical stage. Africa is in the process of disengaging from its former colonial masters and realigning itself with the up and coming power houses of Asia and Brazil.
In a 2012 paper, the European Centre for Development Policy Management (ECDPM) was forced to admit that the relationship between Africa and the EU is changing, noting that Africa is on the rise while the EU is on the wane.
This paper highlights the outdated attitudes of the EU towards Africa and the changing attitude of Africans to development, they are now focusing on trade and investment instead of monetary aid.
Informed people have been warning for decades that pouring endless sums of aid money into Africa will not cure the problems that have blighted the continent since the end of the colonial era.
Trillions have been pumped into Africa in the decades since de-colonization and the situation of the people has got increasingly worse.
Award winning Zambian economist, Dambisa Moyo will know more about the damage aid does to the African people than any European Union bureaucrat, publicity seeking Hollywood actor or ageing celebrity rock star.
She explains it all in her book Dead Aid.
Dambisa Moyo also accurately predicted America's descent into socialism.
Unscrupulous vested interests that benefit from the aid industry have always framed the debate on development aid including the use of harrowing images of starving children to ensure that emotion and hand wringing replaces common sense and logic.
The multi-millionaire aid industry professionals, along with publicity seeking celebrities and agenda driven politicians, are responsible for prolonging misery, disease and death across the African continent, either to appease their white mans guilt or to further their own selfish ends.
It's worth quoting from this report as it not only highlights the changing attitudes of African nations to development through investment and trade as opposed to monetary aid, but it also exposes the real reason for this mammoth summit.
With reference to the EU and Africa:
"The marked reversal of roles between the two continents is a good starting point. Many African countries are experiencing unprecedented economic growth, with a booming natural resources sector and growing markets. Europe meanwhile, is struggling with financial crisis, soaring debt, budget cuts and widespread euro-skepticism".
The wind of change is blowing across Africa but the mindset of the out of date Brussels bureaucrats is too fixed in their anachronistic ideology to understand and adjust accordingly.
"This trend is reinforced by new development partners, such as India, China and Brazil, promoting new kinds of relationships that prioritise trade, investment and geopolitics over official development assistance (ODA)."
This quote confirms what the realists have been saying for years only for them to be derided and smeared with accusations of cruelty, racism and lack of compassion.
"Many African countries' attitudes towards development assistance have changed as well. Rather than relying on ODA, African countries are actively developing other policies and methods to insure economic growth. Domestic resource mobilization, innovative ways to secure national and regional financing and utilization of the resource boom for wider development are examples of new ideas that call for rethinking the role of aid."
EU politicians and bureaucrats are unable to rethink the role of aid because they have committed themselves to giving away 0.7% of GDP whether recipient countries need it or not.
"The game has thus truly changed.
...West African countries led by Nigeria refused to open their economies to free trade with the European Union.
One report says negotiations over the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) stalled two years ago after countries of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) resisted lifting tariff barriers over fears they could crush nascent industries unable to cope with European imports."
The Eurocrats still maintain that using collective bargaining clout to secure global trade deals is an advantage of EU membership. Obviously not in the case of ECOWAS. Great Britain could have secured an independent trade deal had it not been shackled to the EU dead horse.
"The EU should learn from this episode. The bloc, on the other hand, should disabuse itself of delusions of grandeur, because it's greatness is well and truly gone and the wealth accumulated by theft and plunder is fast diminishing. (Ouch! That's a home truth).
"Europe can only be poorer; less powerful. The other point concerns the shifting power and economic dynamics with the rise of new players fronted by China."
The truth is there for all to see but the Eurocrats dedication to the United States of Europe project will always take priority over reality and the well being of the peoples of Europe.
"Statistics indicate that China's trade with Africa jumped from US$10 billion in 2000 to an estimated US$200 billion in 2013 and in the process overtook the United States as Africa's largest trading partner."
The rest of this eye opening article is here.
It should be accepted that it's all over for European Union and no amount of summit meetings with their promises of ever bigger sums of taxpayer money will alter the fact. The colonial age and its aftermath is over and done with. Africa is moving on and realigning itself with dynamic countries and their growing economies; the EU bureaucracy had better get used to it.
As the western countries concentrate on imposing their Marxist inspired 'progressive' agendas on their reluctant populations, Africa and the developing world are moving on and it won't be too long before their global positions are reversed.
If events carry on as they are, anyone with an imagination will have some idea of how history will progress from this point.
Resource rich African states using free enterprise principles, and guided by China, India and Brazil, will realize their potential and prosper; they will continue to develop and eventually overtake the current developed world.
The so called developed world, including the USA, will continue its descent into self imposed mediocrity where inequality has been erased and everyone will be equally poor and miserable.
While African states and the developing world starts to move ahead, western politicians will continue fiddling their expenses and obsessing about gender neutrality, sexuality, gay rights, women's rights, minority rights, animal's rights, abortion, diversity, community cohesion, cultural sensitivity, multi-culturalism, combating climate change and redistribution of what little wealth there is left.
In conclusion, it must be admitted that the EU is time expired, inefficient, corrupt and totally moribund. A self serving, unelected, bloated bureaucracy stuffed with inexperienced career bureaucrats and retired politicians dedicated to outdated ideologies cannot compete in the new dynamic world.
It is in the peoples interests to bring this monster down and enjoy the blessings that are inherent in freedom and liberty.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)