Great Britain's Slow Surrender To Islam - Descent Into Oblivion Continues

The adoption of some aspects of Islamic law into its legal system is just one of a multitude of methods employed by the political establishment to reduce Great Britain from one of history's greatest superpowers, who's contribution to civilization is inestimable, into an upper class version of a third world country.

In order to better understand this issue one must first look at the type of person that masquerades as a politician these days together with their Modus Operandi.

Parliamentary representatives and their attendant bureaucrats no longer come from a broad spectrum of people who have spent a lifetime in the real world and who then went on to use that experience for the benefit of society with a period of public service.

Today's political elite hail from the same flawed gene pool who exiled themselves from the real world when they entered party politics straight from school. Regardless of party, they look the same, they talk the same and they all communicate with the public by using centrally issued slogans and sound bites.

As a political class they are indistinguishable from each other and when it comes to the major issues that are of most concern to the British people; they share the same agenda.

All the party leaders and their senior officers are Europhiles who are committed to handing over British sovereignty to the unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats in Brussels and they are all committed to the destruction of the British way of life in favour of a mythical 'multi-cultural society'

In an attempt to make this a fait accompli, the President of the Law society, a Mr. Nicholas Fluck, talks as if its already here. He justified this assault on this historic mainstay of British life by stating that "we live in a diverse, multi-faith, multi-cultural society".

What Mr. Fluck failed to do was enter the multitude of Sharia controlled ghettos that blight our country and inform the Muslim minority of this fact.

The governments Modus Operandi consists of setting a precedent or point of law using spin, deceit, obfuscation and lies.  Once the precedent is established they expand it and slowly increase its scope using stealth and more deceit.

The adoption of Islamic principles into British law is part of a long planned corruption of Great Britain's historic criminal justice system which, in turn, is part of the larger destruction agenda. It is being spun as a minor alteration of little significance but in truth the destructive consequences are enormous and should be resisted.

British law has evolved over centuries from Ethelred the Unready, Alfred the Great and the Magna Carta, to the blind folded Lady Justice with her scales and sword that we have today. Central to the British system is equality under the law for everyone regardless of gender or family status. This is not possible where Islam and its adherents are concerned.

Giving Islam cultural and moral equivalence to the British Judeo-Christian heritage is central to the ethnic cleansing agenda of the political establishment.  Anyone with an iota of intelligence can see that it isn't equivalent and never will be.

Looking at the violent events in today's world it is obvious that Islam and the majority of its adherents are incompatible with western civilization, particularly those civilisations with a Judeo-Christian heritage and moral code.

The majority of Muslims in Great Britain hail from Pakistan where the persecution and killing of Christians is embedded in their culture and legal system. It was the former President of Pakistan, General Musharraf, the supposed ally of the west, who extended the anti-Christian laws to include the death penalty.

Paedophilia is abhorrent in any civilised society but is an accepted practice in Islam. The police, the establishment and the criminal justice system have all ignored this barbaric practice supposedly in the interests of 'cultural sensitivity' and 'community cohesion'.

Great Britain's animal cruelty laws are routinely ignored to facilitate the provision of halal meat.

The political class are desperately trying to promote Islam as a religion of peace that has been hijacked by a few radicals, but this is a calculated deceit and one which doesn't stand up to the slightest scrutiny.

Here is a list of Muslim attacks on Christians around the world that the establishment would rather the British people didn't see.

According to the political establishment, including the former Archbishop of Canterbury,  the adoption of Islam and Sharia law is 'unavoidable' even though there are less than three million Muslims in a country of some sixty five million souls.

In desperation the government are using threats, intimidation, political correctness and the law to silence any critics of Islam and those that expose their policy to make it an acceptable, integral part of British life.

Unsurprisingly, the BBC, despite being publicly funded, acts as a mouthpiece for the government and willingly disseminates its pro Muslim propaganda.  There is no justifiable reason why a government propaganda department should be funded by the people under threat of prosecution and imprisonment.

In conclusion its worth noting that un-homogenizing, cultural replacement and multi-culturalism only travels in one direction, it only applies to the Angloshpere.

Multi-culturalism is touted as being 'progressive' and it is promoted as being desirable and a force for peace, if so then it should apply to all countries, including those in the Middle East and Africa together with China, Japan, Korea or the Indian sub continent.

It is time to redress the balance, therefore in the interests of fairness and reciprocation the British government, the Archbishop of Canterbury and Mr. Nicholas Fluck should insist that Christian legal protections be incorporated into the legal systems of the above mentioned countries.

All mosque building in Great Britain and the west should cease until the slaughter of non Muslims is stopped and churches are built in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere in the Muslim world.

Why the government uses Islam and its adherents as a front for their cultural replacement agenda is open to further debate but it must be recognized that if they get their way and continue on this destructive course, the Tigris will indeed flow with much blood.

Offended Immigrant Sues Jeremy Clarkson And Wants BBC To Drop Top Gear

One of the endearing characteristics of the long suffering British people is their placid acceptance of ingrates who have abandoned their home countries to enjoy the benefits of British hospitality then do nothing but complain about the host nation's way of life when it doesn't meet their expectations.

News that a little known Indian actress is suing Jeremy Clarkson and the BBC for a perceived insult to an ethnic group of which she does not belong should come as no surprise to anyone outside of the political correctness industry. It is also beyond obvious why this particular ingrate is taking the action that she is.

To say that Somi Guha's film career is non existent would be an understatement.  When the opportunity arose to make some easy money, and enhance her public profile in the process, she must have thought it was her birthday and Diwali rolled into one. The photograph that was used to front this lawsuit was hardly that of a grossly offended victim of bigotry but more of a failed actress using the best image in her portfolio to attract attention.

The lawsuit itself doesn't smell right. It claims that Ms. Guha has instructed lawyers at the trendy, 'right on' law firm Equal Justice, to sue Clarkson and the BBC for a million pounds.

Firstly, the alleged insult used the word 'slope' which refers to those of East Asian origin such as Japanese, Vietnamese or, as in this case, Burmese - she herself is an Indian therefore there are no grounds for her to be offended.

Secondly, where a little known actress gets the money to instigate a law suit is a mystery. She cannot possibly be offended to the point that she would risk her own treasure unless she was put up to it by a vested interest willing to fill her coffers and raise her public profile in order to censor Jeremy Clarkson.

For her information, Top Gear is one of the most popular programmes on the planet and Jeremy Clarkson one of the most popular presenters. The programme uses laddish or schoolboy humour and everyone knows it is irreverent and non politically correct.  If this is not to Ms. Guha's liking then she shouldn't watch it.

Switching off or changing channels is one of the benefits of living in a free country and it can be achieved using a remote control from the comfort of ones own armchair.

Immigrants demanding that the British people change their way of life and their attitudes in order to accommodate theirs has resulted in any Tom, Dick or Abdul taking action against the very people who gave them sanctuary and the opportunity to enjoy a better life than in their home country.

It is sad to note that oppressive political correctness, 'hate crime' laws and intimidation by organized smear units, prevents the majority of British people from revealing what they really think.  Being a dissenter I refuse to be intimidated by the establishment and I couldn't care less about being prosecuted.

However much I am vilified and accused of being a racist, I am not one;  I just happen to disagree with the current political class about open border mass immigration and I do not believe there is such a thing as a functioning multi-cultural society.

In the interests of community cohesion and cultural enrichment, I will try to help Ms. Guha, and other immigrants, to understand some of the harmless quirks of the British people that they should accept as guests. If they intend to settle in Great Britain they should adopt these little quirks and pass them on to future generations.

We British are self deprecating, we laugh and poke fun at each other, we call each other names and are not offended. We were brought up with a proverb which they should teach their own children:

"Sticks and stones can break my bones but names can never hurt me".

If you plan to settle in Great Britain I suggest you get used to it - its what we do, its part of our national character, its who we are and no amount of litigation, legislation or whining will change it. If you can't accept it then maybe Great Britain is not the place for you.

Here is a list of names and cat calls where no malice is intended and no offence is taken until the PC police undertook to impose their multi-cultural agenda:

Scottish people - Jocks, Tartan Terrorists, Ginger Mingers, Wife beaters

English people - Limeys (also generic British when abroad), Whinging Poms (By Australians) Stick your f*cking chariots up your a*rse is a quaint Welsh rugby chant.

Welsh people - Taffy's, Pit Boys, Pit Ponies. Morlocks, and my particular favourite, Sheep Sh*ggers.( This is my own ethnic group, I have been called all of these names and worse and never taken offence)

North East English People - Geordies

Liverpool people - Scousers

Then there's Mancs, Brummies, Kentish Men and Men of Kent.

Irish people - Paddy's, Bog Hoppers, Leprechauns, Micks

American people - Yanks, Sceptics ( rhyming slang based on sceptic tank)

Jewish people - Yids or 4x2's ( Rhyming slang again)

Gypsies - Gypos, Pikies and Didicoys for the flower selling variety.

British people never go for a Chinese meal, they always go for a Chinky.

No ethnic group should be surprised or offended if the indigenous British people give them a nickname.

Sledging and name calling on the field of sport is legendary and some of it is hair curling stuff. Listening to what Mohamed Ali called his opponents would send the serially offended running to their lawyers in fits of apoplexy wanting financial compensation for their own hurt feelings.

There are also names, some unflattering, for tall people, short, fat, thin, fast, slow and so on.

One of the more irritating aspects of the serially offended community is their taking of offence on behalf of other people who are not themselves offended. This gives the said community blanket coverage to be permanently offended and therefore an opportunity to impose political correctness, Cultural Marxism to give it its proper name,  and in effect censor unorthodox opinions.

One would have thought that being an Indian, and an actress to boot, she would make sure that her own house was in order before entering someone else's demanding they change their ways.

Bollywood, the world famous Indian film industry is renown for offending and insulting minorities particularly Sikhs and Muslims with women being a particular target.

It is not racist of me to suggest that Ms.Guha return to her native land and sue her socks off to end discrimination against women, lower caste people and immigrants who, incidentally, are only trying to make a living.

One of the most discriminated against minorities are Christians who unjustly make up six percent of India's prison population.

Excuses for Ms.Guha to issue law suits are in abundance in India where discrimination on the basis of gender and caste is legendary. Offensive and insulting names such as Dalit and Harijan are in common usage - Gandhi himself objected to the names, Harijan and Untouchables, being used for his fellow Indian citizens.

Ms. Guha could be offended and sue on behalf of the African community in Mumbai who are on the receiving end of appalling abuse and discrimination. Read the story of Nigerian Sambo Davis here.

Incidentally, referring to an African gentleman as 'Sambo' is taboo and grounds for a law suit so please Ms. Guha, instruct your lawyers to sue away.

The fact is that according to The Hindu newspaper,  Somi Guha's home country is rife with racism, discrimination and name calling so with that in mind I will articulate what the majority of British people are thinking; before you start agitating on your own or a vested interests behalf to change the British people's way of life, you should go back to your own country and put that right first.

Stephen Kinnock - Hereditary Socialists, Exclusion And Self Flagelation

Children who partake in destructive behavior toward themselves or others are usually diagnosed as having some disorder or other that requires medication to keep its symptoms under control. When whole communities numbering in the tens of thousands engage in similar destructive behavior there doesn't appear to be any pharmaceutical product on the market that could effect such a cure for so many.

Looking at the imposition of Stephen Kinnock as the next Member of Parliament for the people of Aberavon, one has to wonder what it will take for the people to alter their self harming behavior, even when some relatively minor alterations would have beneficial effects on their own and their children's future.

The circumstances surrounding the appointment of Stephen Kinnock, and the stench of political patronage it has left in its wake, deserves closer examination, as does the patronising attitude of the Labour party's political establishment toward the people of this constituency.

The people of Aberavon are obviously unaware of the destructive nature of their tribal voting habits and also the fact that by turning their constituency into a single party state they are effectively disenfranchising themselves.

The people need to understand that today's politicians are unscrupulous, unprincipled placemen who are trained in the black arts of media manipulation, spinning and lying. They have no interest in democracy or representing the people, their only interest is in their own agenda or that of the vested interest they represent.

Stephen Kinnock is a wealthy career bureaucrat who has achieved little in life using his own personal skills or resources. It would appear that he has trailed along on his parents coat tails benefiting from the power and influence they accumulated while in public office.

He may have been born in Wales but he was brought up in London, went to University in Cambridge then spent his formative years breathing the rarefied air of Brussels. He has had very little to do with Great Britain or its people and absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Wales, Aberavon or the working class.

The people of Aberavon are being intellectually lazy by not educating themselves on the motives of the modern day Labour party, nor are they scrutinizing the man who is being dumped on them by an exclusive London based elite of millionaire socialists who have seized control of the Labour movement.

They are incorrectly assuming that this is the same Labour movement that was formed during the industrial revolution. This movement was created by working people with a view to improving the condition of the masses and it was based on the Christian principle of the brotherhood of man.

Today, only four percent of Labour MP's come from the working class with the rest hailing from a wealthy metropolitan elite who have replaced the Christian roots of the party and its mission with a trendy, international 'progressive' agenda.

The powerful inner circle of the working class movement is closed to outsiders, especially working class people, who are deliberately excluded. Any lingering members of the working class in Parliament are powerless curiosities who will be replaced at the next election with elitists such as Stephen Kinnock.

The determination of the current leadership to keep control of the movement in perpetuity can be illustrated by the dynastic attitude to 'safe' seats. The socialist distaste for the hereditary principle is conveniently sidelined as the ruling elite parachute family members into constituencies populated by undiscerning tribal voters.

Apart from the London centric Kinnock, the born and bred Londoner, Hillary Benn, is the fourth generation of the Benn family to become an MP when he was dumped on the undiscerning people of Leeds.

Born and bred Londoner, Jack Dromey, was dumped on the people of Birmingham despite the constituency having an all woman shortlist. Dromey is the husband of senior Labour party stalwart, Harriet Harman. Apparently, their son Harry is on the look out for some dumb voters to represent.

Essex born Jack Straw was dumped in Blackburn and now is son William is being lined up with a 'safe' seat Lancashire.

Welsh Born John Prescott's son David is on the list, as is Tony Blair's son Euan who, despite being born and bred in London, has decided he would like to represent the people of Coventry.

All these prospective candidates have several things in common:

They are all from a wealthy elite.

None of them has ever had a proper job that normal people would consider as work.

None of them know the first thing about the working class, their hopes or their aspirations.

None of them can identify with working class people.

None of them will know anything about the constituency they will be representing nor will they care.

As they pursue their personal agenda, they will maintain the status quo in the constituency. If it is a poor constituency, it will remain poor.

After the last disastrous Labour government left the country bankrupt and transformed beyond recognition, it's a mystery why electors would self flagellate and vote for more of the same.

The people of Aberavon should learn from other tribal voting areas that their loyalty (some have described it as bovine stupidity) will be abused and their interests will not be a priority for Kinnock. They only need to look at the behavior of his parents and the way they treated the people they were supposed to be representing.

The Kinnock family are notorious in British politics for being the first family of troughing - for the uninitiated that means they have a penchant for lining their pockets with tax payers money - and also for being two of the biggest practitioners of socialist hypocrisy on the planet.

The mother of the clan is Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead, formally known as Glenys Kinnock. In complete contradiction to the spin doctors image of a dutiful wife, mother, school teacher and tireless advocate for the poor, she is a ruthless socialist dedicated to spreading her ideology across the planet.

The truth about Glenys Kinnock here.

The patriarch of the clan is Lord Kinnock of Bedwellty, formally know as Neil Kinnock. He is a serial loser who has no qualifications or accomplishments, but through patronage and corruption he made it to the top of the European Union bureaucracy making himself a multi million pound fortune in the process.

It is worth noting that Neil Kinnock was a career socialist politician who never won a general election as leader of the Labour party, he has never held a position in government nor has he any accomplishments or experience in the wealth creating sector. His fortune is made up mostly of taxpayers money he accumulated from lucrative appointments in the EU, his appointment to the House of Lords and sinecures from other contacts he made while in public office.

The truth about Neil Kinnock here.

There must be something in the water in that neck of the woods that separates people from their common sense. In the neighbouring constituency of Neath and Port Talbot, they embarrassed the whole of Wales by electing and re-electing the biggest political charlatan of them all.

The South African coward Peter Hain ran away from his native land, abandoning his comrades to their fate and he now has the temerity to associate himself with the fall of apartheid.

The truth about tribal voting and Peter Hain here and here.

Another tribal voting post here.

The people of Aberavon and other tribal voting areas should do themselves and their country a favour, wake up, learn to think for yourselves and ignore the Labour party elite.

Choose your own candidate from among yourselves, surely there is someone from within your own community that can represent the interests of the people better than a remote elitist who knows nothing about Aberavon or its people and who's only interest is the agenda of the international elite and their vested interests.   

For The European Union To Live Great Britain Must Die - The End Is Nigh Part III

It seems that whenever a British politician wants to get their name in the papers or their face on the television news bulletins all they have to do is propose something that is in the interest of the British people - they don't have to actually carry it out, just a mere mention is usually enough to trigger a chastising response from whatever European bureaucrat is policing British dissent that particular day.

These Eurocrats ought to know by now that all of these proposals are false promises that are made to appease the people's anger at the latest destructive EU diktat or a ploy to gain their votes at election time.

They should also know that the British political leadership are just as committed to 'ever closer union' and the federal superstate as they are, but it still makes them queasy when they see politicians reacting to the wishes of the people even though they know its all lies and bluster.

It's a measure of how much sovereignty the British political class has surrendered when not just the big hitters of the EU such as Angela Merkel, but political pygmies from any two penny nation feel they can lecture the British Prime Minister whenever he mentions anything that might be in the interests of the people he is supposed to be representing.

Who would have thought that a political pygmy named Herman von Rumpuy, an unheard of bureaucrat from a non entity of a country like Belgium, would tell the people of Great Britain that their country is finished as an independent nation state?

And who would have thought that Jose Manuel Barrosso, a self confessed Maoist from a bankrupt backwater like Portugal would threaten the British people with war if they left the EU?

Then there's Laszio Andros, a Hungarian communist apparatchik, who called the British people prejudiced and xenophobic because they don't want the services that they have paid for with their taxes, overrun by economic migrants from countries that were made destitute by Soviet communism.

Joining the queue to lecture the British people are Viviane Reding from tiny Luxembourg, Ollie Rhen from Finland, Mark Rutte from Holland and even some chap called Aligurdus Balevioius from Lithuania.

(See a previous post on these interfering nobody's here)

It is worth noting that all these bureaucrats  have two things in common:

a) None of them have been elected - they are all appointed by their fellow bureaucrats to positions of power and they cannot be removed by the people no matter how destructive they are or no matter what damage they may inflict.

b) They all want to see Great Britain de-homogenized and reduced to a multi-cultural province of the United States of Europe.

Any visitor or tourist to Great Britain will see that its culture and its unique way of life are being systematically destroyed at the behest of the supranational 'progressive' elite, led by these aforementioned bureaucrats of European Union and others from elsewhere, including the UN.

(This is undeniable as a visit to any village, town or city will attest - in some areas the indigenous population have been totally replaced and they are now unrecognizable as parts of Great Britain)

This raises a couple of questions upon which the survival of the British nation and its way of life now depends:

Great Britain has a population of some sixty two million, which is nothing compared to the EU population of over five hundred million, so why is it so important to the Eurocrats that Great Britain be destroyed in this manner? 

Notwithstanding the sixty million pounds of taxpayers money per day they purloin to finance their thievery and corruption, surely the EU would be better off without the destabilizing influence of the British, so why not let them go and rot on their tiny windswept island?

Looking at the recent events in Europe and taking into account British history, it doesn't require a great leap of imagination to understand why an independent, sovereign, homogeneous Great Britain poses such a threat to a post democratic United States of Europe.

The evidence is there for all to see - it cannot be denied that for the nations of Europe, excluding Germany, the EU has been an unmitigated disaster and for those in the Eurozone even more so. Greece, Cyprus, Italy and Ireland have lost their sovereignty altogether. Their right to self determination  has been removed and replaced by a government of appointed European bureaucrats.

Imagine what the effect would be on the poverty stricken unfortunates of the EU when they look at a prosperous people who are free from the stifling shackles of an immovable bureaucracy, enjoying the blessings of liberty just twenty two miles across the English Channel.

This would be destabilizing in the extreme and would invariably lead to liberation movements demanding a return of their sovereignty together with their democracies and their currencies.

The argument that the British people's well being depends on being shackled to a stifling Soviet style bureaucracy who's share of global prosperity is shrinking year on year, is complete and utter nonsense.

Bureaucracies by their very nature grow like an amoeba and spread like a disease until they have replaced individual liberty and decision making, this results in a degradation of every aspect of peoples lives.

Everything from energy usage, to rubbish collection to serving olive oil on restaurant tables is controlled by faceless EU bureaucrats who, incidentally, are some of the highest paid in the world.

The calculating despots and the anti-democratic dreamers who initiated the replacement of independent nation states with a federal superstate failed to take into account the nature and history of the British people.

Most of the countries that make up the EU have been conquered or dominated at some point in their recent histories;  despite numerous attempts, and sometimes against insurmountable odds, the British have not suffered such a setback since the Norman invasion of 1066. The British people do not like to be dominated in their native land and they cherish their freedom and independence.

Listening to some Europeans, German socialist leader Martin Schultz springs to mind, it is obvious that they harbor some envy and more than a little resentment at this history and the attitude it has begat. They would dearly love to see the British people taken down a peg or two for reasons of revenge as well as for the furthering of their federalist agenda.

I will agree with General de Gaulle who, when justifying his constant refusals to allow Great Britain to join the then Common Market, intimated correctly that British eyes cannot look inward to Europe, by their very nature they will always be looking across the wider oceans. Truer words were never spoken by a Frenchman.

An independent, free, prosperous nation trading with the world and at ease with itself will be too big a contrast to the miserable, impoverished citizens of a Soviet style superstate who's access to the freedom restoring instruments of democracy will have been removed.

For a United States of Europe to exist, Great Britain with its culture and its way of life must be destroyed, there cannot be both, it is one or the other. This is why every politician, every lobbyist and every charlatan with a vested interest clamps down hard the minute the British people stir from their slumber and force their politicians to make anti-EU noises.

At this point in history the Eurocrats are in the ascendancy and they have the ability to mobilise tremendous human and financial resources to fight for an end to British independence.

The people have the power to take their country back but whether they have the stamina and will to do so remains to be seen.

Putin v The West - The KGB v The PR Department. We Reap What We Sow

As events in the Ukraine and Crimea unfold it is becoming increasingly obvious that the western leaders are not just being out maneuvered by Russia's Vladimir Putin but they are being shown up for what they actually are, media created PR men with no experience in the real world in which we the people abide.

Just a tertiary glance at the backgrounds, experience and accomplishments of the current western leaders reveals weaknesses that any self respecting tyrant in search of his country's lost glory would be a fool to pass up.

It goes without saying that the fearsome reputation of the KGB is well deserved and therefore anyone who leads this organization is by nature ruthless and single minded - in addition, any KGB leader will be well versed in international affairs and a master of strategy.

Vladimir Putin meets these criteria in abundance and in addition he has acquired a degree of Public Relations and media management skills that matches those on which his western foes are totally reliant.

Here is the public face of Putin that the world sees, flip through and enjoy.

While a young Putin was honing his skills in the KGB, British Prime Minister, David Cameron, was behaving like the upper class twit that he is by attending raves and wrecking restaurants as a member of the exclusive Bullington Club. After his exclusive education he spent a couple of years as a PR man for a failed television company before taking his leave of the real world by entering the closed, incestuous world of party politics.

His supposed successor, George Osborne, who is the current Chancellor of the Exchequer, was also an upper class Bullington Club twit but apparently he did gain some real world experience prior to entering party politics by enjoying cocaine fuelled sessions with dominatrix Natalie Rowe.

Here are the public faces of David Cameron and George Osborne. Please try not to laugh.

Here's George and Natalie.

Barack Obama, the current leader of the free world and Commander in Chief' of the mightiest military machine on the planet, spent his formative years smoking dope and spending his time with Marxist professors before taking up a career in community organizing. President Obama spent his formative years in Indonesia, Hawaii and the Peoples Republic of Chicago.

The last G8 was a classic example of  the mentality of Cameron and his PR men, the manufactured charade of a tieless, down to earth summit was so contrived and phony it was an embarrassment for the people of Great Britain.

One would think that the European Union which prides itself on having the political clout of nearly five hundred million people would have Putin quaking in his kerenky and scurrying back to Moscow.

Who wouldn't be worried with the EU's High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice President if the European Union Commission beating a path to his door?

Vladimir Putin that's who. If the overtly pompous job title isn't enough to split ones side with laughter then the holder will most definitely cause a severe laceration.

The Right Honourable Baroness Ashton of Upholland is the official cover name for Cathy Ashton, a former hippy, serial supporter of left wing causes and the ultimate career bureaucrat. She has never held a proper job nor has she ever been elected to anything. She is one of the highest paid apparatchiks on earth and wields enormous political power, but sadly, in this new post democratic age, she has  been appointed and cannot be removed by the people no matter how destructive and incompetent she may be.

Here's the Baroness on the campaign trail.

One has to remember that Ashton was a Vice Chairperson and treasurer of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament which agitated for unilateral nuclear disarmament at the height of the Cold War. It is now coming to light that she accepted funding for her traitorous organization from the Soviet Union and they adopted the campaign slogan, "Better Red Than Dead".

More on the Baroness here.

Faced with this cast of characters and their priorities, is it any wonder that Vladimir Putin, who is desperate to return Russia to its former glory and influence, is behaving the way he is?

While Putin is running rampant around the globe and running rings around the western leaders, what exactly are their priorities?

State mandated equality and fairness is high on the agenda of both countries together with a plethora of trendy, bleeding heart, hand wringing, guilt ridden 'progressive' nonsense, designed to make the political class feel good about themselves and help them display their compassionate credentials on the world stage.

Other priorities include:

Minimum wage, soon to become Living wage.

Ensnaring more people into welfare dependency and entitlement addiction.

Imposing multi-culturalism via mass immigration and amnesty.

Downgrading the military and erasing their traditions and history. In the case of the USA, this includes feminizing as much as possible to ensure gender neutrality and gay friendliness.

Putting homosexuals on a pedestal, firstly with equal rights then with special rights and now with extra rights. This must be the most pampered minority group on earth bearing in mind their small numbers.

Wrecking traditional marriage and family life

Eradicating the western Judeo-Christian values and its moral compass and giving medieval death cults such as Islam, moral equivalence.

Impoverishing their respective peoples with spending, taxing, borrowing and debt for generations to come.

The list goes on and the longer it does the more Putin, and all the other enemies of the west, are emboldened. Unless something drastic happens and the people wake up to the danger, the west is doomed.

President Putin on western decline, read this and weep.

We the people are to blame - we've known for many years that the political class are out of control and treating us with contempt.

In Great Britain we know that the leaders of the three main parties share an identical agenda on the main issues. They are as one. We know that David Cameron, Nick Clegg and David Miliband hail from a remote elite with no affiliation with the people they are supposed to represent.

The same goes for President Obama.  Everyone knows he is a media created impostor and even when his first term turned out to be a disaster they fell for his spin a second time. The danger now is that like Great Britain, being lied to will be become a normal part of political discourse allowing politicians to get away with destructive policies and outright corruption.

As well as we the people, President Putin knows they are all media creations who are trained in the arts of media management, spin, deceit and lying and unlike Putin, we fall for their propaganda every time. The people are easily seduced with promises the politicians know they will not keep and we will lose our liberties and freedoms to become no better off than the unfortunates of Putin's prison states.

American blogger 90 Miles From Tyranny has put together a gallery of comparisons, well worth a look.

Netanyahu, Putin and Obama at age twenty three.

Vladimir Putin Vs Barack Obama - This is awesome.

Finally just for fun, guess the mystery world leader who would surely have sent Putin back to the Kremlin: Here and here.

New British Identity - Bestowed Upon Them By An Anti-British European

Any discussion about citizenship and national characteristics in a country consisting of two nations, a Principality, a Province and various quasi-autonomous areas such as Cornwall, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man, is bound to be difficult.

British identity is in the eye of the beholder, however most indigenous British people can agree on what they consider not to be British. Sadly, due to the crushing effect of political correctness and a fear of prosecution under Great Britain's Orwellian 'hate crime' laws, most people harbor these views in private, burying them deep inside themselves but holding them nonetheless.

It's a strange phenomenon that British people of all shades of opinion openly criticize, and even make derogatory remarks about their own country, but take umbrage when a foreigner or an immigrant voices similar sentiments. That same umbrage bubbled to the surface when the notoriously anti-British, Nick Clegg used a recent speech to redefine what it is to be British.

The fact that someone as anti-British as Clegg is holding the position of Deputy Prime Minister of our country is insult enough, but students of political speech making will realize that he was not only redefining British identity but openly displaying his contempt for the indigenous British people at the same time.

Clegg will be well aware of the issues that are of most concern to the British people and where they stand with regard to them.  With that in mind he has constructed his speech to:  a) redefine British identity in his own image, b) attempt to show some British roots, and c) insult, smear and denigrate anyone who holds traditional views.

The speech was also designed to pour scorn an anyone who disagrees with his view on the EU, immigration and multi-culturalism.   He also made the point of 'loving' everything about Great Britain that the indigenous people loath while making no mention of the things that matter.

Nick Clegg has done nothing of note in his life outside of politics and he is particularly steeped in the machinations of the European Union bureaucracy. He is ruthlessly dedicated to the destruction of Great Britain and its relegation to a mere province of a federal United States of Europe.

It becomes obvious the more one listens to Clegg that he can barely disguise his loathing for Great Britain, its people, its history, its culture together with its Judeo-Christian values and moral code. He is a placeman for the European Union zealots who have charged him with deceiving the British people into surrendering what's left of their sovereignty to the unelected bureaucrats in Brussels.

Despite the fact that Clegg is only one quarter English and considers himself a citizen of Europe, he deliberately used the collective 'we' when informing the people what he 'loved' about Great Britain in order to create the illusion that he is one of us. He needs to be told that after that insulting speech he most definitely is not.

As I have written previously we are standing amid the wreckage of a once great nation; a nation that achieved its greatness long before the arrival of people such as Clegg who's only mission in life is to destroy what's left of our great country.  A country that has been reduced to almost third world status and where vast areas have been turned into mono-cultural, poverty stricken, welfare addicted, crime ridden ghettos that don't resemble Great Britain in any way, shape or form.

Clegg considers this destruction to be a great achievement and it forms part of the Britain he 'loves'.

He claims that "he 'loves' the way we can cherish our traditions" while he is doing his best to erase those same traditions together with British patriotism and anything that is quintessentially British, all in the interests of multi-culturalism.

He claims that he 'loves' the fact 'we' churn out one ingenious invention after the next, such as the telephone, the steam engine, the jet engine, the world wide web etc.  For his information, these were 'churned' out long before his arrival on the scene when Britain was still a free, independent and sovereign nation. I am not sure that we could have 'churned' these inventions out in a dumbed down Britain run by Clegg and his cohorts.

He 'loves' the fact that 'we' insist on queuing abroad when the locals don't, which is nonsense - in my long expatriate career I didn't queue if the locals didn't, my elbows were sharp as anyone else's and they competed with the best of them.

Indulging in traditional 'progressive' propaganda, he 'loves' the fact that the BBC and the NHS are known and respected across the planet.

No they are not! The NHS is known for its death factories, inefficiencies, interminable waiting lists, its low cancer survival rates and the pathetically low life expectancy if one is taken sick at the weekend. The BBC is renown for its nature programs, Top Gear and its continuous output of left wing propaganda.

In an act designed to enrage the indigenous people Clegg 'loves' the fact that our cities are no longer British and have been colonized by every race, religion, colour and language in existence.

He 'loves' that his wife, the wealthy Spanish lawyer Miriam Gonzalez Durantez, has that feeling of freedom you get in Britain, that "simply doesn't exist anywhere else".

I would suggest she put that freedom to the test and partake of that quaint British custom of an evening or Sunday afternoon stroll, perhaps in the Somali held areas of Ealing or Southall in South West London.

She could try taking a freedom stroll in Somali held Toxteth, Liverpool; after all her husband 'loves' the fact that these cities are home to non English speaking colonists from "all corners of the planet".

Apart from some other banalities about 'loving' the shipping forecast and wearing T-shirts and flip flops when the sun isn't shining, he goes on to tell us that he 'loves' living in a country that is synonymous with human rights and the rule of law.

Because of his youth, inexperience and lack of interest in British history he will be unaware that human rights and the rule of law have been evolving in our country for centuries. We did not have a human rights problem and we didn't need European human rights laws to be enshrined into British law on the orders of the EU bureaucrats.

This is a crooks charter that was put in place to facilitate the imposition of multi-culturalism by making it practically impossible to deport an immigrant no matter how heinous the crime.

Clegg 'loves' this abomination that has allowed all manner of criminal low lifes and terrorists from around the globe to remain in our country to rob, rape and murder the indigenous population with little fear of any serious repercussions.

Clegg demonstrates his imbecility by saying that he 'loves' the fact that the British people respond to any problem, big or small, with a cup of tea. Really? This truly is desperate stuff and an absolutely pathetic attempt to display some Britishness.

In spite of the fact that the vast majority of the British people believe in traditional marriage and family life, Clegg 'loves' the fact that Great Britain is a place where you can be a homosexual and proud - "and now you can get married too". He also claims that Great Britain should have a homosexual Prime Minister. Who would he suggest that should be, the expenses thief, David Laws, the grossly perverted Mark Oaten, the vulgar exhibitionist Chris Bryant or Deputy Speaker of the House, Nigel Evans, who is currently on trial for sexually assaulting his male colleagues?

I won't bore the reader with rest of his nonsense but I will move on to his attempt at displaying his roots. He informs us that after the First World War his grandfather watched the returning troops which left him desperately upset that he hadn't been called up to the front. Apparently he passionately believed that to be a British soldier defending our values of liberty and peace, was the most noble thing you could be.

If he felt that passionate then he could have emulated British hero, William 'Billy Boy' Tickle and thousands of others, including my own grandfather, who demonstrated their passion with action not words; they disguised their ages and volunteered at age sixteen before serving their country in France.

Clegg makes no mention of any other ancestor because his paternal grandfather is as deep as his British roots go.  There is no "good yeoman who's limbs were made in England" for Clegg, he considers himself a citizen of Europe far and above being a citizen of Great Britain.

The latter part of his speech was dedicated to extolling the virtues of the EU while ignoring the disaster that EU membership has wreaked upon the people of Greece, Ireland, Spain, Portugal and the rest of the Mediterranean countries. He also used this part of his speech to insult, smear and denigrate anyone who disagrees with his vision of a degraded Great Britain in a greater Europe.

Apparently, Clegg's vision consists of "great liberal qualities" while the British people's desire for individual liberty and freedom from a tyrannical bureaucracy in their own sovereign nation is "some sepia-tinted memory of Empire" or "some stuffy parochialism dressed up as patriotism".

With boring predictability he goes on to link the anti-EU parties in Europe with extremism then with all the subtlety of Josef Goebbels attempts to link these parties with the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) and its leader Nigel Farage.

It is Nick Clegg's ambition to see Great Britain reduced to a mere province of a post democratic United States of Europe under the thumb of unelected bureaucrats like the anti-British Belgian, Herman von Rumpuy and the Spanish Maoist, Jose Manuel Barrosso.

What Clegg omitted from his speech is a testament to his lack of roots and his deliberate attempt to erase what real born and bred people of this Sceptred Isle consider to be an essential part of being British.

He failed to mention:

Her Majesty the Queen as Head of State - we know he would prefer Herman von Rumpuy or Angela Merkel.

The codification of English law and its evolution since Aethelstan and Alfred the Great up until that evolution was halted by remote, unaccountable European Judges.

Magna Carta and the enshrining of basic rights.

Sir Winston Churchill and the sacrifices made by the British people during their fight against the German domination of Europe.

British military traditions and history from Boadicea to Colonel H Jones. Great battles for liberty including Agincourt, Waterloo, Trafalgar, the Battle of Britain and Goose Green.

Britain's Judeo-Christian heritage as evidenced by the great cathedrals and churches that bless every village, town and city.

Britain's literary heritage doesn't get a mention, nothing about Shakespeare, Bunyan, Dickens or even Geraldus Cambrenesis.

I could go on but I am loath to spend any more time on traitors and quislings like Nick Clegg and his ilk.

In conclusion I am happy to say that I am not the only one that holds Nick Clegg in complete and utter contempt; Stephen Glover says it in his own inimitable style.  It's a pity that the electors in his constituency of Sheffield Hallam don't open their eyes and look at the damage they are doing to their country.

And on that note I will close with a Shakespearean quote which is the antithesis of Clegg.

Dishonour not your mothers; now attest
That those whom you called fathers did beget you.
Be copy now to men of grosser blood,
And teach them how to war. And you good yeoman,
Whose limbs were made in England, show us here
The mettle of your pasture; let us swear
That you are worth your breeding; which I doubt not;
For there is none of you so mean and base,
That hath not noble luster in your eyes.

Henry V - Act 3 Scene 1


For those with a strong constitution Clegg's transcript is here but be warned, a sick bag will be required.

Clarissa Dickson-Wright, Tony Benn And Bob Crow - A Rose Between Two Thorns

The passing of that great British icon, Clarissa Dickson-Wright, came hot on heels of two other celebrity bucket kickers - firstly trade union thug and unrepentant communist, Bob Crow, followed by Great Britain's most notorious champagne socialist and fellow unrepentant communist, Anthony Wedgwood Benn.

The reaction to the passing of these three high profile personalities couldn't have been more different.  The political establishment in the Westminster bubble, together with their sycophants in the media, were queuing up to eulogise the two anti- British revolutionaries is in stark contrast to their virtual silence on the passing of the universally popular, pro-British, politically incorrect TV chef.

One can understand that people who share an ideology with Crow and Benn will say nice things about them, but it is unbecoming of their political opponents and those who should be fighting communism to be eulogizing this thug and his comrade in such glowing terms.

One can only assume that people such as Prime Minister, David Cameron and London's conservative Mayor, Boris Johnson, were trawling for 'working class' votes in their leadership bids by not telling the truth about this reprobate and his upper class twit of a soul mate.

One shouldn't be surprised that the taxpayer funded BBC, and the hideously left wing hacks at the Guardian, went into full 'Nelson Mandela' mode, but the Spectator really should know better. The fight against the horrors of communism and its advocates should be a full time occupation for those that support individual liberty and freedom with no room for sentimentality or any concessions for people like Crow and Benn.

When one reads that Crow stood up for the working man, or that he stuck to his working class roots, the authors are either deluding themselves or they are deliberately distorting the truth for their own personal ends.

Bob Crow stood up for only those working people that paid their dues to his union, he didn't care a jot for the millions of working people who were unable to get to their jobs because of his interminable strikes on the London Underground.  He certainly didn't care about the working people who suffered intimidation and vile abuse from his members when they exercised their legal right to go to work.

Like all champagne socialists, he didn't stick to his working class roots either - while his strikers were bringing London to a standstill and intimidating those of his members that chose to work, Crow was far from the picket line, enjoying the sunshine on the beaches of Rio de Janeiro.

Living in publicly subsidized housing doesn't make you working class either or mean you've kept your working class roots, especially when one is on a six figure salary plus expenses and perks, paid out of his member's dues.

Bob Crow was an unrepentant communist who supported Palestinian terrorism and the disastrous Hugo Chavez communist regime in Venezuela - one of his heroes was the blood soaked despot, Fidel Castro, and he stated that he would like to see a Cuban type revolution in Great Britain.  My guess would be that instead of manning the barricades, Crow would be sunning himself somewhere as far from the action as it would be possible to get.

When London Mayor, Boris Johnson said of Crow that "he was a fighter and a man of character. There can be no doubt that he played a big part in the success of the Tube, and shared my goal to make transport in London an even greater success", he had obviously forgotten the millions of Londoners that Crow had inconvenienced or his sentiment that Johnson's former leader Margaret Thatcher should "rot in hell".

Aristocrat Anthony Wedgwood Benn was a clown of a character who thought that by renouncing his peerage and proletarianising his name to Tony Benn it would make him a member of the working class.  Benn's passionate advocacy of Marxism didn't stretch to actually giving up the bourgeois lifestyle and joining the proletariat - in typical caviar communist fashion, Benn kept as far away from the great unwashed as possible.

One anecdote has our hero travelling in a second class railway carriage when there were seats available in first class; when asked by the conductor why he was travelling in second class he reputedly replied "because there is no third class".

This kind of tokenism doesn't make him working class - it makes him a clown. Using the same logic, one is entitled to ask why he chose to live in Holland Park, one of London's most exclusive areas, instead of a working class area such as Southall or Broadwater Farm?

Benn had an exclusive upbringing and all the advantages that wealth and privilege brings, including private schooling.  In his attempts to become a member of the proletariat he erased all references to his exclusive education from Who's Who, removing his entry all together in later editions.

Volumes have been written about Benn so I leave it to the reader to explore this buffoon at their leisure but I will use a few quotes to help illustrate his extremism.

"Marxism is now a world faith and must be allowed to enter into a continuous dialogue with other world faiths, including religious faith".

"It would be unthinkable to construct a Labour party without Marx....."

"A faith is something you die for; a doctrine is something you kill for; there is all the difference in the world". If it came down to killing it would be a safe bet that both Crow and Benn would make their excuses and be somewhere else away from any action.

It would be safe to say that Clarissa Dickson-Wright had more adoring followers than either Bob Crow or Wedgwood Benn.  She also represented a vision of England that more people identified with than the communist dystopias espoused by the Toytown revolutionaries who enjoyed the bourgeois lifestyle of the very people they claim to despise.

Like Benn, Clarissa was born into privilege but unlike him she remained the person she was born, warts and all - she never felt the need to create a false persona in order to endear herself to the people. She was irreverent and politically incorrect which is the reason why, despite her huge following, she is being ignored by the political elite.

They lived in fear of her popularity and the negative effect that she was having on the imposition of their politically correct agenda.  She represented everything about Great Britain and England that they are trying to destroy.  This is an important reason why her memory should be kept alive for as long as possible, even in the age of the twenty four hour news cycle.

For millions of people, myself included, Clarissa Dickson-Wright stands head and shoulders above the likes of Crow and Benn, whose only wish was to destroy the Great Britain that she represented and replace it with the dull, miserable, blood soaked world of Marx, Castro, Chavez et al.

In the spirit in which I was brought up I offer condolences to the families of all three of the departed but I extend my eternal thanks to Clarissa Dickson-Wright for standing up to the death threats and intimidation of the politically correct bullies and staying true to herself.

Here is a previous post on Clarissa and some of her life in quotes for readers to enjoy.

 A sample to whet your appetite:

"There were several members of the future Labour Cabinet in my circle, including Tony Blair himself. We called him Miranda, not least because of his long hair and girlish looks. He was regarded as a poor, sad thing and considered something of a fantasist".

Update: A fitting tribute here