200th Anniversary Of Waterloo Coincides With Ramadan - Who Cares?

As mentioned previously, in their attempts to impose 'multi-culturalism' on the British people, the political class and the establishment are actively distorting British history as well as discouraging overt celebrations of military victories to avoid giving offence to our historical European enemies.

It was doubly pleasing therefore to see HR the Prince of Wales along with the Duchess of Cornwall and the current Duke of Wellington overtly celebrating the two hundredth anniversary of the defeat of the French at Battle of Waterloo.

(To mark his epic victory, one prominent government Minister is reputed to have said in a citation that the Duke of Wellington "had saved civilisation from the French")

Because of their craven subservience to the European Union (EU) and their obvious discomfort at these celebrations it is also pleasing to know that there will be much anger and gnashing of teeth among the Europhile political establishment in Great Britain along with their masters in Brussels.

This same political establishment are not so coy about marking the start of the Muslim observance of Ramadan today whereby Great Britain's most indulged minority starve and dehydrate themselves between sunrise and sunset.

The British people are being asked not to eat or drink in front of a fasting Muslim out of respect while schools and workplaces are being asked to show flexibility in their requirements during the month.

The political establishment bleat on about the virtues of religious piety, observance and charitable giving during Ramadan while ignoring the fact that hundreds of their fellow countrymen and women are in Iraq and Syria showing none of the above. Instead they are displaying the exact opposite by raping, torturing, immolating and beheading men women and children in the name of Allah, under the orders of Mohammad (Peace Be Upon Him?) and as written in the Koran.

Great Britain's Muslim community - along with most other imported communities - have no interest whatsoever in British history or it's heritage or its way of life. In fact many openly despise all three and together with the British political establishment and the self loathing community are consciously working to bring about cultural and demographic replacement.

The British government, along with the establishment and the aforementioned self loathing community, are well aware that the vast majority of the indigenous British people have as much interest in Ramadan, Islam and Mohammad as Muslims have in Christmas, Easter and Jesus Christ.

It is safe to say that outside of natural curiosity and an acceptance that they exist as customs elsewhere, they have little or no interest in Diwali, Eid al Fitr, Yom Kippur, Chinese New Year Shiva, Buddha, Zoroaster, Guru Nanak either.

This doesn't stop the establishment and the politicised institutions from using political correctness, and the threat of prosecution for hate crimes, to silence any objections and to force acceptance of alien customs and practices no matter how barbaric onto an unwilling British populace.

As sure as death, taxes and political hypocrisy, David Cameron and the establishment will be falling over themselves in a months time to give their Eid Mubarak wishes to the disorientated Muslim community as they battle to get back into sync with their Circadian rhythms and the rest of the civilised world.

In the meantime as British documented Muslims celebrate Ramadan by starving and dehydrating themselves during the day, the real British will have celebrated, and will celebrate or mark in the near future, the eight hundredth anniversary of Magna Carta, the six hundredth anniversary of Agincourt, the two hundredth anniversary of Waterloo, the one hundredth anniversary of World War l,  the seventieth anniversary of Victory in Europe Day and the eighty ninth birthday of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.

In most instances as opposed starving themselves the British will celebrate by drinking and eating, often in quantities that is detrimental to their good health. In order to carry on this a noble tradition I will be raising a glass or three today along with dinner to the Duke of Wellington and his men in honour of their glorious victory over the French and if that upsets or offends anyone be they French or Muslim, that will be too bad.

It is worth noting in conclusion that Ramadan is not without its risks for jihadis; in addition to starving and dehydrating themselves, Muslims are also required under threat of fines, flogging and even death, to refrain from lying, sexual relations, smoking and fighting during Ramadan. Refraining from these during the day for sub-human savages is a tough call indeed.

Update:

Watch this and weep/laugh. British Prime Minister David Cameron doing what he does best. Lying through his teeth.

Rachel Dolezal - Joining Al Jolson Down The Swanee River

Just when you think that the 'progressive' left has reached the peak of their imbecility, along comes Rachel Dolezal, a white girl pretending to be black, to prove us all wrong. The behavior of this sad excuse for a human being has not just taken self loathing to a whole new level, she's taken it into the stratosphere.

Putting hilarity to one side it's worth looking at this issue in a little more detail in order to ascertain whether white people blacking up and pretending to be black people involves any wider implications.

I was aware of the 'white privilege' group of self loathers who believe that all white people are advantaged from birth due to their skin colour while ignoring widespread white poverty along with the fact that the highest offices in the USA have been occupied by black people. I was not aware however that there was a 'WrongSkin' affliction whereby some sad individuals who are white by birth and heritage identify themselves as black and therefore claim they are born in the wrong skin.

There is also the issue of legality, whereby due to the obsession with race and affirmative action in the USA, pretending to be from an ethnic minority or black can bear dividends. Many lucrative positions and scholarships are reserved for ethnic minorities and blacks where the qualifying requirements are sometimes relaxed in order to meet quotas.

It is asserted that Massachusetts Senator and possible Presidential candidate, Elizabeth Warren broke the law when she lied about her Native American heritage in order to secure a lucrative position at Harvard University on the basis of her minority status and being a person of colour.  Given the moniker 'Fauxcahontas' or 'Liawatha' her claim is based on a picture of her supposed great-great grandfather having high cheekbones and a cookbook with the demeaning title of Pow Wow Chow.


Despite being an absolute phony, Rachel Dolezal has secured a position as a part time professor for Africana Studies at Washington University in addition to a position as a civil rights activist with the National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People (NAACP). Although the organisation appears to have given her a green light, real black people are justifiably offended by her fakery.

The sad thing about this issue is the realisation of just how far the 'progressive' left have dragged America's reputation into the arena of wackiness and stupidity.

The Rachel Dolezal racial fakery, the obsession with sexuality and gender along with the global ballyhoo surrounding the fundamental transformation of Bruce Jenner into Caitlyn, the once respected United States of America has become the laughing stock of the world.

On a lighter side, the approval given by the NAACP to Rachel Dolezal adopting a black persona has afforded the world an opportunity to reverse some of the more risible aspects of political correctness and it can start with the rehabilitation of Al Jolson and other minstrels as part of Vaudeville and harmless light entertainment.

Nobody should be offended by a re-release of The Swanee Ribber with Rachel Dolezal's voice added to that of Al Jolson and in Great Britain re-runs of the immensely popular Black and White Minstrel Show can now be shown without causing offence.

Born-in-the-WrongSkin Michael Jackson, a sort of Al Jolson in reverse, certainly started something when he made colour change acceptable.

Deliberately Distorting History To Encourage Self Loathing And Decline

I was fortunate enough to be educated before the socialist/communist/progressive political class did away with the grammar school education system that provided an upward mobility opportunity for working class children. The replacement comprehensive system has systematically dumbed down education in order to achieve the perverted goal of equality of outcome in an egalitarian society.

Apart from the decline of maths, science and literary skills, the understanding of history has been particularly degraded with the result that pride in Great Britain and loyalty to the country can no longer be taken for granted. In fact, led by the government, along with the education establishment and the rest of the self loathing community, the opposite is true.

In their determination to fundamentally transform Great Britain into a so-called 'multi-cultural society' on behalf of the UN/EU, the political class and their agents are actively encouraging recent generations, particularly the young, the dumbed down and the gullible, to be ashamed of their history and their Judeo-Christian heritage.

Combined with the millions of economic migrants and their offspring who, apart from the welfare state and it's 'entitlements' have no interest whatsoever in Great Britain's history and heritage, it's no wonder the country is fast becoming a moral-free, third world mediocrity for the majority.

A recent to visit Buckland Abbey and Plymouth Hoe in Devonshire, England brought to life some of the history that was taught in schools which served to heighten ones sense of patriotism and loyalty to country that is sadly lacking among more recent generations and the immigrant communities.

Buckland Abbey was the residence of one of Great Britain's most famous historical characters, namely Sir Francis Drake, and Plymouth Hoe the site of one the many heroic episodes of his life i.e finishing his game of bowls after the Spanish Armada invasion force had been spotted in the English Channel off Plymouth Sound.

His exploits were enough to fire the imagination of every school boy let alone Queen Elizabeth I who knighted him for his victories over her mortal enemy, the Spanish.

His pillaging of treasure from Spanish galleons off the Spanish Main, his attack on Cadiz, known as 'singeing the kings beard', his circumnavigation of the world and his defeat of the Spanish Armada are legends of British history but are being increasingly portrayed as evidence of Great Britain's historical aggression.

History is brought up to date on Plymouth Hoe with the memorials not only commemorating Sir Francis Drake's defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588 but to those who made the ultimate sacrifice for Great Britain in various campaigns from the Army, the Royal Air Force and the Royal Marines. The centrepiece is a huge and moving memorial to the those heroes who made the ultimate sacrifice while serving in the Royal Navy.

While acknowledging the anniversaries, not celebrating I might add, of historical victories such as the battles of Agincourt, Trafalgar or Waterloo, the British people are being asked to adopt a low profile and refrain from gloating for fear of offending the Spanish and French.

More recently, acknowledging the anniversaries of the defeat of Germany in both World Wars I and II the British people were asked to tone things down and not to be 'judgmental' while the EU bureaucrats refer to World War II as the 'European Civil War'. If this isn't distorting history for political ends I don't know what is.

Rumours abound that the British government are engineering, against the wishes of various peoples, the handover of Northern Ireland to the Eire, Gibraltar to the Spanish and the Falkland Islands to Argentina who have no historical or legitimate claim to the islands. These are supposedly acts of contrition for perceived historical wrongs ordered by the 'progressive' global elite that run the UN/EU bureaucracies.

If any of this sounds familiar to our American cousins then their instincts are correct. They are undergoing a similar exercise by their 'progressive' elite to distort history for political ends.

Located adjacent to Plymouth Hoe are the Mayflower Steps where the Pilgrim Fathers finally set forth on their epic voyage to start a new life in America, free from religious oppression and to preserve their English culture which was being gradually eroded by their exile in the Netherlands.

As every school kid knows this was the beginning of the United States of America which went on to become a country conceived in individual liberty and which eventually became the most prosperous country in history.

The natives tribes did indeed lose out as civilisation advanced but one has to accept that if it wasn't the Europeans that settled the land it would have been the Chinese, the Japanese or latterly the Russians. Either way the natives would not have been left to carry on with their way of life in an unpopulated land brimming with unexploited natural resources.

Abroad, one of the first acts of the newly inaugurated President Obama was to undertake his famous apology tour where he portrayed his country as the historical bad guys and force for evil in the world ignoring the sacrifices made by her sons and daughters for other peoples freedom.

The erasing of America's Judeo-Christian heritage is continuing apace while the self loathing being taught in schools and on campuses across the country has reached new heights of ridiculousness by the incessant promotion of white guilt and supposed white privilege.

It would appear that the 'progressive' leadership won't consider its mission accomplished until the United States is another European type morality free mediocrity governed by the similar remote wealthy elite that has reduced Great Britain and Europe to sad state they are in today.

The Human Rights Industry - Rewarding The Guilty, Punishing The Innocent

It is now accepted as fact that every thought, word and deed of the modern political class is meticulously calculated to further their ideological agenda as opposed to ensuring the security and prosperity of their citizens.

On the contrary, in many cases this well-being is negatively affected as they impose their ideologically driven agenda on their distracted citizens.

The cynical use of universal human rights to further their agenda is one such issue that is exposed under even the most superficial scrutiny.

The idea that the 'progressive' global political elite along with the career bureaucrats of the UN/EU actually care about the condition of billions of people around the world is as preposterous as it is false. Only these elitists could justify imposing strict human rights requirements on the free democracies of the developed world while sucking up to, and doing lucrative business with the planet's most tyrannical totalitarian dictators.

The incorporation of European human rights laws into British law in 1998 by the Blair government is a classic example of agenda driven politicians cynically using historical horrors such as National Socialism and the Holocaust to progress the EU superstate agenda while amassing personal fortunes in the process.

The Council of Europe instituted the European Convention On Human Rights (ECHR) in 1953 in the aftermath of World War II with the intention of preventing the rise of regimes such as the Third Reich. But like all well intentioned projects it has been seized upon by an unscrupulous political class and used as a tool impose the EU agenda.

Great Britain was already a signatory to the ECHR and showing no signs of developing into a Nazi regime when the Convention laws were incorporated into British law. Despite the British having a centuries long history of developing liberties and individual freedoms this incorporation was solely designed to achieve the supremacy of EU law over British law - the supremacy of unelected EU bureaucrats over British judges and elected Parliamentarians.

Traditional British liberty and individual freedoms didn't begin in 1998 but began to coalesce as far back as 893AD when King Alfred the Great began codifying English laws. With a few ups and downs in between, it culminated in the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215. This was amended and modified over the centuries resulting in the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679, Bill of Rights of 1689, the Act of Settlement of 1701.

These documents are accepted to be the inspiration behind the founding documents of the United States of America, namely the Declaration of Independence, The Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Without a shadow of doubt the incorporation of the ECHR into British law has been an unmitigated disaster for the British people and a boon for every foreign terrorist, murderer, rapist and violent criminal that makes it onto the British mainland in addition to being a money maker for the human rights industry; an industry stuffed with money grubbing lawyers that has grown out of all proportion to any actual demand from the British people.

It is worth noting at this point that Matrix Chambers was set up by Cherie Blair, wife of then Prime Minister Tony Blair, in April 2000 in order to cash in on this new human rights industry which exploded onto the scene in the aftermath of the ECHR incorporation.

Any attempt by the British Home Secretary to deport the above mentioned foreign terrorists, murderers, rapists and thousands of violent criminals are thwarted by the politically motivated bureaucrats that sit in judgement in the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, France.

Furthermore they often award thousands of pounds of taxpayer money in 'compensation' if these dangerous criminals are not released onto the streets while awaiting judgement.

By his actions Tony Blair has demonstrated that he has no concern for human rights whatsoever; a venal operator who cynically used the issue to impose his Europhile agenda and make a personal fortune in the process. Since he incorporated ECHR into British law he has bombed and otherwise been instrumental in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians during the course of his illegal war. He has lucrative dealings with blood-soaked tyrants from the former Soviet republics as well as having had cordial relations with Colonel 'Mad Dog' Qaddafi of Libya.

While the UN/EU bureaucrats take the bastions of individual liberty such as Great Britain, America and Israel to task for supposed human rights abuses, they refuse to give equal concern to the serial human rights abusers of China, the decades long dictatorships of Africa, the Muslim tyrannies of the Middle East along with the socialist/communist dystopias of Central and South America.

As previously noted, human rights in Great Britain only apply to foreign terrorists and criminals who are trying to avoid deportation, they don't apply to the tens of thousands of under age white girls who were systematically groomed then raped and pimped out by Muslim paedophile gangs with the tacit approval of the government and it agents.

They don't apply to law abiding citizens who innocently go about their business and end up dead or victims of violent career criminal gangs who were allowed entry into the country unchecked and cannot be removed because of their 'human rights'.

In the run-up to recent election Prime Minister Cameron promised to correct this abomination but as ECHR is a requirement of EU membership and he remains committed to the United States of Europe the British people will continue to be denied their human rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.


   

Engineering England's Fall - The Enemy Within

It's a worthwhile exercise to occasionally leave familiar territory to ascertain whether certain areas of the country are as one perceives them to be in order to confirm that ones interpretation of current affairs are based on reality as opposed to unjustified prejudices.

With this in mind I found myself far from home standing before the alter in a church dedicated to St. Thomas of Canterbury in a small village in the county of Devonshire, South West England.

The village is quintessentially rural England where history seeps from every stone and where every stained glass window in the ancient church tells a story. The site has been a place of worship since Saxon times where the base of the original Saxon cross can be found in the graveyard behind the war memorial.

The reason why this tiny church is relevant today is not only because it remains an active place of worship and facilitates the continuation of the ancient tradition of bell ringing, it's construction and dedication is due to one of the most notable episodes in English history. The murder of the then Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket, in 1170 by knights loyal to King Henry II. They carried out their dastardly act under the false impression King Henry actually wanted to be rid of "this troublesome priest" on a permanent basis.

It is this long embedded history and tradition which will eventually attract the attention of the metropolitan 'progressive' elite and put the English identity of this village in serious jeopardy.

Current events and the actions of the British establishment have proved beyond the shadow of doubt that they are totally committed to replacing England's culture and way of life with a so called 'multi-cultural society' and to this end they have packed Great Britain's institutions and the machinery of state with like minded agents equally committed to England's fall.

Evidence of this ongoing treachery abounds but one recent incident should be enough to convince even the most sceptical of readers of its veracity.

When government inspectors descended upon Market Rason Primary School in rural Lincolnshire they refused to award the top grade despite the high academic achievement because the school was too English or not 'multi-cultural' enough. (Read the appalling story here and here)

The fact that the catchment area is ninety seven percent 'White English' didn't appear to be relevant in their assessment but it speaks volumes about the animosity toward traditional England and the English way of life by these government agents.

When one takes into account that every government department, including the civil service and every institution from the NHS to the BBC, the police, the judiciary, the unions, the quangocracy, the EU and the UN are all stuffed to the rafters with committed 'multi-culturalists' like these school inspectors, what chance has a small village in rural Devonshire got to preserve its way of life?

This replacing of one historic culture and way of life with another in order to achieve political ends is referred to as"un-homogenising" by the global 'progressive' elite who use the United Nations and the European Union as vehicles for their perverted agenda. Anywhere else on the planet its referred to as ethnic cleansing but I digress.

Appointed Special Envoy for Migration, career super bureaucrat Peter Sutherland openly advocates the EU "undermining national homogeneity" as matter of progress but as is normal practice among the unelected global 'progressive' elite the various people's affected are not allowed a say in this cultural upheaval let alone a vote.

Peter Sutherland and his fellow elitists have the mental ability to completely ignore the horrors visited upon hundreds of villages, towns and cities by open border mass immigration.

The rape of tens of thousands of underage white girls by Muslim paedophile gangs, people smuggling and violent street crime by East European criminal gangs, sex slavery and drug related turf wars on the streets of England and all the other negative aspects of mass immigration don't warrant a mention by the likes of Peter Sutherland and his fellow agenda driven bureaucrats.

Imposing 'multi-culturalism' on people who didn't ask for it and don't want it appears to be their life's ambition while ignoring the wishes of the people who's ancient way of life is under threat like never before.



 

Whoever Wins The British Election England Will Lose

As the British people go to the polls in what has been described as the most important election in a generation, the outcome has never been more assured. England and its people will lose by a huge margin.

With seventy five percent of British laws coming from the European Union, all the major players who will eventually form a coalition government are committed to surrendering the other twenty five percent.

What the British people are voting for is the right of their chosen candidate to wield the rubber stamp for the deluge of laws and regulations that will inevitably pour forth from Brussels when their candidates take power on Friday.

The election itself is too close to call and it is predicted that no single party will have enough seats to form a government on its own. The party with the most seats will most likely form a coalition government in harness with one or more of the minor parties.

With the exception of the United Kingdom Independence Party, referred to as Ukip, and some remaining diehards in the Conservative and Northern Irish parties, all the remaining parties that are available for coalition are anti-English.

The Labour Party's move to the far left has been dramatic since the trade union sponsored Marxist, Ed Miliband, was installed as its leader. His entire family led by his late father, Adolph, has been dedicated to the downfall of Great Britain with a communist system being installed in its place.

Red Ed as he is known is committed to Great Britain surrendering whats left of its sovereignty and  being fully absorbed in the United States of Europe federal superstate. Further more he has let it be known that the British people will not be consulted or have a say via a referendum. In true Marxist fashion his contempt for the people is total.

The Scottish Nationalist Party, known by its initials the SNP, despise the English with unbridled passion. They will do everything in their power to break up the current United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and set up an independent socialist country governed by Scots in Edinburgh.

Their visceral hatred for England and the English people has blinded them to the fact that an independent Scotland will be governed, as now, by EU bureaucrats in Brussels and not locally grown socialist ideologues in Edinburgh.

In tandem with the SNP, the Welsh Party, known as Plaid Cymru, is another English hating nationalist party that espouses an independent socialist country governed by them in Cardiff. Like the SNP they haven't quite worked out how they will do this when all power to legislate will be held in Brussels.

The Welsh people are renown for their blind obedience to the Labour Party no matter how their loyalty has been abused over the years, therefore Plaid Cymru are seen more as an irritant as opposed to a serious political player.

If they throw they hands in with the SNP and Red ED's Labour Party they may be able to extract some concessions but their influence over all will be minimal.

The ridiculously named Liberal Democrat Party is a disgrace to political life and to democracy itself. This party is nothing more than a well financed group of power hungry charlatans and consummate liars who traverse the country saying whatever needs to be said to any particular group in order to secure their vote. Having secured them they promptly renege and continue pursuing their pro-EU, socialist agenda as before.

They are fanatically dedicated to the United States of Europe and long for the day when England is no more and Great Britain is reduced to a group of provinces in the greater European federal superstate.

This brings us to the Conservative Party who are forecast to be the largest party after the election and will consequently get first dibs at forming a coalition government.

Like the other parties, this party is committed to the United States of Europe project and who has lost most support to Ukip. Its leader, David Cameron, is a fanatical Europhile who is falsely promising to re-negotiate British terms of membership of the EU while at the same engineering its expansion into the former Soviet republics.

Envisaging a European Union Empire "from the Ural Mountains in the east to the Atlantic Ocean in the west" are hardly the words of someone who is not totally committed to the EU project.

Since all these parties are as one when it comes to the European Union project, which includes imposing so called 'multi-cultural societies' using open border mass immigration, whichever combination forms the next government, England will be doomed.      
 
The pro-EU ideologies of all the party leaders demands that they surrender the remaining twenty five percent of Great Britain's legislative power to Brussels as commanded by the Lisbon Treaty which was signed without the promised referendum.

Scotland and Wales will survive as national entities in the United States of Europe albeit powerless but it is proposed that England will be divided into North and South with one region being aligned with Scandinavia and the other with France and Spain.

Outside of Ukip, England has no friends, not even its own people, who will vote in their millions for the anti-England parties who's final act will be to legislate for their own demise.

The following words have been ringing through my head all day and after writing this article I know exactly why ."You don't know what you've missed till its gone, they paved Paradise and put up a parking lot"
 
         

Libyan Exodus -The End Of Civilisation Is Not An Exaggeration

On the face of it the new Common European Asylum System recently imposed upon the peoples of Europe seems like a compassionate measure designed to make it easier for those fleeing persecution from war torn Libya to escape to Europe without the risk of drowning in the Mediterranean Sea.

Italy being the nearest landfall is bearing the brunt of the exodus and it is claimed that this measure is designed to spread the burden among all the member states.

The peoples of Europe should know by now that the unelected elite that run the European Union don't do compassion, or anything else for that matter, unless it progresses their decades long project to replace the nation states of Europe with a single federal state.

The crowning glory for these unelected bureaucrats was the Lisbon Treaty; this was the final instrument in a series of treaties that made the EU a legal entity. It now has all the attributes of an independent nation state, including a national anthem, a currency, a diplomatic service, an army, a legal system etc.

The only thing it lacks to make it complete as a distinct nation is a generic European citizen. This will be impossible to construct with twenty seven different national identities which have evolved and entrenched themselves over two millennia. As a consequence these national identities must first be destroyed before a European citizen can be created; one which will be loyal to the United States of Europe as opposed to the former individual nation states.  
 
The various cultures of the nation states are all based upon their Judeo-Christian heritage; this is being systematically destroyed and replaced by a mythical 'multi-cultural society' and it is upon this myth that the new European citizen will be based.

This is typical of the ideological nonsense with which the 'progressive' elite indulge themselves; we know from experience that in practice the 'multi-cultural society' consists of a series of semi-autonomous, mono-cultural ghettos, often financed by welfare entitlements and often rife with violent crime. It is nothing less than a modern form of apartheid where different ethnic groups maintain their individual native cultures and practices regardless of their compatibility with the host country.

In effect many immigrant communities have recreated their home country in Great Britain with a British passport and an entitlement to welfare benefits being the only things they have in common with the indigenous population.

This cultural replacement project was originally being achieved by dismantling border controls within the EU but as usual this was ill thought out and only succeeded in the transfer of peoples from the poor states of Europe to the more prosperous. In other words, all that was being achieved was nationality relocation as opposed to cultural replacement.

In order to speed up the cultural replacement agenda all borders were thrown open to all and sundry, including the third world, while any objections raised by the indigenous people were quashed with intimidation, smear and threats of prosecution.

After almost two decades of open border mass immigration the cultural replacement agenda in Great Britain has almost reached the tipping point whereby any action, no matter how draconian, will not halt or reverse the process.

Already the indigenous people with a Judeo-Christian heritage are a minority in many of Great Britain's major cities and some demographers predict that they will become a minority countrywide as early as 2030 and by 2050 at the very latest.

A recent report by the Henry Jackson Society has highlighted the fact that Muslims could decide the outcome of twenty five percent of all constituencies on account that their numbers are now larger than the margin of victory in the previous general election. In fifty one marginal constituencies Hindus could decide and fifteen where Buddhists could decide.

The Common European Asylum System surrenders what little control the British government had left  over its borders to the EU bureaucrats who have determined that the end of Great Britain's unique Anglo-Saxon-Celtic culture is an absolute priority if a generic European citizen is to become a reality.

Anyone with an iota of intelligence will know that when the EU bureaucrats talk about spreading the burden of asylum seekers across the EU they don't mean the poorer countries such as Romania, Bulgaria, the Baltic states, Poland or the recently bankrupt countries such as Greece, Ireland, Spain or Portugal.

These countries are facing an outward migration of their own citizens as things currently stand. They mean Great Britain, Scandinavia and the more prosperous countries. They are also well aware that once legalised anywhere in the EU these migrants will make their way to Great Britain as their country of choice.

The British government and the political elite are fully on board with "ever closer union" toward a single European state and they are fully complying with the cultural replacement agenda. Ancient rights such as freedom of speech are being sacrificed in order to protect various ethnic groups and impose 'multi-culturalism' on the British people who didn't ask for it, weren't consulted and by all accounts don't want it.

The current Home Secretary, Theresa May intends to make any confrontation with the adherents of Islam a hate crime +1, while the Labour Party leader, Red Ed Miliband intends to make so called 'Islamophobia' illegal. 

In the meantime British documented Muslim terrorists, both male and female, are joining the blood soaked rampage through the Middle East with ISIS in ever increasing numbers and young under age white girls are being groomed and raped by Muslim paedophile gangs with little or no comment from either Ms May or Red Ed.

The standards of civilization which evolved over centuries are being eroded away by open border mass immigration and the governments refusal to ensure that incomers are compatible and willing to integrate into the British way of life.
  
On top of the already unsustainable numbers of migrants entering Great Britain every year, the current exodus of North Africans and Middle Eastern refugees into Europe provides an ideal opportunity for the EU bureaucrats to use faux compassion in order to dump tens of thousands more incompatible third world migrants into Great Britain. This will push cultural replacement passed the tipping point from which there will be no return and the end of civilization as we know it will follow.