The fact that headlines and newsreels from various civilised countries are simultaneously full of images and comment about immigrants seeking refuge from persecution should be proof enough that the whole issue is being manufactured for political ends.
The disastrous consequences of mass immigration is at variance to what the relentless tide of spin and propaganda from the offending governments portray. The promised economic benefits turned out be nothing more than extra competition for scarce jobs with wages undercut and suppressed to the joy of unscrupulous employers.
The strain on taxpayer funded social services such as housing, education and health care has reached crisis proportions where, due to political correctness by agenda driven politicians and their compliant bureaucrats, immigrants often get priority over the local people.
The much vaunted cultural enrichment consists of female genital mutilation, spousal abuse, including murder in the name of honour, child brides, Muslim paedophile gangs, jihadi's, sharia law, gender selective abortion, halal meat, electoral corruption at the ballot box etc.etc.
Multiculturalism consists of everything associated with the host nation, including its flags, religious festivals, traditions and way of life being suppressed for the spurious reason that immigrants may be offended, while alien traditions, however repulsive, are accepted and promoted.
In reality multiculturalism consists of thousands of taxpayer financed mono-cultural, crime ridden, welfare addicted ghettos which are off limits to the indigenous people and in many cases to the police 'service' as well.
To the chagrin of the political establishment, the people are becoming immune to government spin and propaganda which is reduced to a series of puerile soundbites and slogans. Who hasn't heard and laughed at the nonsense the politicians want the people to take seriously?
Words and soundbites such as inclusion, cultural enrichment, shared values, celebrating diversity, community cohesion, cultural sensitivity etc. are a running joke. My particular favourite was uttered a Labour MP, who said that "our strength is our diversity" then claimed that sixty four million pounds was needed to promote 'community cohesion'. One needs a heart of stone not to laugh.
Regardless of the spin and propaganda to the contrary, it is now unarguable that open border mass immigration from the third world into developed countries has been an unmitigated disaster for the put upon people who were targeted by the global 'progressive' elite for cultural and demographic replacement.
At this point in time there is a manufactured immigration crisis in the USA, Great Britain and most other western countries as the global elite continue to downgrade and alter the cultural and demographic balances of the white developed world.
There is a light at the end of the tunnel however which is being illuminated by Tony Abbott on behalf of the Australian people who, it appears, is confronting the global elite head on. It is without doubt that despite its tougher than normal immigration rules, Australia has suffered greatly due mass third world immigration.
News that the Australian navy intercepted a boatload of Sri Lankan economic migrants posing as asylum seekers at sea, processed the occupants and then sent some back home via the Sri Lankan navy was met with applause from everyone except the usual crowd of self loathing bleeding hearts and the agenda driven global elite.
The case of these particular migrants highlights the false claims and outright lies that the aforementioned proponents indulge in to further their political ends.
The Sinhalese population are the majority in Sri Lanka therefore should have no reason to seek asylum elsewhere. If they do they are primarily Buddhist and could seek sanctuary in the Buddhist areas of India, Thailand, etc.
Since the ending of the civil war, Sri Lanka is no longer considered as dangerous as it was and it is now considered a destination for adventurous tourists. One has to ask why Sri Lankans are seeking asylum elsewhere when seventy percent of their compatriots, who fled their homeland to Canada, return there each year on holidays and vacations?
The Tamil population derive from, or are ethnically related to, the natives of Tamil Nadu in southern India. They are also mainly Hindu's so should assimilate easily into what is their ancestral home.
The Sri Lankan diaspora are located in nearby countries such as Malaysia and Singapore where they are highly regarded and hold senior positions in industry, business and political life.
When the facts are looked at in the cold light of day one has ask why a boatload of Sri Lankans would embark upon a perilous ocean journey to Australia from Tamil Nadu in India where they already have sanctuary with ethnic ancestors, to a country where they have nothing in common. If some reports are accurate they may even face a hostile reception as well as abuse and ostrication.
To get to Australia from Southern India or Sri Lanka they would have to bypass Malaysia and Singapore which have fairly large and mainly successful Sri Lankan populations.
For those supposed asylum seekers there is an eighteen mile long land bridge between Sri Lanka and India while the distance between Jaffna and Perth, Australia is some three thousand miles. If they take the northern route to Darwin its nine thousand miles while Singapore is some seventeen hundred miles and Kuala Lumpur is a mere sixteen hundred.
There can be no justification for migrants from Sri Lanka or from India to make a perilous sea voyage to Australia while bypassing more suitable countries in order to claim political asylum. The fact is they are economic migrants who are being encouraged in the same way that Guatemalans, Salvadoreans and Hondurans are being encouraged to enter the USA illegally for the purposes of cultural or demographic replacement.
The usual suspects are coming down hard on Tony Abbott and his administration for taking these sensible steps to counter what is yet another ploy by the global elite to force change that the people he represents wholly reject.
With the confession by one of the Labour Party's most senior figures, Peter, now Lord, Mandelson, that the Blair government sent emissaries around the world recruiting immigrants to come to Great Britain in order to facilitate cultural and demographic replacement, it should be more than obvious to every Australian and American that these 'crisis' are deliberately manufactured for political ends.
Tony Abbott is a hero for standing up the the global elite and deserves all the support he can get.
Tuesday, July 8, 2014
Tuesday, July 1, 2014
Engineered Immigration Crisis - British Disease Reaches America
As the United States of America prepares to celebrate its independence from Great Britain, it's former colonial ruler is engaged in a life or death struggle of its own trying to free itself from an imperial tyranny that threatens its very existence.
As part of it's project to rid the world of Great Britain's unique Anglo/Saxon/Celtic culture and its traditional way of life, the European Union Lodge of the global elite have chosen open border mass immigration as its weapon of choice. Combined with rigidly enforced political correctness, carried out with religious fervor by the politicised institutions, the project is rolling relentlessly on and it will soon pass the tipping point from which there will be no return.
This cultural replacement project was long in the planning and although its implementation had been slowly carried out by governments of all colours, its progress took on a new momentum with the accession of new countries into the EU combined with the election of Tony Blair's Labour government in 1997. Immigration needed to be sped up in order for the tipping point to be reached before another Thatcher type conservative took control and derailed the project, possibly putting it into reverse.
Blair's government proceeded to send emissaries to all corners of the world encouraging people to come to Great Britain with promises of free housing, education, health care and welfare cash benefits. They also enshrined the European Union Human Rights disaster into British law making deportation unlikely no matter what crimes were committed.
( See an immigrant recruitment story here)
The rest is history and is there for all to see. Great Britain is no longer the country it was a decade ago and is now so degraded it has more in common with the third world from whence many of its new citizens came.
The global elite need not have worried because after Blair political power in Great Britain was usurped by their own candidate, the self proclaimed 'Heir to Blair', David Cameron. He has made sure that the cultural replacement project remains firmly on course.
Despite his promises to curb mass immigration and to make Great Britain unattractive to welfare colonists and other economic migrants, he continues to encourage it and promote the mythical 'multi-cultural society' over the indigenous people's tradition way of life.
From his prosperous mono-cultural, white, Anglo-Saxon enclave in Whitney, Oxfordshire, David Cameron plans to shame British businesses into employing more ethnic minority workers while at the same time whinging and whining that Parliament is too white.
While cultural replacement is one of the prime reasons for open border mass immigration, demographic replacement is a another one. Immigrants traditionally vote for left of centre candidates therefore right of centre governments will be a thing of the past when electoral benefits are handed out.
The American people are currently having an immigration disaster of their own but they have not yet cottoned on to how this is coming about and for what reason.
It is being labelled as a crisis and in some quarters as a humanitarian crisis but, as it was in Great Britain, this has been long in the planning with a defined objective of demographic replacement.
The spin operation by the government-media complex around this engineered crisis is so blatantly obvious its embarrassing.
It is being reported that the word is being put out in Central American countries such as Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador, that immigrants, particularly children, will not be deported. Simultaneous to this, the word is being put out in the USA that these are unfortunates fleeing drug gangs and violence in their home countries.
It shouldn't take a genius to work out just who is putting the word out and for what reason. Only the 'progressive' left benefits from mass third world immigration and the current Obama administration is about as 'progressive' left as it's possible to be.
The British government admits it sent recruitment parties around the world to entice immigrants into Great Britain knowing that it would make it difficult for British people to find work. This also gives some indication of the low regard and high contempt with which the British government held its own people.
(Read the contemptible story here)
If fleeing violence and drug gangs is a legitimate reason to enter the USA then the entire populations of these countries should be allowed to enter together with those from Colombia, Mexico, Afghanistan and a hundred other violent narco states.
I warned back in 2008 and again in 2012 during the Presidential elections that mass immigration and amnesty will be on Obama's agenda for the purpose of altering the demographic balance in favour of left of centre governments.
This deliberate encouragement of mass immigration was a precursor to the much vaunted immigration reform proposals. Suddenly, with his second term drawing to a close, President Obama is bypassing Congress in order to fulfill his obligation to the global elite by giving amnesty, disguised as a 'path to citizenship', to twelve million or so illegals and there will never be a right of centre government in the USA again.
Candidate Obama promised during his first election campaign to 'fundamentaly transform' America and this project will be complete once immigration reform is implemented. After that, the once great United States of America will join the once 'Great' Britain in the history books as just another former superpower that destroyed itself and rotted from the inside out.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I will be spending the rest of the week celebrating July 4th with my American family and friends camping and floating the Huzza river in Missouri. I will try and lay off the politics but can't promise anything.
As part of it's project to rid the world of Great Britain's unique Anglo/Saxon/Celtic culture and its traditional way of life, the European Union Lodge of the global elite have chosen open border mass immigration as its weapon of choice. Combined with rigidly enforced political correctness, carried out with religious fervor by the politicised institutions, the project is rolling relentlessly on and it will soon pass the tipping point from which there will be no return.
This cultural replacement project was long in the planning and although its implementation had been slowly carried out by governments of all colours, its progress took on a new momentum with the accession of new countries into the EU combined with the election of Tony Blair's Labour government in 1997. Immigration needed to be sped up in order for the tipping point to be reached before another Thatcher type conservative took control and derailed the project, possibly putting it into reverse.
Blair's government proceeded to send emissaries to all corners of the world encouraging people to come to Great Britain with promises of free housing, education, health care and welfare cash benefits. They also enshrined the European Union Human Rights disaster into British law making deportation unlikely no matter what crimes were committed.
( See an immigrant recruitment story here)
The rest is history and is there for all to see. Great Britain is no longer the country it was a decade ago and is now so degraded it has more in common with the third world from whence many of its new citizens came.
The global elite need not have worried because after Blair political power in Great Britain was usurped by their own candidate, the self proclaimed 'Heir to Blair', David Cameron. He has made sure that the cultural replacement project remains firmly on course.
Despite his promises to curb mass immigration and to make Great Britain unattractive to welfare colonists and other economic migrants, he continues to encourage it and promote the mythical 'multi-cultural society' over the indigenous people's tradition way of life.
From his prosperous mono-cultural, white, Anglo-Saxon enclave in Whitney, Oxfordshire, David Cameron plans to shame British businesses into employing more ethnic minority workers while at the same time whinging and whining that Parliament is too white.
While cultural replacement is one of the prime reasons for open border mass immigration, demographic replacement is a another one. Immigrants traditionally vote for left of centre candidates therefore right of centre governments will be a thing of the past when electoral benefits are handed out.
The American people are currently having an immigration disaster of their own but they have not yet cottoned on to how this is coming about and for what reason.
It is being labelled as a crisis and in some quarters as a humanitarian crisis but, as it was in Great Britain, this has been long in the planning with a defined objective of demographic replacement.
The spin operation by the government-media complex around this engineered crisis is so blatantly obvious its embarrassing.
It is being reported that the word is being put out in Central American countries such as Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador, that immigrants, particularly children, will not be deported. Simultaneous to this, the word is being put out in the USA that these are unfortunates fleeing drug gangs and violence in their home countries.
It shouldn't take a genius to work out just who is putting the word out and for what reason. Only the 'progressive' left benefits from mass third world immigration and the current Obama administration is about as 'progressive' left as it's possible to be.
The British government admits it sent recruitment parties around the world to entice immigrants into Great Britain knowing that it would make it difficult for British people to find work. This also gives some indication of the low regard and high contempt with which the British government held its own people.
(Read the contemptible story here)
If fleeing violence and drug gangs is a legitimate reason to enter the USA then the entire populations of these countries should be allowed to enter together with those from Colombia, Mexico, Afghanistan and a hundred other violent narco states.
I warned back in 2008 and again in 2012 during the Presidential elections that mass immigration and amnesty will be on Obama's agenda for the purpose of altering the demographic balance in favour of left of centre governments.
This deliberate encouragement of mass immigration was a precursor to the much vaunted immigration reform proposals. Suddenly, with his second term drawing to a close, President Obama is bypassing Congress in order to fulfill his obligation to the global elite by giving amnesty, disguised as a 'path to citizenship', to twelve million or so illegals and there will never be a right of centre government in the USA again.
Candidate Obama promised during his first election campaign to 'fundamentaly transform' America and this project will be complete once immigration reform is implemented. After that, the once great United States of America will join the once 'Great' Britain in the history books as just another former superpower that destroyed itself and rotted from the inside out.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I will be spending the rest of the week celebrating July 4th with my American family and friends camping and floating the Huzza river in Missouri. I will try and lay off the politics but can't promise anything.
Monday, June 30, 2014
British People Lied To Again - Cultural Replacement Continues Unabated
The total humiliation of British Prime Minister David Cameron over the appointment of the new President of Europe, Jean-Claude Junker, has demonstrated once and for all that Great Britain has no influence in the European Union. Governments of all shades have continually lied to the British people about the necessity to be in the heart of Europe in order to have influence in the decision making process.
They reiterate over and over again that Great Britain must have a seat at the top table or be relegated to the fringes of Europe and hence become a second class player in what is supposed to be a global superpower.
The facts are stark and tell their own story - politicians from all parties have done everything they have been ordered to do by the Brussels Eurocrats; they have surrendered British sovereignty, they hand over fifty five million pounds per day of their citizens hard earned money, they rigorously impose every law, regulation and diktat, no matter how destructive and their influence in Europe is exactly zero.
(Another fact that must be noted is that every bureaucrat that has been appointed by the British political class to any position in the European bureaucracy is more often than not a crony or a fellow politician getting payback for past favours. They also become extremely wealthy individuals with their personal coffers bulging with the fruits of their compatriots labour. The EU truly is the gravy train to end all gravy trains as far as the political class is concerned, but I digress)
One of the requirements of EU membership is that Great Britain must be un-homogenised, which means that the countries' unique Anglo-Saxon-Celtic culture must be erased and replaced by a so called 'multi-cultural society'. Un-homogenising is a politically correct term which is used by the UN instead of the more accurate 'cultural replacement' which itself disguises the real term which they are loath to use and that is 'ethnic cleansing'.
This may seem like harsh terminology but it cannot be denied that any conscious, pre-planned agenda to replace one culture with another, or a mix of other cultures, is nothing less than ethnic cleansing.
"Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive". This quote by Sir Walter Scott from the poem Marmion is never more apt than when it is applied to modern day politicians, especially those who continue to deny that the real agenda of the European Union project is a post democratic federal superstate. It would be easier for everyone, including themselves, if they just came out and admitted this truth and then campaigned on its merits.
A letter dated 30th April 1952 from one of the founders of the EU project, a French professional bureaucrat named Jean Monet, is in the public domain and lays out unequivocally their malign intentions.
"Europe's nations should be guided towards the superstate without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each described as having an economic purpose, but which eventually and irreversibly lead to federation".
From that moment onward the political class have followed Monet's deceit meticulously by surrendering British sovereignty treaty by treaty, from Rome to Maastricht to Lisbon, covering each surrender with a tissue of lies and continuing to deny the ultimate aim is a post democratic federal United States of Europe.
(A must read article on EU deceit here which includes information on the Merkel/Junker axis)
Current Prime Minister, David Cameron, is just one more in a long line of political charlatans who claimed to be Eurosceptic but who, in reality, are committed to all aspects of the federal superstate project including ethnic cleansing.
At this point as the British public wake up from their propaganda induced slumber and realise that they have been continuously lied to, David Cameron's lies get ever more desperate and as a result they become more obvious.
The rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) and his humiliation by Angela Merkel and her cabal appears to have pushed him over the edge.
Previously he has promised a re-negotiation followed by a referendum in 2017 if he is re-elected, but Cameron and the British people know staright from the horses mouth (pun intended), that Angela Merkel and her cabal will not allow a renegotiation and will not recognise the result of any referendum.
Of all the issues around EU contributions, corruption, economic stagnation and stifling regulations, it is the issue of mass immigration and cultural replacement that concerns the British people most of all.
The mass immigration/cultural replacement agenda has been a qualified success for the political class and their multi-culti useful idiots, but without a shadow of doubt it has been an unmitigated disaster for the British people.
No hamlet, village, town or city has been unaffected by mass immigration with some areas being totally cleansed of indigenous British people. Ethnic cleansing in some areas is now so complete that they are unrecognisable as British, with some Muslim areas being controlled by imams or tribal elders and operating under sharia law.
Taxpayer funded services such as education, housing and health are collapsing under the weight of mass immigration where, in some cases, immigrants are given priority over the indigenous population in order to create multi-cultural areas and to promote 'cultural enrichment', 'diversity' and whatever other soundbite politicians use to justify their destructive agenda.
In a dishonest attempt to appease the anger of the British people, Cameron has promised to curb mass immigration and "cut net immigration' from the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands" during the lifetime of this Parliament.
He has promised to make welfare benefits difficult to claim for new immigrants and to put restrictions on immigration from accession countries, but every anti-British EU bureaucrat from two penny countries such as Belgium, Luxembourg and Lithuania feel confident enough to slap him down and refuse him permission to implement any welfare reforms.
If proof were needed that Cameron is committed to the cultural replacement agenda one only has to examine the issue of non EU immigration. He has it within his power to stop immigration from outside the EU but he steadfastly refuses to do so.
His promise to "cut net immigration from the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands" is not only a premeditated lie, if true it would still do nothing to prevent cultural replacement, un-homogenising, ethnic cleansing or whatever one chooses to call it.
This soundbite is so patronisingly juvenile one would have to be more than dumb to fall for it. If four hundred thousand and one educated western people leaving the country are replaced by 500,000 illiterate third world peasants that does indeed reduce net immigration to the tens of thousands, but it has also replaced one culture with another and, as an intended consequence, downgraded the nation closer to third world status.
Despite all the promises made to the people, Great Britain's population has increased by five million in twelve years with no sign of slowing down. By any measure this is unsustainable unless there is a deliberate agenda to gradually downgrade the country and remove the domination of the indigenous culture.
Regardless of the spin that the agenda driven politicians will use, it is a fact that seventy percent of graduates moving abroad will have a devastating impact on the economy.
(See the story here)
It is also a fact that if they are replaced by any number of illiterates from the third world it will further degrade the country in addition to progressing the cultural replacement, un-homogenising, ethnic cleansing agenda.
(See the story here)
In conclusion it should be re-iterated that this is a deliberate agenda of cultural replacement and downgrading which is being perpetrated by a cabal of self serving politicians. It is being imposed on a populace who didn't ask for it, don't want it and who weren't consulted.
In any other country this abuse of the indigenous population would attract the attention of every hand-wringing, bleeding heart 'progressive' do-gooder on the planet but because its happening to a country of white, Anglo-Saxons with a Judaeo-Christian heritage it is obviously perfectly acceptable.
Cameron poster from John L Jones
They reiterate over and over again that Great Britain must have a seat at the top table or be relegated to the fringes of Europe and hence become a second class player in what is supposed to be a global superpower.
The facts are stark and tell their own story - politicians from all parties have done everything they have been ordered to do by the Brussels Eurocrats; they have surrendered British sovereignty, they hand over fifty five million pounds per day of their citizens hard earned money, they rigorously impose every law, regulation and diktat, no matter how destructive and their influence in Europe is exactly zero.
(Another fact that must be noted is that every bureaucrat that has been appointed by the British political class to any position in the European bureaucracy is more often than not a crony or a fellow politician getting payback for past favours. They also become extremely wealthy individuals with their personal coffers bulging with the fruits of their compatriots labour. The EU truly is the gravy train to end all gravy trains as far as the political class is concerned, but I digress)
One of the requirements of EU membership is that Great Britain must be un-homogenised, which means that the countries' unique Anglo-Saxon-Celtic culture must be erased and replaced by a so called 'multi-cultural society'. Un-homogenising is a politically correct term which is used by the UN instead of the more accurate 'cultural replacement' which itself disguises the real term which they are loath to use and that is 'ethnic cleansing'.
This may seem like harsh terminology but it cannot be denied that any conscious, pre-planned agenda to replace one culture with another, or a mix of other cultures, is nothing less than ethnic cleansing.
"Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive". This quote by Sir Walter Scott from the poem Marmion is never more apt than when it is applied to modern day politicians, especially those who continue to deny that the real agenda of the European Union project is a post democratic federal superstate. It would be easier for everyone, including themselves, if they just came out and admitted this truth and then campaigned on its merits.
A letter dated 30th April 1952 from one of the founders of the EU project, a French professional bureaucrat named Jean Monet, is in the public domain and lays out unequivocally their malign intentions.
"Europe's nations should be guided towards the superstate without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each described as having an economic purpose, but which eventually and irreversibly lead to federation".
From that moment onward the political class have followed Monet's deceit meticulously by surrendering British sovereignty treaty by treaty, from Rome to Maastricht to Lisbon, covering each surrender with a tissue of lies and continuing to deny the ultimate aim is a post democratic federal United States of Europe.
(A must read article on EU deceit here which includes information on the Merkel/Junker axis)
Current Prime Minister, David Cameron, is just one more in a long line of political charlatans who claimed to be Eurosceptic but who, in reality, are committed to all aspects of the federal superstate project including ethnic cleansing.
At this point as the British public wake up from their propaganda induced slumber and realise that they have been continuously lied to, David Cameron's lies get ever more desperate and as a result they become more obvious.
The rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) and his humiliation by Angela Merkel and her cabal appears to have pushed him over the edge.
Previously he has promised a re-negotiation followed by a referendum in 2017 if he is re-elected, but Cameron and the British people know staright from the horses mouth (pun intended), that Angela Merkel and her cabal will not allow a renegotiation and will not recognise the result of any referendum.
Of all the issues around EU contributions, corruption, economic stagnation and stifling regulations, it is the issue of mass immigration and cultural replacement that concerns the British people most of all.
The mass immigration/cultural replacement agenda has been a qualified success for the political class and their multi-culti useful idiots, but without a shadow of doubt it has been an unmitigated disaster for the British people.
No hamlet, village, town or city has been unaffected by mass immigration with some areas being totally cleansed of indigenous British people. Ethnic cleansing in some areas is now so complete that they are unrecognisable as British, with some Muslim areas being controlled by imams or tribal elders and operating under sharia law.
Taxpayer funded services such as education, housing and health are collapsing under the weight of mass immigration where, in some cases, immigrants are given priority over the indigenous population in order to create multi-cultural areas and to promote 'cultural enrichment', 'diversity' and whatever other soundbite politicians use to justify their destructive agenda.
In a dishonest attempt to appease the anger of the British people, Cameron has promised to curb mass immigration and "cut net immigration' from the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands" during the lifetime of this Parliament.
He has promised to make welfare benefits difficult to claim for new immigrants and to put restrictions on immigration from accession countries, but every anti-British EU bureaucrat from two penny countries such as Belgium, Luxembourg and Lithuania feel confident enough to slap him down and refuse him permission to implement any welfare reforms.
If proof were needed that Cameron is committed to the cultural replacement agenda one only has to examine the issue of non EU immigration. He has it within his power to stop immigration from outside the EU but he steadfastly refuses to do so.
His promise to "cut net immigration from the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands" is not only a premeditated lie, if true it would still do nothing to prevent cultural replacement, un-homogenising, ethnic cleansing or whatever one chooses to call it.
This soundbite is so patronisingly juvenile one would have to be more than dumb to fall for it. If four hundred thousand and one educated western people leaving the country are replaced by 500,000 illiterate third world peasants that does indeed reduce net immigration to the tens of thousands, but it has also replaced one culture with another and, as an intended consequence, downgraded the nation closer to third world status.
Despite all the promises made to the people, Great Britain's population has increased by five million in twelve years with no sign of slowing down. By any measure this is unsustainable unless there is a deliberate agenda to gradually downgrade the country and remove the domination of the indigenous culture.
Regardless of the spin that the agenda driven politicians will use, it is a fact that seventy percent of graduates moving abroad will have a devastating impact on the economy.
(See the story here)
It is also a fact that if they are replaced by any number of illiterates from the third world it will further degrade the country in addition to progressing the cultural replacement, un-homogenising, ethnic cleansing agenda.
(See the story here)
In conclusion it should be re-iterated that this is a deliberate agenda of cultural replacement and downgrading which is being perpetrated by a cabal of self serving politicians. It is being imposed on a populace who didn't ask for it, don't want it and who weren't consulted.
In any other country this abuse of the indigenous population would attract the attention of every hand-wringing, bleeding heart 'progressive' do-gooder on the planet but because its happening to a country of white, Anglo-Saxons with a Judaeo-Christian heritage it is obviously perfectly acceptable.
Cameron poster from John L Jones
Sunday, June 29, 2014
Christianity Portrayed As Bunkum - Questioning Islam Is A Hate Crime
Accusations of exaggeration and hyperbole are the standard reaction of the 'progressive' global elite, whenever it is suggested that there is a deliberate campaign to denigrate Christianity as a precursor to its elimination from the western world. At the other end of the religious spectrum, even the mildest questioning of Islam is rapidly accompanied by accusations of Islamophobia at the very least, with threats of prosecution for hate crimes or racial hatred at worst.
One doesn't have to engage in hours of research to prove the veracity of this phenomenon as a glance at the television schedules and the film industry are all that is required.
Just looking at the programme headlines should be enough to convince any sceptics that there is a concerted effort to question and denigrate the very foundations of Christianity and, by extension, western civilisation.
The History Channel alone has aired documentaries such as:
Bible Mysteries Explained - This series concluded that the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah was caused by a meteor storm, the collapse of the walls of Jericho was caused by an earthquake, the parting of the Red Sea was an unusual wind blowing on a unique underwater topography, the Star of Bethlehem was a comet, the Burning Bush was an atmospheric quirk and so on and so forth.
The Real Jesus - This questions the accuracy of the Gospels' with reference to Jesus being the Messiah or the Son of God
The Forbidden Scriptures - This programme suggests that there are Gospels missing from the Bible and that those that are included may have censored.
Lost In Translation - This programme suggests that the Bible has been mis-translated, selectively edited and censored and therefore compromised as the basis of Christianity.
(Documentaries info here)
It should also be noted that there always seem to be programmes questioning the basis of Christian festivals:
Programmes about the truth of the Virgin Birth, the census that took the Holy Family to Bethlehem, the birth of Jesus in a stable, the existence of the three Wise Men etc. always seems to appear around Christmas time.
Programmes suggesting that Jesus really didn't die on the cross but was substituted, together with questions about the Resurrection, the existence of Pontius Pilate or the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin usually appear around Easter time.
More recently there have been science programmes aired about the universe that suggest that, in addition to the the Big Bang, water came from the tails of comets and that the earth was seeded with life brought from outer space by comets.
Taking all these programmes together one can only come away with the intended message - there is no Christian God and the Christian faith is a load of complete and utter b*ollocks.
The film industry has had a field day where Christianity is concerned. Efforts to faithfully tell the Biblical story such as Jesus of Nazareth, The Greatest Story Ever Told etc. are accompanied by downright offensive and blasphemous films such as The Last Temptation of Christ and The Life of Brian.
More recently there's been The Da Vinci Code and Angels and Demons which challenge the basis of Christianity and the Catholic Church.
It is only right and proper that global religions which guide the lives and behavior of millions of adherents are subjected to detailed scrutiny. Therefore one is entitled to ask why Islam is not being subjected to the same level of scrutiny.
Whenever there is any form of investigation into Islam it is either mild by comparison with Christian scrutiny and, more often than not, accompanied by violence and blood curdling threats.
The History Channel produced a documentary entitled Inside Islam which is woefully inadequate and which doesn't subject Islam to anything like the scrutiny it gives to Christianity. In fact it goes the other way with one reviewer quoted as as saying that it "explores the historic and poetic wellspring of the Muslim people".
The reviewer, Tom Keogh, goes on to say that "it was Gabriel in fact who transmitted the Word of God to the 40 year old, seemingly ordinary Mohammad in the 7th century, making him extraordinary to millions today. Sure, anti-Western sentiment creeps into the story, but in every important way, 'Inside Islam' is an antidote to gross anti Muslim bigotry".
Anti Muslim bigotry indeed. Not only is Mr Keogh failing to question the historical accuracy of Gabriel transmitting the word of God to Mohammad but he is also ignoring the violent history of Islam and the news bulletins emanating from the Middle East.
There is no Koran Mysteries Explained questioning whether Mohammad actually did ride to Jerusalem on a white steed and climb to Heaven up a sliver ladder.
Unlike for Jesus, there is no The Real Mohammad documentary to examine whether he really was a prophet, there is no investigation into his blood lust or his paedophilia.
Unlike for the Bible, there is no The Forbidden Koran to check if anything has been omitted or censored.
Unlike for the Bible, there is no Lost In Translation to check for mis-translation or selective editing of the Koran.
There are no television programmes around Ramadan or Eid about the supposed flight of Mohammad from Mecca to Medina. Neither are there television programmes around Haj time questioning the truth about Hagar and Ismael and the discovery of fountain of Zam Zam.
There has been no archaeological exploration of Medina to confirm that the tomb inside the green mosque is actually that of Mohammad or of Mecca to prove that the site was once visited by Adam or Abraham as claimed.
(Inside Islam story here)
When all this is added together the resultant conclusion is that the Christian God doesn't exist Jesus was just another historical man but the Muslim Allah is alive and well and Mohammad is most definately is his prophet.
Any attempt to scrutinise Islam in the way Christianity and other religions are, is met with threats, violence and blood shed.
Channel 4's documentary about the history of Islam had to be cancelled because of death threats to the writer and presenter. The Danish cartoons resulted in rioting and bloodshed across the world, the rape and murder of the American Ambassador to Libya, together with three of his colleagues, was blamed on a third rate video about the life of Mohammad.
(Channel 4 story here)
The fact that western governments continue to indulge Muslims and punish their critics is proof of their determination to impose multi-culturalism on people who are vehemently opposed to this 'religion' and who are revolted by its barbaric practices.
In their own countries Christians are being persecuted in the workplace for wearing only tiny symbols of their faith while there are no similar restrictions for Muslims, some of who are excused duty for anything that brings them into minor contact with pork products or alcohol.
(American flag a threat to the Muslim community? See here)
Christian festivals are being downgraded or their celebrations abandoned altogether while Muslim festivals are being upgraded and given official sanction. Children are being bombarded with Muslim propaganda in their schools for reasons of 'cultural enrichment' while being forced to 'celebarte diversity' often against the wishes of their parents.
Some of the more barbaric practices of Islam are not taught in schools for obvious reasons nor are they included in the 'cultural enrichment' propaganda.
As Muslim jihadis behead their way across Syria and Iraq, as Muslim men rape their way across Sweden, Belgium and the other European countries, as Muslim men groom and gang rape under age white girls in cities across England, as Boko Haram kidnap hundreds of young girls in Nigeria for sex slavery and as young men, born and bred in Great Britain, flock to join violent uprisings across the world, the British government still insists on calling Islam the religion of peace.
The political class and its Common Purpose trained technocrats in the politicised institutions, together with their attendant armies of petty bureaucrats, are still installing Islam into the mainstream of British life giving it moral equivalence with other religions. As part of this agenda they are harassing and persecuting anyone who raises the slightest objection or exhibits any patriotic sentiment for Great Britain or England.
It goes without saying that the 'progressive' elite are using Islam as part of their cultural replacement agenda and their general downgrading of western civilisation.
The British and other western governments are ignoring the overwhelming evidence that Islam is a barbaric, blood soaked, murderous cult that has made no contribution to civilisation whatsoever and they are continuing to impose it on an unwilling people who don't want it, didn't ask for it and weren't consulted.
Update: In a story close to home, it has transpired that two supposedly ordinary young boys from Cardiff have disappeared only to reappear in Syria fighting for ISIS or to give it it's full name, The Islamic State In Iraq and Syria. This is a particularly blood thirsty army who's brutality is proving too much even for battle hardened Al Qaeda operatives.
Stories of their brutality abound which includes beheading, rape, dismemberment, crucifixion and mass murder of entire villages. All this barbarism is put on social media such as Facebook and Twitter for all the world to see.
(Barbarism in action here)
Being born some twenty three miles from my own village in South Wales, it is worth examining how myself and these two savages have evolved into totally different people with totally different values.
I was born and brought up in abject poverty but still taught to be polite and well mannered with a distinct knowledge of right and wrong. These values were instilled in me by a combination of parents, teachers and Sunday School Superintendents all working together to ensure I would become a law abiding, productive member of society.
'My fellow Welshmen' Nasser Mutharna and his brother Aseel enjoyed a typical middle class upbringing, they attended a Catholic school and by all accounts were ambitious, with the elder brother hoping to be the first Asian Prime Minister.
A clue to their subsequent taking of the murderous path to Muslim jihad is the admission by their father that he brought them up to be a mixture of British and Yemeni. They were born in Wales had a Welsh education and he wanted them to adopt British standards. However he took them to the mosque to learn Arabic, they ate Yemeni food except Sundays when they ate roast beef. They wore Yemeni clothes on special occasions and western clothes at other times.
Despite having an English grandfather with three English and one Irish great grand parents, I had no such clash of cultures to contend with because I was integrated. I have no urge to behead anyone who doesn't adopt Christianity, or who makes documentaries questioning the Christian faith. I don't want a fatwa declared on blasphemous film makers and don't want the Monty Python team beheaded because they made The Life of Brian.
If any proof were needed that multi-culturalism doesn't work and Islam is a blood thirsty death cult then these Welsh born jihadis are it. They were not radicalised by imams, their blood lust is inbred and if these two brothers can turn into barbaric blood thirsty sub humans then so can every Muslim in Great Britain.
The government and the multi-culturalists have created a monster that will have to be confronted sooner or later. When these battle hardened killers use their British passports to return to the land of their birth they will not be picking up their lives where they left off nor will they be integrating. They will bring their jihad and their cause back with them and use their newly acquired battle skills to foment violent revolution in Great Britain.
The Muslim population in Cardiff alone has doubled in ten years to twenty five thousand. If only a quarter of these take up jihad there will be six and a quarter thousand people in Cardiff alone killing for the caliphate.
Extrapolating these figures to the country as a whole gives some idea of the potential disaster that British people are facing solely because the agenda driven political class and the multi-culturalists refused to listen.
(Read the full shocking story here)
From the comments - NHS punishment squad harrasses a Christian on behalf of a Muslim. See here.
One doesn't have to engage in hours of research to prove the veracity of this phenomenon as a glance at the television schedules and the film industry are all that is required.
Just looking at the programme headlines should be enough to convince any sceptics that there is a concerted effort to question and denigrate the very foundations of Christianity and, by extension, western civilisation.
The History Channel alone has aired documentaries such as:
Bible Mysteries Explained - This series concluded that the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah was caused by a meteor storm, the collapse of the walls of Jericho was caused by an earthquake, the parting of the Red Sea was an unusual wind blowing on a unique underwater topography, the Star of Bethlehem was a comet, the Burning Bush was an atmospheric quirk and so on and so forth.
The Real Jesus - This questions the accuracy of the Gospels' with reference to Jesus being the Messiah or the Son of God
The Forbidden Scriptures - This programme suggests that there are Gospels missing from the Bible and that those that are included may have censored.
Lost In Translation - This programme suggests that the Bible has been mis-translated, selectively edited and censored and therefore compromised as the basis of Christianity.
(Documentaries info here)
It should also be noted that there always seem to be programmes questioning the basis of Christian festivals:
Programmes about the truth of the Virgin Birth, the census that took the Holy Family to Bethlehem, the birth of Jesus in a stable, the existence of the three Wise Men etc. always seems to appear around Christmas time.
Programmes suggesting that Jesus really didn't die on the cross but was substituted, together with questions about the Resurrection, the existence of Pontius Pilate or the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin usually appear around Easter time.
More recently there have been science programmes aired about the universe that suggest that, in addition to the the Big Bang, water came from the tails of comets and that the earth was seeded with life brought from outer space by comets.
Taking all these programmes together one can only come away with the intended message - there is no Christian God and the Christian faith is a load of complete and utter b*ollocks.
The film industry has had a field day where Christianity is concerned. Efforts to faithfully tell the Biblical story such as Jesus of Nazareth, The Greatest Story Ever Told etc. are accompanied by downright offensive and blasphemous films such as The Last Temptation of Christ and The Life of Brian.
More recently there's been The Da Vinci Code and Angels and Demons which challenge the basis of Christianity and the Catholic Church.
It is only right and proper that global religions which guide the lives and behavior of millions of adherents are subjected to detailed scrutiny. Therefore one is entitled to ask why Islam is not being subjected to the same level of scrutiny.
Whenever there is any form of investigation into Islam it is either mild by comparison with Christian scrutiny and, more often than not, accompanied by violence and blood curdling threats.
The History Channel produced a documentary entitled Inside Islam which is woefully inadequate and which doesn't subject Islam to anything like the scrutiny it gives to Christianity. In fact it goes the other way with one reviewer quoted as as saying that it "explores the historic and poetic wellspring of the Muslim people".
The reviewer, Tom Keogh, goes on to say that "it was Gabriel in fact who transmitted the Word of God to the 40 year old, seemingly ordinary Mohammad in the 7th century, making him extraordinary to millions today. Sure, anti-Western sentiment creeps into the story, but in every important way, 'Inside Islam' is an antidote to gross anti Muslim bigotry".
Anti Muslim bigotry indeed. Not only is Mr Keogh failing to question the historical accuracy of Gabriel transmitting the word of God to Mohammad but he is also ignoring the violent history of Islam and the news bulletins emanating from the Middle East.
There is no Koran Mysteries Explained questioning whether Mohammad actually did ride to Jerusalem on a white steed and climb to Heaven up a sliver ladder.
Unlike for Jesus, there is no The Real Mohammad documentary to examine whether he really was a prophet, there is no investigation into his blood lust or his paedophilia.
Unlike for the Bible, there is no The Forbidden Koran to check if anything has been omitted or censored.
Unlike for the Bible, there is no Lost In Translation to check for mis-translation or selective editing of the Koran.
There are no television programmes around Ramadan or Eid about the supposed flight of Mohammad from Mecca to Medina. Neither are there television programmes around Haj time questioning the truth about Hagar and Ismael and the discovery of fountain of Zam Zam.
There has been no archaeological exploration of Medina to confirm that the tomb inside the green mosque is actually that of Mohammad or of Mecca to prove that the site was once visited by Adam or Abraham as claimed.
(Inside Islam story here)
When all this is added together the resultant conclusion is that the Christian God doesn't exist Jesus was just another historical man but the Muslim Allah is alive and well and Mohammad is most definately is his prophet.
Any attempt to scrutinise Islam in the way Christianity and other religions are, is met with threats, violence and blood shed.
Channel 4's documentary about the history of Islam had to be cancelled because of death threats to the writer and presenter. The Danish cartoons resulted in rioting and bloodshed across the world, the rape and murder of the American Ambassador to Libya, together with three of his colleagues, was blamed on a third rate video about the life of Mohammad.
(Channel 4 story here)
The fact that western governments continue to indulge Muslims and punish their critics is proof of their determination to impose multi-culturalism on people who are vehemently opposed to this 'religion' and who are revolted by its barbaric practices.
In their own countries Christians are being persecuted in the workplace for wearing only tiny symbols of their faith while there are no similar restrictions for Muslims, some of who are excused duty for anything that brings them into minor contact with pork products or alcohol.
(American flag a threat to the Muslim community? See here)
Christian festivals are being downgraded or their celebrations abandoned altogether while Muslim festivals are being upgraded and given official sanction. Children are being bombarded with Muslim propaganda in their schools for reasons of 'cultural enrichment' while being forced to 'celebarte diversity' often against the wishes of their parents.
Some of the more barbaric practices of Islam are not taught in schools for obvious reasons nor are they included in the 'cultural enrichment' propaganda.
As Muslim jihadis behead their way across Syria and Iraq, as Muslim men rape their way across Sweden, Belgium and the other European countries, as Muslim men groom and gang rape under age white girls in cities across England, as Boko Haram kidnap hundreds of young girls in Nigeria for sex slavery and as young men, born and bred in Great Britain, flock to join violent uprisings across the world, the British government still insists on calling Islam the religion of peace.
The political class and its Common Purpose trained technocrats in the politicised institutions, together with their attendant armies of petty bureaucrats, are still installing Islam into the mainstream of British life giving it moral equivalence with other religions. As part of this agenda they are harassing and persecuting anyone who raises the slightest objection or exhibits any patriotic sentiment for Great Britain or England.
It goes without saying that the 'progressive' elite are using Islam as part of their cultural replacement agenda and their general downgrading of western civilisation.
The British and other western governments are ignoring the overwhelming evidence that Islam is a barbaric, blood soaked, murderous cult that has made no contribution to civilisation whatsoever and they are continuing to impose it on an unwilling people who don't want it, didn't ask for it and weren't consulted.
Update: In a story close to home, it has transpired that two supposedly ordinary young boys from Cardiff have disappeared only to reappear in Syria fighting for ISIS or to give it it's full name, The Islamic State In Iraq and Syria. This is a particularly blood thirsty army who's brutality is proving too much even for battle hardened Al Qaeda operatives.
Stories of their brutality abound which includes beheading, rape, dismemberment, crucifixion and mass murder of entire villages. All this barbarism is put on social media such as Facebook and Twitter for all the world to see.
(Barbarism in action here)
Being born some twenty three miles from my own village in South Wales, it is worth examining how myself and these two savages have evolved into totally different people with totally different values.
I was born and brought up in abject poverty but still taught to be polite and well mannered with a distinct knowledge of right and wrong. These values were instilled in me by a combination of parents, teachers and Sunday School Superintendents all working together to ensure I would become a law abiding, productive member of society.
'My fellow Welshmen' Nasser Mutharna and his brother Aseel enjoyed a typical middle class upbringing, they attended a Catholic school and by all accounts were ambitious, with the elder brother hoping to be the first Asian Prime Minister.
A clue to their subsequent taking of the murderous path to Muslim jihad is the admission by their father that he brought them up to be a mixture of British and Yemeni. They were born in Wales had a Welsh education and he wanted them to adopt British standards. However he took them to the mosque to learn Arabic, they ate Yemeni food except Sundays when they ate roast beef. They wore Yemeni clothes on special occasions and western clothes at other times.
Despite having an English grandfather with three English and one Irish great grand parents, I had no such clash of cultures to contend with because I was integrated. I have no urge to behead anyone who doesn't adopt Christianity, or who makes documentaries questioning the Christian faith. I don't want a fatwa declared on blasphemous film makers and don't want the Monty Python team beheaded because they made The Life of Brian.
If any proof were needed that multi-culturalism doesn't work and Islam is a blood thirsty death cult then these Welsh born jihadis are it. They were not radicalised by imams, their blood lust is inbred and if these two brothers can turn into barbaric blood thirsty sub humans then so can every Muslim in Great Britain.
The government and the multi-culturalists have created a monster that will have to be confronted sooner or later. When these battle hardened killers use their British passports to return to the land of their birth they will not be picking up their lives where they left off nor will they be integrating. They will bring their jihad and their cause back with them and use their newly acquired battle skills to foment violent revolution in Great Britain.
The Muslim population in Cardiff alone has doubled in ten years to twenty five thousand. If only a quarter of these take up jihad there will be six and a quarter thousand people in Cardiff alone killing for the caliphate.
Extrapolating these figures to the country as a whole gives some idea of the potential disaster that British people are facing solely because the agenda driven political class and the multi-culturalists refused to listen.
(Read the full shocking story here)
From the comments - NHS punishment squad harrasses a Christian on behalf of a Muslim. See here.
Tuesday, June 24, 2014
Nigella Lawson Barred From USA - Celebrity Junkies Welcome
In an increasingly dangerous world that is rapidly going to hell in a hand basket, national reputation counts for a lot, therefore it is imperative that governments and their agents do all they can to enhance that reputation and guard against incidents that put it at risk.
The actions of the lowest ranked government bureaucrats can have a detrimental effect in high profile cases which can generate disproportionate publicity, especially where celebrities are concerned.
Unlike Great Britain, the USA is an independent, sovereign nation and therefore has control over its borders and, quite rightly, it has the absolute right to decide which foreigners to allow in. When a controversial decision is made without an explanation, negative publicity is inevitable, the national reputation is affected and the nation as a whole becomes something of a laughing stock.
One such incident was the barring of the popular celebrity chef Nigella Lawson from boarding her flight to Los Angeles without an explanation. It must be noted that the authorities are not obliged to give an explanation but they should have been aware that this would fuel speculation and that in turn would call its competence into question, it would also have a negative effect on an already battered reputation.
The speculation over Nigella Lawson is varied and in many cases bizzar, the most plausible reason being the revelation during the trial of her domestic helpers that she had occasionally used narcotics in the past.
(See here)
Word around the world is that the USA has strict guidelines on allowing people into the country who have criminal records, especially where drugs are involved and it is the interpretation of these guidelines, among other things, that is making the country a laughing stock.
To recap very briefly; Nigella hit the headlines when her husband and high profile art collector, Charles Saatchi, was photographed throttling her outside a restaurant in London. This precipitated a bitter divorce battle where Saatchi threatened to ruin her.
Coincidentally after his threats a trial of their domestic helpers followed and it was at this trial that Nigella admitted smoking marijuana and taking cocaine with her terminally ill first husband. It was suggested by a friend that use of these substances would help both of them get through what was obviously a trying, stressful time.
Despite attempts to label her as a habitual drug user and bad mother, her doctor was able to confirm that no long term drug use was involved and that she was drug free.
It has been suggested that Saatchi deliberately engineered the trial knowing that the resulting publicity would alert the American immigration authorities and have negative affect on her lucrative American television career. Some say that he is such a malignant piece of work he alerted them himself but this again is pure speculation.
As is the case with their British counterparts, American bureaucrats live in an isolated world where common sense is a nonexistent commodity and America's reputation suffered as a consequence. If past drug use was the reason for Nigella's exclusion and her presence in the USA constitutes a danger to impressionable children, how does that square with the legalisation of marijuana in Colorado?
It is this kind of glaring inconsistency that shows up the bureaucracy and makes them look petty. This however, is nothing compared to the British celebrities they do let in.
If the authorities are worried that the domestic goddess may be a poor role model for young Americans then what on earth kind of role model is Ozzy Osbourne, an out of control junkie who probably reaches more American kids than a television chef however glamorous.
A serial alcohol and drug abuser, Ozzie is quoted as saying: "I get high, I get f*cked up, what the hell is wrong with getting f*cked up" which will have a much more devastating impact on young minds than 'check the seasoning and add a little more salt and pepper if needed'.
Apart from biting the heads off doves and bats, Ozzy apparently desecrated an American shrine when he urinated against the Alamo memorial.
(See here)
While Nigella gets banned, Ozzy gets a television series and an invite to the White House.
As bad as he is, Ozzie is an amateur compared the ultimate rock and roll icon, Keith Richards. Drug abuse has been as much a part of his life as music and to his credit he doesn't regret or apologise for his addled past. Keith has a mansion in Massachusetts and has recently bought a luxury apartment in New York.
(See Keef here)
It's not the fact that the authorities banned Nigella and rolled out the welcome mat for Ozzy and Keith but the fact that without an explanation it makes the American authorities, and by extension the country at large, look petty and incompetent before the sceptical world.
P.S. Along with millions of other punters, I'm a fan of all three so good luck to them all.
The actions of the lowest ranked government bureaucrats can have a detrimental effect in high profile cases which can generate disproportionate publicity, especially where celebrities are concerned.
Unlike Great Britain, the USA is an independent, sovereign nation and therefore has control over its borders and, quite rightly, it has the absolute right to decide which foreigners to allow in. When a controversial decision is made without an explanation, negative publicity is inevitable, the national reputation is affected and the nation as a whole becomes something of a laughing stock.
One such incident was the barring of the popular celebrity chef Nigella Lawson from boarding her flight to Los Angeles without an explanation. It must be noted that the authorities are not obliged to give an explanation but they should have been aware that this would fuel speculation and that in turn would call its competence into question, it would also have a negative effect on an already battered reputation.
The speculation over Nigella Lawson is varied and in many cases bizzar, the most plausible reason being the revelation during the trial of her domestic helpers that she had occasionally used narcotics in the past.
(See here)
Word around the world is that the USA has strict guidelines on allowing people into the country who have criminal records, especially where drugs are involved and it is the interpretation of these guidelines, among other things, that is making the country a laughing stock.
To recap very briefly; Nigella hit the headlines when her husband and high profile art collector, Charles Saatchi, was photographed throttling her outside a restaurant in London. This precipitated a bitter divorce battle where Saatchi threatened to ruin her.
Coincidentally after his threats a trial of their domestic helpers followed and it was at this trial that Nigella admitted smoking marijuana and taking cocaine with her terminally ill first husband. It was suggested by a friend that use of these substances would help both of them get through what was obviously a trying, stressful time.
Despite attempts to label her as a habitual drug user and bad mother, her doctor was able to confirm that no long term drug use was involved and that she was drug free.
It has been suggested that Saatchi deliberately engineered the trial knowing that the resulting publicity would alert the American immigration authorities and have negative affect on her lucrative American television career. Some say that he is such a malignant piece of work he alerted them himself but this again is pure speculation.
As is the case with their British counterparts, American bureaucrats live in an isolated world where common sense is a nonexistent commodity and America's reputation suffered as a consequence. If past drug use was the reason for Nigella's exclusion and her presence in the USA constitutes a danger to impressionable children, how does that square with the legalisation of marijuana in Colorado?
It is this kind of glaring inconsistency that shows up the bureaucracy and makes them look petty. This however, is nothing compared to the British celebrities they do let in.
If the authorities are worried that the domestic goddess may be a poor role model for young Americans then what on earth kind of role model is Ozzy Osbourne, an out of control junkie who probably reaches more American kids than a television chef however glamorous.
A serial alcohol and drug abuser, Ozzie is quoted as saying: "I get high, I get f*cked up, what the hell is wrong with getting f*cked up" which will have a much more devastating impact on young minds than 'check the seasoning and add a little more salt and pepper if needed'.
Apart from biting the heads off doves and bats, Ozzy apparently desecrated an American shrine when he urinated against the Alamo memorial.
(See here)
While Nigella gets banned, Ozzy gets a television series and an invite to the White House.
As bad as he is, Ozzie is an amateur compared the ultimate rock and roll icon, Keith Richards. Drug abuse has been as much a part of his life as music and to his credit he doesn't regret or apologise for his addled past. Keith has a mansion in Massachusetts and has recently bought a luxury apartment in New York.
(See Keef here)
It's not the fact that the authorities banned Nigella and rolled out the welcome mat for Ozzy and Keith but the fact that without an explanation it makes the American authorities, and by extension the country at large, look petty and incompetent before the sceptical world.
P.S. Along with millions of other punters, I'm a fan of all three so good luck to them all.
Monday, June 23, 2014
Cricketer v Muslim Bomber - British Values Absent From Government
As the repercussions from the Muslim Trojan Horse scandal rumbles on and the danger that these repercussions could have a negative effect on Prime Minister David Cameron's re-election prospects, he has resorted to what he does best, i.e. making promises he knows he won't keep.
Like the rest of the career politicians that make up the old political order, everything he says and does is concocted by spin doctors and media managers who's sole aim is gaining political advantage.
Whether a particular policy is right or wrong doesn't matter, how it plays in the media is the only consideration and this is with a view to winning votes.
For the uninitiated, the Muslim Trojan Horse scandal surfaced when school inspectors exposed a plan by Muslim activists to take over schools with intention of indoctrinating impressionable pupils with the joys of radical Islam and jihad. Some twenty eight schools had already been taken over with a significant number of pupils already brainwashed.
(Trojan horse scandals here and here)
It has been inferred that some school inspectors and government departments had an inclination that this was going on but true to form, as with the Muslim paedophile scandals, they turned a blind eye for reasons of 'cultural sensitivity'.
The long suffering British people are rightly outraged that this kind behavior is going on in their once green and pleasant land, but their outrage will be to no avail. The political class, led by the Prime Minister, David Cameron, have committed themselves to implementing a cultural and demographic replacement agenda that has been long in the planning.
The people are crippled by the same political correctness that the British institutions use to implement this agenda. The key positions in all of these institutions are manned with Common Purpose trained technocrats who in turn command armies of like minded petty bureaucrats.
These cultural Marxists run everything from the civil service, to the BBC and the NHS - more damaging is the fact that they also run the police 'service' and the education department.
David Cameron and the political class are single minded that this agenda will be fully implemented and this will require that the traditional way of life, along with British values, be replaced with a so called 'multi-cultural society'.
It can taken for granted therefore that when David Cameron appears before the bought-and-paid-for media with promises to act in defence of British values, he is merely repeating a carefully crafted response which is designed by his spin doctors to do three things:
a) sympathise with the peoples' outrage in order to pretend he shares their concerns. In other words 'he gets it'.
b) make promises that are constructed to appease the people's anger and close down the debate for rest of that particular the news cycle.
c) stem the hemorrhage of votes that these scandals generate.
This kind of shameless media manipulation is what passes for acceptable political discourse with this new generic political class, where the truth or the public good are to be avoided at all costs in order to progress the project and keep it on the rails.
David Cameron's promise to teach British values in British schools is impossible because, as mentioned previously, the entire British establishment, including the education department as been politicised and manned with like minded technocrats who are committed to the cultural replacement agenda.
(Cameron on British values here)
Examples abound of government departments ignoring British values in order to facilitate the said agenda and none more so than the different treatment meted out to a Zimbabwean cricketer and a Muslim bomber.
Duncan Fletcher was born in Salisbury, Rhodesia of parents who were born in England. It's worth noting that all four of his grandparents were also born in England. A gifted cricketer he went on become the manager of the English cricket team and guided them to their first Ashes victory over Australia in eighteen years. As a reward for his services to English cricket he was given the honour of OBE.
Again for the uninitiated, the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire is an ancient order of chivalry bestowed by the Monarch for services to Great Britain.
The one thing Duncan Fletcher was refused was British citizenship although he was entitled by the virtue of his parent and grandparents nationality. The Home Office claimed he hadn't met the residency requirements but ignored the fact that he was away touring with the English cricket team for six months a year.
In all Duncan Fletcher waited fifteen years before the British government were finally shamed into granting him citizenship in 2005.
(See here)
Muktar Said Ibrahim was born in Eritrea in 1978 and arrived in Great Britain aged twelve in 1990, supposedly as 'a child dependent on asylum seekers', whatever that means. He was granted residency in 1992'.
A violent criminal thug, he committed indecent assault when aged fifteen, he was involved in gang violence, and then two years later in 1996 he was sentenced to five years in prison for two armed robberies. He applied for naturalisation in 2003 and was granted a British passport in 2004. Despite his appalling criminal record, unlike Fletcher he had to wait all of one year.
Muktar Said Ibrahim rewarded the generosity of the British people by strapping on a bomb with the intention of killing and maiming innocent people while they commuted to work on the London Transport system on July 21st, 2005.
Along with his other gang members, all immigrants granted leave to remain or given British passports, he is currently serving a life sentence with a minimum set at forty years.
(See a brief biography here)
Although the news cycle has moved on, the people responsible for the different treatment of Duncan Fletcher and Muktar Ibrahim have not, in fact they have most likely increased in number and become more dedicated to their cultural replacement cause.
If the government had the interests and safety of the British people in mind, Muktar Ibrahim would have been deported after his release from prison the first time but, as the British people know to their costs, no immigrant gets deported anymore no matter how heinous their crime. The cultural replacement project takes priority over the people's safety every time.
If David Cameron is serious about restoring British values then it is imperative that instead of making promises, he clears the civil service, along with all the politicised government departments, of the indoctrinated Common Purpose trained technocrats that are instrumental in destroying those same British values and way life for their mythical multi-cultural society.
This a re-edited post from June.
Like the rest of the career politicians that make up the old political order, everything he says and does is concocted by spin doctors and media managers who's sole aim is gaining political advantage.
Whether a particular policy is right or wrong doesn't matter, how it plays in the media is the only consideration and this is with a view to winning votes.
For the uninitiated, the Muslim Trojan Horse scandal surfaced when school inspectors exposed a plan by Muslim activists to take over schools with intention of indoctrinating impressionable pupils with the joys of radical Islam and jihad. Some twenty eight schools had already been taken over with a significant number of pupils already brainwashed.
(Trojan horse scandals here and here)
It has been inferred that some school inspectors and government departments had an inclination that this was going on but true to form, as with the Muslim paedophile scandals, they turned a blind eye for reasons of 'cultural sensitivity'.
The long suffering British people are rightly outraged that this kind behavior is going on in their once green and pleasant land, but their outrage will be to no avail. The political class, led by the Prime Minister, David Cameron, have committed themselves to implementing a cultural and demographic replacement agenda that has been long in the planning.
The people are crippled by the same political correctness that the British institutions use to implement this agenda. The key positions in all of these institutions are manned with Common Purpose trained technocrats who in turn command armies of like minded petty bureaucrats.
These cultural Marxists run everything from the civil service, to the BBC and the NHS - more damaging is the fact that they also run the police 'service' and the education department.
David Cameron and the political class are single minded that this agenda will be fully implemented and this will require that the traditional way of life, along with British values, be replaced with a so called 'multi-cultural society'.
It can taken for granted therefore that when David Cameron appears before the bought-and-paid-for media with promises to act in defence of British values, he is merely repeating a carefully crafted response which is designed by his spin doctors to do three things:
a) sympathise with the peoples' outrage in order to pretend he shares their concerns. In other words 'he gets it'.
b) make promises that are constructed to appease the people's anger and close down the debate for rest of that particular the news cycle.
c) stem the hemorrhage of votes that these scandals generate.
This kind of shameless media manipulation is what passes for acceptable political discourse with this new generic political class, where the truth or the public good are to be avoided at all costs in order to progress the project and keep it on the rails.
David Cameron's promise to teach British values in British schools is impossible because, as mentioned previously, the entire British establishment, including the education department as been politicised and manned with like minded technocrats who are committed to the cultural replacement agenda.
(Cameron on British values here)
Examples abound of government departments ignoring British values in order to facilitate the said agenda and none more so than the different treatment meted out to a Zimbabwean cricketer and a Muslim bomber.
Duncan Fletcher was born in Salisbury, Rhodesia of parents who were born in England. It's worth noting that all four of his grandparents were also born in England. A gifted cricketer he went on become the manager of the English cricket team and guided them to their first Ashes victory over Australia in eighteen years. As a reward for his services to English cricket he was given the honour of OBE.
Again for the uninitiated, the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire is an ancient order of chivalry bestowed by the Monarch for services to Great Britain.
The one thing Duncan Fletcher was refused was British citizenship although he was entitled by the virtue of his parent and grandparents nationality. The Home Office claimed he hadn't met the residency requirements but ignored the fact that he was away touring with the English cricket team for six months a year.
In all Duncan Fletcher waited fifteen years before the British government were finally shamed into granting him citizenship in 2005.
(See here)
Muktar Said Ibrahim was born in Eritrea in 1978 and arrived in Great Britain aged twelve in 1990, supposedly as 'a child dependent on asylum seekers', whatever that means. He was granted residency in 1992'.
A violent criminal thug, he committed indecent assault when aged fifteen, he was involved in gang violence, and then two years later in 1996 he was sentenced to five years in prison for two armed robberies. He applied for naturalisation in 2003 and was granted a British passport in 2004. Despite his appalling criminal record, unlike Fletcher he had to wait all of one year.
Muktar Said Ibrahim rewarded the generosity of the British people by strapping on a bomb with the intention of killing and maiming innocent people while they commuted to work on the London Transport system on July 21st, 2005.
Along with his other gang members, all immigrants granted leave to remain or given British passports, he is currently serving a life sentence with a minimum set at forty years.
(See a brief biography here)
Although the news cycle has moved on, the people responsible for the different treatment of Duncan Fletcher and Muktar Ibrahim have not, in fact they have most likely increased in number and become more dedicated to their cultural replacement cause.
If the government had the interests and safety of the British people in mind, Muktar Ibrahim would have been deported after his release from prison the first time but, as the British people know to their costs, no immigrant gets deported anymore no matter how heinous their crime. The cultural replacement project takes priority over the people's safety every time.
If David Cameron is serious about restoring British values then it is imperative that instead of making promises, he clears the civil service, along with all the politicised government departments, of the indoctrinated Common Purpose trained technocrats that are instrumental in destroying those same British values and way life for their mythical multi-cultural society.
This a re-edited post from June.
Tuesday, June 17, 2014
Angelina Jolie And William Hague Distract Attention From Peacetime Rape
Despite the fact that she is only an actress, Angelina Jolie must rank as one of the most influential people among those who consider themselves to be the global movers and shakers. Add to that the fact that she is married to Brad Pitt then the drawing power of this couple is increased beyond measure.
The ability to generate publicity on this scale can be used in a positive way to the benefit of millions of the less fortunate or in a negative way as the antics of imbeciles like Justin Bieber demonstrate.
The media gave Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt blanket coverage recently when they teamed up with the British Foreign Secretary, William Hague, to progress their campaign of tackling the issue of rape during wars. The campaign centred on Bosnia where a vicious and bloody civil war claimed the lives of tens of thousands of innocent civilians and where some fifty thousand men, women and children were the victims of rape.
Jolie, Pitt and Hague must be commended for using their celebrity to generate publicity for such a noble cause and hopefully their action to get as many of the perpetrators prosecuted will come to fruition. In addition to visiting Sarajevo, they have also visited other war zones such as Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo where rape was endemic during their respective civil wars.
(See the story here and here)
Looking a little deeper into the issue of rape, Angelina Jolie, who is fronting the campaign, has overlooked the fact that her efforts are not without their negative side and one has to wonder whether she has chosen the wrong target. By using her considerable ability to draw the media's attention to war zone rape , she has inadvertently taken the spotlight off horrific rapes that have recently been in the news elsewhere.
The world was shocked and horrified when young girls were not only gang raped in India but hung from a tree afterwards. Young girls were being gang raped on the transportation systems, including buses, with one unfortunate lady dying from the injuries she sustained during a particularly brutal attack.
In a country that is renown for its poor treatment of women, the negative global publicity that ensued had the effect of forcing the government and the police to act in the women's interests not only with the issue of personal safety but of women's rights in general.
Jolie's campaign has distracted the attention away from India and apparently the momentum for change has been lost, much to the relief of the authorities no doubt.
Looking at the issue of rape in a wider context, its been twenty years since the war in Bosnia ended and although fifty thousand rapes during the three year conflict is an appalling number it is a minor statistic when compared to rape generally.
When discussing war time rape it is worth remembering that rape and pillage has always been an indulgence of war from time immemorial, the spoils of war had always been counted in treasure, slaves and concubines.
In ancient times Alexander the Great indulged as did the Romans before the Vikings took things to whole new level. During the Second World War the Germans raped, pillaged and murdered their way across Russia before the Russians did the same as they conquered Germany. It is estimated that over a million German women were raped after the fall of Berlin.
It could be argued that the way to end rape during war is to stop war from starting in the first place and that is unlikely to happen. Angelina Jolie's campaign to bring the perpetrators to justice however remains right, proper and noble.
But what of rape during peacetime? The statistics are shocking and although there are no mitigating circumstances for rape, one would think that rape on this scale outside the heat of battle would be more deserving of Angelina Jolie's attention.
As mentioned earlier some fifty thousand people were raped during the three year Bosnian conflict but according to UN statistics eighty thousand were raped in the USA between 2004 and 2010. Even this is overshadowed by the US Justice Department figures of some three hundred thousand rapes per year. (That's 300,000 per year)
(See the DOJ report here and more stats here)
When looking at the country by country rape statistics, and they do vary considerably depending on source, the USA, India, Great Britain, South Africa, Mexico, Germany, Russia, Sweden, Belgium, Lesotho, Botswana and Canada are consistently at the top.
(See one such report here)
As the British Foreign Secretary William Hague will be well aware, the rape crises in some European Union countries is a scandal that is being deliberately ignored on the grounds of cultural sensitivity and political correctness.
Rape in Sweden is now reaching epidemic proportions due mainly to the sudden influx of Muslims. According to some statistics, one in four Swedish women will be raped by a Muslim in their lifetime. The Swedish government are renown for their craven obedience to the EU and they are at the forefront of the campaign to impose multi-culturalism across the continent but this shouldn't be at the cost of their women's safety.
(See Swedish rape stats here)
Sweden considers itself to be the vanguard of 'progressivism' in the EU and prides itself on its record of equality and women's rights but as one commentator noted they can have women's rights or Islam but they can't have both.
(See a report here, also Muslims rape 300 Swedish children in seven months, see here)
The story is the same in Belgium where there were five gang rapes in a single week carried out by Muslim gangs with similar horror stories in all other European countries and in countries as far away as Canada and Australia.
(See here and here)
In Great Britain, the adherence to the cultural replacement agenda by the political class is the stuff of legend; this is where the authorities including the local councils, teachers, socials services and the police 'service' ignored Muslims paedophile gangs in most of the major cities on the grounds of cultural sensitivity.
Hundreds of underage white girls were groomed then subjected to horrific sexual abuse, including gang rape, with the complicit approval of the authorities.
(See stories here)
In conclusion I will add that once the objectives of Angelina Jolie's campaign against war rape are achieved, she should concentrate her efforts on peacetime rape which is a far bigger issue and more widespread.
William Hague is well aware of the rape epidemic engulfing Great Britain and Europe, which includes the rape of children, and he should bring his influence to bear on Angelina Jolie and urge her to use her publicity generating prowess to combat peacetime rape. She should draw particular attention to Muslim gangs, who believe that all western women are prostitutes, and who are ruining the lives of thousands of victims across the continent and the wider world at large.
Some previous posts on Muslim child sex abuse in Great Britain here and here.
Update: Teenager raped by 30 men in Birmingham, UK. It's not a war zone so Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and William Hague are not interested. See here.
The ability to generate publicity on this scale can be used in a positive way to the benefit of millions of the less fortunate or in a negative way as the antics of imbeciles like Justin Bieber demonstrate.
The media gave Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt blanket coverage recently when they teamed up with the British Foreign Secretary, William Hague, to progress their campaign of tackling the issue of rape during wars. The campaign centred on Bosnia where a vicious and bloody civil war claimed the lives of tens of thousands of innocent civilians and where some fifty thousand men, women and children were the victims of rape.
Jolie, Pitt and Hague must be commended for using their celebrity to generate publicity for such a noble cause and hopefully their action to get as many of the perpetrators prosecuted will come to fruition. In addition to visiting Sarajevo, they have also visited other war zones such as Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo where rape was endemic during their respective civil wars.
(See the story here and here)
Looking a little deeper into the issue of rape, Angelina Jolie, who is fronting the campaign, has overlooked the fact that her efforts are not without their negative side and one has to wonder whether she has chosen the wrong target. By using her considerable ability to draw the media's attention to war zone rape , she has inadvertently taken the spotlight off horrific rapes that have recently been in the news elsewhere.
The world was shocked and horrified when young girls were not only gang raped in India but hung from a tree afterwards. Young girls were being gang raped on the transportation systems, including buses, with one unfortunate lady dying from the injuries she sustained during a particularly brutal attack.
In a country that is renown for its poor treatment of women, the negative global publicity that ensued had the effect of forcing the government and the police to act in the women's interests not only with the issue of personal safety but of women's rights in general.
Jolie's campaign has distracted the attention away from India and apparently the momentum for change has been lost, much to the relief of the authorities no doubt.
Looking at the issue of rape in a wider context, its been twenty years since the war in Bosnia ended and although fifty thousand rapes during the three year conflict is an appalling number it is a minor statistic when compared to rape generally.
When discussing war time rape it is worth remembering that rape and pillage has always been an indulgence of war from time immemorial, the spoils of war had always been counted in treasure, slaves and concubines.
In ancient times Alexander the Great indulged as did the Romans before the Vikings took things to whole new level. During the Second World War the Germans raped, pillaged and murdered their way across Russia before the Russians did the same as they conquered Germany. It is estimated that over a million German women were raped after the fall of Berlin.
It could be argued that the way to end rape during war is to stop war from starting in the first place and that is unlikely to happen. Angelina Jolie's campaign to bring the perpetrators to justice however remains right, proper and noble.
But what of rape during peacetime? The statistics are shocking and although there are no mitigating circumstances for rape, one would think that rape on this scale outside the heat of battle would be more deserving of Angelina Jolie's attention.
As mentioned earlier some fifty thousand people were raped during the three year Bosnian conflict but according to UN statistics eighty thousand were raped in the USA between 2004 and 2010. Even this is overshadowed by the US Justice Department figures of some three hundred thousand rapes per year. (That's 300,000 per year)
(See the DOJ report here and more stats here)
When looking at the country by country rape statistics, and they do vary considerably depending on source, the USA, India, Great Britain, South Africa, Mexico, Germany, Russia, Sweden, Belgium, Lesotho, Botswana and Canada are consistently at the top.
(See one such report here)
As the British Foreign Secretary William Hague will be well aware, the rape crises in some European Union countries is a scandal that is being deliberately ignored on the grounds of cultural sensitivity and political correctness.
Rape in Sweden is now reaching epidemic proportions due mainly to the sudden influx of Muslims. According to some statistics, one in four Swedish women will be raped by a Muslim in their lifetime. The Swedish government are renown for their craven obedience to the EU and they are at the forefront of the campaign to impose multi-culturalism across the continent but this shouldn't be at the cost of their women's safety.
(See Swedish rape stats here)
Sweden considers itself to be the vanguard of 'progressivism' in the EU and prides itself on its record of equality and women's rights but as one commentator noted they can have women's rights or Islam but they can't have both.
(See a report here, also Muslims rape 300 Swedish children in seven months, see here)
The story is the same in Belgium where there were five gang rapes in a single week carried out by Muslim gangs with similar horror stories in all other European countries and in countries as far away as Canada and Australia.
(See here and here)
In Great Britain, the adherence to the cultural replacement agenda by the political class is the stuff of legend; this is where the authorities including the local councils, teachers, socials services and the police 'service' ignored Muslims paedophile gangs in most of the major cities on the grounds of cultural sensitivity.
Hundreds of underage white girls were groomed then subjected to horrific sexual abuse, including gang rape, with the complicit approval of the authorities.
(See stories here)
In conclusion I will add that once the objectives of Angelina Jolie's campaign against war rape are achieved, she should concentrate her efforts on peacetime rape which is a far bigger issue and more widespread.
William Hague is well aware of the rape epidemic engulfing Great Britain and Europe, which includes the rape of children, and he should bring his influence to bear on Angelina Jolie and urge her to use her publicity generating prowess to combat peacetime rape. She should draw particular attention to Muslim gangs, who believe that all western women are prostitutes, and who are ruining the lives of thousands of victims across the continent and the wider world at large.
Some previous posts on Muslim child sex abuse in Great Britain here and here.
Update: Teenager raped by 30 men in Birmingham, UK. It's not a war zone so Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and William Hague are not interested. See here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)