Happy New Year - Ring Out The Old and Ring In The New

Happy New Year to people of goodwill everywhere. I hope and pray it's the year when the old destructive guard are swept from power and replaced with disciples of liberty and freedom dedicated to the well being of the people.

Merry Christmas To Everyone

Best wishes for a Merry Christmas and a Happy, Healthy and Prosperous New Year and thank you for your patience and patronage.

Bombing Syria - Precision Munitions Miss By Two-Thousand Miles

Listening to the British Prime Minister, David Cameron, make the case to Parliament for bombing Syria one would be forgiven for thinking that Syria based ISIS killers are an imminent threat to the British people and if they remain unbombed carnage in the homeland will ensue. One would also be forgiven for thinking that Syrian President, Bashir al-Assad, became a murdering tyrant overnight and therefore must be deposed immediately.

This nonsense falls apart under the most cursory examination and it is typical of the spin doctor authored speeches that Cameron is able to convincingly deliver with his perfect well practiced diction.

Firstly, Bashir al-Assad has been a murdering tyrant for the past fifteen years and his father Hafez al-Hassad for thirty years before that with no mention of regime change; it's more than coincidence that he must be deposed now only after gaining the support of Russian President, Vladimir Putin, who's ambitions in the Middle East are seen as a threat to western interests.

Secondly, and more incredulous, is Cameron's assertion that only by bombing Syria can the British people be made safe from ISIS killers. It needs to be made absolutely clear that murder and mayhem on the British mainland has been committed in the past, and most likely will be committed in future, either by born and bred British Muslims or imported Muslim terrorists who have been given British citizenship without proper vetting.

If precision munitions need to be dropped on potential killers of British citizens then they need to be dropped two thousand miles closer to home on the radicalising mosques and madrassas that operate unhindered in the myriad of sharia controlled ghettos that churn out ISIS activists and sympathisers by the thousands.

The truth is that the Royal Air Force can flatten every ISIS controlled city or facility in the entire Middle East and it won't make the British people any safer from violence or death perpetrated by Muslims as demanded by their prophet Mohammad and as written in the Koran.

As a matter of fact many British born and foreign British documented Muslims have said in the past that bombing their brothers in the Middle East is one reason for their radicalisation and their support for ISIS.

Three of the 7th July London Transport bombers were born in West Yorkshire, England of Pakistani parents with the fourth born in Jamaica and raised in West Yorkshire.

The brutal killing of Fusilier Lee Rigby in a London street was carried out by British born sons of Nigerian immigrants.

In contrast, the 21st July London bombers consisted of one British documented immigrant from Ghana, West Africa, one from Eritrea, two from Somalia and three from Ethiopia which included two women.

One of these bombers, Muktar Said Ibrahim was given British citizenship despite a record of gang violence, armed robbery and sexual assault. ( See a previous article on Ibrahim here)

Mohammed Emwazi, better known as Jihad John was a British documented Kuwaiti raised in Great Britain from the age of six.

The British government grants citizenship to anywhere between 150,000 to 250,000 immigrants per year without proper vetting.

Neither David Cameron nor the British people have any idea how many radicalised Muslims there are in their midst waiting to deal death and destruction in the name of Allah. Cameron and his government absolutely refuse to tackle the Muslim institutions that act as a breeding ground for radical Islamists, which includes mosques, madrassas and prisons.

To conclude, there hundreds, perhaps thousands, of jihadis and ISIS activists already in Great Britain ready and waiting to cause murder and mayhem, therefore it is incumbent upon David Cameron to explain to the British public how bombing Syria or Iraq would have prevented the atrocities carried out by these home grown and foreign born jihadis in the past and how bombing them today will prevent further atrocities in the future.

Refusal To Eliminate ISIS - Politics In The Face Of The Enemy

One doesn't have to tax the memory too much to recall those heady days back in 1991 and 2003 when the leaders of the free world put the safety and security of their citizens and those of other threatened countries before agenda driven political expedience.

Names such as 'Operation Desert Storm' and 'Operation Iraqi Freedom', Colin Powell, 'Stormin' Norman Schwarzkopf, Stealth Bombers, Smart Bombs and Precision Munitions became household names. Who can possibly forget the images as the American led coalition forces unleashed 'Shock and Awe' to defeat a ruthless and battle hardened enemy in record time with a minimum of casualties.

The Iraqi military machine prior to Desert Storm was the fifth largest in the world with over a million personnel armed with thousands of tanks and artillery pieces, a functioning air force, air defence systems, missile systems, including Scuds, all dug in and waiting for the assault. Also to be taken into account during Operation Iraqi Freedom was the possible use of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons.

As a reminder to the younger audience, Operation Desert Storm was over in forty-two days while Operation Iraqi Freedom was over in sixty days.

Today the world is being led to believe that a rag tag army of some thirty-thousand recruits, some no more than disaffected schoolkids, using captured equipment consisting of thirty or so outdated tanks and artillery pieces, some heavy machine guns and abandoned Humvees can hold the world to ransom while committing atrocities of the most barbaric and sickening kind.

It's obvious even to the most casual of observers that if the current crop of world leaders stopped the agenda driven politics and committed their military machines to a coalition charged with defeating ISIS, it would be over in weeks rather than months.

What should be a simple military campaign to eradicate ISIS is stymied by politicians not only playing geo-political games but also pandering to political correctness and their 'progressive' agendas at home.

NATO member Turkey is playing all sides against each other while reaping economic and political benefits. Any student of history will know that Turkey has a deep visceral hatred for the Kurds whom they have oppressed since Ottoman days.

The Turks and the Kurds are supposed to be allies against ISIS but the Kurds are refused any assistance or armaments from the USA and its supposed allies in order to keep the Turks onside.

In the meantime Turkey is acting as a staging post for ISIS volunteers as well as financing them via oil sales. Turkey is extorting two billion Euros per year from the European Union for refugee assistance along with visa free travel for all it's citizens and fast track membership of the EU federal state.

Russia is bombing ISIS along with Syrian rebels opposed to the Assad regime. The USA bombing campaign is a derisory, ineffective pin prick whereby seventy-five percent of missions return with unused ordinance due to fear of collateral damage or environmental concerns.

President Obama is more concerned with socially engineering the once mighty US military into a gender neutral, LGBT friendly home guard along with his stated objective of 'standing with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction'.

The French have sent an aircraft carrier to the area to drop a few bombs only in response to the Paris atrocity. Had there been no atrocity France would be continuing with it's efforts to undermine Israel on behalf of Hamas, Hezbollah, The Palestinian Authority and ISIS.

Although British Prime Minister, David Cameron, has been itching to have a war in Syria since the civil war began he has been prevented until now by the British Parliament. It's worth bearing in mind that Cameron's original excuse for going to war in Syria was regime change, not fighting ISIS.

Fear mongering about the non-existent ISIS threat from Syria, Cameron has finally got his war; unlike the French, he cannot send an aircraft carrier because he has decommissioned them as part of his evisceration of the British military in preparation for its absorption into the European Defence Force.

(At this moment in time the much vaunted Royal Navy does not have an operational aircraft carrier; the one it does have will not be aircraft capable until 2020 at the earliest, in any event it does not have enough sailors to man it or support ships to service it or the other two carriers it has commissioned).

For the record, the real ISIS threat to the British people is not from Syria but from home grown terrorists nurtured in the myriad of sharia controlled Muslim ghettos that Cameron refuses to dismantle along with the imported ready-made terrorists allowed in by his open border, mass immigration policy. Jihad John and the 7/7 bombers are cases in point.

At this juncture the personae dramatis are:

The Syrian government who are fighting the Syrian rebels and ISIS

The Kurds who are fighting ISIS and the Turks

The Turks who are fighting the Russians, the Syrian government forces, the Kurds and ISIS

The Russians who are bombing the Syrian rebels, ISIS and possibly the Turks in the near future

The French who are bombing ISIS

The British who are bombing ISIS and the Syrian government forces

The Americans who are dropping a few bombs on ISIS providing they don't kill any Muslims or harm the environment

The Jordanians who were bombing ISIS but have run out of ordinance

ISIS who are fighting everyone who will not submit to Islam

NATO who may be fighting the Russians if they attack Turkey in revenge for its downed bomber

Missing are the Saudi Arabians and the Qataris who are supposed to be allies of the USA, France and Great Britain but are financing and giving succour to ISIS while financing the spread of Wahhabism and mosque building throughout the western world.

Missing also is the UN and Ban Ki-moon where its business as usual passing resolutions against Israel, who it must be stated, would wipe out ISIS in a heartbeat if given a free hand to do so by the rest of the world.

How the informed world must long for those simpler days when military leaders were given a mission and left to accomplish it without political interference because as sure as night follows day, when the politicians get involved disaster follows.

Public Safety Or Cultural Replacement? - The Politicians Have Chosen!

When President Hollande of France announced before the remains of his slaughtered compatriots were cold that the massacre in Paris changed nothing whereby some thirty thousand unvetted Muslim immigrants would still be allowed into France, he not only displayed his callous insensitivity to the victims and their loved ones but also his fanatical determination to finish the cultural replacement agenda mandated by the European Union and the UN.

Incidentally, this is the same cultural replacement agenda that is also progressing in the USA albeit at a slower but ever quickening pace.

There have been over seven hundred police raids on suspected terrorist hangouts around Paris since the atrocity therefore one is bound to ask why these raids were not carried out after the Charlie Hebdo massacre which shook the world only ten months ago?

Brussels, the capital city of Belgium and home to the European Union, suffered a five day lockdown as security authorities tried to capture known jihadis with dual Moroccan-Belgian citizenship who had travelled unhindered to and from France and even participated in atrocities in Syria.

It is acknowledged that there are thousands more of these committed ISIS activists emanating from the scores of autonomous, sharia controlled ghettos that infest the city. Whoever gives these known ISIS activists passports is guilty of facilitating the Muslim jihad in Europe and America and the subsequent atrocities such as those in Paris, London, Boston and Madrid.

The story is the same in many of Europe's major towns and cities where similar sharia controlled Muslim ghettos have been allowed to proliferate unhindered to become breeding grounds for ISIS and extreme murderous specimens such as the late, unlamented Jihad John.

Why these appalling hell holes continue to exist, let alone be formed in the first place, is a question the political class steadfastly refuses to answer. Despite the tough rhetoric spewed forth after the Paris massacre by the likes of Hollande, Merkel, Cameron, Obama and co, they will take no practical action to eradicate these ISIS breeding grounds.

It was only eleven months ago that the political elite from around the world gathered for the PR photo-op promising action after the Charlie Hebdo massacre, and the subsequent coordinated attacks elsewhere in Paris that day that claimed a total of seventeen lives with twenty-two injured.

The same global leaders made the same noises after the Madrid bombings in 2004 which killed one hundred and ninety-one innocents and injured eighteen hundred, and again after the London transport atrocity of 2005 which claimed fifty-two innocent lives and injured seven-hundred. The list of Muslim atrocities goes on and on and are not confined to Europe; Bombay 2008, Boston 2013, Nairobi 2013, Tunisia 2015. Apart from rhetoric and sound bytes nothing concrete is ever done to eliminate the problem.

The fact that the political elite in Europe and the USA are using the same rhetoric and sound bytes to absolve Islam from the violence perpetrated around the world in its name is proof positive that this is a concerted effort by the global political elite to embed Islam in developed world societies.

The loved ones of the victims of Muslim terrorists and all of us, potential future victims, no longer want to hear that "it's nothing to do with Islam" because it so obviously is, (see here) or that "Islam is a great global religion of peace" because it so obviously isn't. (see here)

Open border mass immigration from the backward, undeveloped world was spun by the various European governments as necessary for several reasons, including: a) economic prosperity b) cultural enrichment c) to strengthen communities through diversity, whatever that means.

(For cultural enrichment watch this disgusting spectacle taking place at one of Londons' iconic tourist attractions. Note the tourist buses passing in the background)

The truth is that when combined with rigidly policed political correctness and one-way hate crime laws, the mass immigration of semi-literate Muslims who are incapable of integration into western societies is an unstoppable catalyst for downgrading those same societies.

If the object of the exercise is to downgrade advanced Judeo-Christian societies to create an egalitarian world with the moral equivalence between cultures and religions then it's QED; mission accomplished and may the Lord have mercy on us all.

H/T thereligionofpeace

Happy Thanksgiving

To American people wherever you may be, have a Happy Thanksgiving Day and may God Bless America.

Obama v Putin - A Conscious Uncoupling Or Abdication?

Nothing generates more pity than seeing something that was once noble and respected reduced to a beaten, humiliated mockery of its former self. The pathos is not shared by everyone however as the humiliated party often has plenty of enemies who rejoice at the fall from grace.  

Like the bull awaiting the tercio de muerte after hours of torment in the bullring, President Barack Obama and the United States of America are in the final stages of destruction, joining Great Britain among those once great nations that have descended first into mediocrity then into degradation followed finally by cultural oblivion.

What makes the fall of these nations more pitiful is that it was not brought about by external enemies bent on military conquest but slowly and deliberately by internal enemies bent on ideological conquest on their enemies' behalf.

It amounts to the same thing; the culture, the way of life and the very standards of civilisation are irrevocably changed for the worse and downgraded for the majority of citizens.

If revenge is a dish best served cold then this particular offering is at absolute zero. Having put down his internal enemies and rebuilt his military strength, President Putin set about restoring his beloved Russia's former glory. To an experienced political operator like Vladimir Putin, the advent of the Obama administration was like a gift from Heaven after the Reagan/Thatcher era with their defeat of communism and consequential fall of the Russian empire.

President Obama's recent press conference in Antalya, Turkey was so inept and embarrassing it confirmed once and for all that he has conceded America's global leadership in the various spheres of influence to Putin and Xi Jinpin of China, especially the volatile middle east.
(Watch it here with a transcript here)

This abdication of America's traditional global role is by design as opposed to a failure to act in response to events.

His words and actions from the beginning of his Presidency, along with those of his wife, Michelle, demonstrated their hatred primarily of white people but also of the United States of America itself, together with it's history, it's Judeo-Christian heritage and it's way of life. They are dedicated to the destructive teachings of Saul Alinsky and Marx as opposed to individual liberty and the free enterprise system espoused by the Founding Fathers.

As the 'apology tour' confirmed, they do not believe in American exceptionalism, rather that America is evil and the root cause of the world's problems. As a consequence he has devoted his entire Presidency to the now infamous 'fundamental transformation' of America.

Obama and his handlers deliberately conceded the global leadership role in order to give total focus to the destruction of the United States and its replacement with an egalitarian, downgraded nation where the instruments that made America free and prosperous at home and envied abroad were erased.

Instruments such as Christianity, democratic government, free enterprise and the Constitution to name but a few.

The most shameful behaviour of Obama and his administration is the consummation of their hatred of white people using phony movements such as 'black lives matter' and 'white privilege' while excusing the overtly racist antics of organisations such as the Nation of Islam, the New Black Panthers and the Church of Jeremiah Wright.


When Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, presented her counterpart with a plastic toy reset button to indicate the administration's new direction for Russo-American relations, one could not only sense the embarrassment in the room at such a juvenile publicity stunt but it also confirmed to Putin and the Russians that this administration is not serious.


It only got worse when John Kerry replaced Clinton as Secretary of State. What did the administration imagine Putin and the rest of the world were thinking when Kerry outdid the banality of the reset button by co-opting superannuated crooner James Taylor to sing "You've Got A Friend" to the French nation who were recently traumatised by the Charlie Hebdo massacre?

In conclusion its worth noting that in past years the first contact after a serious national tragedy would have been the President of United States but after the recent Paris massacre President Hollande contacted President Putin first, followed by a meeting with Obama pencilled in for next week.

This suggests that President Obama has indeed abdicated the role of free world leader in order to dedicate the remaining months of his Presidency to finishing off the fundamental transformation of America from greatness into mediocrity
  

   

Paris Slaughter - The Real Guilty People Will Go Unpunished

When the class bully made it known he was going to give me a beating on the way home after school I believed him for the simple reason he had done it before to others. He never made idle threats for effect or to instill fear or for reasons of ego or bravado. Whatever his reason he always dished out the beating as promised.

Bearing in mind the fanatical commitment to their cause, along with their history of following through on their threats of violence, when radical Islamists threaten to bring their jihad to Europe, America and the rest of the civilised world, it would be the height of irresponsibility not to take them seriously.

As recently as a week ago they were using social media to announce that not only were they going to bring their jihad to Europe, they would use the the so called 'refugee crisis' as a Trojan Horse to smuggle in their fighters to join the thousands of home grown fanatics already embedded.

To avoid a beating I took an alternative route home which was used by a rival gang who were no friends of the school bully. In other words I took the threat seriously and as a result took positive action and used a superior force to save my skin.

While the civilised world joined the French people to mourn the deaths their innocent compatriots, the guilty leaders who's refusal to take action to protect their citizens in the face of threats facilitated the atrocity.

Their reaction to the merciless slaying of their citizens is depressingly predictable; the perfunctory trotting out of the usual spin doctor authored platitudes.

In the recent past we heard the same platitudes trotted out after the Ottowa Parliament atrocity and again after the Lindt cafe in Sydney, Australia; they were broken out again and dusted down for use after the Charlie Hebdo killings in Paris.

With minor variations it's the usual litany of soundbites: 'sympathy for the victims, dastardly acts, savagery, extremist minority, nothing to do with Islam, shoulder to shoulder with our staunch ally, no stone left unturned to bring the perpetrators to justice' etc.etc. ad nauseam.

These platitudes will be returned to the shelf ready to be brought out and used again after the next atrocity with the name of the town, city or country altered accordingly.

The guilty people who's agenda driven inaction facilitated this atrocity and who's hands are soaked in innocent blood are:

German Chancellor, Angela Merkel

French President, Francois Hollande

British Prime Minister, David Cameron

European Union President, Jean-Claude Junker

Another EU President, Donald Tusk

UN Special Representative for Migration, Peter Sutherland

Aided and abetted by the President of The United States, Barack Obama and his Secretary of State John Kerry, along with all the right-on celebrities and their dumbed down followers who agitate for open borders.

They will take no practical steps to protect their citizens from murder and mayhem by radical Muslims if it compromises the projects to which they are totally committed and which they have sworn to complete.

With the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty, the transfer of sovereignty from the democratically elected parliaments of the nation states of Europe to the appointed bureaucrats of the European Union is for all intents and purposes complete.

The cultural replacement agenda to create a generic European citizen, loyal to the EU as opposed to the individual nation states, is effected by imposed 'multi-culturalism' which is continuing apace. Open border mass immigration and the so called 'refugee crisis' is a visible manifestation of this perverted project.

To the obvious glee of the UN's ethnic cleanser, Peter Sutherland, the souls of the murdered innocents had barely departed before Merkel, Junker and Tusk confirmed that this atrocity will not stop, slow down or hinder in any way the open border mass immigration disaster currently engulfing the peoples of Europe, including unvetted refugees from Syria.

David Cameron and Francois Hollande are the junior team with regard to the others and they will duly trot out similar sentiments as the tragedy is slowly replaced in the news cycle.

If proof were needed that a parallel fundamental transformation is continuing apace in the USA; President Obama steadfastly refuses to enact border controls and against the advise of the intelligence and military experts, his administration will go ahead regardless of the danger and welcome tens of thousands of Syrian refugees in addition to giving amnesty to millions illegal immigrants by Executive Order.

In conclusion, it's worth adding that in a display of utter contempt for their vulnerable citizens and the victims of the latest outrage; despite all agreeing that further attacks are inevitable these same politicians will be indulging in an expensive jamboree in Paris, of all places, to proclaim that the biggest threat to our safety and security is climate change, with the imposition of global socialism as the only possible solution.

Citizens of the civilised world beware, hang on to your heads and your wallets because both sets of criminals are coming for you.

Hollande: Revenge Without Mercy But Labels Netanyahu A Terrorist

Apart from the Israeli President, Benyamin Netanyahu, Russian President, Vladimir Putin and to some extent German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, the current batch of world leaders are not only weak and indecisive but hypocritical in the extreme; it must also be noted that we the people must bear some of the responsibility for voting them into power.

While civilised people across the world mourn the victims of the Paris atrocity and express sympathy with their loved ones, one mustn't lose sight of the fact that this outrage was thoroughly predictable. It happened because the leaders of the so called 'free world' - especially the leaders of the European Union - put their fundamental transformation agenda before the safety and security of their respective citizens.

In pursuance of their United States of Europe and its new citizen, which is being created using imposed multi-cuturalism, these leaders have adopted anti-citizen positions, along with high moral stances, as they lecture and bully their respective populations into acquiescence.

In Europe there is no one more risible or hypocritical than French President Francois Hollande. A doctrinaire socialist, he adopts all the positions of the 'progressive' left including punitive taxes (seventy-five percent for the 'rich'), expanding welfare entitlements and dependency, EU integration, climate change, multi-culturalism, phony pacifism and most importantly the visceral hatred of Israel and the Jewish people.

Listening to the war-like language issuing forth from Hollande after the Paris massacre, one would be forgiven for confusing this Hollande with the one that regularly excoriates Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu for defending his people against the daily onslaught of the murderous Hamas and other Islamic terrorist groups.

Now that the Muslim jihad has arrived on the shores of France, it appears to be acceptable to promise a war of revenge, executed without mercy, upon inhuman barbarians regardless of the high possibility of collateral damage to innocent civilians.

One has to remember the reaction by Hollande and the rest of the world leaders - including President Obama and John Kerry - when Netanyahu defended his people against the four thousand rockets fired into Israel from Gaza which deliberately targeted innocent civilians.

Taking out the rocket launching sites and the terrorists snatch squads who used tunnels to abduct and butcher innocent Israeli citizens was labelled 'disproportionate' and Netanyahu was harassed on a daily basis by Hollande and the rest to 'show restraint' while protecting his citizens.

After the Charlie Hebdo atrocity in Paris, Hollande invited the Palestinian Authority terrorist leader Mahmoud Habbas for the solidarity 'Je Suis Charlie' photo shoot but publicly displayed his contempt for Israel and the Jewish people by snubbing Prime Minister Netanyahu.

Along with the rest of the cowardly EU leadership, Hollande is at the forefront of the various campaigns to isolate Israel including the vile Boycott, Disinvest and Sanctions favoured by the ever-so-trendy celebrity community and their army of useful idiots.

While Israel is roundly condemned for building a security wall to protect itself against the same savages that attacked France, front line EU countries are erecting security barriers of razor wire to protect themselves against terrorist incursion during the phony 'refugee crisis' without comment.

Hypocrisy knows no bounds when terrorists bring their murder and mayhem onto home soil.

Since the leaders of the free world, including the USA and the EU, are standing by and supporting France as it executes its 'war of revenge, waged without mercy', upon the Muslim 'barbarians' of ISIS, it is now incumbent upon these same leaders to give equal support to Israel and its Prime Minister, Benyamin Netanyahu, who are the biggest victims of Islamic terrorism on the planet bar none.    

Lost Briton Of Gitmo - A Saudi Citizen Who Refused Release Twice

While the British political class pat themselves on the back in congratulations and wealthy right-on celebrities quaff champagne to celebrate the release of the so-called last British inmate of Guantanamo Bay, a Mr.Shaker Aamer; his lawyers will be preparing the inevitable lawsuit to relieve the British taxpayers of millions of their hard earned money in compensation.

If Mr. Aamer is a victim of an injustice by the representatives of the British people then his millions will be deserved; but, however one looks at the entire saga something stinks to high heaven. It is only right and proper therefore that before the British taxpayers hand over their hard earned cash they get an explanation for some of the more incredulous actions and behaviors of Mr. Aamer and the governments involved.

The deceit begins right off the bat when the government-media complex initially kept referring to Mr. Aamer as British or a Briton. That was a deliberate distortion,  known in the real world as an outright lie. He is, in fact, a Saudi Arabian citizen given leave to remain in Great Britain by virtue of his marriage to Zin Siddique, a British documented Muslim.

Born in Medina, the second holiest Islamic site on the planet and burial site of their prophet Mohammad, Shaker Aamer would unlikely be a common or garden Muslim but most likely a fervent adherent of the virulent Wahhabi strain that is financing mosque building and organising jihad across the civilised world.

As the story goes Aamer was educated in various middle eastern countries, followed by the USA and Europe and therein lies the first question; how does a seventeen year old from a fractured family in a medieval country organise travel, accommodation, education and the required finance of such, thousands of miles from home in the developed world?

Following on from his education and global travel, Aamer finds himself in London and establishes residency by marriage to the aforementioned Ms.Siddique. The narrative continues that the Aamer family, now four strong with another on the way, are happy, contented and settled. So settled was Mr.Aamer he was in the process of applying for British citizenship.

Meanwhile half a world away in Afghanistan the medieval savages of the Taliban and al-Qaeda are in full bloodletting mode, mutilating and butchering all and sundry for the pettiest of crimes, including dancing and flying kites, as they imposed their brutal Islamic regime.


Also at this time the world was holding its breath in trepidation as the United States was about to unleash hell fire on Afghanistan to root out and destroy the Taliban and al-Qaeda.

Incredulously, we are being asked to believe that Shaker Aamer abandoned his application for British citizenship and sacrificed his career as an Arabic interpreter, to uproot his pregnant wife and their children from the safety of London to work for an Islamic charity in about-to-be bombed Afghanistan where Arabs are treated with suspicion by the locals.

It needs to be verified to the British taxpayers, the name of the charity, how was it financed and by who, and what did this charity work entail?

The Aamer family reportedly traveled unmolested between towns and places with names that curdle the blood of westerners. Places such as, Kandahar, Jalalabad and Tora Bora, fearsome places that were war torn, lawless and infested with brutal Taliban and al-Qaeda fighters.

Bearing in mind the Taliban/al-Qaeda attitude to Great Britain and the west, how was this unmolested travel accomplished by a British resident with his British wife and his British kids in tow?

Captured by the Northern Alliance allies while trying to cross into Pakistan, Aamer was handed over to the US military who suspected he was an al-Qaeda operative involved in recruitment, financing and planning.

The veracity of the evidence against Shaker Aamer, and whether it was gathered using torture is for the legal experts to verify and for the politicians to decide if he is safe to release.

The main stream media narrative is that the evil Americans were holding an innocent Brit in appalling conditions either to save face because the lack of evidence indicated incompetence or because he harboured sensitive information about both the British and American intelligence communities and their methods.

If that is the case, why did the British government lobby Presidents Bush and Obama for his release?

Increasing numbers of people do not believe Aamer's incredible explanation for his presence in Afghanistan. Also, they want to know why the British government lobbied for the release of a Saudi citizen but joined the European Arrest Warrant which has left British citizens languishing in appalling conditions in foreign jails without evidence and for issues that are not offences in Great Britain.

The questions accumulate but the government remains silent and will most likely declare the American and British intelligence services guilty of abusing Mr.Aamers' human rights and hand over a shed load of taxpayer's money then hope the issue will go away.

The truth is that eight years of his incarceration were voluntary, President Bush offered to release him to his native Saudi Arabia in 2007 and President Obama did the same in 2009, both offers he refused to accept.

He had committed no crimes in SA and it appears he was not wanted for any crime or misdemeanour against the country or Islam.

His marriage to a foreigner is being used as an excuse because her status would prevent her living in SA (it didn't prevent an infidel like me from living there but I digress). However one would think that Zin Siddique's status could be rearranged at government level so that Shaker Aamer could be freed from the hell hole in Guantanamo Bay and his family could be reunited at last and live happily ever after, not in the bacon and beer culture of Great Britain but in the spiritual home of their religion.


 

Tom And Dick

Five weeks down since hand surgery and recovery is on track; slowly regaining the use of my fingers.

Still unable to type with more than one finger but hopefully I will be able to put my own socks on in the near future. I'm disappointed that I'm missing all the big stories at this critical moment in history. Hanging in there.

Thanks for your understanding and messages.

The UN And Cultural Genocide - The Puppet And The Puppet Master

Let's be clear and unequivocal from the outset, an integral part of the post war reordering of the planet by both the United Nations and the European Union includes the removal from power and influence of predominately white people who share a Judeo-Christian heritage.

It should be obvious by now that the so called refugee crisis which has dominated the global bought-and-paid-for media has been long in planning; it has been brilliantly coordinated and flawlessly executed.

This mass influx of third world, mainly Muslim, economic migrants into Europe combined with imposed quotas for each country guarantees that the generational project to replace the individual cultures of the European nation states, along with their Judeo-Christian heritages, with artificially constructed 'multi-cultural societies' will pass the tipping point and become irreversible. 

Even now as the truth emerges that only one in five of those swarming into Europe are refugees fleeing the Syrian civil war - the rest being economic migrants from a variety of countries and continents including Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Africa - they persist with calling it 'the refugee crisis'.

One only has to follow the agenda of the de facto world government at the UN, along with its European subsidiary in Brussels, to see this tragedy for what it is. It also reveals the callousness and the fanaticism of the key players along with the depths they will plummet to achieve their goal.

The UN/EU bureaucrats and their propaganda machine use the politically correct term of 'unhomogenising' to describe their cultural replacement agenda. To that end they dispatched their super bureaucrat and senior Bilderberger, Peter Sutherland, to tour the capitals and legislatures of Europe advising the various political establishments to "undermine national homogeneity".
(See here)

Even by the UN's own criteria this undermining of national homogeneity is in fact cultural genocide, at least within the spirit of its Articles and Declarations.
(See here)

Great Britain's Prime Minister, David Cameron, is the archetypal modern politician. He possesses all the attributes he needs to deceive enough of the electorate into believing he represents their interests and can be trusted with their safety and well being.

In actuality Cameron is a self confessed 'progressive' who is totally dedicated to the UN and the EU, along with their cultural replacement agenda. He represents the UN and the EU in the Westminster Parliament, not the British people.

When UN or EU bureaucrats make any demand on Cameron, whether it be increased contributions, an increase in immigrant quotas or welfare entitlement policy, he makes an initial high visibility pretence at being tough for the benefit of his home audience before quietly complying at some later date.

Instead of asking the obvious questions regarding the unhomogenising propaganda of Peter Sutherland and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Cameron merely repeats their nonsense, almost by rote.

( David Cameron on unhomogenising here)

Sutherland and the UN/EU propaganda machine push the line that the future progress, security and and prosperity of the British people, and those of the other European nation states, is being hindered by their lack of diversity and their homogeneous, mono-cultural societies.

This justification for cultural genocide of the nations that advanced civilisation from the dark ages to the modern world, raises multiple questions that need to be addressed by Ban Ki-moon, Peter Sutherland, David Cameron along with all the other advocates of the UN/EU cultural replacement agenda.

If progress, security and prosperity is impossible to achieve in the homogeneous, mono-cultural nations of Europe, how is it that the same doesn't apply to homogeneous, mono-cultural nations such as Japan, China, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States and Ban Ki-moon's own country of South Korea?

Also, if these same immigrants are essential for the future prosperity of the developed world, how is it that their home countries have not progressed but remain backwards and undeveloped?

It is now universally accepted that imposed multi-culturalism using open border mass immigration has been a complete and utter disaster for the peoples of Great Britain and Europe. Cameron, Sutherland et al, need to explain how tens of thousands of impoverished, crime ridden, welfare funded, mono-cultural ghettos, with their violent turf wars could possibly be vital for the security or the future prosperity of the European people?

How can the barbaric customs of incompatible, backward cultures from the undeveloped, uncivilised world add anything to western civilisation let alone guarantee their future security and prosperity?

How can importing female genital mutilation, paedophilia, incest, child marriage, honour killings, spousal abuse, homophobia, beheading and mutilation complement British or European culture?

How can Sharia law or the violent exhortations to dominate all other cultures, as written in the Koran, be compatible with the European people, their way of life or their Judeo-Christian heritage?

They are obviously not compatible and never will be therefore the UN/EU elites have decided, without consultation, that Islam will gradually supersede the Judeo-Christian heritages of Europe as part of their cultural replacement agenda.
(Listen to David Cameron on Islamification here)

If, as the UN and the EU claim, that this is a humanitarian crisis of Biblical proportions, why is it that the burden is being put solely on the people of Europe and the Anglosphere to take the brunt of it?

Admittedly it was exacerbated by western interference, but this remains a Middle Eastern problem concerning mainly people of the Muslim faith, therefore why aren't the oil rich countries of the Middle East, including the Gulf States, dealing with it or at the very least alleviating the suffering of their coreligionists?

Why is the UN's Ban Ki-moon putting pressure on Europe and not the rest of the nations that make up his organisation to take their 'fair share' of refugees?

Why is Saudi Arabia offering to fund mosque building in Germany and Europe but refusing to take their fair share of immigrants or to fund their rehabilitation in Europe?

The answers are blindingly obvious; the cultural genocide by mass immigration being imposed by the UN/EU has caused opposition to the European project putting it's continuation at risk. The lack of democratic means to address this disaster has seen an increase in violence and the rise of patriotic and nationalist parties.

This threat to their generational project was viewed with horror by the UN/EU elites with the distinct possibility that their prize could be lost at this late stage. Something needed to be done to push cultural replacement past the tipping point and what better way was there than opening the borders to all and sundry.

The usual tactic of demonisation and smear is being deployed with venom against any person or party that questions or opposes this cultural genocide and open border mass immigration. The rising tide of opposition is being labelled as the rise of the 'far right' and adherents are smeared as bigots, fascists, xenophobes and Islamophobes along with the overused but predictable favourite 'racist'.

Everyone outside of the agenda driven, global 'progressive' establishment, along with their collaborators in the media and the self loathing community, see this crisis for what it is; a deliberate and final push by the UN/EU to replace the successful, centuries old Judeo-Christian cultures of Great Britain and Europe while downgrading the standards of civilisation with the intention of finalising their project to impose the equality of nations and cultures.

Refugee 'Crisis' - UN Bigwigs Break Cover To Assist The EU Power Grab

The infamous quote "never let a crisis go to waste" has been attributed to various political players including Sir Winston Churchill, anti-American revolutionary Saul Alinsky and latterly Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel when he was an integral part of the Obama political machine. Whatever the context they used, the interpretation is unambiguous; any crisis, no matter how small or what it is, can be used to gain political advantage or to advance a particular cause.

The current so called 'crisis' involving refugees, whether it is genuine or deliberately engineered, will not go to waste by either the European Union ruling bureaucrats or their masters at the UN de facto world government in New York.

Unelected EU President, Jean Claude Junker, is milking it for all it's worth in order to accumulate more power over the individual states especially concerning control over their borders. Not only is he imposing refugee quotas on the individual states using something called  the Common Asylum Policy, he is unilaterally changing international law by altering the criteria which defines refugee status.

This is draconian even for an unelected dictator like Junker. Anyone looking for work will now be considered as a refugee as opposed to someone fleeing war or persecution. This act alone opens the borders to practically the whole world.

The action by Junker is most likely to counter the fact that a person's status changes from refugee to economic migrant the moment they voluntarily cross a border from a safe haven country as most of these migrants have done from Turkey, Greece, Cyprus and Italy. It would be illegal for genuine refugees to proceed further without registration in the first safe country.

This unauthorised movement across borders would have the effect of re-defining and downgrading the so-called 'refugee crisis' into one of economic migration and welfare colonialism.

Add the redefinition of refugee status to President Junker's intention to use the state of individual economies for quota allocation, Great Britain will be in his cross-hairs by virtue of its economy being not quite as bankrupt as Greece or the other EU members outside of Germany. Junker's personal hatred of Great Britain and its people will guarantee a quota far exceeding that of which it is capable of absorbing.

With the serial appeaser David Cameron as their Prime Minister, the British people had better prepare themselves for yet another deluge of economic migrants and welfare colonists.

In his usual attempt to appear tough before the people, Prime Minister, David Cameron stated that Great Britain will not be subject to the Common Asylum Policy or Junker's quota's and announced that he would accept five thousand Syrian refugees directly from camps in Lebanon.

After an application of pressure from President Junker, along with that of German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, the Labour Party, the tedious professional do-gooder Bob Geldof and a selection of other British celebrities, David Cameron caved in within hours with a subsequent announcement that Great Britain will now be accepting twenty thousand immigrants for starters.


Incidentally, one celebrity has past form with regard to Syrian refugees; the notorious champagne socialist Emma Thompson has led another protest to the Prime Minister demanding an increase in the numbers of Syrians admitted into Great Britain.

This is the same Emma Thompson that protested against the building of a Tesco grocery store near her residence because it would 'alter its village atmosphere' along with the horrific prospect that 'the underpaid Tesco staff would not fit it with the local residents'.
( See here and here)

If the British people have reason to worry that they are about to suffer another deluge of economic migrants then this would be further justified by the intervention of the UN in the form of its Secretary-General, Ban Ki-Moon and his malevolent enforcer Peter Sutherland.

Judging by the attitude and actions of both the EU and the UN toward the British people, their culture, their Judeo-Christian heritage and their way of life it is plainly obvious that these institutions and their leaders are determined to bring about their erasure and their replacement with a so called 'multi-cultural society'.

In what is becoming a mantra similar to taxing the the rich, both the UN and the EU demand that everyone should take their 'fair share' of Syrian immigrants. In an interview with British television Ban Ki-moon is arguing that Great Britain 'should do much more' to alleviate the 'refugee crisis'.

He is deliberately ignoring the fact that Great Britain has been changed beyond recognition by a population increase of eight million since Tony Blair obeyed the UN and EU bureaucrats and opened the borders to mass immigration in 1997.

That's 8,000,000 consisting mainly of immigrants and their offspring from the undeveloped and uncivilised world. Although this has been an unmitigated disaster for the British people and their way of life, it has progressed the UN/EU agenda of replacing Great Britain's culture, heritage and way of life with a mythical 'multi-cultural society' by leaps and bounds.

Does the influx of six hundred and thirty-six thousand immigrants (636,000) last year alone constitute a fair share?

A thoroughly evil piece of work, Peter Sutherland is Ban Ki-moon's Special Representative for Migration. He is a life-long super bureaucrat who was also a former unelected European Union Commissioner, the former Director General of GATT then the WTO. He is currently Chairman of Goldman-Sachs International and the London School of Economics.

Sutherland is totally committed to the replacement of British culture and its Judeo-Christian heritage and he works tirelessly to bring it about. He has toured the capitals of Europe and addressed the British Parliament, and also the obsessively secret Bilderberg group, preaching his destructive message. He has even appeared on the BBC to urge the EU leaders to 'undermine national homogeneinty'.
(See here and here)

According to this monster the future of Great Britain and Europe depends on them replacing their cultures with 'multi-cultural societies'; how they became some of the greatest, civilised nations on earth before the influx of incompatible economic migrants and welfare colonists he doesn't explain.

Both Ban Ki-moon and Peter Sutherland need to explain the contradiction of why the great civilisations of Great Britain and Europe must erase their cultures to survive when Ban Ki-moon's native South Korea is the most homogeneous nation on the planet while at the same time being one of the most prosperous.

They also need to explain how many refugees from the current 'crisis' will be journeying to South Korea. Likewise the homogeneous countries of Japan, China, Saudi Arabia etc.

In conclusion: it must be accepted that both the EU and the UN are using this so called 'crisis' to further their agendas which consist of replacing the cultures and Judeo-Christian heritage in Europe to facilitate the creation of a generic European citizen and for the UN to create an egalitarian planet based on equality of nations, cultures and people.

What Crisis? Mass Immigration Is Central To The Cultural Replacement Agenda

   

Watching the human tragedy unfold across Europe one has to give credit to the federalists who have successfully reached the tipping point with regard to their generational project to replace the independent, sovereign states of Europe with a post-democratic superstate.

Until the Euro-sceptics exposed the real project behind the lies and deceit of the federalists, the majority of the people's of Europe swallowed the line that the the institution known as the European Union (EU) was nothing more than a loose, mutually beneficial trading arrangement.

The real project to transfer sovereignty from the democratically elected national legislatures to appointed bureaucrats in Brussels, along with the creation of a generic European citizen, was not only kept from the people but actively denied by a malevolent political class.

The method laid out by EU  'founding father', Jean Monet, was that the transfer of sovereignty and the creation of the European Superstate was to be achieved by stealth using lies and deceit.

Using a series of treaties, each being disguised as being of economic benefit, would allow the transfer of sovereignty to be completed before the people realised what had happened. This was finally achieved with the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty as a Constitution, which was imposed on the peoples of Europe without the promised referenda.

The creation of a generic European citizen loyal to the European Union as opposed to the nation states was to be created using a combination of open border mass immigration and the wilful destruction of the various national identities along with their cultures and way of life.

The rise of Eurosceptic parties across the EU is in response to this cultural replacement element of the superstate project which is considered to be essential by the federalists if a generic European citizen is to be created.

Cultural replacement was being achieved by a combination of open border mass immigration, hate crime laws, which applied exclusively to the indigenous population, along with a policy of rigidly policed political correctness.

The peoples of Europe watched as their countries were being changed beyond recognition by a mass influx of immigrants mainly from the undeveloped and Muslim countries and this precipitated the rise of Euroscepticism accompanied by demands for a repatriation of sovereignty particularly over border control.

This has caused some consternation among the ruling political elite of Europe who see their superstate project being derailed at this late stage just when it is within their grasp.

Their response to this clear and present danger of people power is typical of the callous, heartless bureaucrats that they are.

This wave of immigrants didn't suddenly appear out of nowhere; deliberately creating a humanitarian crisis as a pretext for opening the borders to even more immigrants to add to the millions already admitted has the effect of bringing the tipping point for irreversible cultural replacement closer.

When it comes to imposing their superstate with its cultural replacement agenda on an unwilling people nothing is sacred to these fanatics and that includes using their massive propaganda machine to stir up emotions using the image of a dead child which is sick beyond belief.
.

To their eternal shame and condemnation these same fanatics refused to use the same propaganda machine when Christian children were being sold into slavery, raped, crucified and beheaded by Islamic terrorists in Egypt, Nigeria, Iraq and Syria or to insist on their evacuation to Europe. In fact they did the opposite; Coptic, Orthodox and Yazidi Christians were left at the mercy of Islamic savages for reasons of political and cultural replacement expediency.

There are other clues that serve to expose the appalling cynicism of the agenda driven monsters that populate the EU bureaucracy and one of them is timing. Although the river of immigrants has been flowing into Europe for over a decade, particularly into Great Britain and Scandinavia, this has turned into a tsunami in recent months from Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria, in addition to non middle eastern countries such as Pakistan, India, Algeria, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Somalia etc.

This is despite the fact that the Afghan wars have been raging since 1979, the Eritrean wars since 1993, the Iraq insurgency since 2003 and the Syrian civil war since 2011. Its more than a coincidence that this swarm of immigrants appear together like a perfect storm just as the cultural replacement project in Europe is under threat.

While the EU bureaucrats and their cohorts in the UN apply pressure on the the European nation state governments to ignore the demands of their people and further increase the numbers of immigrants, no pressure whatsoever is being applied to the oil rich countries of the middle east who could solve this so called 'crisis' overnight. They have both the money and the capacity to absorb millions of their co-religionists without the need for perilous sea voyages or arduous hikes across unfriendly countries that don't want them.

If it's the humanitarian crisis of Biblical proportions that they claim, why is no pressure being applied by the UN/EU elites to Japan, China, South Korea, Venezuela, Brazil, Indonesia or any other country outside white Judeo-Christian countries of Europe and the Angloshpere?

To prevent their cultural replacement agenda getting derailed, the EU/UN elites need to increase the rate of third world immigration into Europe without generating a reaction from the already abused people of Europe and consequently increasing support for the Eurosceptic parties.

To this end they will continue to precipitate this so called 'humanitarian crisis' and continue to pressure the Judeo-Christian countries to further degrade their cultures and way of life while ignoring the more suitable oil rich countries of the middle east.


 

British Independence Surrendered Using Lies, Deceit And Treachery

                                       German Chancellor with British Gauleiter David Cameron

There was a time in the not too distant past when children were brought up to believe that lying was one of the most damnable sins possible, almost as heinous as murder itself. Those involved in bringing up a child, including parents, neighbours, teachers , Sunday School superintendents and the local Bobby, were consistent in embedding the message that lying was supremely bad.

Lying was a means of persuasion exclusive to crooks, cheats and vagabonds of all persuasions; the threat of eternal damnation being no deterrent for those who lived dishonest lives on the fringes of society and endeavored to take advantage of the decency of their fellow citizens.

In those innocent days nothing hurt more than being lied to, whether it was the disappointment of being taken advantage of or the realisation that a person in position of trust had betrayed that trust for their own personal ends.

As we know to our cost those days are long gone.  In this modern age of the professional generic politician, lying is an acceptable means of gaining and the holding on to power. The 'ends justifying the means' extends to all political parties as they fight to impose their ideologically driven agendas.

The long suffering British people have been the victims of serial lying since the then Prime Minister Edward Heath, surrendered British sovereignty using a premeditated tissue of lies. With malice aforethought Heath and his collaborators, deceived the people, took them for fools and rendered them powerless in the face of their historical enemies and subject to a hostile bureaucracy bent on the destruction of their nation.

                                                     Heath Signs The British Death Warrant

Lying through his teeth, Heath declared that those who feared that going into Europe would mean a loss of independence and sovereignty were completely unjustified. Heath and his political descendants have been lying to the British people ever since.
(Leo McKinstry article on EU lying here)

It is now an accepted fact that the creation of a post democratic superstate had been the intention of the politicians from the beginning with the surrendering of sovereignty to be achieved by a series of treaties. Each treaty was to be falsely promoted as a tidying up exercise or having an economic benefit with the object of creating the superstate without the people realizing what happened until it was too late.
(Fredrick Forsyth on superstate lies here)

This was lying on a monumental scale by the agenda driven political class and its like minded cronies in the establishment.  It was willful deceit in pursuit of their political goals.

In  the hope of a plumb position in the new superstate, a consummate and practiced liar, Tony Blair negotiated Great Britain's final surrender with the Lisbon Treaty, again claiming it was a tidying up exercise as opposed to the final nail in the coffin of the independent nation states of Europe. Blair along with Cameron and the leaders of the other two parties promised the people a referendum before its adoption.

They were lying of course as we all knew they were and as things stand today, the British people have lost their independence without the promised referendum. Apart from the United Kingdom Independence Party (Ukip), all party leaders are totally committed to the European superstate project and will make any promise, tell any lie and stab any back to make sure that the British people stay locked in the EU prison.

The actual deed of signing the Lisbon treaty fell to Blair's successor Gordon Brown, a sociopath who's lies were so audacious they were an embarrassment to anyone with an iota of decency. His excuse for denying a referendum was his infamous 'red lines' which he claimed rendered a referendum unnecessary. These were a series of opt-outs which supposedly protected British interests. What they were and where they are now is a mystery.
(Red Line stories here and here)

                                              Brown signs away Great Britain's Independence

The government at Westminster may have changed but the habit of lying to the British has not, in fact it is so embedded into everyday political discourse one has to accept that a politician is lying as a matter of course. The modern politician no longer engages in proper debate or speaks to the public as adults, they are totally controlled by media managers, spin doctors and image makers.

They talk in a series of centrally issued slogans and sound bites and are unable to respond independently to any topic relying instead on the 'line-to-take' dispensed by the duty spin doctor. Any appearances outside the remote incestuous world they inhabit is choreographed down to the minutest detail and this mainly consists of a set of contrived and often embarrassing photo opportunities.

In a desperate rearguard action to avoid defeat in the recent general election, the Prime Minister David Cameron and his then Deputy Nick Clegg took political lying to levels previously unseen. These two had zero experience in the world that normal people inhabit and live under the impression that PR and spin can fool all of the people all of the time.

Even though they know, that ever increasing numbers of people know that they are lying, they persist with their nonsense in the hope that they can fool enough people to mitigate their predicament.

Cameron continues to promise a renegotiation of membership terms despite the politicians and bureaucrats that control the EU, and therefore Great Britain, are unanimous that there will be no renegotiation, there will also be no repatriation of powers to Westminster.

He knows when he promises to curb immigration or prevent immigrant access to the people's welfare system that he will be not allowed to do this by his EU masters but he makes the promises anyway.

He also knows that any referendum on Great Britain's membership will be an exercise in deceit unprecedented in political history. In the unlikely event that the people voted to leave, Cameron's EU masters will ignore the result as they did the Irish and the Dutch.

The sad thing about the current political class is that they would get more credibility if they simply treated the British public with respect, displayed a little honesty and told the truth. The public know where the politicians stand on the main issues so they might as well stop lying and maybe, just maybe, their Creator, whoever they conceive him to be, will judge them well and forgive them for their life of lying, cheating, and deceiving the very public they have sworn to serve.

(Due to time constraints this is a re-edited post from last year)

Mass Immigration, Anchor Babies, Citizenship And Allegiance

To the horror of the establishment controlled political class, Donald Trump has once again brought a contentious issue to the fore, an issue which they would have preferred to be kept locked away in a dark recess somewhere, far away from the attention of the American people.

In addition to the issue of illegal immigration and sealing the deliberately engineered porous border, Trump has added anchor babies and citizenship into the mix and it is causing palpitations and apoplexy to the usual suspects in the establishment and the government-media complex.

Judging by the high levels of support being given to anti-American politicians - those are the ones who go around the place referring to themselves as liberals or 'progressives' - it is plainly obvious that tens of millions of Americans have no idea what 'fundamental transformation' entails or how it will negatively affect their lives and the lives of future generations.

In order to better understand the issues, a very brief visit to the basic historical facts is necessary:

Great Britain and the United States of America, along with their kith and kin in the white, predominantly English speaking, Judeo-Christian diaspora, are largely responsible for the advances in learning, science, technology and all the other disciplines that have allowed civilisation to advance to it's current level.

These advances have allowed those civilised nations to pull ahead of the undeveloped world in terms of knowledge, technical proficiency and prosperity along with the physical and material well-being that they inevitably allow.

This inequality of people and of nations is an anathema to the global 'progressive' elite and their
de facto world government based at the United Nations.

Dominated by representatives from the undeveloped world, who are by and large driven by a Marxist ideology or Islam, the UN has embarked upon a generational mission to permanently end this inequality of people and of nations by a global redistribution of wealth, technology and industry.

They have an arsenal of weapons at their disposal to help achieve this, including the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO), UN Agenda 21, Monetary Development Aid and latterly the Combating Climate Change scam.
(Read a previous article about UN redistribution here)

Due to their natural propensity for discovery, exploration, curiosity and hard work - virtues which are unfortunately lacking in the undeveloped world -  these measures alone will not prevent the white, predominantly English speaking Judeo-Christian world from maintaining their advanced global.
position.

The only way to end what is in fact a natural ability for global leadership is to bring them down to the level of the undeveloped world by stripping them of their prosperity and industries then eliminating them altogether by cultural and demographic replacement.

The only sure means to achieve this is open border mass immigration from the undeveloped and uncivilised nations into the developed world. This is combined with a rigidly policed policy of political correctness, along with positive discrimination and a statute book full of hate crime laws aimed exclusively at the white, predominantly English speaking Judeo-Christian population.

This brings us to the situation we see today. The once mighty and prosperous United States of America is in the process of being fundamentally transformed from 'the shining city upon a hill whose beacon light guides freedom-loving people everywhere' into an indebted, degraded socialist dystopia run by self loathing, agenda driven, Marxist ideologues and the Ummah.
(Read about US degradation here)

Not only is the southern border being deliberately left open; the laws of the land are being selectively applied, or ignored all together, when it comes to illegal immigrants. This allows them to remain in the country even after committing heinous crimes including drug trafficking, violent robbery, rape and murder.

Anchor babies and the deliberate misinterpretation of the Constitution is just another means to allow immigrants to gain a foothold in the United States and subsequently bring in an entire family. In the course of a decades long expatriate career I have personally met many people in various parts of the world who traveled to the United States at the last possible moment before giving birth then departing at the earliest possible opportunity after the baby's citizenship has been formalised.

If the United States is anything like Great Britain, then citizenship and passports are being randomly thrown at any third world immigrant like confetti, regardless of loyalty or allegiance.

Giving citizenship to as many foreign born, non-white, non-English speaking and non-Judeo-Christian people as possible - and actively removing Christian symbols from public life - has allowed the political class to re-define citizenship in an attempt to erase the dominant two millenia long Judeo-Christian culture and claim a UN/EU mandated 'multi-cultural society', albeit a severely degraded one.

The allegiance of third world immigrants is most likely the easiest issue to deal with within the mass immigration debate.

Empirical evidence in Great Britain highlights the fact that second generation offspring of third world immigrants, and some developed world immigrants for that matter, are loyal to their grandparents and parents country of origin, not Great Britain, their country of birth.

Muslims in particular are loyal primarily to the Ummah - the global Muslim community - followed by their ancestral country of origin, then their country of documentation last of all.

Despite swearing a Naturalization Oath of Allegiance, being in possession of the citizenship documentation does not guarantee allegiance; far from it. After receiving their documentation, many immigrants remain openly hostile to their host country and wish to do it harm from outside and within.

The Oath itself is unequivocal:

I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."

Hundreds, possibly thousands, of born and raised British and American citizens have decamped to Africa and the Middle East to join the barbaric Islamic State raping, mutilating and killing in the name Allah the Merciful.

Many have sworn another Oath; to use their documentation to return to America and Great Britain with the intention of waging jihad, bringing mayhem and murder into heart of their host country.

These vitally important issues are routinely ignored because the 'fundamental transformation' agenda is the priority for the 'progressive' political establishment.

It is worth noting in conclusion that Donald Trump has exposed the hypocrisy of the establishment politicians that use the Constitution in their attempt to counter and disqualify his proposals.

These are the same politicians that trash the Constitution when it suits their political agenda then hide behind it when they are exposed as the frauds they are.

They routinely ignore the First Amendment with their attacks on free speech and freedom of religion.

They are in open contempt of the Second Amendment with their ongoing attempts to seize legally held guns from law abiding citizens on behalf of the UN.

They routinely ignore the Fourth Amendment with their warrentless searches and invasions of personal and professional privacy.

They do however hide behind the Fifth Amendment when they are caught misbehaving as was the case with IRS miscreant Lois Lerner.

They routinely ignore the Tenth Amendment by imposing federal law on the States and the people.

.....and so it goes on and ever on; these same anti-Constitutional activists are using the Fourteenth Amendment in order to justify anchor babies only to use them as a facility to import entire families from the undeveloped world and to further degrade America.
(Interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment here)

Trump is fearlessly tackling these contentious issues head-on, regardless of the opprobrium of his fellow candidates and his 'progressive' enemies; they would prefer he remained silent on these issues for the simple reason that it exposes their lack of spine and policy to tackle the issues themselves.