Nelson Mandela, Mrs Thatcher And The Biased BBC

Like the National Health Service, the British Broadcasting Corporation, universally known as the BBC, is touted by its supporters as another much loved British institution and another envy of the world. This taxpayer funded broadcaster is required by its Charter to be a 'public service' and politically neutral.

The reality couldn't be further from the manufactured truth. The BBC is run by a government appointed Trust and is infested with politically correct 'progressive' activists who's only mission in life is the dissemination of their own propaganda.

The trade unions who dominate the BBC workforce set new lows yesterday when organising their strike against job cuts and so called bullying. (Trade Unionists complaining about bullying? Maybe they should get some advise from Arthur Scargill).

A union spokesperson stated that they would postpone strike action and return to work should the ailing former President of South Africa, Nelson Mandela, shuffle off his mortal coil and go to meet his maker.

They also stated that the possible death of ailing former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, "might not have warranted the same response" or as another union spokesperson is quoted a saying on a possible return to work,  "I could not guarantee it".

An unnamed spokesperson demonstrated the BBC mindset perfectly when he/she/it said of the contingency that "we welcome this announcement and it is a tribute to the BBC staff ".

For those reluctant 'subscribers' who are familiar with the BBC, this kind of political bigotry comes as no big surprise but for those who are not so familiar, consider this an education in the manner of how a state broadcaster operates.

The Chairman and the BBC Executive Board, who are supposed to guarantee that BBC is run in the interests of the taxpayer, are appointed by the government not the taxpayers. The BBC comes under the remit of the Orwellian Ministry of Culture, Media and Sport.

(It is a sign of the post democratic age when under a supposedly freedom loving Conservative government and in a time of financial constraint, the British people have to pay for and suffer such a totalitarian institution as a Ministry of Culture, Media and Sport).

The current Chairman is Chris Patton, a serial loser and career political bureaucrat. As the Conservative Member of Parliament for Bath he was such an utter failure that his own constituents booted him out of a safe seat.

As a reward for being a loyal 'progressive' bag carrier and without any qualifications for the job, he was made Governor of Hong Kong where, as Fat Pang, he managed to upset all sides during the handover to the Chinese.

Fat Pang Patton is the epitome of the reward for failure culture that infests British public life. Since Hong Kong, he has been a disastrous European Commissioner and was keeping a low profile as Chancellor of Oxford University when he was mysteriously appointed the Chairman of the BBC Executive Board.

Since he joined the BBC it has staggered from one disaster to another with the Jimmy Savile paedophile sex ring and the huge renumeration packages of its top executives making global headlines.

BBC employees, from the top executives and editors to programmers, presenters, journalists and cameramen, even down to the chief sweeper up and bottle washer, are steeped to the core in 'progresive' politics.

It should come as no surprise that the BBC and its employees have an uncontrollable, visceral hatred for Mrs Thatcher but consider Nelson Mandela to be a divine being on par with Che Guevara and his butcher in chief, Fidel Castro.

It must be pointed out that BBC bias is the issue here and not any philosophical affiliations.

To some, Nelson Mandela is a freedom fighter who suffered torture and imprisonment in pursuit of his cause, to others he is a common terrorist no different to Al Qaeda and who was sentenced to prison as a criminal for his indiscriminate bombing campaign.

To the BBC he is halfway to divinity.

To some, Margaret Thatcher enlightened the people and saved her country from the economic disaster perpetrated by the communist controlled trade unions and Labour party, to others she set the relentless 'progressive' revolution back decades and engineered the fall of communism.

To the BBC she is the devil incarnate.

It is a mystery that the BBC is the standard bearer for equality and women's rights but they have never given Mrs Thatcher any credit for taking on the male dominated political establishment and going on to become Great Britain's first female Prime Minister.

When it comes to the great issues of the day, the BBC can be guaranteed to relentlessly push the 'progressive' agenda.

The following is just a sample:

The BBC is passionate about the Palestinians while hating Jews and Israel.

Despite the relentless increase in government spending and debt, the BBC continues to push the Labour party line on 'savage cuts'.

The BBC is a soapbox for Al Gore and his Man Made Global Warming Scam. They are now so hopelessly biased on this issue that they have unilaterally declared their legal obligation to be balanced as obsolete.

They declare that because Climate Realism is a minority view they are not obliged to give it equal air time. Now that 'combating climate change' fanatics are in a minority the same should apply but I doubt it will.

The same goes for party political bias. The BBC refuse to give UKIP air time comparable with their support but continue to indulge the ultra 'progressive' Liberal Democrats even though support has plummeted.

The BBC are committed Europhiles who support the United States of Europe while demonising anyone who disagrees.

The BBC indulge in sexuality politics and are relentless in pursuit of the LGBT agenda and homosexual marriage.

They despise Christianity but take the politically correct point of view on the issue of Islam.

The BBC are the governments biggest promoters of immigration, celebrating diversity, and the transformation of Great Britain into a multi-cultural state.

The BBC had a hatred for President Bush that was almost as visceral as that of Mrs Thatcher but they adore the new 'Progressive in Chief', Barack Obama.

They had a similar hatred for President Ronald Reagan.

Ignoring the majority of the people, the leaders of the three legacy parties, LibLabCon are all adamant that the BBC is a much loved British institution and should continue to be funded by the taxpayer.

The fact that the BBC is a government run propaganda broadcaster, which is funded under threat of imprisonment, gives an indication of how far down the authoritarian road Great Britain has travelled.

One day, when freedom is restored to Great Britain, the BBC will be confined to the dustbin of history and its employees will be free to leave and go work for a state broadcaster in any dictatorship of their choice.

Update:

Over at dikiebo, The vile BBC obviously can't resist insulting Christians in time for Easter.

Desperate Politicians Take Lying To A Whole New Level

"There are three signs of a hypocrite: when he speaks he lies, when he makes a promise he breaks it, and when he is trusted he betrays that trust" - Muhammad

I was lucky in that I was born and bred in an age where lying was considered as bad a crime as stealing. No shake of the head, time outs or sitting on the naughty step for five minutes. Punishments lasted until apologies had been accepted and the lessons about lying etched on the mind. Being labelled a liar was equally as bad as being labelled a thief.

No rational person takes kindly to being lied to on account of being patronised, demeaned and insulted, but what makes it worse is being lied to by a person in whom trust has been invested.

It should be obvious by now, even to the dumbest of observers, that the modern day politician has turned lying into art form.

There is no bigger practitioner of this than British Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg. He has either been well trained in the art of lying or he just can't help himself. He does it all the time without apology or shame.

Clegg's reaction to the successful appeal against deportation by Muslim terrorist Abu Qatada yesterday, is a classic example.

Since its imposition on the British people, Clegg has been the most vocal supporter of the Human Rights Act. Qatada is being allowed to stay in  Great Britain because of this Act.

The British people are outraged by this travesty of justice, so Clegg is now telling the people that he wants Qatada deported despite the fact that it is his beloved HRA that is preventing his removal.

Clegg's famous pledge over tuition fees was exposed as lie after the release of confidential papers and this should have served as a lesson for both Clegg and the electorate. Neither have taken note because Clegg still lies and the electorate still believe him.

The question for Clegg is simple: if he really wants an acknowledged "extremely dangerous individual" like Abu Qatada deported, will he support the deportation of the equally dangerous career criminal and child killer Aso Mohammed Ibrahim?

After killing an innocent child and serving only 2 months in prison, the illegal immigrant Ibrahim was allowed to stay on account of his 'human rights' being protected by Clegg's HRA.

To Clegg and the so called justices "the risk to the public was not a relevant consideration under Human Rights law" so Abu Qatada and Ibrahim get to stay on publicly financed welfare benefits for the rest of the miserable lives.

Nick Clegg was not the only one lying through his teeth yesterday. His boss, the pretend Prime Minister David 'Call Me Dave' Cameron, was at it too over mass immigration.

Terrified by the public reaction to the mass immigration disaster and coupled with the imminent arrival of thousands Romanian and Bulgarian beggars and criminals, 'Dave' is going overboard making promises he knows he won't keep.

The latest whoppers in his campaign of 'making Great Britain unattractive to immigrants and ending the countries reputation for welfare and health tourism' are both desperate and blatant. Its not working because the people know his reputation for lying and refuse to believe him anymore.

'Dave' is going to put a stop to legal and illegal immigrant children getting a free education. He is also going to stop new immigrants from getting cash welfare benefits, free health care and free housing.

Dave 'Pants on Fire' Cameron has already been told by Britain's real Prime Minister, the EU Head of State Herman von Rumpoy, that he will not be permitted to do any of this.

'Dave' knows this, the people know this, and 'Dave' knows that the people know this, but in his desperation, he continues to spout forth with lies and falsehoods.

To compound his humiliation, the Swedish Prime Minister, Fredrik Reinfeldt has chastised him for telling these untruths, declaring that 'Daves' promises "are unfortunate". Incidentally, Fredrik believes in unlimited immigration and presides over a country where it is forecast that 50% of Swedish women will be raped at some point in their life by a Muslim man.

Thanks for the advise Fredrik but the only thing that's unfortunate is your Premiership of Sweden, at least for your womenfolk it is.

The reason for 'Dave's' sudden outpouring of false promises is the panic attack he is undergoing because he is on course to be a one term Prime Minister. He knows that his pro European, 'progressive' agenda has been rejected by the people and he is going to pay the price with defeat and then his job.

It could be said that 'Dave' and Clegg have modelled themselves on that other great European, Charles de Gaulle who is quoted as saying:

"In politics it is necessary to betray one's country or the electorate. I prefer to betray the electorate".  The difference being that 'Dave and Clegg are betraying both.

Al Qaeda Terrorist Wins Another Appeal - British Government No Longer In Control

The news that Al Qaeda terrorist Abu Qatada has won yet another appeal against deportation is another bitter blow for the British people for several reasons. The first reason being that this low life gets to remain in Great Britain funded by welfare benefits, which are paid for by the very people he hates and who want him removed.

Secondly, the so called Justices have dictated that although he is a very dangerous individual, he cannot be deported on Human Rights grounds, therefore he cannot be held in prison indefinitely, regardless of the danger he poses to the British people.

This means that for their own protection, the British people have to pay up to $7,500,000 per year to keep him under surveillance.

Thirdly, all Qatada's legal bills are paid for by the British people to the tune of $1,000,000 and rising. Justice like this is unavailable to the British people on the grounds of cost.

Fourthly and most depressingly, it is final proof that the British government is impotent and can no longer run the country in the interests of the British people. The country is being run by some supranational entities with the connivance of a political elite who have nothing but contempt for the people they claim to represent.

Since Tony Blair's 'New' Labour government enshrined the European Human Rights legislation into British law, the people have had to suffer one humiliation after another as their country has become a safe haven for the worst criminal low lifes the world has vomited forth.

The truth is that prior to the incorporation of HRA into law, there was no problem with human rights in Great Britain. Common sense prevailed with the Home Secretary having the power, after consultation, to remove or refuse entry to anyone who was 'not conducive to the public good'.

Since the incorporation of this pernicious law, Great Britain has become a welfare funded home for terrorists, murderers, rapists, paedophiles, violent criminals etc. who cannot be deported because of their 'human rights'.

By their decisions, these judges have indicated that the victims of these criminals not only have no justice in their own country but they have no human rights either.

What kind of government allows the situation to arise where the human rights of  low life, foreign, criminals takes precedence over the human rights of their innocent victims, many of them children?

For the British people there is no recourse and they are now suffering the consequences of the political class surrendering their sovereignty to the unelected politicians of the European Union and the United Nations.

Conservative Party leader David Cameron, Labour Party leader Red Ed Miliband and the Home Secretary Theresa May, have all expressed their revulsion and frustration at their inability to deport Abu Qatada but they all refuse to remove the obstacles that keep him here despite having the power to do so.

Red Ed Miliband's protestations are doubly hypocritical as it was a Labour government of which he was a prominent member that imposed the HRA on the people in the first place.

Its must be mentioned that the Liberal Democrat leader Nick 'Calamity' Clegg is a big supporter of the HRA and has proudly made his intentions clear that he will never support its repeal.

In an expression of utter contempt for the victims of foreign criminals, Clegg unashamedly claims that it's a good thing that the criminal low lifes are allowed to stay as it demonstrates how civilised the British people are.

It would be appropriate that the voters of Eastleigh and Sheffield Halam should take note of what Clegg is saying on their behalf and examine their consciences.

It is worth noting that the Clegg family use their taxpayer funded wealth to insulate themselves from the crime infested ghettos that they have created for the rest of the people. The chances of this elite family becoming the victims of the foreign criminals that Clegg protects is extremely remote.

While Abu Qatada and the rest of the global criminals enjoy their taxpayer funded life in the world's biggest welfare resort, the British people's living standards are dropping faster than the temperature.  Meanwhile their government is obsessing about Man Made Global Warming, (now renamed 'Combating Climate Change'), homosexual marriage, raising booze prices, spending, borrowing and taxing the people into penury.

The British people deserve better and the crimes committed against them by the political class should be remembered at the ballot box. Roll the May elections.

Please read my previous post on Abu Qatada here.

Politicians Legalise Theft In Cyprus - Progressive Agenda Rolls On

Many people expressed their scepticism when I put forward the view last week, that the impending bank heist in Cyprus was a planned power and wealth grab by EU and global 'progressive' politicians. In light of recent events I suggest they look at the evidence, with their blinkers removed, and rethink their scepticism.

As any member of the hard left will confirm, this is how 'progressives' operate. The current bank heist on the island of Cyprus was a classic power grab operation from the start. The same tactics have been used in other countries and its really not that difficult to understand.

In this case the object of the operation was not rescuing the Cypriot banks or their sabotaged economy nor was it anything to do with the helping the Cypriot people in their hour of need.

The real object of this 'rescue' was breaking the taboo that private property is sacrosanct and with the added bonus of removing the right of the people to choose their own destiny via the ballot box.

The way the EU authoritarians, led by Germany's Angela Merkel, went about this operation deserves credit. It was brilliant in it's conception and carried out to perfection, with all their objectives achieved.

The people of Cyprus now join Ireland, Greece and Italy as a country where democracy has been suspended and where the government is run directly by the European Union. As with Ireland, Italy and Greece their national parliaments are powerless therefore the people are disenfranchised.

They will suffer years, possibly decades, of EU enforced poverty and despair, with no recourse to a democratically elected government for any alternative policy.

Ironically, the German people will get a vote on the bank theft and the forced austerity plan but the Cypriot people will not. The rest of the EU need to take note that this how a power grabs work and these are the consequences.

In exchange for some EU bribe money, the government of Cyprus has confiscated private wealth from the people, together with that of foreign investors, and effectively handed it over to the EU.

Before the bank heist was carried out the people were softened up with a bit of PR demonising spin. The line was pushed that there's plenty of money in the banks but it belongs to bad people, such as Russian oligarchs, the Russian mob and the 'rich', so it really wouldn't be so bad to seize it on behalf of the people. Who could possibly object?

The politicians responsible for this spin offered no proof of who held money in these banks but what is certain is that not all the depositors were oligarchs, mobsters or the 'rich' people. The bank seizure applied to pension funds and honest people's money too, these people had deposited legitimately earned money and life savings into the banks in good faith.

The Cypriot people should take comfort from the fact that the government sympathises with their plight. Their Dear Leader, President Nicos Anastasiades, is quoted as saying that he "understands your anger" and he called for "all Cypriots to work together".

This is a variation on the tired old slogan which is trotted out by politicians the world over whenever they are about to shaft the people, "we're all in it together".

As is normal in these situations, the guilty people who organised this crime, namely the political class and their cronies, the banksters and the well connected party donors, will get away unpunished with their ill gotten gains intact. There will be no justice for the people of Cyprus.

Now that the idea of  'private property is the government's property' has been entered into the public psyche, what can we expect from the political class in the future as they move their 'progressive' agenda of global equality and fairness forward?

It would be a mistake to think that this is a single instance or that it is confined to the Eurozone. Dutch Finance Minister, Jerven Dijisselobloem, in his moment of triumph, let it slip that this "represented the new template for dealing with a bank crisis". Ooops!

He was quickly reprimanded by his bosses Angela Merkel and Christine Legarde of the IMF and was forced to back peddle somewhat by claiming that it was a single instance. Too late Jerven, the cat is out of the bag!

Christine Legarde, who as Finance Minister was herself the architect of the French economic disaster, claimed that this bank theft was "a comprehensive and creditable plan".

Coming from the head of the IMF gives this bank theft international legitimacy so it will be considered as a green light for any government to seize private property. It should not stretch the imagination of anyone to see that unscrupulous 'progressive' governments the world over will be seizing private assets, safe in the knowledge that there will be no protest from the international institutions.

Spain, Portugal and the other indebted EU countries are next, followed by indebted countries around the world. This is an opportunity that the 'progressives' will not be able to pass up.

Our American cousins should take note that according to sources inside the government, their Progressive in Chief, Barack Obama, is planning a heist of his own.

As the saying goes 'even Stevie Wonder can see this one coming'. By refusing to deal with government deficit spending he is deliberately driving up an unsustainable debt. When the next downgrade comes he will raid their personal savings accounts in addition to their 401K pension funds in response.

He intends to do this by taking the cash and replacing it with a worthless government IOU. The American people who did the right thing will be stripped of their wealth and will be rendered as poor as their compatriots who didn't bother to save for the future. Equality and fairness for the masses in one stroke. Job done, mission accomplished.

The people of Europe should extend a hand to our American cousins and welcome them to the world of socialism. 'Come on in the waters lovely'.

If proof were needed that this is the start of a global heist, it will be noted that no government leader has expressed any outrage at this blatant theft, therefore we must assume it meets with their approval.

It is devastating for those British people who believe in liberty, free enterprise and prosperity that the leader of the Conservative party, the traditional guardian of these sacred values, has given his approval to this theft. There is no hope for the freedom loving people of Great Britain while the 'progressive' usurper David Cameron remains in control.

The great man himself has summed up this awful political low life that is destroying the British nation:

"That David Cameron is welcoming these plans shows how far the British political class is from any ideals of democracy, accountability and liberty. Instead the future to him is a technocratic, post democratic world, run in the most part by unelected, fanatical and deluded power-mongers in Brussels and Frankfurt". - Nigel Farage

Mass Immigration Debate - Euro Elections And The Rise Of UKIP

"Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive" - Sir Walter Scott

As their savings are looted by corrupt politicians, the ordinary Cypriot will agree that the European Union is a total disaster for the people who are forced to suffer the consequences of the political elite's dream of a United States of Europe.

The whole European project has been built on lies and deceit from the outset. To say that the European people were conned by the political elite is an understatement.

British Prime Minister Edward Heath and his cronies willfully lied through their teeth when they pushed the Common Market as a series of trade agreements and nothing else.

Those who knew that this was the beginning of the federal superstate project were derided, demonised and smeared, much as they are to this day. As the political class progressed their 'ever closer union' project through the various treaties, they continued to lie about the nature of the project and continued to demonise and smear those who spoke the truth.

The truth speakers were right, the common market became the European Economic Community (EEC), which then went on to drop Economic part of the title, and become the European Community (EC).

The traitors continued to lie about the superstate as the EC became the European Union and adopted its own currency, flag, national anthem, armed forces and constitution. Even now, to this day, they continue to deny that 'ever closer union' means a United States of Europe federal superstate.

The EU is where it is today on the basis of lies, deceit and smear, and this is coming home to haunt the ruling class as the disenfranchised people of Europe organise and agitate to take back control of their countries.

In Great Britain this movement is led by the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP). From humble beginnings they now take on the might of the corrupt elites and the special interest groups that have dominated the European political scene, and have exposed the crooks for what they are.

UKIP represents the traditional British values that were tossed overboard by the main parties as they competed with each other to prove who was the most modern and 'progressive'.

As a result of their corrupt, lying ways, Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrats, the three legacy parties, have used up the goodwill of the British people and they are hemorrhaging support to UKIP.  As a result of this dissent, they showing signs of panic.

The biggest issues for the British people are mass immigration and the imposition of a multi-cultural state. This has been a massive upheaval and subsequent disaster for the British people and it was imposed without consultation or consent.

This transformation was a long planned project by a remote elite who call themselves 'progressives' and who think they know what is best for the British people and the world.

In an attempt to stem the loss of support and to spike the guns of UKIP, the out of touch elite are doing what they do best... lying.

As an indication of their continued mendacity the legacy parties are trying to outdo each other by sucking up to the British people and sympathising with their plight over the immigration/multi-cultural disaster.

Right on cue, and as requested by his rattled Conservative party, 'Call Me Dave' Cameron made his long awaited speech on immigration. This speech was hot on the heels of Liberal Democrat leader 'Calamity' Clegg, who has decided that their long standing policy of amnesty for illegal immigrants is suddenly wrong.

In turn this follows a grovelling speech by Labour leader, Red Ed Miliband, who is claiming that Labours policy of open border mass immigration may have been a little misguided.

In addition to these exhibitions of mendacity, the 'progressives' have commissioned an ex Marxist pseudo-intellectual and self confessed lefty Hampstead Liberal, to hit the media with a supposed well researched view on the effects of mass immigration. (Why are these 'progressives' always ex Marxists. John Read, Peter Mandelson, Bob Ainsworth, Tony Blair etc.)

David Goodhart in his Saturday essay for the Daily Mail, is trying to convince the British people that mass immigration was really nobody's fault, it wasn't pre-planned, it was all some kind of accident.

He's at again today in the Mail with a piece about the effects of mass immigration on the town of Merton in South West London. He seems to think that the building of a super mosque capable of accommodating 10,000 worshipers, when there are already six other mosques in the area, is some kind of quaint anomaly.

Goodhart goes on to highlight the local park where different groups of Africans, Caribbeans, Tamils, Pakistanis, East Europeans and Somali's hang out and sometimes fight each other. Very enriching.

 He admits that there may have been some negative effects but on the whole the 'accident' of mass immigration and multi-culturalism has been a positive thing. The displaced white population think differently as the town they grew up in is transformed into a foreign country.

As anyone with a modicum of intelligence will understand, this sudden interest in mass immigration by the legacy parties, and their faux sympathy with the British people, is electioneering pure and simple.

European elections are due in 2014 and after the defeat in the Eastleigh byelection to UKIP, 'Call Me Dave' and the other leaders are desperate to regain lost ground and support.

True to form instead of telling the truth, they employ the dark arts of spin, lies and deceit. They don't know any different, they really are shysters through and through.

It must be acknowledged that if there was no election looming, the long planned project of mass immigration and the fundamental transformation of Great Britain into a multi-cultural society would continue unabated and with their full support.

The rise of UKIP is causing many sleepless nights among the party leaders and the remote elite, so lets hope that as the election gets closer these sleepless nights turn into nightmares and signals their descent into the dustbin of history.

Mass Immigration Disaster - Progressive Political Apologists Claim It Was An Accident

The Saturday Essay by 'progressive' do gooder, David Goodhart, in the Daily Mail is the latest in a series of speeches and musings by the remote ruling elite, admitting that mass immigration may have been an error.

This essay follows hot on the heels of Red Ed Miliband's admission that the Labour Party's immigration policy may have been misguided and Nick's Clegg's admission that his Lib Dem party's long standing policy on amnesty for illegals is now suddenly wrong.

At the time of writing, Conservative Ministers, MEP'S and Honourable Members worried about their imminent annihilation in the coming European Elections, are urging their leader 'Call Me Dave' Cameron to make a major speech on the follies of mass immigration.

The sad thing about this sudden outpouring of faux concern and speech making, is that they think the people don't know what they are up to. The people are well aware that if there were no election looming and UKIP were not gaining ground, there would be no concern, no speeches and no sham essays.

Since Prime Minister Edward Heath sacked his Shadow Cabinet member Enoch Powell for warning about the economic burden of mass immigration, it has been obvious that transforming Great Britain into a multi-cultural society has been a long planned cross party policy. Powell's sacking and his subsequent hounding out of office gave an indication that the government and the craven Establishment would adopt a zero tolerance to dissent, no matter how small.

This zero tolerance is still in evidence today by the smearing of anyone, including law abiding ladies from Rochdale, who dare to raise the question of mass immigration or multi-culturalism. Politicians and the Establishment are determined to socially engineer the multi-cultural country that their 'progressive' ideology demands, with or without the consent of the British people and in this case it is most definitely without their consent.

The patronising arrogance of this 'progressive' elite renders them incapable of understanding the hopes, aspirations or wishes of the majority of the people. They are under the delusion that they are always right and that they know what is best for the British people.

As is always the case, these elitists are immune from the consequences of the ideology that they force on other people.

Perhaps if they were made to leave their exclusively white havens in Hamptsead and forced to live in the ghettos they have created in Mosside, Manchester or Broadwater Farm, Tottenham, or the monocultural cesspits in Bradford, Leicester, Bristol, Wolverhampton, Rochdale, Rotherham etc. ad nauseum, they wouldn't be so keen on mass immigration.

The self confessed 'left leaning Hampstead liberal' David Goodhart is one such patronising elitist who championed mass immigration as a vehicle for social engineering, together with the imposition of a multi-cultural dystopia on the the people, and for the simple reason that he knows best.

This so called essay, like Cleggs speech, is a carefully crafted piece of propaganda designed to give the impression that a)  a multicultural society is already here so get used to it, b) in many places the diverse communities are living in peace and harmony c) Britain is a livelier and more dynamic country and d) mistakes were made but the mass immigration policy is the right one but perhaps it happened a tad too fast.

David Goodhart condescended to come down from planet Progressive and spent 18 months touring the country in order to reach his pro multi-cultural conclusions. Those who have spent decades living with the appalling consequences of mass immigration and who have reached very different conclusions are routinely dismissed as inward looking little Englanders and racists.

He states that the race lobby, of which he is a member, "have been slow to recognise that strong collective identities are legitimate for majorities as well as minorities, for white as well as black".

Goodhart also states that "existing citizens must have special rights over non citizens. Immigration must be managed with their interests in mind". If anyone outside of his elite circle said this they would, without a doubt, be smeared as racists.

He thinks that by pretending to sympathise with the majority who are against mass immigration and multi-culturalism, that he can spike the guns of UKIP on behalf of his political masters. The polls indicate that the defection away from the legacy parties is strong and irrevocable so his 18 months travelling among the plebs will be in vain.

Goodhart goes on to state the shocking fact that more immigrants arrive on British shores in a single year than arrived in the whole period from 1066 to 1950. As he well knows, this was a deliberate, well planned policy but he is trying to absolve his 'progressive' friends from blame by claiming it was an 'accident'.

In 1948 the government gave the right to Empire and Commonwealth citizens the to live and work in Great Britain and to their horror hundred of thousands turned up unexpectedly. They tried this line again with the Eastern Europeans in 1997 when a projected influx of 16,000 turned into 1.5 million.

According to Goodhart, by the time of the next census in 2021 the non white population will have trebled to 20% and white Britons will be a minority by 2066. He correctly states that in some towns and cities this is already the case.

He claims there was no discussion in the 'New' Labour Cabinet about this influx or about the pressure this would put on public services. As a magazine editor and Financial Times correspondent, how would he know what was discussed in the Cabinet? Not even senior government Ministers knew what Blair was discussing with his secretive inner circle.

The arrogance of these people is on full display as Goodhart goes on to admit that they, including him, are deep into "a huge social experiment" and to give it a chance of working we must slow down.

Who gave the political class, and people such has Goodhart, permission to be indulging in social experimentation with the well being of the British people?  They don't have the right to alter peoples lives for the worse without their consent. The people are not guinea pigs in some kind of 'progressive' laboratory.

Goodhart States that "the whole post war process of immigration has been badly managed". He also states that the importation of people from the Indian subcontinent to the soon to close textile mills
"was a poor piece of social engineering". He then tests the credulity of the reader by trying to claim that "no one really engineered it. It just happened".

This is the second time in this so called essay that Goodhart tries to convince his readers that the mass immigration disaster was an accident and that the government was not to blame.

As Goodhart well knows, mass immigration and its disastrous consequences didn't "just happen". He admits himself that senior people were following a secret pre-planned agenda which had different priorities from those of the British people.

"There has been a huge gap between our ruling elite's views and those of the ordinary people on the street".  No kidding Goodhart. Among normal people this is known as 'stating the bleeding obvious'.

As we all do occasionally, Goodhart was dining at an Oxford college when an eminent person next to him, 'a very senior civil servant' said that "when I was at the Treasury, I argued for the most open door possible to immigration because I saw it as my job to maximise global welfare not national welfare". He doesn't name this 'very senior civil servant' who should be made to explain his views to the British people. Its the people's money that he's giving away after all.

Another guest, one of the most powerful television executives in the country held similar views. "He, too, felt global welfare was paramount and that he had a greater obligation to someone in Burundi that to someone in Birmingham". Goodhart fails to mention who this powerful television executive was, so that he can be held accountable for his views, especially if the television company was the publicly funded BBC.

This demonstrates, even to apologists such as Goodhart, that mass immigration and the creation of a multi-cultural society was no accident. Rather it was planned by a secretive powerful elite who excluded the British people and transformed their country, using their money and without their consent.

I could carry on fisking this excuse for an essay but the pubs are open and there are better things in life than reading a piece of propaganda that attempts to absolve the current political leadership of any blame for their disastrous policy of mass immigration and cultural replacement.

As the mood of the nation swings away from the legacy political parties and their 'progressive'  ideology, the British people can expect a lot more of this pseudo intellectual nonsense from all corners of the Establishment as they try to reverse the tide of change.

Hopefully the momentum toward a free and prosperous Great Britain will be unstoppable right up to the next election cycle where the current political order will get the kicking that they thoroughly deserve.

Illegal Immigrant Amnesty Is Now Wrong. Child Abuse To Remain A Shared Value

When politicians abandon their long standing positions and start aligning themselves with the people, it's a sure sign they are worried about their jobs. It's got nothing to do with their convictions, their principles or what's best for the country, it's all about them keeping their cushy, taxpayer funded jobs and imposing their will on the people.

The latest u-turn comes from Parliament's most despicable serial liar and Great Britain hater, Nick Clegg. How this appalling man came to be the Deputy Prime Minister is testament to the corrupt, undemocratic British political system and the stupidity of the electorate who repeatedly swallow his spin and deceit time and again.

For his entire miserable life this political low life has championed multi-culturalism. He has campaigned for the end of Great Britain as an independent, sovereign nation and an end to its unique Anglo-Saxon-Celtic culture.

Nobody should be fooled into believing that Nick Clegg has 'seen the light' when he announced today that he now believes that giving amnesty to illegal immigrants is wrong. This policy was in his party's election manifesto, it is one of the core instruments he uses for the fundamental transformation of Great Britain into the egalitarian, multi-cultural society of his dreams.

'Calamity' Clegg's previous policy was for illegal immigrants to earn amnesty and British citizenship if they can stay undetected for ten years. He obviously doesn't understand the meaning of the word illegal. If there is going to be a statute of limitations for criminal behavior, why would it only apply to illegal immigration? By his own perverted logic this statute is discriminatory and exclusive because it excludes burglars, car thieves, vandals, expense cheats and Cabinet Ministers who pervert the course of justice.

Clegg now claims that his amnesty policy "risked undermining public confidence in the entire immigration system". One has to ask as to where this idiot has been since 1997 when Blair, with Clegg's approval, abandoned border controls and opened the immigration floodgates to facilitate cultural replacement and to 'rub the right's nose in diversity'.

Clegg and his gang of fundamental transformers would have us believe that this sudden change of heart is because of the lack of confidence in the immigration system and nothing to do with the up and coming European Union elections.

In a clear demonstration of Clegg's propensity for serial lying, he insisted that he would not "indulge in low populism that patronises the British people" nor would he "say things because he thinks that's what the British people want to hear" when that is exactly what he is indulging in by making this u-turn at this time.

This is patronising nonsense from Clegg and it clearly demonstrates his contempt for the British people. He is making the mistake of assuming that the entire nation is as stupid and naive as the electorate of his constituency in Sheffield.

This sudden change of heart coincides with a recent poll which puts the British people's concerns about mass immigration at the very top of their agenda.

It also coincides with the irrevocable rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party. UKIP has always proposed that the British people should regain control of their borders and put in place a moratorium on all immigration until the shambles presided over by Clegg is cleaned up.

The latest brainwave from Cameron and Clegg's incompetent government is a clear demonstration of how out of touch with the real world these people are. In order to "bring down net immigration from the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands", they have announced a pilot scheme targeted at 'high risk' individuals from 'two or three nationalities'.  Relatives already in Great Britain will be required to post a bond which would be forfeited if their guests overstay their visa or use public services.

To anyone with an iota of intelligence it should be obvious that 'high risk' individuals from dodgy nationalities should not be given a visa in the first place. It should also be obvious that visitors determined to stay would be happy to forfeit a bond in exchange for a lifetime on welfare benefits.

There are currently no checks that would indicate whether an immigrant has used any public
 services. The Health Service, for instance, is universally available to everyone, no questions asked.

There is nothing in this policy to prevent a visitor who is intent on staying permanently from using the myriad of avenues available in order to prevent their deportation. This includes the hated Human Rights Act of which Clegg is the biggest supporter.

Nobody with an ounce of sense will be fooled into believing that Nick Clegg is doing anything but lying for electioneering purposes. This speech was cynically made to appease the voters' justified fears over mass immigration and to counter the ever growing threat of UKIP.

Despite this pathetic attempt at ingratiating himself with the majority of people over mass immigration, Nick Clegg let slip his true beliefs about a fundamentally transformed Great Britain. He is trying to convince the people that a multi-cultural society is a fait accompli where there is no going back, so we should just get used to it.

"For a diverse society like ours to function successfully, for different groups to integrate and co-exist, British citizens must believe that the rules by which migrants come and settle here are reasonable, and properly enforced".

Nick Clegg and his bag carriers know as well as everyone else that diverse groups such as Muslims, for example, have no intention of integrating, nor are they being encouraged to by the government to do so. In fact the opposite is true as Muslim leaders set up self governing 'no go' areas where only Sharia law applies, and this with the approval of his government.

With Clegg and his government's approval, heinous crimes by foreign cultures are being tolerated in the name of multi-culturalism, such as:

Muslim paedophile gangs and child sex abuse.

Drug abuse with it's associated violent crime by Jamaican Yardie gangs.

Slavery and people trafficking by Chinese Triad gangs.

Female genital mutilation by African tribal savages.

Female abuse inside the family by Asian cultures.

Premeditated murder, renamed 'honour' killings, by backward Eastern European and Asian cultures.

Organised crime gangs from Russia and Eastern Europe, including organised gangs of child criminals.

Institutional  or cultural corruption from Nigeria and other African countries.

Great Britain is also considered a safe haven for Muslim terrorists and torturers from despotic African regimes.

Are these the 'shared values' that multi-culturalists drone on about when they are spinning the benefits of mass immigration?

When he talks about 'shared values', Nick Clegg and his gang should point out to the British people, what exactly they are.

No matter how hard he tries or how much spin and lies he pours forth, Nick Clegg cannot hide the fact that multi-culturalism is being forced on the British people against their will because he despises the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic culture of which he has no interest.

If there is any justice in this world, traitorous people like Clegg, who have clearly committed treason, will face a day of reckoning and hopefully this will start with the fall of the European Union and his ejection from office at the next election.

With committed multi-culturalists controlling the government machine, it would appear that UKIP is now Great Britain's last hope for survival. The time has finally arrived for the British people to make a choice. Live proud, free and prosperous in the open world or poor and captive in the tyrannical EU.