Friday, September 13, 2013
Islamic Jihad And The Treachery Of The Political Establishment
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Thursday, September 12, 2013
EU President Warns The British People - Surrender Your Sovereignty Or Its War
When reference is made to the President of the European Union it must be noted that unlike normal democratic countries, such as the USA, this dictatorship of bureaucrats has more than one; at the last count it had at least four and all of them appointed.
It must be remembered that the EU is the vehicle being used by an elite political class to take decision making and governance out of the hands of the people and into their own hands via an enormous unaccountable bureaucracy. For the skeptical people of the world, the EU is what government in the post democratic age looks like.
This bureaucracy, which controls the lives of approximately five hundred million people, is entirely appointed and no matter how destructive it is, it cannot be removed by popular vote.
No one is sure which of these Presidents is the most senior or which one represents the United States of Europe; what is certain is that they all have impeccable socialist/communist/progressive credentials and they are all committed to governance in the post democratic age. Please read on and take your pick.
President of the European Council, Mr. Herman von Rompuy. This Belgian totalitarian was the one that was going to be so important he would stop the traffic in Beijing. In reality he is a clownish figure universally derided as Rumpy Pumpy; he is notorious for his belief that the sovereign nation state is dead and anyone who says otherwise is a liar and risks war.
President of the Council of the European Union, currently held by a Mr. Algirdas Butkevioius of Lithuania. Like most other people subjected to this nonsense I have no idea what he does or what purpose he serves other than making the bureaucracy more complex and expensive for the taxpayers.
President of the European Parliament, Mr. Martin Schultz. This thoroughly obnoxious character is a German socialist thug with a deep, visceral hatred for Great Britain and its people. Obviously he is still irked by the events of the last century. He really should learn to how lose wars with a little more grace.
President of the European Commission, Mr. Jose Manuel Barrosso. A Portuguese 'former' Maoist who, like his comrade President Rumpy Pumpy, does not believe in the sovereign nation state. Judging by his words and actions, Barrosso is still very much a follower of his long dead Chinese hero.
To complete this rogues gallery of appointed bureaucrats Presidents we have the Vice President of the European Commission, Baroness Cathy Ashton of Upholland. This appalling creature is the archetypal professional super bureaucrat. She also labours under the grandiose title of High Representative Of The Union For Foreign Affairs And Security Policy; she has never held a proper job in the real world and has never been subject to a popular vote in all of her miserable, worthless life.
In order to give the appearance of a real country, this gang of totalitarians emulate the traditions of the United States of America and it fell to President Jose Manuel Barrosso to give a sick parody of the real thing and deliver the 'State of the Union' address to the European Parliament. Incidentally, if it wasn't for threats, bullying and fines, no one would have turned up to listen.
During his speech, he reiterated his assertion that Europe needs even more integration and if anyone disagrees with him, i.e. the British people, they are risking another war. Sadly, it is becoming more apparent with every word that he utters, that this creepy fanatic would rather have another war than see his fake nation disappear and the nation states of Europe regain their sovereignty.
It is beyond the understanding of this Maoist lunatic that the British people disagree with him and do not want to be powerless subjects in a German dominated United States of Europe. If anyone is in any doubt about German intentions then they should listen to the words of Frau Merkel herself.
Speaking on German television (she wouldn't dare say this on British television) Merkel called for "more Europe, including budgetary union". She then went on to add that "step by step we must from now on give up more competences to Europe and allow Europe more powers of control".
For those unfamiliar with EU jargon, 'competences' is the word chosen to disguise the real word they are afraid to use, that word being sovereignty.
This statement by Frau Merkel must be read in conjunction with her other statement about the increase in use of the German language in EU institutions. This is how domination starts and for Barrosso's information, war is how it ends.
Ireland has succumbed to Barrosso's threats and the Irish people have all but given up being the proud nation that they once were, therefore threatening them as he did over the Lisbon Treaty referendum is nothing more than the cowardly act of an authoritarian bully.
The British people have almost succumbed but not quite; the majority want out of his fake bureaucratic nation and this is most likely the reason for Barrosso's threats.
The world is changing and the rule of nasty little totalitarian communists like himself and von Rompuy is coming to an end; the British people will not surrender their country cheaply. These two warmongers should look through their history books lest the British give President Martin Schultz another reason for his reckless hate.
Update: It's worth remembering that President Obama is a big supporter of the European Union. It would appear that this dictatorship of bureaucrats is the type of government he would prefer for the American people. He has practically ordered Prime Minister Cameron to fix it so that the British people remain stuck in this disastrous dictatorship.
It must be remembered that the EU is the vehicle being used by an elite political class to take decision making and governance out of the hands of the people and into their own hands via an enormous unaccountable bureaucracy. For the skeptical people of the world, the EU is what government in the post democratic age looks like.
This bureaucracy, which controls the lives of approximately five hundred million people, is entirely appointed and no matter how destructive it is, it cannot be removed by popular vote.
No one is sure which of these Presidents is the most senior or which one represents the United States of Europe; what is certain is that they all have impeccable socialist/communist/progressive credentials and they are all committed to governance in the post democratic age. Please read on and take your pick.
President of the European Council, Mr. Herman von Rompuy. This Belgian totalitarian was the one that was going to be so important he would stop the traffic in Beijing. In reality he is a clownish figure universally derided as Rumpy Pumpy; he is notorious for his belief that the sovereign nation state is dead and anyone who says otherwise is a liar and risks war.
President of the Council of the European Union, currently held by a Mr. Algirdas Butkevioius of Lithuania. Like most other people subjected to this nonsense I have no idea what he does or what purpose he serves other than making the bureaucracy more complex and expensive for the taxpayers.
President of the European Parliament, Mr. Martin Schultz. This thoroughly obnoxious character is a German socialist thug with a deep, visceral hatred for Great Britain and its people. Obviously he is still irked by the events of the last century. He really should learn to how lose wars with a little more grace.
President of the European Commission, Mr. Jose Manuel Barrosso. A Portuguese 'former' Maoist who, like his comrade President Rumpy Pumpy, does not believe in the sovereign nation state. Judging by his words and actions, Barrosso is still very much a follower of his long dead Chinese hero.
To complete this rogues gallery of appointed
In order to give the appearance of a real country, this gang of totalitarians emulate the traditions of the United States of America and it fell to President Jose Manuel Barrosso to give a sick parody of the real thing and deliver the 'State of the Union' address to the European Parliament. Incidentally, if it wasn't for threats, bullying and fines, no one would have turned up to listen.
During his speech, he reiterated his assertion that Europe needs even more integration and if anyone disagrees with him, i.e. the British people, they are risking another war. Sadly, it is becoming more apparent with every word that he utters, that this creepy fanatic would rather have another war than see his fake nation disappear and the nation states of Europe regain their sovereignty.
It is beyond the understanding of this Maoist lunatic that the British people disagree with him and do not want to be powerless subjects in a German dominated United States of Europe. If anyone is in any doubt about German intentions then they should listen to the words of Frau Merkel herself.
Speaking on German television (she wouldn't dare say this on British television) Merkel called for "more Europe, including budgetary union". She then went on to add that "step by step we must from now on give up more competences to Europe and allow Europe more powers of control".
For those unfamiliar with EU jargon, 'competences' is the word chosen to disguise the real word they are afraid to use, that word being sovereignty.
This statement by Frau Merkel must be read in conjunction with her other statement about the increase in use of the German language in EU institutions. This is how domination starts and for Barrosso's information, war is how it ends.
Ireland has succumbed to Barrosso's threats and the Irish people have all but given up being the proud nation that they once were, therefore threatening them as he did over the Lisbon Treaty referendum is nothing more than the cowardly act of an authoritarian bully.
The British people have almost succumbed but not quite; the majority want out of his fake bureaucratic nation and this is most likely the reason for Barrosso's threats.
The world is changing and the rule of nasty little totalitarian communists like himself and von Rompuy is coming to an end; the British people will not surrender their country cheaply. These two warmongers should look through their history books lest the British give President Martin Schultz another reason for his reckless hate.
Update: It's worth remembering that President Obama is a big supporter of the European Union. It would appear that this dictatorship of bureaucrats is the type of government he would prefer for the American people. He has practically ordered Prime Minister Cameron to fix it so that the British people remain stuck in this disastrous dictatorship.
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
Putin Takes Control - American Global Influence Evaporates
On this day when the American people remember the tragic loss of their fellow citizens in the World Trade Centre atrocity, it is worth reminding ourselves that this is also the anniversary of the Benghazi atrocity where sections of the Muslim world celebrated their victory over the Great Satan on the 11th September 2001. These two atrocities came about as a result of the erosion of American power and influence over several decades and particularly during the last six years.
Those of us who support the informed American people in their fight to prevent a European type descent into third world mediocrity, the performance of their President and his acolytes in recent weeks will be depressingly familiar.
There was a hope that the USA, with its dedication to individual liberty, free enterprise and constitutionally limited government, would remain that shining city on a hill as Great Britain and the Anglosphere fell victim to the global 'progressive' agenda. That turned out to be a case of false optimism.
Like their counterparts in the rest of the Anglosphere, the American people allowed themselves to be manipulated by unscrupulous, agenda driven political elitists in pursuit of political power. They were seduced by the slick advertising campaigns of the professional PR men to such a ridiculous extent that they elected a man solely on the basis of his half white skin colour, his telegenic persona and his ability to read pre-written speeches off a teleprompter.
As the British people did with their media created Prime Minister, David Cameron, they totally ignored his lack of history, experience, achievements and his lack of connections with real people in the real world. It didn't seem to bother the American people when it was revealed that candidate Obama was steeped in Marxist ideology, anti-white racial politics and anti-American radical socialism.
When candidate Obama stood in front of his fake Greek columns and stated to the world that he was "five days away from fundamentally transforming America", what on God's earth did the American people think he meant? They were obviously not watching the disastrous descent of the great European nations into bankruptcy, poverty and third world mediocrity which was the result of the imposed 'progressive' agenda that would shortly be imposed on them.
What we are witnessing today during the Syrian crisis is the result of America's descent into mediocrity because of the imposition of that same 'progressive' agenda; this slow evaporation of American influence did not go unnoticed in the Kremlin, Beijing or the caves of Tora Bora.
President Obama's performance at the recent G20 summit was abysmal and an embarrassment for the American people; it highlighted the world of difference between a worldly wise, experienced political operator, albeit a KGB thug, and an inexperienced, media created fake who's only experience is in community organizing.
When one looks back into recent history, it is unimaginable to think that a tinpot dictator from a nonentity of a country like Syria can cause so much grief and humiliation for an American President.
One has to ask what would Presidents Kennedy, Reagan and Bushes 1 and 2 have done in the case of Syria? Conversely, what would President Obama have done had he been faced with the Cuban missile crisis, the nuclear armed Mad Dog Gaddafi or the invasion of Kuwait by a tyrant like Saddam Hussein?
It must be remembered that on the brink of nuclear war, President Kennedy stood nose to nose with Nikita Khrushchev, a ruthless, dedicated communist, and refused to budge an inch, forcing a humiliating climb down by this political fanatic.
It must also be remembered that Ronald Reagan stood nose to nose with seasoned Russian cold warriors Leonid Brezhnev, Yuri Andropov (who like Putin was leader of the KGB) and Mikhail Gorbachev, resulting in the defeat of communism and the liberation of Eastern Europe.
For years Colonel Gaddafi had sponsored terrorist organisations around the world, from the Palestinians and the Irish Republican Army to Carlos the Jackal and the Red Army Factions. After several warnings from President Reagan and a few strategically placed cruise missiles, including on several of his homes, Gaddafi retreated to his Bedouin tent not to be heard of again until his demise at the hands of own his people.
This kind of influence and respect has all but evaporated and it is not difficult to understand why.
Like Great Britain and Europe, the priorities of the American 'progressive' elite changed from economic strength and the interests of their own people to:
State mandated equality and fairness, including equality of nations and cultural relativity.
Redistribution of wealth.
Expanding government and welfare entitlements.
Replacing individual liberty with so called collective responsibility.
Gender neutrality and sexuality politics.
Downgrading the military and much more.
One has to bear in mind that there are fifty Muslim countries on the planet with a population approaching two billion souls, which is almost twenty four percent of the world's population. It cannot be difficult to understand that these religious orientated people are repulsed by the obsession with secular Marxist equality together with the homosexual agenda.
What must they be thinking about the West's obsession with homosexuals and especially David Cameron's vow to send his team around the world to encourage all governments to legislate for gay marriage?
President Obama's lack of experience or leadership skills becomes glaringly apparent by watching his performance during the Syrian debacle. He has surrounded himself with like minded agenda driven fanatics such as Hillary Clinton and now the appalling John Kerry. They are like rabbits caught in the headlight of a child's tricycle. They simply do not know what to do.
In an attempt to emulate Presidents Kennedy, Reagan and Bush x 2, President Obama comes over all macho by making his infamous 'red line' threat over chemical weapons to the worlds media. He looked as macho as a kitten when his bluff is called by Bashar al Assad and he failed to act.
In a cringe making attempt to save face, which only served to make him a bigger laughing stock than he already is, his red line suddenly becomes the world's red line. This is dismal and a pathetic attempt to absolve himself from blame.
The President, who doesn't think twice about using executive power to bypass Congress, tries to offload responsibility by demanding they vote on military action, which by his own account he doesn't need.
President Putin, who is wallowing in Obama's obvious lack of leadership and subsequent discomfort, rubs his nose further in the dirt by offering the life line of a negotiation which Obama gratefully accepts and asks Congress to delay their vote.
The world is watching as Putin's Russia replaces Obama's America as the power broker and main influence in Middle Eastern politics. To the dismay of freedom lovers around the world, the rookie is giving the so called master a lesson in global foreign policy.
In conclusion it's worth taking stock of the change in global influence since the western world committed Hari Kari by adopting the 'progressive' agenda.
The British and Europeans have been ousted from sub Saharan Africa by the resource hungry Chinese. The rest of Africa is dominated by the Muslim world from Egypt to Mali. As we have seen, the Middle East is becoming increasingly dominated by Russia and radical Islamic factions, including the supposedly defeated Al Qaeda.
Central and southern Asia, including India, is influenced by Russia with China dominating the Far East. The former western ally, Japan, dropped off the radar decades ago. Indonesia and the Pacific are increasingly being influenced by radical Islam.
Central and South America are dominated by socialist regimes who's political ideologies stem from Karl Marx, Fidel Castro, Che Guevara and Simon Bolivar.
Great Britain, Europe, the United States and the Anglosphere in general have rotted from the inside out and are now reduced to bystanders in an increasing hostile world. The descent into third world mediocrity is unlikely to slow down while 'progressives' such as Obama, Cameron, and the EU bureaucrats remain in control.
All is not lost however and freedom loving people of the world should take heart; there is one tiny glimmer of light in this dark nightmare of destruction. The Australian people have demonstrated that with resolve and leaders armed with the right policies they can consign the 'progressive' destroyers to the dustbin of history where they belong.
Update: Putin lectures America in the New York Times
Those of us who support the informed American people in their fight to prevent a European type descent into third world mediocrity, the performance of their President and his acolytes in recent weeks will be depressingly familiar.
There was a hope that the USA, with its dedication to individual liberty, free enterprise and constitutionally limited government, would remain that shining city on a hill as Great Britain and the Anglosphere fell victim to the global 'progressive' agenda. That turned out to be a case of false optimism.
Like their counterparts in the rest of the Anglosphere, the American people allowed themselves to be manipulated by unscrupulous, agenda driven political elitists in pursuit of political power. They were seduced by the slick advertising campaigns of the professional PR men to such a ridiculous extent that they elected a man solely on the basis of his half white skin colour, his telegenic persona and his ability to read pre-written speeches off a teleprompter.
As the British people did with their media created Prime Minister, David Cameron, they totally ignored his lack of history, experience, achievements and his lack of connections with real people in the real world. It didn't seem to bother the American people when it was revealed that candidate Obama was steeped in Marxist ideology, anti-white racial politics and anti-American radical socialism.
When candidate Obama stood in front of his fake Greek columns and stated to the world that he was "five days away from fundamentally transforming America", what on God's earth did the American people think he meant? They were obviously not watching the disastrous descent of the great European nations into bankruptcy, poverty and third world mediocrity which was the result of the imposed 'progressive' agenda that would shortly be imposed on them.
What we are witnessing today during the Syrian crisis is the result of America's descent into mediocrity because of the imposition of that same 'progressive' agenda; this slow evaporation of American influence did not go unnoticed in the Kremlin, Beijing or the caves of Tora Bora.
President Obama's performance at the recent G20 summit was abysmal and an embarrassment for the American people; it highlighted the world of difference between a worldly wise, experienced political operator, albeit a KGB thug, and an inexperienced, media created fake who's only experience is in community organizing.
When one looks back into recent history, it is unimaginable to think that a tinpot dictator from a nonentity of a country like Syria can cause so much grief and humiliation for an American President.
One has to ask what would Presidents Kennedy, Reagan and Bushes 1 and 2 have done in the case of Syria? Conversely, what would President Obama have done had he been faced with the Cuban missile crisis, the nuclear armed Mad Dog Gaddafi or the invasion of Kuwait by a tyrant like Saddam Hussein?
It must be remembered that on the brink of nuclear war, President Kennedy stood nose to nose with Nikita Khrushchev, a ruthless, dedicated communist, and refused to budge an inch, forcing a humiliating climb down by this political fanatic.
It must also be remembered that Ronald Reagan stood nose to nose with seasoned Russian cold warriors Leonid Brezhnev, Yuri Andropov (who like Putin was leader of the KGB) and Mikhail Gorbachev, resulting in the defeat of communism and the liberation of Eastern Europe.
For years Colonel Gaddafi had sponsored terrorist organisations around the world, from the Palestinians and the Irish Republican Army to Carlos the Jackal and the Red Army Factions. After several warnings from President Reagan and a few strategically placed cruise missiles, including on several of his homes, Gaddafi retreated to his Bedouin tent not to be heard of again until his demise at the hands of own his people.
This kind of influence and respect has all but evaporated and it is not difficult to understand why.
Like Great Britain and Europe, the priorities of the American 'progressive' elite changed from economic strength and the interests of their own people to:
State mandated equality and fairness, including equality of nations and cultural relativity.
Redistribution of wealth.
Expanding government and welfare entitlements.
Replacing individual liberty with so called collective responsibility.
Gender neutrality and sexuality politics.
Downgrading the military and much more.
One has to bear in mind that there are fifty Muslim countries on the planet with a population approaching two billion souls, which is almost twenty four percent of the world's population. It cannot be difficult to understand that these religious orientated people are repulsed by the obsession with secular Marxist equality together with the homosexual agenda.
What must they be thinking about the West's obsession with homosexuals and especially David Cameron's vow to send his team around the world to encourage all governments to legislate for gay marriage?
President Obama's lack of experience or leadership skills becomes glaringly apparent by watching his performance during the Syrian debacle. He has surrounded himself with like minded agenda driven fanatics such as Hillary Clinton and now the appalling John Kerry. They are like rabbits caught in the headlight of a child's tricycle. They simply do not know what to do.
In an attempt to emulate Presidents Kennedy, Reagan and Bush x 2, President Obama comes over all macho by making his infamous 'red line' threat over chemical weapons to the worlds media. He looked as macho as a kitten when his bluff is called by Bashar al Assad and he failed to act.
In a cringe making attempt to save face, which only served to make him a bigger laughing stock than he already is, his red line suddenly becomes the world's red line. This is dismal and a pathetic attempt to absolve himself from blame.
The President, who doesn't think twice about using executive power to bypass Congress, tries to offload responsibility by demanding they vote on military action, which by his own account he doesn't need.
President Putin, who is wallowing in Obama's obvious lack of leadership and subsequent discomfort, rubs his nose further in the dirt by offering the life line of a negotiation which Obama gratefully accepts and asks Congress to delay their vote.
The world is watching as Putin's Russia replaces Obama's America as the power broker and main influence in Middle Eastern politics. To the dismay of freedom lovers around the world, the rookie is giving the so called master a lesson in global foreign policy.
In conclusion it's worth taking stock of the change in global influence since the western world committed Hari Kari by adopting the 'progressive' agenda.
The British and Europeans have been ousted from sub Saharan Africa by the resource hungry Chinese. The rest of Africa is dominated by the Muslim world from Egypt to Mali. As we have seen, the Middle East is becoming increasingly dominated by Russia and radical Islamic factions, including the supposedly defeated Al Qaeda.
Central and southern Asia, including India, is influenced by Russia with China dominating the Far East. The former western ally, Japan, dropped off the radar decades ago. Indonesia and the Pacific are increasingly being influenced by radical Islam.
Central and South America are dominated by socialist regimes who's political ideologies stem from Karl Marx, Fidel Castro, Che Guevara and Simon Bolivar.
Great Britain, Europe, the United States and the Anglosphere in general have rotted from the inside out and are now reduced to bystanders in an increasing hostile world. The descent into third world mediocrity is unlikely to slow down while 'progressives' such as Obama, Cameron, and the EU bureaucrats remain in control.
All is not lost however and freedom loving people of the world should take heart; there is one tiny glimmer of light in this dark nightmare of destruction. The Australian people have demonstrated that with resolve and leaders armed with the right policies they can consign the 'progressive' destroyers to the dustbin of history where they belong.
Update: Putin lectures America in the New York Times
Monday, September 9, 2013
Progressives Kicked Out Down Under - Australian People Refuse To Be Transformed
While freedom lovers around the world celebrate the humiliation of the 'progressive' vandals that have been rampaging through Australia, destroying all the good things that have been built up over the centuries, the rag tag alliance of millionaire socialists, hippies, peaceniks and green fascists are crying into their champagne/carrot juice at the halting of their transformation project.
Although Great Britain and America are the number one targets for the global 'progressive' agenda, Australia and Canada, having been created by evil white Europeans are not far behind.
According to the perverted minds of the global 'progressive' elite these four countries are largely to blame for all the ills of the world because the prosperity they engendered were the result of the two things they hate the most, i.e. capitalism and colonialism.
At this point it's worth a very brief recall of history and attitudes.
Due to the religious nature of their belief systems, the ability to understand the shear momentum of historical circumstances is beyond a 'progressive's' mental capabilities. They cannot understand that the unfortunate instances of cruelty that accompanied the European expansion into the Far East and the New World are miniscule compared to the outright savagery that preceded it.
If one listens to the emotionally charged, hippie-like interpretation of history, one would get the impression that Genghis Khan's blood soaked rampage across Asia didn't take place or the bloodletting of the early Chinese emperors, African chieftains, Arab slave traders, Moghul conquers ad infinitum, were figments of western imaginations.
According to modern 'progressives', the native tribes of the world would be all be living in peace and harmony like some medieval version of Woodstock, or 1960's flower power San Francisco, if it wasn't for the invasion of the white European. Their tiny, closed minds cannot accept the reality that many of these primitive people were permanently hungry, disease ridden, nomadic and at continuous war with each other.
The truth is that on the American continent Indian tribes butchered each other and took body parts as trophies; the same was the case with tribes the length and breadth of African continent. Perhaps the human sacrifices performed on innocents by the Aztecs and the Inca's in South America would be considered as quaint cultural oddities by these 'progressive' history deniers.
Australia and its people loom large in the cross hairs of the global 'progressives' and like their counterparts in Great Britain and America, the Australian people must be punished and fundamentally transformed for their historical 'crimes' of advancing civilization and bringing prosperity to an undeveloped continent.
Until the election of Tony Abbott a few days ago the fundamental transformation of Australia was continuing apace by the motley band of socialists, green fascists, and hippies, led by the Labor Party. The Australia of rugged individualism and free enterprise, contact sports and the Amber Nectar was being gradually replaced. Throw another shrimp on the barbie and have another tinny Cobber was to be replaced by halal meat, sharia law and no bikini's allowed on Bondi Beach.
Like Europe and America, forced multi-culturalism using mass immigration is the weapon of choice for the government and with it came the usual cultural enrichment associated with importing incompatible cultures. Middle Eastern men harassing women, violence when asylum seekers demands are not met, Muslim anti-freedom protests and the usual calls for beheading of those who supposedly insult the prophet.
Then there is the cultural enrichment offered by the Australian Sudanese community who are involved in violence with other African groups from Burundi, Congo, Sierra Leone, Liberia and Rwanda. It doesn't take a genius to work out that if these groups murder each other in their own countries, they are not suddenly going to get along peacefully because they have relocated to Australia.
Although the Australian people have spoken loud and clear that enough is enough, they or their new Prime Minister cannot expect an easy ride from the global 'progressives'. They will not accept defeat graciously and go walkabout quietly into the outback. This is a bitter blow for them and their spin machines are already cranking up to nullify this superb result for freedom.
CNN, that loyal bastion of 'progressive' reporting from America is detracting from the victory of conservative policies over socialism by claiming that the electorate were 'jaded', disillusioned and disengaged by continual Labor party infighting. In typical Obama-like fashion they are blaming anything including Rupert Murdoch.
They seem to be ignoring the fact that the Main Stream Media in their own country, including themselves, are an embarrassment with their continual groveling to their obviously inadequate 'Progressive in Chief'.
In Great Britain, the ultra left wing Guardian, better known as the printed version of the BBC, was unusually restrained in it's reporting of this historic victory but a read through the comments at the end of the item gives the reader a clue about the mentality of its readership. Hippie heads are exploding at the thought of normality being restored by the Australian people.
The BBC are not so restrained, as the mouthpiece for global as well as British 'progressivism' they cannot help themselves. Their man in Sydney, Jon Donnison, can barely hide his disappointment and spins this stunning victory with the party line, "Abbott's victory is not so much a ringing endorsement as a rejection of Labor".
According to our intrepid reporter in Sydney this victory has nothing to do with Labor's socialist policies ruining the economy as they did in Great Britain and the EU.
It had nothing to do with deficit spending and national debt.
It had nothing to do with the disastrous policy of forced multi-culturalism via mass immigration.
It had nothing to do with taxes and lower living standards put in place to finance the 'man made global warming' scam.
It had nothing to do with being continually lied to by unscrupulous politicians.
According to the BBC's man in Sydney, it's all about a disagreement between Kevin Rudd and the lying Welsh bint, Julia Gillard who swore before the world's media that "there will be no carbon tax under any administration that I lead", prior to introducing a carbon tax.
The world's 'progressives' and their media whores are not going to allow Tony Abbott or the Australian people to take their country back without a fight and it's worth concluding with what the American people have to endure as they come to terms with what is happening to them.
The Los Angeles Times have cranked up their smear machine to fight Tony Abbot even though these geographically challenged numbskulls couldn't find Australia if it was the only country marked on an atlas.
Among other things, they insult the new Prime Minister of Australia by calling him a 'gaffe prone right winger ,with a propensity for insensitivity and controversy'. This is a bit rich from a country that elected a pot smoking, Marxist community organizer as it's President, not once but twice. This is not to mention the gaffe prone, insensitive plagiarizer Joe Biden as their VP.
Los Angeles itself and California as a whole is renown for its political geniuses like the brain dead socialist and race baiter, Maxine Waters or the serial sex pest and pervert Bob Filner.
If the botox crippled Nancy Pelosi is the best America can offer then the LA Times really should take care who they seek to belittle.
The freedom loving people of the of world should take heart and emulate the bravery of our Australian brothers and sisters and have the courage to kick out the 'progressive' rabble who are intent on destroying western civilization.
Although Great Britain and America are the number one targets for the global 'progressive' agenda, Australia and Canada, having been created by evil white Europeans are not far behind.
According to the perverted minds of the global 'progressive' elite these four countries are largely to blame for all the ills of the world because the prosperity they engendered were the result of the two things they hate the most, i.e. capitalism and colonialism.
At this point it's worth a very brief recall of history and attitudes.
Due to the religious nature of their belief systems, the ability to understand the shear momentum of historical circumstances is beyond a 'progressive's' mental capabilities. They cannot understand that the unfortunate instances of cruelty that accompanied the European expansion into the Far East and the New World are miniscule compared to the outright savagery that preceded it.
If one listens to the emotionally charged, hippie-like interpretation of history, one would get the impression that Genghis Khan's blood soaked rampage across Asia didn't take place or the bloodletting of the early Chinese emperors, African chieftains, Arab slave traders, Moghul conquers ad infinitum, were figments of western imaginations.
According to modern 'progressives', the native tribes of the world would be all be living in peace and harmony like some medieval version of Woodstock, or 1960's flower power San Francisco, if it wasn't for the invasion of the white European. Their tiny, closed minds cannot accept the reality that many of these primitive people were permanently hungry, disease ridden, nomadic and at continuous war with each other.
The truth is that on the American continent Indian tribes butchered each other and took body parts as trophies; the same was the case with tribes the length and breadth of African continent. Perhaps the human sacrifices performed on innocents by the Aztecs and the Inca's in South America would be considered as quaint cultural oddities by these 'progressive' history deniers.
Australia and its people loom large in the cross hairs of the global 'progressives' and like their counterparts in Great Britain and America, the Australian people must be punished and fundamentally transformed for their historical 'crimes' of advancing civilization and bringing prosperity to an undeveloped continent.
Until the election of Tony Abbott a few days ago the fundamental transformation of Australia was continuing apace by the motley band of socialists, green fascists, and hippies, led by the Labor Party. The Australia of rugged individualism and free enterprise, contact sports and the Amber Nectar was being gradually replaced. Throw another shrimp on the barbie and have another tinny Cobber was to be replaced by halal meat, sharia law and no bikini's allowed on Bondi Beach.
Like Europe and America, forced multi-culturalism using mass immigration is the weapon of choice for the government and with it came the usual cultural enrichment associated with importing incompatible cultures. Middle Eastern men harassing women, violence when asylum seekers demands are not met, Muslim anti-freedom protests and the usual calls for beheading of those who supposedly insult the prophet.
Then there is the cultural enrichment offered by the Australian Sudanese community who are involved in violence with other African groups from Burundi, Congo, Sierra Leone, Liberia and Rwanda. It doesn't take a genius to work out that if these groups murder each other in their own countries, they are not suddenly going to get along peacefully because they have relocated to Australia.
Although the Australian people have spoken loud and clear that enough is enough, they or their new Prime Minister cannot expect an easy ride from the global 'progressives'. They will not accept defeat graciously and go walkabout quietly into the outback. This is a bitter blow for them and their spin machines are already cranking up to nullify this superb result for freedom.
CNN, that loyal bastion of 'progressive' reporting from America is detracting from the victory of conservative policies over socialism by claiming that the electorate were 'jaded', disillusioned and disengaged by continual Labor party infighting. In typical Obama-like fashion they are blaming anything including Rupert Murdoch.
They seem to be ignoring the fact that the Main Stream Media in their own country, including themselves, are an embarrassment with their continual groveling to their obviously inadequate 'Progressive in Chief'.
In Great Britain, the ultra left wing Guardian, better known as the printed version of the BBC, was unusually restrained in it's reporting of this historic victory but a read through the comments at the end of the item gives the reader a clue about the mentality of its readership. Hippie heads are exploding at the thought of normality being restored by the Australian people.
The BBC are not so restrained, as the mouthpiece for global as well as British 'progressivism' they cannot help themselves. Their man in Sydney, Jon Donnison, can barely hide his disappointment and spins this stunning victory with the party line, "Abbott's victory is not so much a ringing endorsement as a rejection of Labor".
According to our intrepid reporter in Sydney this victory has nothing to do with Labor's socialist policies ruining the economy as they did in Great Britain and the EU.
It had nothing to do with deficit spending and national debt.
It had nothing to do with the disastrous policy of forced multi-culturalism via mass immigration.
It had nothing to do with taxes and lower living standards put in place to finance the 'man made global warming' scam.
It had nothing to do with being continually lied to by unscrupulous politicians.
According to the BBC's man in Sydney, it's all about a disagreement between Kevin Rudd and the lying Welsh bint, Julia Gillard who swore before the world's media that "there will be no carbon tax under any administration that I lead", prior to introducing a carbon tax.
The world's 'progressives' and their media whores are not going to allow Tony Abbott or the Australian people to take their country back without a fight and it's worth concluding with what the American people have to endure as they come to terms with what is happening to them.
The Los Angeles Times have cranked up their smear machine to fight Tony Abbot even though these geographically challenged numbskulls couldn't find Australia if it was the only country marked on an atlas.
Among other things, they insult the new Prime Minister of Australia by calling him a 'gaffe prone right winger ,with a propensity for insensitivity and controversy'. This is a bit rich from a country that elected a pot smoking, Marxist community organizer as it's President, not once but twice. This is not to mention the gaffe prone, insensitive plagiarizer Joe Biden as their VP.
Los Angeles itself and California as a whole is renown for its political geniuses like the brain dead socialist and race baiter, Maxine Waters or the serial sex pest and pervert Bob Filner.
If the botox crippled Nancy Pelosi is the best America can offer then the LA Times really should take care who they seek to belittle.
The freedom loving people of the of world should take heart and emulate the bravery of our Australian brothers and sisters and have the courage to kick out the 'progressive' rabble who are intent on destroying western civilization.
Friday, September 6, 2013
Putin Humiliates Great Britain and America - Oh How The Mighty Have Fallen
Watching macho man President Putin using the G20 summit to impose himself and his country onto the world stage is a wonder to behold. Conversely, watching the pathetic performances of the Western leaders in response is an indication of how degraded their countries have become.
As the world knows, President Putin is nothing more than a KGB thug who uses the residual power of his former organization coupled with outright corruption to stay in power. Putin can put a lifetime of experience in the world of intrigue and power politics to achieve his dubious ends.
His two main antagonists are media created products of the Public Relations world with no experience in anything other than advertising, spin, media management and lying. One would think with this experience they would win the PR battle with Putin outright but it is now clear that he is beating them hands down at their own game.
To the inhabitants of the world outside of the comfortable, entitlement obsessed, politically correct West, President Putin is the macho hard man who spends his free time in the great outdoors and who is habitually photographed riding horses, grappling bare chested with giant fish or shooting bears in the wilderness. This may be PR but he is going some way to restoring the image of mighty Russia, and the developing world lap it up as opposed to what the 'progressive' West has to offer.
Barack Obama and David Cameron are two cheeks of the same a*se, they were both plucked from obscurity early in their lives and groomed for high office by the 'progressive' elite that seems to dictate world affairs outside of public scrutiny.
While Putin gives the impression of offering the world traditional values and policies which appeal to ordinary people and with which they can identify, the Western world led by Obama and Cameron are imposing the gender neutral, equality obsessed, multi-cultural policies of a secretive 'progressive' elite which appeal to nobody but themselves.
Obama and Cameron have turned the Western world into a laughing stock with their unwanted 'progressive' nonsense such as their obsession with sexuality politics and gay marriage, government imposed equality and fairness, degrading their once mighty military machines by social engineering, perverting and politicising their institutions to the point where their dedication to political correctness makes them unable to carry out the functions they were created to perform.
It's an indication of how far the mighty have fallen when a political thug from a mostly lawless, vodka drenched giant gypsy camp can dismiss Great Britain as "a small island- nobody pays any attention to them apart from the Russian oligarchs who have bought Chelsea". Ouch!
He has the confidence to call US Secretary of State, 'Hanoi' John Kerry a liar over al Qaeda involvement in Syria. The fact that both jibes are true does not alter the greater fact that the status of Great Britain and America is so diminished that their history can be ignored and they can be insulted and abused like seven stone weaklings in a school playground.
The British and American people have no one to blame but themselves when they take a long, hard look at the quality of person they have elected to represent them on the world stage.
To the ordinary people of the world David Cameron is more like a limp wristed Hugh Grant than a giant of Sir Winston Churchill's stature. His defence against Putin's insult has been compared to Grant in 'Love Actually'. Cameron's stated objective was to purge the Conservative party of the very policies that put the 'Great' in Britain and make it more modern and trendy; in the process he has finished a degrading project started years earlier by his political predecessor and traitor, Edward Heath.
Instead of building on the historical greatness of his country and using the relationships built up over centuries to positive effect, he is carrying on with the policy of managed decline initiated by his political predecessors in order to bring about an 'equality of nations' as required by the perverted notion of national and cultural relativity.
The people of the once great USA are now finding out to their cost what the British people have been enduring for decades. One would have thought that they would have been learning from the degradation being suffered by their trans-Atlantic cousins and taking steps to avoid a repetition in their beloved homeland.
What in God's name were they thinking when they fell for a vacuous, media created fake like Barack Obama? The facts were there for all to see. He was an empty suit without a history or any qualifications other than hanging out with Marxist professors, smoking dope and 'community organising'.
What makes matters worse was that after a disastrous first term, which he kicked off with an apology tour of the world, he wrecked the economy and humiliated the military by introducing the sexuality agenda. They then went and re-elected him for another term.
Obama's performance at the G20 is juvenile and an embarrassment for the American people. He is on record for all to see declaring his red line over chemical weapons in Syria and no amount of spin can alter this. His attempt at denial is more than pathetic and typical of the cowardice he displays with his constant blaming of others. Even 'Hanoi' John Kerry confirms Obama's red line.
The world no longer has any respect for Great Britain or the USA and as a result, the enemies of freedom are emboldened, the world is a more dangerous place and will remain so as long as these two media created fakes are in charge.
Great Britain is being harassed by Christina de Kircher, the mad woman of Argentina over the Falkland Islands; and by the bankrupt Spanish over Gibraltar. Britain is being overrun by beggars, street criminals and welfare colonists and Cameron is powerless to stop it. Cameron is managing the further decline of a once great civilization.
The United States of America is not far behind Great Britain and its decline will only accelerate while President Obama remains in power.
America's welfare bill is growing by the day with record numbers of scroungers shamelessly trading the work ethic that made America great for 'free stuff' that is earned by some one else.
The once mighty NASA is reduced to outreaching to the Muslim world and what's left of America's astronaut community have to hitch a ride to the Space Station they created from Vladimir Putin's Russia.
America's once mighty military is now a vehicle for social engineering and sexuality politics. It may still have enormous firepower but it has no respect. America's enemies, especially those who worship death instead of life, are losing their fear and are looking forward with relish to meeting the first all women or gay regiments on the battlefield.
Pictures speak louder than words and the images that went around the world of the President of the United States of America bowing down to the King of Saudi Arabia has damaged the reputation of this administration and the country.
At this rate it will only be a matter of time before a real Count Rupert from a Duchy of Grand Fenwick fancies his chances.
As the world knows, President Putin is nothing more than a KGB thug who uses the residual power of his former organization coupled with outright corruption to stay in power. Putin can put a lifetime of experience in the world of intrigue and power politics to achieve his dubious ends.
His two main antagonists are media created products of the Public Relations world with no experience in anything other than advertising, spin, media management and lying. One would think with this experience they would win the PR battle with Putin outright but it is now clear that he is beating them hands down at their own game.
To the inhabitants of the world outside of the comfortable, entitlement obsessed, politically correct West, President Putin is the macho hard man who spends his free time in the great outdoors and who is habitually photographed riding horses, grappling bare chested with giant fish or shooting bears in the wilderness. This may be PR but he is going some way to restoring the image of mighty Russia, and the developing world lap it up as opposed to what the 'progressive' West has to offer.
Barack Obama and David Cameron are two cheeks of the same a*se, they were both plucked from obscurity early in their lives and groomed for high office by the 'progressive' elite that seems to dictate world affairs outside of public scrutiny.
While Putin gives the impression of offering the world traditional values and policies which appeal to ordinary people and with which they can identify, the Western world led by Obama and Cameron are imposing the gender neutral, equality obsessed, multi-cultural policies of a secretive 'progressive' elite which appeal to nobody but themselves.
Obama and Cameron have turned the Western world into a laughing stock with their unwanted 'progressive' nonsense such as their obsession with sexuality politics and gay marriage, government imposed equality and fairness, degrading their once mighty military machines by social engineering, perverting and politicising their institutions to the point where their dedication to political correctness makes them unable to carry out the functions they were created to perform.
It's an indication of how far the mighty have fallen when a political thug from a mostly lawless, vodka drenched giant gypsy camp can dismiss Great Britain as "a small island- nobody pays any attention to them apart from the Russian oligarchs who have bought Chelsea". Ouch!
He has the confidence to call US Secretary of State, 'Hanoi' John Kerry a liar over al Qaeda involvement in Syria. The fact that both jibes are true does not alter the greater fact that the status of Great Britain and America is so diminished that their history can be ignored and they can be insulted and abused like seven stone weaklings in a school playground.
The British and American people have no one to blame but themselves when they take a long, hard look at the quality of person they have elected to represent them on the world stage.
To the ordinary people of the world David Cameron is more like a limp wristed Hugh Grant than a giant of Sir Winston Churchill's stature. His defence against Putin's insult has been compared to Grant in 'Love Actually'. Cameron's stated objective was to purge the Conservative party of the very policies that put the 'Great' in Britain and make it more modern and trendy; in the process he has finished a degrading project started years earlier by his political predecessor and traitor, Edward Heath.
Instead of building on the historical greatness of his country and using the relationships built up over centuries to positive effect, he is carrying on with the policy of managed decline initiated by his political predecessors in order to bring about an 'equality of nations' as required by the perverted notion of national and cultural relativity.
The people of the once great USA are now finding out to their cost what the British people have been enduring for decades. One would have thought that they would have been learning from the degradation being suffered by their trans-Atlantic cousins and taking steps to avoid a repetition in their beloved homeland.
What in God's name were they thinking when they fell for a vacuous, media created fake like Barack Obama? The facts were there for all to see. He was an empty suit without a history or any qualifications other than hanging out with Marxist professors, smoking dope and 'community organising'.
What makes matters worse was that after a disastrous first term, which he kicked off with an apology tour of the world, he wrecked the economy and humiliated the military by introducing the sexuality agenda. They then went and re-elected him for another term.
Obama's performance at the G20 is juvenile and an embarrassment for the American people. He is on record for all to see declaring his red line over chemical weapons in Syria and no amount of spin can alter this. His attempt at denial is more than pathetic and typical of the cowardice he displays with his constant blaming of others. Even 'Hanoi' John Kerry confirms Obama's red line.
The world no longer has any respect for Great Britain or the USA and as a result, the enemies of freedom are emboldened, the world is a more dangerous place and will remain so as long as these two media created fakes are in charge.
Great Britain is being harassed by Christina de Kircher, the mad woman of Argentina over the Falkland Islands; and by the bankrupt Spanish over Gibraltar. Britain is being overrun by beggars, street criminals and welfare colonists and Cameron is powerless to stop it. Cameron is managing the further decline of a once great civilization.
The United States of America is not far behind Great Britain and its decline will only accelerate while President Obama remains in power.
America's welfare bill is growing by the day with record numbers of scroungers shamelessly trading the work ethic that made America great for 'free stuff' that is earned by some one else.
The once mighty NASA is reduced to outreaching to the Muslim world and what's left of America's astronaut community have to hitch a ride to the Space Station they created from Vladimir Putin's Russia.
America's once mighty military is now a vehicle for social engineering and sexuality politics. It may still have enormous firepower but it has no respect. America's enemies, especially those who worship death instead of life, are losing their fear and are looking forward with relish to meeting the first all women or gay regiments on the battlefield.
Pictures speak louder than words and the images that went around the world of the President of the United States of America bowing down to the King of Saudi Arabia has damaged the reputation of this administration and the country.
At this rate it will only be a matter of time before a real Count Rupert from a Duchy of Grand Fenwick fancies his chances.
Thursday, September 5, 2013
European Union And The Syrian Tyranny - All's Quiet On The Western Front
The people of the various nations that make up the European Union are constantly bombarded with propaganda that extols the virtues of this soviet style political union especially using collective action for achieving results for the benefit of all.
In reality this dangerous abomination would be more accurately described as a union for politicians rather than a political union. It should be obvious to everyone that the EU has been a complete and utter disaster for the people of Europe not just the impoverished Mediterranean countries but the rich countries as well. Everything the EU bureaucrats do in search of their beloved post democratic United States of Europe results in disaster for all the people who are not part of the Brussels elite.
The accent is always on using collective power to achieve results but it appears this does not include the appalling tragedy being suffered by the people of Syria where the British were left to wage war on it's own.
It's worth reminding ourselves of some of the issues and characters that make the EU such a blight on the cause of individual freedom, prosperity and peace.
With the adoption of a Constitution under the guise of the Lisbon Treaty, the EU gave itself all the attributes of an independent state including a President who would have such a high profile that he would 'stop the traffic in Beijing'.
President Herman von Rompuy couldn't stop the traffic in Legoland but he attracts a salary greater than that of President Obama. On the Syrian tragedy, von Rompuy states that there is no alternative to a political solution and is therefore working with the Russians, who support the Assad government.
This stance is echoed by the other President, a Mr. Jose Manuel Barrosso. Yes, the EU has not one President but two; and Barrosso is also calling for a political solution, while throwing hundreds of millions of taxpayers money at Syria and it's neighbouring countries.
The long suffering EU taxpayers, who have been reduced to penury in their own countries by EU imposed austerity packages, have already forked out some 800 million Euros in aid to Syria and are about to take another 400 million hit due to President Barrosso's generosity with their money.
It is not known what the 93 million unemployed people in the EU think about Barrosso's largesse or the unemployed youths of Greece and Spain among whom unemployment now stands at a disgraceful 50%+. It is not surprising that a self confessed Maoist like Barrosso feels nothing of other people's pain as he doles out their money in the oil rich Middle East who are more than capable of looking after their own.
While the Presidents of the EU warn against military action and seek a peaceful solution with one of the main supporters of the Assad regime, President Hollande of France is advocating arming the rebel forces.
It is now universally accepted, even by a large contingent of the French people, that President Hollande is a brick short of a full load who infamously called for a 75% tax rate during a recession triggering a brain drain and an associated flight of capital.
He wants to the arm the rebels who are fighting the Russian supported government. He also does not specify which of the rebel factions he wants to support or why. Is it the Saudi financed al Qeada rebels who stop and murder truck drivers because they are the 'wrong' Muslim sect, or is it the rebel group that kills government soldiers then cuts them open and eats their internal organs?
Unlike the rest of the world, President Hollande is obviously unaware that all of the warring factions are uncivilized savages who are yelling Allah u Akbar as they shoot each other down then enjoy the corpses for lunch.
Besides making the EU a legal entity, the biggest change that came about as a result of the Lisbon Treaty/Constitution was the creation of the High Representative Of The Union For Foreign Affairs And Security. The title by itself, let alone the salary and perks, indicates the exalted status of this super bureaucrat. This person alone should have been the one who deals with the whole issue of Syria, anti-government rebels, human rights abuses, regime change and, more importantly, Prime Minister Cameron's narcissistic warmongering.
Baroness Ashton is the archetypal EU bureaucrat in that she has never been elected to anything in her life and has no qualifications or experience to hold such a post and is reputedly bone idle. As a peacenik and former treasurer of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), a traitorous organization which advocated unilateral nuclear disarmament at the height of the cold war, she also demonstrates her pro Soviet credentials.
With the European Defence Force, together with the whole EU diplomatic service at her disposal, the Syrian issue is what her exalted office was created for. This situation is what the bankrupt Greek, Irish and Spanish taxpayers are forking out their hard earned millions for.
There is no need for the Presidential twins von Rompuy and Borrosso to be bothering their heads about Syria, or for Prime Minister Cameron to be unilaterally bombing Syrians. In her position of High Representative blah blah blah......the Baroness Ashton's negotiating teams should be initiating talks with all the warring factions and their various supporters including Presidents Putin, Obama and Hollande.
The second highest paid female politician on the planet, after Christine Largarde of the IMF, the Baroness has been more than useless and her performance is coming under intense criticism from all quarters including brain dead French socialists.
The fact is that the global political class, who give themselves fancy titles such as President, Prime Minister and High Representative, are only career bureaucrats financed by corrupt bankers and corporations who only have their own interests in mind. There is not a single statesman among the whole sorry bunch.
One of the worlds most prestigious institutions has been on rocky ground for years, but with the awarding of the Nobel peace prize to a radical socialist, race baiter and community organizer who had only been in office for a matter of months and who is now advocating death and destruction, it is now a totally discredited laughing stock.
In conclusion, with Baroness Ashton's incompetence, President Obama's total ineptitude and Prime Minister Cameron's failed warmongering, the world will have no alternative but to send for the ultimate global peacemaker and all round 'straight kinda guy'. The Middle East Peace Envoy for the Quartet would have had this sorted out ages ago if let alone to get on with it. Tony Blair's fee is likely to be in the tens of millions but it will ultimately be money well spent.
In reality this dangerous abomination would be more accurately described as a union for politicians rather than a political union. It should be obvious to everyone that the EU has been a complete and utter disaster for the people of Europe not just the impoverished Mediterranean countries but the rich countries as well. Everything the EU bureaucrats do in search of their beloved post democratic United States of Europe results in disaster for all the people who are not part of the Brussels elite.
The accent is always on using collective power to achieve results but it appears this does not include the appalling tragedy being suffered by the people of Syria where the British were left to wage war on it's own.
It's worth reminding ourselves of some of the issues and characters that make the EU such a blight on the cause of individual freedom, prosperity and peace.
With the adoption of a Constitution under the guise of the Lisbon Treaty, the EU gave itself all the attributes of an independent state including a President who would have such a high profile that he would 'stop the traffic in Beijing'.
President Herman von Rompuy couldn't stop the traffic in Legoland but he attracts a salary greater than that of President Obama. On the Syrian tragedy, von Rompuy states that there is no alternative to a political solution and is therefore working with the Russians, who support the Assad government.
This stance is echoed by the other President, a Mr. Jose Manuel Barrosso. Yes, the EU has not one President but two; and Barrosso is also calling for a political solution, while throwing hundreds of millions of taxpayers money at Syria and it's neighbouring countries.
The long suffering EU taxpayers, who have been reduced to penury in their own countries by EU imposed austerity packages, have already forked out some 800 million Euros in aid to Syria and are about to take another 400 million hit due to President Barrosso's generosity with their money.
It is not known what the 93 million unemployed people in the EU think about Barrosso's largesse or the unemployed youths of Greece and Spain among whom unemployment now stands at a disgraceful 50%+. It is not surprising that a self confessed Maoist like Barrosso feels nothing of other people's pain as he doles out their money in the oil rich Middle East who are more than capable of looking after their own.
While the Presidents of the EU warn against military action and seek a peaceful solution with one of the main supporters of the Assad regime, President Hollande of France is advocating arming the rebel forces.
It is now universally accepted, even by a large contingent of the French people, that President Hollande is a brick short of a full load who infamously called for a 75% tax rate during a recession triggering a brain drain and an associated flight of capital.
He wants to the arm the rebels who are fighting the Russian supported government. He also does not specify which of the rebel factions he wants to support or why. Is it the Saudi financed al Qeada rebels who stop and murder truck drivers because they are the 'wrong' Muslim sect, or is it the rebel group that kills government soldiers then cuts them open and eats their internal organs?
Unlike the rest of the world, President Hollande is obviously unaware that all of the warring factions are uncivilized savages who are yelling Allah u Akbar as they shoot each other down then enjoy the corpses for lunch.
Besides making the EU a legal entity, the biggest change that came about as a result of the Lisbon Treaty/Constitution was the creation of the High Representative Of The Union For Foreign Affairs And Security. The title by itself, let alone the salary and perks, indicates the exalted status of this super bureaucrat. This person alone should have been the one who deals with the whole issue of Syria, anti-government rebels, human rights abuses, regime change and, more importantly, Prime Minister Cameron's narcissistic warmongering.
Baroness Ashton is the archetypal EU bureaucrat in that she has never been elected to anything in her life and has no qualifications or experience to hold such a post and is reputedly bone idle. As a peacenik and former treasurer of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), a traitorous organization which advocated unilateral nuclear disarmament at the height of the cold war, she also demonstrates her pro Soviet credentials.
With the European Defence Force, together with the whole EU diplomatic service at her disposal, the Syrian issue is what her exalted office was created for. This situation is what the bankrupt Greek, Irish and Spanish taxpayers are forking out their hard earned millions for.
There is no need for the Presidential twins von Rompuy and Borrosso to be bothering their heads about Syria, or for Prime Minister Cameron to be unilaterally bombing Syrians. In her position of High Representative blah blah blah......the Baroness Ashton's negotiating teams should be initiating talks with all the warring factions and their various supporters including Presidents Putin, Obama and Hollande.
The second highest paid female politician on the planet, after Christine Largarde of the IMF, the Baroness has been more than useless and her performance is coming under intense criticism from all quarters including brain dead French socialists.
The fact is that the global political class, who give themselves fancy titles such as President, Prime Minister and High Representative, are only career bureaucrats financed by corrupt bankers and corporations who only have their own interests in mind. There is not a single statesman among the whole sorry bunch.
One of the worlds most prestigious institutions has been on rocky ground for years, but with the awarding of the Nobel peace prize to a radical socialist, race baiter and community organizer who had only been in office for a matter of months and who is now advocating death and destruction, it is now a totally discredited laughing stock.
In conclusion, with Baroness Ashton's incompetence, President Obama's total ineptitude and Prime Minister Cameron's failed warmongering, the world will have no alternative but to send for the ultimate global peacemaker and all round 'straight kinda guy'. The Middle East Peace Envoy for the Quartet would have had this sorted out ages ago if let alone to get on with it. Tony Blair's fee is likely to be in the tens of millions but it will ultimately be money well spent.
Tuesday, September 3, 2013
'British Are A Nation Of Surrender Monkeys' - Prime Minister's Mouthpiece Cuts Loose
It would be interesting to see the reaction if the author of this gross insult were to walk into room full of veterans who have faithfully carried out their duty when put into harms way. It would be similarly interesting to see the reaction of those who have lost loved ones who made the ultimate sacrifice in the service of their country.
To be labeled 'a nation of crisp eating surrender monkeys' by someone who has experienced the heat of battle and been on the receiving end of weapons designed to kill or maim is one thing, but to be labeled as such by a more than useless journalist who has made no contribution whatsoever to the life of the nation is a bitter pill to swallow.
The low life in question is serial failure Toby Young, an author and journalist who has achieved nothing in life on his own merits and whos sole purpose on the planet is to act as a mouthpiece for the equally useless Prime Minister David Cameron.
Young was an utter failure at school but mysteriously managed to secure a place at Oxford University where he obtained the infamous Politics Philosophy and Economics degree which is the necessary qualification if one wants to join the cross party 'progressive' elite. At this point it's worth mentioning his impeccable 'progressive' pedigree. He is the son of a BBC Radio producer and a Labour Party life peer, the Baron Young of Dartington. This life long social reformer was one of those responsible for destroying Great Britain's education system which they replaced with the 'progressive' comprehensive system that is still trapping young people in mediocrity to this day.
Toby Young's insult formed part of the collective tantrum thrown by the warmongering wing of David Cameron's Conservative Party after they lost the House of Commons vote on using weapons of mass destruction on unspecified warring factions in Syria. It is beyond Young's capabilities to understand that the British people have no faith in the political class and wouldn't trust them with a schoolboys peashooter let alone a cruise missile.
Young's attack on the British people was pure spite, reflecting the chagrin of his master who desperately wanted a war in order to have something on his otherwise empty Curriculum Vitae and to give him an international reputation which is noteable only for his continual groveling to Germany's Angela Merkel and Herman von Rumpuy of the EU.
His insult does not even contain any accurate facts and is patent nonsense:
"no longer can we pride ourselves on standing up to tyranny".
Great Britain and the West have failed to stand up to tyrants and mass murder for years so why is Assad any different?
In his indecent haste to speak on behalf of his defeated master, Young shows his ignorance of contemporary politics:
"Gone is the special relationship that meant that Britain and America could always count on each other to commit blood and treasure to defending the principles of liberal democracy".
If Toby Young would take his head out of Cameron's backside for long enough to look around, he might have noticed that any special relationship went up in a haze of dope smoke with the election of the unreconstructed British hater Barack Obama. Young is obviously unaware that 'defending the principles of liberal democracy' doesn't appear to apply in countries like North Korea, Sudan, Zimbabwe etc. (see previous post)
Toby Young builds up to his hysterical finale with a double dose of bovine excrement:
"The message sent out by the mother of parliaments to tyrants across the world was: Do whatever you like. Gas your own citizens. Murder innocent children. Commit genocide. We won't lift a finger to stop you".
This nonsense is breathtaking in it's hypocrisy and double standards. Where was the mother of parliaments when Saddam Hussein was gassing Iranians and his own citizens prior to Gulf War l? Where is the mother of parliaments when Christian men, women and children are being mercilessly butchered in Nigeria, Egypt, Pakistan and a host of other Muslim countries? Where was the mother of parliaments when Omar al Bashir was committing genocide in Sudan?
The mother of parliaments didn't lift a finger to stop those tyrants so why is Assad so different?
Toby Young insults the whole of the British nation because they refuse to give their media created Prime Minister a free hand to dish out death and destruction onto the Syrian people without making a case and without credible evidence.
He needs to inform the British people as to which of the various factions the Prime Minister should bomb. The latest reports are indicating that it was a Saudi financed, al Qaeda backed rebel group that used these weapons and nobody should be surprised if that were the case. Other reports are suggesting that the British government's own Ministry of Business, Innovation and Skills was party to supplying some of the materials that are required to manufacture these weapons.
British Prime Ministers and American Presidents have always turned a blind eye to tyrants when it has suited them to do so. Saddam Hussein met Toby Young's criteria for tyranny and mass murder but he was feted and supplied by the West while he was at war with Iran: when that conflict was over and he turned his attention to Kuwait his behavior suddenly became unacceptable.
The tyrant Bashir al Assad and American Secretary of State John Kerry, together with their families, enjoyed a friendly relationship until recently; what Toby Young doesn't explain is how Assad has suddenly became persona non grata without doing anything different from what he has done over the years. It must be remembered that Assad was just as bad a tyrant when Kerry was enjoying their friendship as he is now.
Apart from the insult thrown at the British people by a lickspittle like Toby Young, it is interesting to note the nonsense spewing forth from the other apologists for David Cameron's bloated ego.
The Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne is supposed to be looking after the nations finances, which were devastated by the previous socialist government; not agitating for another war which will only mean more hardship for the long suffering British people. He is currently borrowing 120 billion per year and racking up such a massive debt it will take generations to pay off, if ever. How does he propose to pay for an arsenal of cruise missiles and other expensive ordinance when, as the outgoing Treasury Minister said, "there is no money left?"
Osborne shows himself up for the cynical, spin infested political charlatan that he is by waxing lyrical about Great Britain's place in the world. It is worth paying particular attention to what he said after the House of Commons vote:
"I think there will be a national soul searching about our role in the world and whether Britain wants to play a big part in upholding the international system, be that by being an open trading nation that I would like us to be or whether we turn our backs on that".
Of all the political double talk, spin and outright lies the people have to listen to from these awful people, this must rank up there with the most shameful.
Osborne must be off his rocker if he wants the people to take him seriously about "being an open trading nation" when he personally, together with his boss Cameron and his de-toxified Consevative party, are busy diminishing the country and destroying it as such by submerging it into the United States of Europe. George Osborne needs to explain to the British people how their country can possibly be an 'open trading nation' while at the same time exchanging its independence to trade globally for the supposed collective clout of the European Union bureaucracy.
If George Osborne seriously thinks he can get away with making comments about Great Britain as an 'open trading nation and turning their backs on the world', then he is not the strategist he claims to be. Great Britain and its Commonwealth partners were the ideal global trading partners until Osborne's predecessors 'turned their backs on the world' and dumped them in favour of the inward looking, disastrous collective in Brussels.
Great Britain is shackled to the same European dead horse that has ruined the economies of the Mediterranean countries together with Ireland and Portugal, but unshackled in the case of waging war where the EU has dumped Great Britain to go it alone.
Two issues need to be mentioned in conclusion:
Firstly: As he is an advocate of waging war, there is nothing preventing Toby Young from becoming a war correspondent and sending dispatches from the Syrian front line. As is traditional with modern day war correspondents he can embed himself with any number of factions, including the rebels who are fighting the tyrannical government he wants overthrown and punished.
Any armchair warmonger can advocate military action from the comfort and safety of a Daily Telegraph office so I would suggest that unless Toby Young is prepared to go there himself and report in person on the consequences of his advocacy, he should keep his insults to himself and his mouth firmly shut.
Secondly: If the British people do not need permission from EU bureaucrats like Herman von Rumpuy and Baroness Ashton to wage a destructive war, then surely they do not need permission to serve olive oil in a dipping bowl at restaurant tables, work more than forty eight hours per week, empty rubbish bins more than once a fortnight, deport foreign terrorists and criminals and to decide who gets welfare and who does not. There's not a bigger impoverishing tyranny on the planet than the European Union so Cameron could do the world a favour by raining his bombs down on Brussels.
To be labeled 'a nation of crisp eating surrender monkeys' by someone who has experienced the heat of battle and been on the receiving end of weapons designed to kill or maim is one thing, but to be labeled as such by a more than useless journalist who has made no contribution whatsoever to the life of the nation is a bitter pill to swallow.
The low life in question is serial failure Toby Young, an author and journalist who has achieved nothing in life on his own merits and whos sole purpose on the planet is to act as a mouthpiece for the equally useless Prime Minister David Cameron.
Young was an utter failure at school but mysteriously managed to secure a place at Oxford University where he obtained the infamous Politics Philosophy and Economics degree which is the necessary qualification if one wants to join the cross party 'progressive' elite. At this point it's worth mentioning his impeccable 'progressive' pedigree. He is the son of a BBC Radio producer and a Labour Party life peer, the Baron Young of Dartington. This life long social reformer was one of those responsible for destroying Great Britain's education system which they replaced with the 'progressive' comprehensive system that is still trapping young people in mediocrity to this day.
Toby Young's insult formed part of the collective tantrum thrown by the warmongering wing of David Cameron's Conservative Party after they lost the House of Commons vote on using weapons of mass destruction on unspecified warring factions in Syria. It is beyond Young's capabilities to understand that the British people have no faith in the political class and wouldn't trust them with a schoolboys peashooter let alone a cruise missile.
Young's attack on the British people was pure spite, reflecting the chagrin of his master who desperately wanted a war in order to have something on his otherwise empty Curriculum Vitae and to give him an international reputation which is noteable only for his continual groveling to Germany's Angela Merkel and Herman von Rumpuy of the EU.
His insult does not even contain any accurate facts and is patent nonsense:
"no longer can we pride ourselves on standing up to tyranny".
Great Britain and the West have failed to stand up to tyrants and mass murder for years so why is Assad any different?
In his indecent haste to speak on behalf of his defeated master, Young shows his ignorance of contemporary politics:
"Gone is the special relationship that meant that Britain and America could always count on each other to commit blood and treasure to defending the principles of liberal democracy".
If Toby Young would take his head out of Cameron's backside for long enough to look around, he might have noticed that any special relationship went up in a haze of dope smoke with the election of the unreconstructed British hater Barack Obama. Young is obviously unaware that 'defending the principles of liberal democracy' doesn't appear to apply in countries like North Korea, Sudan, Zimbabwe etc. (see previous post)
Toby Young builds up to his hysterical finale with a double dose of bovine excrement:
"The message sent out by the mother of parliaments to tyrants across the world was: Do whatever you like. Gas your own citizens. Murder innocent children. Commit genocide. We won't lift a finger to stop you".
This nonsense is breathtaking in it's hypocrisy and double standards. Where was the mother of parliaments when Saddam Hussein was gassing Iranians and his own citizens prior to Gulf War l? Where is the mother of parliaments when Christian men, women and children are being mercilessly butchered in Nigeria, Egypt, Pakistan and a host of other Muslim countries? Where was the mother of parliaments when Omar al Bashir was committing genocide in Sudan?
The mother of parliaments didn't lift a finger to stop those tyrants so why is Assad so different?
Toby Young insults the whole of the British nation because they refuse to give their media created Prime Minister a free hand to dish out death and destruction onto the Syrian people without making a case and without credible evidence.
He needs to inform the British people as to which of the various factions the Prime Minister should bomb. The latest reports are indicating that it was a Saudi financed, al Qaeda backed rebel group that used these weapons and nobody should be surprised if that were the case. Other reports are suggesting that the British government's own Ministry of Business, Innovation and Skills was party to supplying some of the materials that are required to manufacture these weapons.
British Prime Ministers and American Presidents have always turned a blind eye to tyrants when it has suited them to do so. Saddam Hussein met Toby Young's criteria for tyranny and mass murder but he was feted and supplied by the West while he was at war with Iran: when that conflict was over and he turned his attention to Kuwait his behavior suddenly became unacceptable.
The tyrant Bashir al Assad and American Secretary of State John Kerry, together with their families, enjoyed a friendly relationship until recently; what Toby Young doesn't explain is how Assad has suddenly became persona non grata without doing anything different from what he has done over the years. It must be remembered that Assad was just as bad a tyrant when Kerry was enjoying their friendship as he is now.
Apart from the insult thrown at the British people by a lickspittle like Toby Young, it is interesting to note the nonsense spewing forth from the other apologists for David Cameron's bloated ego.
The Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne is supposed to be looking after the nations finances, which were devastated by the previous socialist government; not agitating for another war which will only mean more hardship for the long suffering British people. He is currently borrowing 120 billion per year and racking up such a massive debt it will take generations to pay off, if ever. How does he propose to pay for an arsenal of cruise missiles and other expensive ordinance when, as the outgoing Treasury Minister said, "there is no money left?"
Osborne shows himself up for the cynical, spin infested political charlatan that he is by waxing lyrical about Great Britain's place in the world. It is worth paying particular attention to what he said after the House of Commons vote:
"I think there will be a national soul searching about our role in the world and whether Britain wants to play a big part in upholding the international system, be that by being an open trading nation that I would like us to be or whether we turn our backs on that".
Of all the political double talk, spin and outright lies the people have to listen to from these awful people, this must rank up there with the most shameful.
Osborne must be off his rocker if he wants the people to take him seriously about "being an open trading nation" when he personally, together with his boss Cameron and his de-toxified Consevative party, are busy diminishing the country and destroying it as such by submerging it into the United States of Europe. George Osborne needs to explain to the British people how their country can possibly be an 'open trading nation' while at the same time exchanging its independence to trade globally for the supposed collective clout of the European Union bureaucracy.
If George Osborne seriously thinks he can get away with making comments about Great Britain as an 'open trading nation and turning their backs on the world', then he is not the strategist he claims to be. Great Britain and its Commonwealth partners were the ideal global trading partners until Osborne's predecessors 'turned their backs on the world' and dumped them in favour of the inward looking, disastrous collective in Brussels.
Great Britain is shackled to the same European dead horse that has ruined the economies of the Mediterranean countries together with Ireland and Portugal, but unshackled in the case of waging war where the EU has dumped Great Britain to go it alone.
Two issues need to be mentioned in conclusion:
Firstly: As he is an advocate of waging war, there is nothing preventing Toby Young from becoming a war correspondent and sending dispatches from the Syrian front line. As is traditional with modern day war correspondents he can embed himself with any number of factions, including the rebels who are fighting the tyrannical government he wants overthrown and punished.
Any armchair warmonger can advocate military action from the comfort and safety of a Daily Telegraph office so I would suggest that unless Toby Young is prepared to go there himself and report in person on the consequences of his advocacy, he should keep his insults to himself and his mouth firmly shut.
Secondly: If the British people do not need permission from EU bureaucrats like Herman von Rumpuy and Baroness Ashton to wage a destructive war, then surely they do not need permission to serve olive oil in a dipping bowl at restaurant tables, work more than forty eight hours per week, empty rubbish bins more than once a fortnight, deport foreign terrorists and criminals and to decide who gets welfare and who does not. There's not a bigger impoverishing tyranny on the planet than the European Union so Cameron could do the world a favour by raining his bombs down on Brussels.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)